

The Mosquito-Borne Disease 'Triple E' Is Spreading In the US As Temperatures Rise (grist.org) 54
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Wired: A 41-year-old man in New Hampshire died last week after contracting a rare mosquito-borne illness called eastern equine encephalitis virus, also known as EEE or "triple E." It was New Hampshire's first human case of the disease in a decade. Four other human EEE infections have been reported this year, in Wisconsin, New Jersey, Massachusetts, and Vermont. Though this outbreak is small, and triple E does not pose a risk to most people living in the United States, public health officials and researchers are concerned about the threat the deadly virus poses to the public, both this year and in future summers. There is no known cure for the disease, which can cause severe flu-like symptoms and seizures in humans four to 10 days after exposure and kills between 30 and 40 percent of the people it infects (Warning: source paywalled; alternative source). Half of the people who survive a triple E infection are left with permanent neurological damage. Because of EEE's high mortality rate, state officials have begun spraying insecticide in Massachusetts, where 10 communities have been designated "critical" or "high risk" for triple E. Towns in the state shuttered their parks from dusk to dawn and warned people to stay inside after 6 pm, when mosquitoes are most active.
Like West Nile virus, another mosquito-borne illness that poses a risk to people in the US every summer, triple E is constrained by environmental factors that are changing rapidly as the planet warms. That's because mosquitoes thrive in the hotter, wetter conditions that climate change is producing. "We have seen a resurgence of activity with eastern equine encephalitis virus over the course of the past 10 or so years," said Theodore G. Andreadis, a researcher who studied mosquito-borne diseases at the Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, a state government research and public outreach outfit, for 35 years. "And we've seen an advancement into more northern regions where it had previously not been detected." Researchers don't know what causes the virus to surge and abate, but Andreadis said it's clear that climate change is one of the factors spurring its spread, particularly into new regions. [...]
Studies have shown that warmer air temperatures up to a certain threshold, around 90 degrees Fahrenheit, shorten the amount of time it takes for C. melanura eggs to hatch. Higher temperatures in the spring and fall extend the number of days mosquitoes have to breed and feed. And they'll feed more times in a summer season if it's warmer -- mosquitoes are ectothermic, meaning their metabolism speeds up in higher temperatures. Rainfall, too, plays a role in mosquito breeding and activity, since mosquito eggs need water to hatch. A warmer atmosphere holds more moisture, which means that even small rainfall events dump more water today than they would have last century. The more standing water there is in roadside ditches, abandoned car tires, ponds, bogs, and potholes, the more opportunities mosquitoes have to breed. And warmer water decreases the incubation period for C. melanura eggs, leading one study to conclude that warmer-than-average water temperatures "increase the probability for amplification of EEE." Climate change isn't the only factor encouraging the spread of disease vectors like mosquitoes. The slow reforestation of areas that were clear-cut for industry and agriculture many decades ago is creating new habitat for insects. At the same time, developers are building new homes in wooded or half-wooded zones in ever larger numbers, putting humans in closer proximity to the natural world and the bugs that live in it. The report notes that the best way to prevent mosquito bites is to "wear long sleeves and pants at dusk and dawn, when mosquitoes are most prone to biting, and regularly apply an effective mosquito spray." Local health departments can also help protect the public by "testing pools of water for mosquito larvae and conducting public awareness and insecticide spraying campaigns when triple E is detected," notes Wired.
A vaccine for the disease exists for horses, but because the illness is so rare "there is little incentive for vaccine manufacturers to develop a preventative for triple E in humans," adds the report.
Like West Nile virus, another mosquito-borne illness that poses a risk to people in the US every summer, triple E is constrained by environmental factors that are changing rapidly as the planet warms. That's because mosquitoes thrive in the hotter, wetter conditions that climate change is producing. "We have seen a resurgence of activity with eastern equine encephalitis virus over the course of the past 10 or so years," said Theodore G. Andreadis, a researcher who studied mosquito-borne diseases at the Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, a state government research and public outreach outfit, for 35 years. "And we've seen an advancement into more northern regions where it had previously not been detected." Researchers don't know what causes the virus to surge and abate, but Andreadis said it's clear that climate change is one of the factors spurring its spread, particularly into new regions. [...]
