Another Online Pharmacy Bypasses the FDA To Offer Cut-Rate Weight Loss Drugs 124
An anonymous reader shares a report: Hims & Hers Health, one of the online pharmacies that got its start prescribing dick pills, is now offering knockoff versions of GLP-1 weight loss drugs. Hims & Hers says it will offer drugs that mimic Ozempic and Wegovy, the active ingredient of which is semaglutide. The copycat versions are made by compounding pharmacies. The formulations aren't the same as the FDA-approved versions of the drug and haven't been directly evaluated by the FDA, either. But they're cheaper than the real thing: $199 a month, compared to the branded version, which can cost more than $1,000 a month without insurance.
Compounding pharmacies can make knockoff versions of branded drugs when they are in shortage, as the GLP-1 drugs -- prescribed for diabetes and weight loss -- currently are. The FDA has already received reports of adverse events for compounded versions of semaglutide. Hims & Hers says it "conducted extensive research for over a year" into finding a supplier, but does not name the one it chose to partner with. "Over the last year, we have grown in our conviction -- based on our medical experts' evaluation and the strength of our infrastructure -- that if done properly, compounded GLP-1s are safe and effective," the company said in its statement.
Compounding pharmacies can make knockoff versions of branded drugs when they are in shortage, as the GLP-1 drugs -- prescribed for diabetes and weight loss -- currently are. The FDA has already received reports of adverse events for compounded versions of semaglutide. Hims & Hers says it "conducted extensive research for over a year" into finding a supplier, but does not name the one it chose to partner with. "Over the last year, we have grown in our conviction -- based on our medical experts' evaluation and the strength of our infrastructure -- that if done properly, compounded GLP-1s are safe and effective," the company said in its statement.
Might be worth it (Score:4, Interesting)
I know several people who have gotten prescriptions for the semaglutide weight loss drugs who won't buy it because insurance (even most good insurances) won't cover it and out of pocket its just too expensive.
$199 per month is still expensive but it takes it from unattainable for most down to just a rather expensive prescription. In general though we need both a) the drug to get cheaper and b) insurances to start covering it. Weight loss at the level that this is usually prescribed isn't merely cosmetic - its a true health issue.
Re: (Score:3)
They could always not buy either and save $200 - $1,000 a month. They could also stop buying the $200+ a month they spend on shitty snack food that's making them fat in the first place and save even more.
Dear God - get this man a medal! No one could have ever figured out that eating less would work.
Maybe keep the prescription option too though. You know, in case someone has difficulty with the "less eating" part.
Re: (Score:2)
While what you say may be true, the reality is that fixing a societal issue is a much more difficult and longer term problem - one that might never be fixed. If a weight loss drug can get individuals back to the healthy weight regardless of the societal issues, then it would behoove them to go that route rather than waiting around for the world to fix itself.
Re:Might be worth it (Score:4, Insightful)
Much of the world doesn't have this problem
Yes, they do. Rising obesity rates are a problem everywhere.
Countries by obesity rate [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Indeed.
The reality is that our species evolved in an environment where food was scarce. When food is plentiful, and without external cultural factors, a large amount of the population do not seem to be capable of properly self-regulating their calorie intake. This drug effectively makes that struggle easier by making you feel less hungry.
I wouldn't suggest that we start administering it at birth, but if someone is obese they have already displayed this issue with their impulse control, and it shouldn't be
Re: (Score:2)
Indeed.
The reality is that our species evolved in an environment where food was scarce. When food is plentiful, and without external cultural factors, a large amount of the population do not seem to be capable of properly self-regulating their calorie intake. This drug effectively makes that struggle easier by making you feel less hungry.
I wouldn't suggest that we start administering it at birth, but if someone is obese they have already displayed this issue with their impulse control, and it shouldn't be any issue for them to access this. "Just eat less" has already been something they have demonstrably been unable to achieve without help.
Impulse control - another character fault of those obese people. And drugging people at birth? Ever read the side effects of this stuff?
REminds me of when the smart people started putting young boys on Ritalin, because young boys need chemically restrained. It was great, The boys calmed right down, and were no more a problem than the girls were - Victory for maintenance drugs.
Oh, wait. the medical miracle turned out to harm young boys developing brains, leaving them prone to depression, and also ten
Re: (Score:3)
Not just that. Don't forget the rise of ultra processed foods designed to tap into that biology to be as addictive as possible.
Re: (Score:2)
Much of the world doesn't have this problem
Yes, they do. Rising obesity rates are a problem everywhere.
