
Researchers Finally Link Long Covid 'Brain Fog' to Inflammation (thehill.com) 39
An anonymous reader shared this report from The Hill:
A new study indicates the debilitating "brain fog" suffered by millions of long COVID patients is linked to changes in the brain, including inflammation and an impaired ability to rewire itself following COVID-19 infection. United Press International reported this week that the small-scale study, conducted by researchers at Corewell Health in Grand Rapids, Michigan, and Michigan State University, shows that altered levels of a pair of key brain chemicals could be the culprit.
The study marks the first time doctors have been able to provide scientific proof that validates the experiences of the approximately 12 million COVID "long-haulers" in the U.S. who have reported neurological symptoms. Researchers looked at biomarkers in study participants and found that those complaining of brain fog had higher levels of an anti-inflammatory protein that is crucial to regulating a person's immune system, UPI reported. They also showed lower serum levels of nerve growth factor, a protein vital to the brain's plasticity...
One of the biggest issues involving long COVID has been doctors' inability to find physical proof of the symptoms described by patients. The study has changed that, according to co-author Dr. Bengt Arnetz.
The study marks the first time doctors have been able to provide scientific proof that validates the experiences of the approximately 12 million COVID "long-haulers" in the U.S. who have reported neurological symptoms. Researchers looked at biomarkers in study participants and found that those complaining of brain fog had higher levels of an anti-inflammatory protein that is crucial to regulating a person's immune system, UPI reported. They also showed lower serum levels of nerve growth factor, a protein vital to the brain's plasticity...
One of the biggest issues involving long COVID has been doctors' inability to find physical proof of the symptoms described by patients. The study has changed that, according to co-author Dr. Bengt Arnetz.
How about sense of smell? (Score:4, Interesting)
My nose has felt inflamed ever since the first time I caught COVID, and my sense of smell is only maybe 1/4 to 1/3 of what it used to be. At least I don't smell farts so much anymore.
Re: How about sense of smell? (Score:2)
Mine is severely impaired too. Thankfully, no brain fog in my case.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: How about sense of smell? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Brain cells don’t “regrow”. You probably just cleared up the infection.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Look into hypnotism for the tinnitis. It doesn't necessarily make the tinnitis away. Rather it makes it so you just don't care at all. Its just background nonsense.
The guitarist in my old band was going out of his mind with his, and the hypnotherapy worked amazingly. He still had it, but he just didnt notice it unless he was reminded.
Re: (Score:2)
Inflamation (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1, Funny)
"How do you know if someone is vegan? Don't worry -they will tell you."
Re: Inflamation (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Inflamation (Score:2)
Probably the same percentage as in the general population.
Re: (Score:3)
I wonder how many of these people still eat meat?
I wonder why you think that point is relevant.
Re: (Score:2)
A carnivore diet significantly reduces inflammation, but I don't think that's what the poster was going for...
"A carnivore diet" (Score:1)
I eat herbivores.
A study on 17 people, 10 of which are symptomatic (Score:2, Offtopic)
Re: (Score:3)
Yes, and... that's the point of a pilot study--to see if it's worth it to make a larger study.
Some details from the paper on that point:
While formal power calculations are not required for pilot studies [38], it was important to have a sufficient sample size to examine the feasibility of recruiting participants with and without long COVID, and whether differences could be detected between groups [39].
(Limitations:) First and foremost is the small sample size, which makes generalizability to other populatio
Re: (Score:3)
One of the biggest issues involving long COVID has been doctors' inability to find physical proof of the symptoms described by patients. The study has changed that, according to co-author Dr. Bengt Arnetz.
is clearly overstating the results. The result of that study is indeed just an indication that it may be worth looking into this causality hypothesis some more.
Send this article (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Why? They won't read it.
Re: (Score:2)
Sorry, while COVID vaccine decreases the chance of getting COVID, and decreases the severity of the disease, there are indications that it doesn't decrease the prevalence of long COVID (among those who do catch the disease).
So this isn't additional evidence that vaccination isn't desirable. If you weren't already convinced, this won't convince you.
FWIW, I'm relying of articles from Science News to make the assertions in the first paragraph. And they WEREN'T and assertion that there is no effect, merely th
Re: (Score:1)
That is not how vaccines work. You still need to be exposed to the infection(s) for the antibodies to do their job.
Stop talking to anti-vaxxers, they are making you stupid.
the last in a long chain of evidence (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
it's one of the most studied viruses of all time
Which is certainly one reason why so many symptoms have been attributed to it, and why so many hypotheses exist on what it may cause. Just imagine infections with, for example, OC43, had been studied as intensely, accompanied by a big media campaign warning the population of all sorts of symptoms that might occur due to an OC43 infection. Then we would pretty likely have a similar number of people complaining about OC43 effects, and since infections with OC43 are currently considered a "common cold", that w
Re: (Score:2)
You are so unbelievably stupid, and as is typical it’s the idiots who think they’re the most intelligent.
Hold up! (Score:2)
The study marks the first time doctors have been able to provide scientific proof that validates the experiences of the approximately 12 million COVID “long-haulers” in the U.S. who have reported neurological symptoms.
Where are all those people that kept saying, "it's just the flu" and therefore weren't going to abide safety guidelines or get vaccinated?
Re:Hold up! (Score:4, Insightful)
Where are all those people that kept saying, "it's just the flu" and therefore weren't going to abide safety guidelines or get vaccinated?
Dead.
(...or they got vaccinated and/or sought medical assistance once infected while still complaining that it was all a hoax.)
Re: (Score:2)
Dead.
I was in the ER a few months ago with an injury to a finger and was hallwayed because all the rooms were filled. While I was waiting for service, they wheeled this perhaps 60 year old lady in who had collapsed near her apartment and took an ambulance in eventually getting into the hallway parking stall next to me. She started to rage when she was coming to her senses and the hospital staff told her and that she had the symptoms of a severe infection. She started saying the hospital staff was poisoning h
Re: (Score:2)
Where are all those people that kept saying, "it's just the flu" and therefore weren't going to abide safety guidelines or get vaccinated?
Dead.
(...or they got vaccinated and/or sought medical assistance once infected while still complaining that it was all a hoax.)
I wonder who mods such a nonsense statement as "insightful", but the epidemiological numbers tell a different story. The majority of people infected with Sars-Cov-2 had no or mild symptoms, vaccinated or not. Just because vaccination has prevented severe outcomes in some patients does not change that fact.
But is it unique to COVID-19? Seems unlikely (Score:2)
The protein and symptoms described could have occured from ANY viral infection. So is whole debacle REALLY unique to COVID, or are we just seeing more reporting of something already previously existing for certain individuals?