Studies have shown that warmer air temperatures up to a certain threshold, around 90 degrees Fahrenheit, shorten the amount of time it takes for C. melanura eggs to hatch. Higher temperatures in the spring and fall extend the number of days mosquitoes have to breed and feed. And they'll feed more times in a summer season if it's warmer -- mosquitoes are ectothermic, meaning their metabolism speeds up in higher temperatures. Rainfall, too, plays a role in mosquito breeding and activity, since mosquito eggs need water to hatch. A warmer atmosphere holds more moisture, which means that even small rainfall events dump more water today than they would have last century. The more standing water there is in roadside ditches, abandoned car tires, ponds, bogs, and potholes, the more opportunities mosquitoes have to breed. And warmer water decreases the incubation period for C. melanura eggs, leading one study to conclude that warmer-than-average water temperatures "increase the probability for amplification of EEE." Climate change isn't the only factor encouraging the spread of disease vectors like mosquitoes. The slow reforestation of areas that were clear-cut for industry and agriculture many decades ago is creating new habitat for insects. At the same time, developers are building new homes in wooded or half-wooded zones in ever larger numbers, putting humans in closer proximity to the natural world and the bugs that live in it. The report notes that the best way to prevent mosquito bites is to "wear long sleeves and pants at dusk and dawn, when mosquitoes are most prone to biting, and regularly apply an effective mosquito spray." Local health departments can also help protect the public by "testing pools of water for mosquito larvae and conducting public awareness and insecticide spraying campaigns when triple E is detected," notes Wired.
A vaccine for the disease exists for horses, but because the illness is so rare "there is little incentive for vaccine manufacturers to develop a preventative for triple E in humans," adds the report.
Re:Ahhh! Dontcha just love... (Score:5, Informative)
More than 99.9% of studies agree: Humans caused climate change [cornell.edu].
There's a lot of money in having the public misunderstand that. Because the fossil fuel industry is $12 Trillion USD market per year. [precedenceresearch.com]
There's not a lot of money in the scientific position. No one owns the solar or wind reserves. That's democratized. And there's competition in the market for the infrastructure, to profits don't compare tot he fossil fuel profits.
Moreover, it's not that hard to actually understand. If you increase the concentration of greenhouse gasses, you increase the greenhouse effect.
It was first recognised in 1898 when Svante Arrhenius published his paper [rsc.org] calculating that a doubling of CO2 would increase the global mean surface temperature by about 3C.
In 1938, G. S. Callendar calculated that it was happening. [wiley.com]
In the 1980s the fossil fuel industry, admiring the work of the tobacco industry in managing to hide science from the public, hired the same group of scientists, through the George C Marshall institute. Prominently Fred Singer [wikipedia.org] and Frederick Seitz [wikipedia.org], who had done a lot of work obfuscating the tobacco-cancer link readily move to obfuscating the global warming-greenhouse gas link.
But the science is not controversial. That has been clear throughout.
Ok, but... (Score:2)
You do realize that the majority of world government leaders are picked not based on their intelligence, wisdom, or foresight, but by a popularity contest, right?
Expecting such a government - led by folks whose primary skills were charisma and popularity - to somehow act conscientiously when it comes to the administration of the shared public good (i.e., the environment) is naive at best and ridiculous at worst. None of the first world leaders got to their position by telling people what they didn't wa
Re: (Score:2)
But I don't see that autocracies are doing better than democracies.
But certainly democracies are vulnerable to persistent misinformation to the voter, and outright corruption of the elected official.
Unelected officials are not less corrupt.
"The Mosquito" Book was disappointing... (Score:2)
Why did you propagate the troll's vacuous Subject? You even got me to look at the second troll's mumble to see if it was hidden by more abuse of mod points used to censor. Turned out the comment deserved the oblivion. However on looking at the overall situation, I smell s herd of sock puppets, some with mod points. The low UID might be the actual bot herder, but who cares? The FP tripe certainly didn't deserve Funny visibility.
However my main topic is the book The Mosquito by Timothy Winegard. It did ment
Why did you propagate the troll's vacuous Subject? (Score:2)
It is time-consuming though. And there are a lot of bots pushing this sort of stuff on social media at Putin's behest.
Re: (Score:2)
While I mostly agree, in many cases I think the troll's only purpose is to create such a vacuous Subject that the entire discussion gets sucked into the vacuum (that nature abhors).
Re: (Score:3)
How you do us a solid and follow the money? You could write up a story and get it posted to slashdot!
Re:Ahhh! Dontcha just love... (Score:5, Insightful)
Always shilling the liberal climate change narrative. Follow the money. Behind every climate change push is some businessman benefiting tremendously. What's sad is these duped shills get nothing for their efforts
From 1912 [imgur.com]. I'm sure this guy was benefitting from all his shilling. The source [google.com].
Re: (Score:3)
The story of what happened *after* Arrhenius's greenhouse ideas were floated is very interesting. They were rejected, for what in those days were very sound scientific reasons. The two main reasons were (1) the overlap of CO2s absorption spectrum with water vapor means CO2 wasn't blocking anything water wasn't already blocking and ; (2) atmospheric CO2 was in equilibrium with CO2 dissolved in the ocean so the ocean would resist any tendency for atmospheric concentrations to rise.