Countries by obesity rate [wikipedia.org]
Exactly.
But while it is fun to crap on the USA, and sprinkle a little hatred on people with weight issues, there are other things involved. Those pesky lipophilic endocrine disruptors. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/p... [nih.gov]
And then there is the phytoestrogens - yup, an endocrine disrupter. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/p... [nih.gov] But it's kind of sensitive to mention that one, Vegans get upset. But Phytoestrogens, added to the other disruptors, and you easily get yourself an obesity "epidemic". And those disrupt
Re: (Score:2)
It's easy to pick on the person who is picking on the "sick". But the fact that you say you know several people points to a very serious societal problem. I don't even know several obese people, let alone ones that have been prescribed a pill to address their weight.
Much of the world doesn't have this problem, so what's going on around you that makes so many people you know need to turn to medicine?
It's quite telling that in the USA when doctors ask you "are you on any medication" and you say not, they instantly assume you're lying.
That silly USA again - is there anything they don't screw up, while the rest of the world all look like Greek Gods and Goddesses, we eat ourselves to death a few hundred thousand every minute. You really need to contact these people in Europe and let them know that they are wrong. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/... [europa.eu] Unless of course, you consider 53 percent a negligible number. https://www.who.int/europe/new... [who.int]
Now of course, you might live in North Korea, where obesity is almost non-existent, but they s
Re: (Score:3)
>"Loosing weight is simple if you're overweight, consume fewer calories that you need and your body will burn the fat to make up the difference."
Yep. For the 99+% of overweight, it is just that simple. I lost 30 pounds (19% of my then weight), recently, by simply by reducing caloric intake to well below my "ideal" caloric intake (from probably around 2200 to around 1300). Went from overweight to ideal weight in less than 3 months. No meds, no special supplements, no exercise, no restrictions on what
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Oh, for sure I was overeating. That is why I needed to, and then did, lose weight through caloric restriction, returning to my "correct" weight. My issue is that after weight loss dieting, I tend to slip back into overeating again instead of staying in the correct calorie range.
The body (at least mine) will tolerate quite a bit of caloric deviation from too low to too high before weight change starts. I estimate perhaps at least 5% but maybe as much as 10%.
Re: Might be worth it (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
Ah, next year's candidate for the Nobel prize in Stupidity.
First, while there are overweight people who snack on junk food too much, this is a stereotype. The real problem isn't "junk food", the real problem is "cheap food", which is loaded with sugars and other additives to replace the lack of taste in the product.
Secondly, from personal experience, I can tell you that I cut my caloric intake by 25% for a month, and lost not a *&@^#% pound. While the usual suspects have been tested, it's possible the
Re: (Score:2)
I would disagree with your definition of junk food, and include your "cheap food" as a subset. Part of the problem is the perception (and if it's accurate, then that's another part of the problem) that food of decent quality is unaffordable or requires too much prep time. And, to be clear, I completely agree that part of the problem is health condi
Re: (Score:2)
It's not so much that food of decent quality is unaffordable-- it's that most people don't realize how bad "typical" food is.
Do you shop at Whole Foods (or equivalent), or Wal-Mart? Do you buy frozen foods, or make your own? Many years ago, I discovered the high levels of fructose in my diet were killing my digestive tract-- this confused me, because other than a tendency to drink soda on occasion, I'm not really into sweets.
Closer examination of product labels revealed that High Fructose Corn Syrup was i
Re: (Score:2)
You seem to have done a U-turn in the middle of that post, because your final conclusion is that decent food is more expensive. Plenty of people will perceive it as crossing the threshold into unaffordable.
As to my personal habits: I don't live in the US, and over here in the EU there's less HFCS, MSG and aspartame in processed food. The only frozen food I buy is frozen vegetables, which are often better quality than fresh ones, frozen fish, and ice-cream (when I haven't got round to making it myself). I do
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Cheaper, yes, but if it were that easy we wouldn't have an obesity epidemic. Yes its a choice, but if we have a drug that makes it easier for people to make better choices then we shouldn't scoff at it and declare that the obese just have to live with their situation as some penance.
Re: Might be worth it (Score:2)
Type 2 diabetes is a choice?
Perhaps, for some.
Genetics have a say in it as well.
I had/have a heart condition (genetic) drove my weight to 245 before I got things fixed through open heart surgery . I was 72 inches tall and sub-200 pounds for many years post-college. Still, as my weight climbed, I became insulin dependent.
I was and still am an avid hiker and cyclist.
