NASA has flirted on and off again with the notion of a manned
mission to Mars. It appears again that this may be a reality, with JPL physicist Mark Adler pushing ahead on this. Interesting stuff to read-and hopefully they won't make the same network mistake as the space station did.
nasa web site (Score:1)
NIML (Score:1)
The biggest thing to avoid in a long duration mission is exposure to radiation. Since the greatest amount of radiation is absorbed while in deep space, we want to reduce this time. The best way to do this, is to stay on mars longer.
Check out Zubrin's book. It's pretty good.
Keep in mind that my estimates for travel time are rough numbers I pulled out of my ass. I'm no expert. I just read Zubrin's book, thought it was pretty cool, and am trying to remember pieces from when I read it. No flaming! Please! I can't take it!
More important things? (Score:1)
Sheesh.
If our money is going to be forcibly taken from us, the two best things that can be done with it are the military and scientific research. And we can't have enough of either.
I want to go! (Score:1)
I can't belive I'm first to offer to go! (No, not first post dummy)
I've got in mind a couple different females with a technical bent who I could try to talk into going with me. There is no true geek out there that wouldn't want to brag "My kid was born on Mars!" I think that will be the biggest achivment, getting people born up there. Soon were on our way to a perminate colony.
Personally I don't belive life will be found on mars, other then life we bring from earth. I could be wrong though.
So, I'm open to either group if they need more people to go.
cooperate while competing (Score:1)
Looks like two different groups will land people on mars the same year. Good for them, I hope both groups try ot out do each other, and in the end both have people on Mars at the same time.
If that happens, some advice: Agree that if one group has problems all compitition is off, both coopoerate to solve the problem. This is on mars of course. What I'm getting at is if one group loses both habitation modules, agree to live togather (very crowded) as best you can. If it turns out that both groups have problems mineing fuel, agree to share what cuelf you have made, so that some people stay for 4 extra years until a rescue mission can be launched, and the other group goes. In the case that one group can't return as planed, agree to get those who have had the most problems (health or personal) off of Mars first even if it means one entire group goes up in the other's rocket. There are more ways to cooperate, agree in an emergency the priority for both groups is solving it for whichever group has the problem.
When there isn't an emergency, compete at all costs. Don't let the other group out do you! Work long and hard to make the biggest best modules (NASA which is planning bigger ones) or the largest rockets (other group) Compete to get the best people for the job, the best test equipment.
We don't need to waste money... (Score:1)
I'd rather have a cure for cancer, AIDS, paralysis and/or Alzheimer's than a couple of people dancing on the surface of Mars.
Moon base first (Score:1)
Don't send up Martin Landau and Barbara Bain, though, I don't want that nuclear dump exploding and...
When was it not being considered? (Score:1)
Hardly... (Score:1)
There are hundreds of OSs available for embedded apps that have a wide range of features, facilities, and no surprise, response times. Some have disk/file i/o modules, some do virtual memory, some do networking...
None that I know of are called win* or *nix or *nux.
Do you want 10 million Dollars? (Score:1)
http://www.xprize.org/
Why 10base2... (Score:1)
10base2 can be used with cable which is quite well shielded, and thus less susceptible to interference. (Of course I'm sure you could build a 10baseT cable with similar properties) and whats the last time you saw a BNC connector's retention mechanism break off? The clips on RJ45 can be kind of fragile. And of course, as the previous poster said, you don't need power, and theres no hub/switch to fail. I believe there are some products which offer protection against disconnections/loss of termination by auto terminating the cables somehow, not sure of the specifics.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Network mistakes? - Maybe on the user end ... (Score:1)
Besides, trying to use NT for any real time control would never pass any formal qual tests.
/dev
I agree 100% !!!! (Score:1)
Keep PC OSes out of rt apps!!!
blatant RTEMS plug.
/dev
manned is crazy (Score:1)
know what AI is? (Score:1)
fool....