The spectrum argument was
Re: (Score:3)
It'll take a lot to get people turned around on DDT. I know because I was involved in such an attempt that had some merits, but ultimately ran up against the fact that DDT is the poster child for an environmentally dangerous pesticide. It's what *you* came up with when you were thinking of something ridiculous to use.
The one thing that everyone knows about Silent Spring, whether they read it or not, is that Silent Spring targets DDT. We'd have been politically smarter to go with one of the *other* organo
Re: (Score:2)
If Seb Gorka posts a string of lies I rebut the lies and respond with the correct facts. I don't say "WHO FUNDED HIM!!"
If something is incorrect in the story, then say what it is - Because "Follow the money" is weak.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
more and more people now reject everything
actually it's just the opposite. you're losing because reality is in fact a thing.
https://epic.uchicago.edu/insi... [uchicago.edu]
you are poison and i want you the fuck out of my country. build a wall to keep your ilk of "im something of a fucking idiot myself" on the other side
Re: (Score:3)
Very true indeed! It's obviously more scare mongering from the climate scares department!
Here's that paper [fit.edu]r from 2005 calculating the deaths from the anthropogenic part of climate change for the year 2000 to be about 160,000. Can you please link to some refutation in a similar standard of Journal as Nature, that has had a similar impact. (3900 citations over the 19 years)?
Because the casual observer might think that you're saying things with no evidence. Or even rational basis.
It could be anything, linking this to climate change is frivolous!
From one of the articles linked above: Like West Nile virus, another mosquito-borne illness that poses a risk to p
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
To answer your question, climate skeptics like Richard Lindzen and Roy Spencer get to publish in journals like Science or the Journal of Atmospheric Sciences. Pretty much any journal will publish a paper that is critical of the assumptions of AGW if it doesn't make unsupported claims. Even papers that eventually proved outright *wrong* can still be good papers.
Climate skeptical researchers are where proponents of anthropogenic climate change were in the late 50s. Most of their colleagues didn't find thei
Re: (Score:2)
Every journal would publish a paper like that.
You've got a mistaken understanding of academic publishing:
Journals make money by selling their publications to libraries and academic institutions. They can do that because of the prestige of the journal, which is most commonly estimated by the average number of citations that their papers get.
A well evidenced, well reasoned paper that overthrows an accepted understanding is the very pinnacle of doing that. Such a paper wou
The dupes are spreading!!! (Score:2)
Dupe! Idiots.
Re: (Score:2)
RCD - Republican Cuased Deaths (Score:2, Insightful)
It's cute to pretend there's no climate change, global warming, or a need to change how we deal with it. If mtakes us more money if we have a stock portfolio so much the better.
Republican Caused Disease and Republican Caused Death (RCD) is now in its sixth year, first being prevalent when Republicans pretended horse tranq would solve COVID-19. It didn't, and 3.4 million people died from COVID.
And now the continued emphasis on detracting from science, ignoring climate and other global change, will continu
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
To be fair, the Republicans are against ANY experts who have uni degrees in anything. It makes it harder to flim-flam the proles into accepting Republican bullshit.
Re: (Score:1)
You do know that more people died of Covid under Biden/Harris than did under Trump...right?
Re: (Score:2)
You do know that more people died of Covid under Biden/Harris than did under Trump...right?
You do know that the Florida Orange Man only had to deal with COVID-19 for about a year, while Biden/Harris has had almost 4 years?
OMG!!! (Score:2)
You mean it's STILL happening [slashdot.org]?
Re: (Score:1)
This claim needs to be verified, but I'm starting to come around to this point of view as well. If it can even be proven that long ago they displaced something else which can be reintroduced and can serve the same purpose in the food chain without also spreading disease, I'd go along with it.
Re: (Score:2)
You'll never be 100% sure of the outcome. Here is what I posted on the dupe article earlier today replying to somebody making the same suggestion:
https://slashdot.org/comments.... [slashdot.org]
Surely this time... (Score:5, Funny)
eastern equine encephalitis
So... Ivermectin?
Re: (Score:1)
Undoubtedly escaped from a Chinese glue factory research center.
Re: (Score:2)
eastern equine encephalitis
So... Ivermectin?
or bleach
Triple-E (Score:3)
The absolute worst part is the comment at the end. (Score:2, Troll)
"""A vaccine for the disease exists for horses, but because the illness is so rare "there is little incentive for vaccine manufacturers to develop a preventative for triple E in humans," adds the report."""
This right here says everything you need to know about late-stage capitalism.
I'm just completely stunned by the utter callousness, yet its also sadly unsurprising.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Yup, another doomsday scenario (Score:1, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Death is often the preferable outcome in viral encephalitis.
Terrible capitalists. (Score:2)
A vaccine already exists for horses, but there is little incentive for vaccine manufacturers to develop a preventative for triple E in humans because the illness is so rare.
