Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Mars Earth

Mars' Middle Atmosphere Appears Driven By Gravity Waves 16

A new study published in the Journal of Geophysical Research Planets reveals that atmospheric gravity waves play a crucial role in driving latitudinal air currents on Mars, particularly at high altitudes. Phys.Org reports: The study applied methods developed to explore Earth's atmosphere to quantitatively estimate the influence of gravity waves on Mars' planetary circulation. [...] "On Earth, large-scale atmospheric waves caused by the planet's rotation, known as Rossby waves, are the primary influence on the way air circulates in the stratosphere, or the lower part of the middle atmosphere. But our study shows that on Mars, gravity waves (GWs) have a dominant effect at the mid and high latitudes of the middle atmosphere," said Professor Kaoru Sato from the Department of Earth and Planetary Science. "Rossby waves are large-scale atmospheric waves, or resolved waves, whereas GWs are unresolved waves, meaning they are too fine to be directly measured or modeled and must be estimated by more indirect means."

Not to be confused with gravitational waves from massive stellar bodies, GWs are an atmospheric phenomenon when a packet of air rises and falls due to variations in buoyancy. That oscillating motion is what gives rise to GWs. Due to the small-scale nature of them and the limitations of observational data, researchers have previously found it challenging to quantify their significance in the Martian atmosphere. So Sato and her team turned to the Ensemble Mars Atmosphere Reanalysis System (EMARS) dataset, produced by a range of space-based observations over many years, to analyze seasonal variations up there.

"We found something interesting, that GWs facilitate the rapid vertical transfer of angular momentum, significantly influencing the meridional, or north-south, in the middle atmosphere circulations on Mars," said graduate student Anzu Asumi. "It's interesting because it more closely resembles the behavior seen in Earth's mesosphere rather than in our stratosphere. This suggests existing Martian atmospheric circulation models may need to be refined to better incorporate these wave effects, potentially improving future climate and weather simulations."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Mars' Middle Atmosphere Appears Driven By Gravity Waves

Comments Filter:
  • "Not to be confused with gravitational waves from massive stellar bodies, GWs are an atmospheric phenomenon when a packet of air rises and falls due to variations in buoyancy."

    • by zshXx ( 7123425 )
      Such a garbage clickbait title. I immediately got excited that this is some new research on gravitational waves and its awesome that they were able to study effect on atmosphere.... but.. meh. Do better slashdot.
      • Re:clickbait (Score:4, Insightful)

        by greytree ( 7124971 ) on Friday March 14, 2025 @03:50AM (#65232289)
        One should not ascribe to clickbait generation what can adequately explained by Slashdot "editor" ignorance.

        i.e. Far from trying to lure you in with a confusing headline, the editors do not have the knowledge to know it was confusing.
    • On Earth, variations in buoyancy are usually thermic. I wonder what causes the difference in buoyancy on Mars if they do not call them thermals?
    • Re:clickbait (Score:4, Interesting)

      by Ormy ( 1430821 ) on Friday March 14, 2025 @06:57AM (#65232501)
      Not clickbait at all, 'gravity wave' is the correct term for the phenomenon in question (ocean waves on Earth are correctly referred to as gravity waves for example). If you got confused and thought they meant 'gravitational waves' then that's on you, most scientists would not confuse the terms as you have. I could understand readers of Cosmopolitan failing to comprehend the difference, but not on Slashdot.
      • think the confusion stems from the fact that if you google gravity waves- the results are about gravitational waves... i'm still scrolling through the results and have yet to find the correct phenomenon.

        Not to mention the amount of articles ON GRAVITATIONAL WAVES using gravity waves.... guess they too subscribe to Cosmo.

        Not everyone on slashdot is a climate or astro physics researcher to know the difference... i'll go back to reading my cosmo now... 30 ways to heat things up in the atmosphere - no10 will sh

        • Then the blame lies with Google, for using the terminology incorrectly. Or with you for believing what you read on Google without applying your own judgement.
          • Feel free to find a single person* with the judgement to distinguish the difference between gravity waves and gravitational waves?

            *A single person who is not trained in the sciences.

            Not sure if pretentious cunt, or troll. Apply your own judgement.

        • by Ormy ( 1430821 )
          Fair point. " i'll go back to reading my cosmo now... 30 ways to heat things up in the atmosphere - no10 will shock you ;)" That gave me a pretty good chuckle tbh.
  • I read, "Not to be confused with gravitational waves from massive stellar bodies, GWs are an atmospheric phenomenon when a packet of air rises and falls due to variations in buoyancy."

  • ... are just normal atmospheric processes with a fancy name (buoancy waves probably didn't have the cool sounding cosmoslogy associations). Hot air rises , cold air sinks. This affects how the atmosphere behaves. Wow, who knew? They cause high and low pressure areas on Earth which creates our weather.

Work continues in this area. -- DEC's SPR-Answering-Automaton

Working...