Myths Help Geologists Understand Modern Threats 61
morleron writes "According to a report in the "Guardian Unlimited" geologists have begun using ancient myths as clues to geologic events in Earth's past. Among other things scientists have followed the tracks of ancient stories to uncover the huge Seattle earthquake and tsunami that obliterated large parts of the coasts of Washington and Oregon roughly 300 years ago; the discovery that a volcano on Fiji is active instead of dormant as has been thought for years; and that the Biblical and Near Eastern myths of a world ending flood are probably based on the sudden inundation of the Black Sea when the landbridge that used to link Turkey with Europe - what is now called the Bosporus - suddenly collapsed some 7600 years ago. It's amazing how much information our ancestors passed on in oral and early written myths...we're finally getting smart enough to listen."
So what I want to know is (Score:2, Funny)
Re:So what I want to know is (Score:1)
Re:So what I want to know is (Score:1)
Re:So what I want to know is (Score:2)
Eve and the apple (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Eve and the apple (Score:1)
Re:Hera and the apple (Score:1)
There is an implication of a historical basis.
Christian Lore (Score:2)
NO problem... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:NO problem... (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:NO problem... (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:NO problem... (Score:1)
Pre-Science (Score:1)
Onward! (Score:2)
oh, for the mod points... (Score:1)
It's not all on us... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:It's not all on us... (Score:4, Informative)
Re:It's not all on us... (Score:5, Informative)
The story tellers had to "sex it up" to be certain that the story got through. And the sexed-up stories survived. So, we get thunderbirds [thunderbirdsonline.com] ;-)
It's rather cool that things haven't really changed that much over time. People flock to movies "based on a true story", but aren't willing to pay to see a documentary on the same story. (Unless the story's already "sexy".)
Re:It's not all on us... (Score:1)
Re:It's not all on us... (Score:1)
Re:It's not all on us... (Score:2)
It's not so much as they were boring stories -- I'm sure they were exciting and fascinating.
But when a culture with no scientific understanding witnesses something astounding, they will interpret as fantastical.
Much like the saying that "any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic", in this case it's a matter of "anything spectacular a
Re:It's not all on us... (Score:2)
.
-shpoffo
Myth-Control (Score:2)
And if you think we've risen past that, witness how many people still have "a lucky shirt" or pass around chain letters. *grumble*
Yet again... (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Yet again... (Score:1)
When you consider that the writers didn't use the same language that we do, they may have been unable to clearly articulate what they witnessed. Compounding that problem is the loss of meaning in the translation to Greek and then English from the original Hebrew. The translators had never seen these types of things and wouldn't know how to explain them in a scientifically robust manne
Agreed (Score:2)
hardly surprising, really (Score:5, Insightful)
i figure as the amount of what we know about the earth's climatic and geological history increases, the more of these correlations with myth we'll find. i think the idea of being able to predict localized patterns of geological events like eruptions and earthquakes is what's really seductive, i don't know what kind of value this sort of new insight will have for predicting major natural disasters will have on a human timescale, though. saying an earthquake will happen in the next 200 to 1000 years is next to useless in terms of preparing for it in the short-term.
hell, the history channel loves to tell us that according to the mayan calendar, this age of the world will end in 2012. doesn't necessarily mean we'll have another great flood on our hands, but it certainly makes for good tv.
Re: hardly surprising, really (Score:2)
The problem is that thinking of "explanations" for the myths is easy, but verifying them is all but impossible.
Explaining the Myths (Score:2)
Easy to explain them. You make them fit, however it takes, same as psychology.
Alien contact? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Alien contact? (Score:2)
"Noah's Ark is a problem. We'll have to call it 'early quantum state phenomenon.' Only way to fit 5,000 species of mammals on the same boat."
Re:Alien contact? (Score:1)
I look forward to finding out that the Greek Gods were aliens with advanced Quantum Technology (read Ilium by Dan Simmons for that interesting diversion) Actually, isn't there a Star Trek ep based off this?
That would be Who Mourns for Adonais? [treknation.com] from season 2.