My insulin usage is now 1/2 what it was when I weighed 245. But, I can't break the 200 barrier even on Ozempic. I came close with Mo
Re: (Score:3)
Exercising and adjusting diet is exponentially cheaper with broader benefits. amirite? Always remember, type-2 diabetes is by choice.
So is being a condescending asshat being a choice.. Look up endocrine disruptors and lipophilia, read it and then come back and tell us that it's a personality defect for lesser humans.
Re:Might be worth it (Score:4, Insightful)
It only goes so far though. I was up at 130kg (Up from 80kg in the 90s when I was working as a laborer to pay my way through university. Guess what happens when you replace a physical get-buff 1 been on diet shakes (and having done keyo, atkins, you name it) and an hour of gym and/or riding bicycles a day for the better part of a year I got it down to about 105, but it just got stuck there for months refusing to go lower. Eventually the body fights back.
Unfortunately 105 while dramatically better than 130 is still overweight enough to pose health problems and diabetes in my middle age, it needs to be below 80 for me to be in the clear (I'm not tall, so that 105 is still significant).
The doc is convinced Ozempic would get me to where I need to get to stave off diabetes, below 80s, but I just cant afford the damn thing because the diabetes hasnt kicked in, yet, although the early signs are there.
Re: (Score:2)
The doc is convinced Ozempic would get me to where I need to get to stave off diabetes, below 80s, but I just cant afford the damn thing because the diabetes hasnt kicked in, yet, although the early signs are there.
Eliminate carbohydrates and high fructose corn syrup and you will go below 105 within a month.
what is the canada price for real one? (Score:2)
what is the canada price for real one?
Re:what is the canada price for real one? (Score:4, Informative)
I don't have the Canadian prices, but I have the unsubsidized Norwegian prices. Should be similar in Canada.
Wegovy 2.4 mg - 4 weeks $285
Ozempic 1 mg - 4 weeks $100
Buy the patent (Score:2)
I haven't dug into what the real results of semaglutide are but if this is a real measurable reduction in obesity with an acceptable prevalence of side effects and with obesity being the growing problem that it is then just buy the patent and make it cheap for everyone to take.
For important drugs with wide implications I think the public should reserve the right to say "this is too important to have under a single provider at a premium price" so just pay them for their dev costs and little more on the top f
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Buy the patent (Score:5, Interesting)
See that's exactly what I am talking about.
You are 100% correct and every doctor and health professional will tell people just the same but it is almost 100% useless as a policy prescription. Does the government buy everyone a gym membership? How do you make them go? How do you make sure they have proper technique? It take's a lifetime to become obese and stay that way, we need multi-pronged solutions for sure and advocacy is a big part of it but it can't just stop there.
The doctor can't even force someone to exercise despite telling them to do it every single time they see them but if they don't and say their blood pressure keeps rising he can keep saying that but at some point he's just gonna have to write the script because the patients health is getting worse.
So yes, it makes us feel good to say "just exercise there fatty fat fat" it doesn't really get us closer to having an effect on obesity *as a society*. This is that line between what we say to each other as individuals ("hey get started exercising, i'll help you get started and you probably won't have to take any drugs" is what we would tell someone we know) versus what we say and do as a society.
Re: (Score:2)
So yes, it makes us feel good to say "just exercise there fatty fat fat" it doesn't really get us closer to having an effect on obesity *as a society*.
The problem is many people love to judge others - I imagine it makes them feel better about their own perceived personal shortcomings somehow. They really have no interest in solving the problem or helping anyone - they just like to dismissively shit on other people.
Re: (Score:2)
So yes, it makes us feel good to say "just exercise there fatty fat fat" it doesn't really get us closer to having an effect on obesity *as a society*.
The problem is many people love to judge others - I imagine it makes them feel better about their own perceived personal shortcomings somehow. They really have no interest in solving the problem or helping anyone - they just like to dismissively shit on other people.
Exactly.
Sarcasm truth alert - I mean if we are obese, it has to be a personality defect, people too mentally weak and lacking impulse control that the better people have. A true strain on society, when the superior healthy and thin people have to pay the medical bills for those who shouldn't be covered at all because the fatties are 100 percent responsible for all their health problems. Sarcasm off
It's a whole lot more complex than simple lack of willpower, and there is a direct link between endocrine
Re: (Score:2)
How do you make sure they have proper technique?
And that's the hardest part because most "coaches" or "trainers" are more like glorified personal cheerleaders whose primary skill is setting the pins in machines.