People don't seem to realise the capability of AI right now. You see, you don't need "human like" AI to do a scientific mission. In fact, humans cannot gather the sort of information that is needed in any space mission. Did you know that alot of systems practically run themselve right now? and most of the software was based on 5 to 10 year old technology? Trust me, if NASA spent even a fraction of the money that they currently spend on shuttle missions in R&D of AI robotics that can think and react on their own, you would be surprised that we even thought about ever using humans to explore anything. The human mind may be one of the most amazing computer system ever designed, but when it comes to exploration, it has its limits. As we decide to explore furter into space, manned missions would be a waste of time. Robotic probes are the only way to do deep space exploration and research. We may as well start using them now, insteading of waiting till later on.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
space exploration = new technology (Score:1)
I need to go. (Score:1)
~afniv
"Man könnte froh sein, wenn die Luft so rein wäre wie das Bier"
"We could be happy if the air was as pure as the beer"
Let's pose a problem. (Score:1)
My main point is with humans you can decide real time which rocks might reveal the most science and make the most observations.
Again, AI is only a tool. It can help with automation and extending human capabilities. But I've yet to see AI do "exploration" in the true sense of the word.
~afniv
"Man könnte froh sein, wenn die Luft so rein wäre wie das Bier"
"We could be happy if the air was as pure as the beer"
Man I wanna be immortal (Score:1)
the best is yet to come. I wish I could live forever!! Hey, maybe by the time I'm an old fogie I could transfer my brain to another body!!
(Plug for my project).
http://members.xoom.com/Lycadican
************
No TCP/IP from Mars. (Score:1)
I didn't see anyone else mention it, so...
TCP/IP can't be used between Earth and Mars. The time lag is too great - all your packets would be considered to have timed out by the machine on the other end before they got to there.
I guess someone's going to have to come up with a new protocol.
NIML (Score:1)
----
We don't need to waste money... (Score:1)
To the USA: spend the money on more important things.
We don't need to waste money... (Score:1)
What else of use did we find there?
We don't need to waste money... (Score:1)
Ion engines (Score:1)
Kinda interesting, the SEP slowly spirals up the Mars Transfer Vehicle from a circular orbit to a highly elliptical, high energy orbit. The orbit stays above ~1000mi limit at closest approach until the very end. This is to avoid the space debris at these lower levels. The orbit is then tightened down into this area to rendezvous with the crew taxi.
The crew taxi on this model was a X-38 with an attached booster engine. For those who don't know, the X-38 is the crew return vehicle for the space station. It's a small lifting body shuttle-like vehicle. It has been designed to fit on top of an Airane rocket. Nice to see it reused here.
man is right (Score:1)
Speaking of such things, I had to chuckle when I watched "Deep Impact." For the time and money they spent on that manned space ship, they could have sent up enough nukes to vaporize a small state.
Network mistakes? (Score:1)
Last month's news (Score:1)
It's still interesting, but I think most of the
The Journey (Score:1)
On another note, it would be great to have a new frontier. It might even kindle a new spirit of hope and cooperation. Anyway its better than just sitting around just selling each other things. (what the world is basically doing now).
manned is crazy (Score:1)
NASA seems obssesed in "manned" missions.
i think the old cliche still applies. no buck rogers, no bucks. nasa needs to send humans to make it glamerous enough to make joe sixpack not bitch too much about the cost of it. personally, i think sometimes the human race, just like an individual, needs to do things just so it can say, 'hey! i can do that!' i think a manned mission to mars is a good thing. my two cents worth.
The Space Race is open again... (Score:1)
Just curious... does anybody know what the Pathfinder robot was running ?
There's only one permanent way to Mars - via Moon (Score:1)
The only way to do it properly is to colonise our Moon first and use the cheaper materials from a shallower gravity well, together with orbital construction, to manufacture large craft, and hit Mars with dozens of people with thousands of tonnes of supplies to estabish a spacefareing colony there.
There is already an organisation which wishes to do this. It is called The Artemis Project [asi.org] and it is pretty much as close as you can get to an Open Source space effort.
Vik :v)
I want to go! Me too! (Score:1)
Do computer people ever get to go on these missions? Or just the military/scientist type people?
We don't need to waste money... (Score:1)
Re: We don't need to waste money... (Score:1)
With the ability to leave the planet we are now tied to, we could possibly survive the next millenium.
So if you think that wasting money on developing travel to other planetrs, you must not care about your grandchildren, or there gradchildren.
Read some Heinlein.
What could we learn? (Score:1)
What's that Chris? You say you want to sail around the world? Don't be silly, you'll only fall off the edge of the earth!