What terrible capitalists. You can sell women full body deoderant and convince them their arms and fingers have a smell without it. You can sell this.
Re: (Score:2)
There have been experimental vaccines developed, but the regulatory process doesn't envision needing to approve a vaccine for a disease that has maybe twenty or thirty cases in a bad year; you can't do phase 2 efficacy testing, which requires hundreds of subjects. So it's safe to say there will never be an "approved" EEE vaccine.
I discussed this with workers in a lab handling EEE some twenty years ago. Technically speaking potentially infected EEEV tissues theoretically *should* be handled in a BSL-3 fac
Re: (Score:2)
I think a better use of our resources would be the worldwide eradication of mosquitoes. They serve no critical purpose in the food chain, as the various animals and insects that eat them all also eat other things. Wiping them out would significantly reduce human disease, because these things can spread all sorts of diseases from animals to humans, not just EEE.
Re: (Score:2)
Back in the DDT days, many mosquito "control" agencies called themselves mosquito "eradication" agencies. None of them ever came close to eradicating mosquitoes.
Here's why. A single gravid (pregnant) mosquito can lay up to 300 eggs in a clutch. Under ideal conditions, a mosquito may go from egg to laying its own eggs in as little as two weeks. Over the course of a summer, that single egg could theoretically have 10^14 descendents. In reality it will be much less; conditions are never ideal and many
Re: (Score:2)
Back in the DDT days, many mosquito "control" agencies called themselves mosquito "eradication" agencies. None of them ever came close to eradicating mosquitoes.
Here's why. A single gravid (pregnant) mosquito can lay up to 300 eggs in a clutch. Under ideal conditions, a mosquito may go from egg to laying its own eggs in as little as two weeks. Over the course of a summer, that single egg could theoretically have 10^14 descendents. In reality it will be much less; conditions are never ideal and many females will never get a blood meal and therefore have zero descendants. However it's not out of a question for a single egg laid at the start of June to have tens of millions of descendants by September.
It starts with releasing large numbers of genetically modified male mosquitoes designed so that the female mosquitoes in the next generation don't live to adulthood, but the males do and pass on the defective gene. From there, it's just a matter of watching the population implode. Eventually, all male mosquitoes will be genetically modified, and no females will survive to the next generation, and then there isn't a next generation.
By the way, mosquitoes do play a number of roles in ecology. The larvae are an important food source for fish and a number of animals (frogs, birds, bats) predate on adults. A number of plants need mosquitoes as pollinators.
I didn't say that they didn't play a role. It just isn't a critical role.
Re: (Score:2)
Eventually, all male mosquitoes will be genetically modified, and no females will survive to the next generation, and then there isn't a next generation.
Having worked in the field for decades, I understand how this is supposed to work. But it only has any chance of working so perfectly in a laboratory. It has zero chance of working *so perfectly* in real world conditions. Take, say, Palm Beach county in Florida. Do you really think you can supplant the *entire* male mosquito population over two thousand square miles, about 1/3 of it wetlands? What about the places over the edges? Or beyond the edges of edges? How are you going to keep mosquitoes from
Re: (Score:2)
Eventually, all male mosquitoes will be genetically modified, and no females will survive to the next generation, and then there isn't a next generation.
Having worked in the field for decades, I understand how this is supposed to work. But it only has any chance of working so perfectly in a laboratory. It has zero chance of working *so perfectly* in real world conditions. Take, say, Palm Beach county in Florida. Do you really think you can supplant the *entire* male mosquito population over two thousand square miles, about 1/3 of it wetlands? What about the places over the edges? Or beyond the edges of edges? How are you going to keep mosquitoes from infiltrating?
To truly eradicate the species, this would have to be done everywhere, all at once — not just in one area at a time — and boosted wherever the mosquito count starts to rise again, as part of an ongoing worldwide eradication effort. Anything short of that will just create a temporary reduction in certain areas, which will eventually be replaced by mosquitoes migrating from other areas.
Re: (Score:2)
Indeed, but this technology won't even eradicate the species locally, except possibly in certain special cases like the Florida Keys.
But even local eradication is very temporary. I worked with the CDC DVBID when they were tracking the emergence of the Asian tiger mosquito (Ae albopictus), which first entered the country in Houston in 1985. Within three years it was in thirteen states. If there is suitable habitat for a mosquito species, it will colonize that habitat explosively.
It was already north (Score:3)
I first heard of EEE a while back, maybe 35-40 years ago? (So long ago I can't remember.) I was living in Boston, MA at the time and it was infecting people in New England.
It sounds like it has not been as common in recent years, and now that it's back -- just everywhere it was before -- it's due to global warming.
Why wasn't it due to global warming in the 1980s when it was New England before?
Re: (Score:1)
Just in time! (Score:1)
Just in time for election season...