Re:Alien contact? (Score:1)
Re:Alien contact? (Score:2)
Some of the cultural phenome
Strait of Gibraltar also? (Score:3, Interesting)
It looks a lot like the Bosporus.
Re:Strait of Gibraltar also? (Score:2)
The event is calles the Messinian Salinity Crisis. [leeds.ac.uk]
In a nutshell, the movement of Africa towards Europe managed to close the straits of Gibraltar around 6 million years ago; as the rivers feeding the Med don't make up for evaporation, the whole sea evaporated (the degree of this is disputed, but large deposits of salt lie under the sediments of the sea).Black Sea flood? (Score:2)
In other words.... (Score:1)
Immanuel Velikovsy did this before? (Score:2)
Re:Immanuel Velikovsy did this before? (Score:1)
Why can't some scientists objectively approach these kinds of subjects instead of dismissing them outright without applying rational scrutiny. To sug
Re:Immanuel Velikovsy did this before? (Score:2)
His ideas were radical at the time and were ridiculed as unscientific simply because the ideas were different from established theories.
No, they were ridiculed because they were - and still are - completely wrong.
Why can't some scientists objectively approach these kinds of subjects instead of dismissing them outright without applying rational scrutiny. To suggest that his theories were flawed or some type of voodoo science is in itself unscientific
Some scientists DID apply rational scrutiny to Velikov
Velikovsky -- Bad Astrophysics or bad Archaelogy? (Score:2)
If we are on the subject of ancient writings, myths, or oral traditions, the bit about the planet Venus being ejected as a flaming co
It can just finally be proven scientifically (Score:2)
No -- we were listening before. We just didn't have the tools to prove that there might be something more to this than just myths. This is called the scientific method.
Now me, I don't give a rat's ass about earthquakes or floods. It just isn't news. Wake me when they have found proof that there really were dragons and unicorns and elves and orcs and cool old guys with
Re:It can just finally be proven scientifically (Score:3, Funny)
A *Terrific* Example of this! (Score:5, Interesting)
Anyway, not to get into too much detail: the residents of Frank lived at the bottom of a mountain they named "Turtle Mountain," but which had a much older Indian name of "The Mountain That Moves." Throwing all caution to the wind, the mountain was soon being mined for coal.
Needless to say, thirty million cubic meters of mountain moved -- downhill, rapidly -- during the night of April 29, 1903, burying the town under hundreds of feet of rock. It's a great story, [sympatico.ca] though sad.
It is well worth the effort of visiting the site. Fascinating history throughout the area, lots of superb dayhiking, and if you hump it up Turtle mountain (or even partway up) you get the most astounding view of the destruction. When that mountain moved, it moved a long way. There are house-sized boulders halfway up the opposing slope. It was a massive landslide.
Point of the Story: Listen to the myths, people! The natives weren't just making shit up for the helluvit! It was the bleeding Mountain That Moves! D-oh!
Re:A *Terrific* Example of this! (Score:1)
The disaster would have been even more terrible if a brave soul hadn't been able to make his way across the fields over gigantic boulders left from the landslide to warn an oncoming passenger
That's fine and all (Score:1)
The Guardian should be careful. (Score:2)
"Ancient" myths? (Score:2)
300 years is "ancient"? Really??
Re:"Ancient" myths? (Score:2)
Re:"Ancient" myths? (Score:5, Funny)
A wise man once say: the Americans think a hundred years is a long time, but the English think a hundred miles is a long drive.
One SLIGHT problem.. (Score:3, Interesting)
The 'black sea flood' didn't actually happen. Meltwater inputs into the Volga, Deniper and other major rivers in Ukraine were, as far as the evidence shoes, greater than evaporation, leading to an outflow across the Bospohorous; it was not until ca. 7500 years ago that the Med rose to a similar level to the black sea. [gsajournals.org]
Re:One SLIGHT problem.. (Score:1)
I guess that makes this book, Noah's Flood [barnesandnoble.com], a bit less interesting.