Starship Rocket Breaks Up Mid-Flight, But SpaceX Catches Booster Again After Launch (cnbc.com) 36
SpaceX conducted its seventh test flight of the Starship rocket on Thursday with mixed results. The upper stage was lost nine minutes after launch, but the Super Heavy booster successfully landed back at the launch site, marking a second successful recovery. CNBC reports: SpaceX said in a post on X that the ship broke up during its ascent burn and that it would "continue to review data from today's flight test to better understand root cause." After the rocket lost communication, social media users posted photos and videos of what appeared to be fireballs in the sky near the Caribbean islands. Starship's launch trajectory takes it due east from Texas, which means the fireballs are likely debris from the rocket breaking apart and reentering the atmosphere.
Starship launched from SpaceX's private "Starbase" facility near Brownsville, Texas, shortly after 5:30 p.m. ET. A few minutes later, the rocket's "Super Heavy" booster returned to land at the launch site, in SpaceX's second successful "catch" during a flight. It did not catch the booster on the last flight. There were no people on board the Starship flight. However, Elon Musk's company was flying 10 "Starlink simulators" in the rocket's payload bay and planned to attempt to deploy the satellite-like objects once in space. This would have been a key test of the rocket's capabilities, as SpaceX needs Starship to deploy its much larger and heavier upcoming generation of Starlink satellites. You can watch a recording of the launch here.
Starship launched from SpaceX's private "Starbase" facility near Brownsville, Texas, shortly after 5:30 p.m. ET. A few minutes later, the rocket's "Super Heavy" booster returned to land at the launch site, in SpaceX's second successful "catch" during a flight. It did not catch the booster on the last flight. There were no people on board the Starship flight. However, Elon Musk's company was flying 10 "Starlink simulators" in the rocket's payload bay and planned to attempt to deploy the satellite-like objects once in space. This would have been a key test of the rocket's capabilities, as SpaceX needs Starship to deploy its much larger and heavier upcoming generation of Starlink satellites. You can watch a recording of the launch here.
Re: (Score:1)
The super-genius strikes again. He really expects this shit to make to Mars? It can't even make it to LEO! BTW his mother must have been referring to the WIle E. Coyote version of a 'genius'.
The actual comedy gold, is trying to watch everyone else pretend they can do what he does.
You actually expect to rely on anyone else to get you off this dying rock? Good luck with the ACMEs of the world.
Re: (Score:3)
No one is getting "off this dying rock". There is nowhere to go, no matter what the various conmen try to sell you. Either we fix it (unlikely) or we all die.
Re: (Score:2)
Good luck trying "fixing" the sun becoming a red giant.
Re: (Score:2)
Good luck trying "fixing" the sun becoming a red giant.
... in five billion years. Which is a good thing, because Mars will be if anything *less* habitable than it is now. To put five billion years in perspective, animals only diverged from our common ancestor with mushrooms only 800 million years ago. Any descendants we may have alive at that point will be less human than a hagfish -- the most primitive vertebrate still in existence.
Re: (Score:2)
Good luck trying "fixing" the sun becoming a red giant.
A little over one century ago, humans first left the ground and took flight. We’ve gone just a tad farther than that since then.
If we haven’t figured out how to get off this “dying rock” by the time our Sun becomes our enemy, we deserve our lazy-ass fate.
Re: (Score:2)
That's not the deadline. The earth will become uninhabitable long before the sun becomes a red giant.
Re: (Score:1)
The actual comedy gold, is trying to watch everyone else pretend they can do what he does.
Not everyone has enough money to do groundbreaking things like put a car in orbit.
Re: (Score:2)
You want to be technical, the car was a giant successful publicity stunt.
The groundbreaking involving the car was the successful launch of Falcon-Heavy on the first attempt. Normally, they'd just have a concrete/steel mass as the payload simulator, because nobody was willing to risk an actual satellite on a brand-new rocket, even if SpaceX offered the space for free.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
The actual comedy gold, is trying to watch everyone else pretend they can do what he does.
Anyone can do what Shit-Nazi-Turd Nazi Musk does. Because all he does is take credit for the accomplishments of other people.
Tesla was founded by Martin Eberhard and Marc Tarpenning.
Tom Mueller is the ACTUAL rocket scientist behind SpaceX.
Hell, PayPal was created by Max Levchin. Musk was the retarded dumb-as-fuck moron who kept insisting they rename the company "X" [the-independent.com] (a running theme for the fucking retarded Afr
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
Hey, Elon wrote a fantastic computer game while he was still at school -- I'm sure he must have placed it in the public domain so that the Japanese could make an arcade variant called "Alien Invaders". Then he invented the Hyperloop and, being the philantropist that he is, refused to patent it so that Goddard could could come up with the VacTrain (albeit a century earlier). Rumor is that, thanks to a weird temporal anomaly, Von Braun was a student of Musk's teachings in respect to rockets.
There is not
Re: (Score:1)
What I want to know is, will Musk completely deflate if he farts? Clear and present danger to the neighborhood. As a prophylactic to forestall such a smelly event I suggest stitching that flatulent asshole completely shut.
Re: (Score:2)
Stop being anonymous...and lets revisit this in 6 months.
Bittersweet. Caught Booster, Lost Ship (Score:5, Interesting)
The booster catch was awesome, looks like they lost the first Version2 (carefully avoiding invoking Godwin's law) ship though, complete opposite to New Glen that lost the booster but got the payload into orbit. Can't wait to see what the next version of both these vehicles accomplishes.
It's not surprising though, after all it's a flight test and there are thousands of changes to the new vehicle. Now the question is if they re-fly this booster and will the FAA impose a flight delay until the loss of the ship is determined?
This is great, congrats to SpaceX and Blue Origins for making such awesome progress.
Re: (Score:3)
Agree, unfortunately this looks like the kind of incident that the FAA will want a full report on before green-lighting any further test. If anything because it caused all flights to be diverted over the Northern Atlantic.
Re: (Score:2)
Thats a good point. Space X should be compensating airlines for having to reschedule flights. eg Qantas from Au to South Africa multiple times even for postponed launches.
RUD (Score:2)
I love SpaceX's term for an explosion: rapid unscheduled disassembly (RUD)
SpaceX is doing some amazing stuff, including introducing some new lingo.
Re: (Score:1)
That's not new. The same terminology was used in 1986.
Lost the crew but caught the booster! (Score:1)
So cool. So not like fucking with astronaut lives. All I've got to say is, Musk baby needs to ride the next one. Sposed to be safer than an exploding Tesla, right? So please go right ahead and put your tiny balls where your fat mouth is.
Re: (Score:3)
Geez, I never thought I'd ever be a Musk apologist, but you seem to have an inordinate amount of hate that doesn't seem justified from the facts.
Moment of Flight Termination (Score:3)
https://x.com/AutismCapital/st... [x.com]
Preliminary Cause (Score:3)
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/... [x.com]
Re: (Score:1)
Remember how long is took NASA to even get the most preliminary reading on the cause of any failure? Then there was the mandatory two years of program delay while Congressional factions squabbled over Assigning Blame.
As Sleepy Joe put it in his farewell address, we''re in the new age of robber barons - and I wouldn't have it any other way. This is Cornelius Vanderbilt vs. Leland Stanford all over again. This time around, we will be getting a Transcontinental Railroad to Mars.