Re: (Score:2)
Exactly so I am not exactly keen to subsidize that industry. I would totally support more advocacy for exercise, I'm glad the Presidential Fitness Test is back on for kids
But if you've been obese since your teenage years chances are you need medical intervention so take the pills if it helps and we should encourage that. We American's already love drugs way too much, what's one more?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
To be fair being overweight or obese is not good, it should be discouraged but it takes a lifetime to get that way for people and for many this is just how they were brought up and the statistics are really depressing since I think it's something like if you are already obese by 16-17 the chances of turning that back later in life is like less than 15% or something like that, it's very low. Ingrained behaviors since childhood are very hard to break and combine that with our less than ideal diet where sugar
Re: (Score:2)
What a weird coincidence that people with gut biome issues also eat more. Also I guess gut biomes are getting worse every year, that explains why more and more Americans are getting obese. Oh, and gut biomes are worse in the US than in, say, Asia, which explains why BMI is so much higher there - not the diet.
Re: (Score:2)
It's well understood that eating more calories than you expend will make you fat.
On the other hand, Gut biome issues are a fun new theory with obvious logical failures. The relationship is still being studied and is not fully understood, and anybody telling you different is peddling junk science. On the other hand, being able to blame "biomes" is a lot easier than blaming yourself.
Re: (Score:2)
there's good research saying gut biome makes a huge difference on BMI
There sure is. And I used to have that. Very bad cafeteria food in college wrecked that and I only had limited means to feed myself outside of that. It started a weight gain process that is very difficult to control. Not to mention the much less free time you have once you have a job. I was very physically active before then.
Eating right does not fix the microbiome. Not to mention that those same bacteria actually produce chemicals that tell your brain you need certain types of foods.
The good bacteria
Re: (Score:2)
As a pet peeve, the BMI is not intended for use with individuals. Anyone who does so is just flat out wrong.
The creator of the BMI specifically stated that there were too many variations between individuals for such a simple ratio to be useful, and he warned against it's use for individuals. It was designed to study populations.
So if you say the average BMI of the United States is "X", then you can indeed say that population is trending towards obesity.
If you apply it to an individual, you're an idiot.
Re: Buy the patent (Score:2)
"The drug is indicated for chronic weight management in patients with a body mass index (BMI) of 27 kg/m2 or greater who have at least one weight-related ailment or in patients with a BMI of 30 kg/m2 or greater."
Re: (Score:2)
The drug isn't the problem. The problem is the guidelines for use, which use an inaccurate measurement to determine obesity.
Re: (Score:2)
>"The barbell deadlift results in a measurable reduction in obesity plus other beneficial effects and isn't subject to patents."
Eater fewer calories is a lot easier and cheaper. I am not anti-exercise, but there is absolutely no need to exercise in order to lose weight.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I do agree that it is *better* to lose weight by raising metabolism. Or a blend of caloric reduction and exercise. I was just saying it isn't a requirement. But if you still over-eat, even if the ideal point is raised through a higher metabolism, there will still be fat weight gain. Think Sumu wrestlers- lots of muscle, but also overweight with too much fat as well (of course, that is their goal).
Re: (Score:2)
I do agree that it is *better* to lose weight by raising metabolism. Or a blend of caloric reduction and exercise. I was just saying it isn't a requirement. But if you still over-eat, even if the ideal point is raised through a higher metabolism, there will still be fat weight gain. Think Sumu wrestlers- lots of muscle, but also overweight with too much fat as well (of course, that is their goal).
This is exactly my point. For Sumo wrestlers to be that size, they are eating more food than most people could consume if they tried. Many people who first want to get strong are encouraged to eat diets of like 3k-4kCal/day and they complain that its "so hard" to eat that much.
Re: (Score:2)
Very very few people would take the risk of investing in costly research and development activity if the government could just swoop in and steal the fruits of it. Ironically it's the government that's made R&D so expensive.
Re: (Score:2)
so just pay them for their dev costs and little more on the top for their trouble
I said as such but let me re-iterate: I would not expect a pharma company to just do all the work of developing a drug and not be compensated for it or end up in the red, so they can submit their R+D expenditure and what their expected revenue would be and we can even throw them some of that. They did the work, they should get paid. That does not mean they are entitles to the maximum amount of profit for the maximum amount of time.
I said the exact same about the CV19 vaccines, that they should have been be
Re: (Score:2)
>so just pay them for their dev costs and little more on the top for their trouble
but that's the catch.
In very round numbers, it's a billion dollars to get a drug to the point of late clinical trials.
I'm not sure of the exact number, but call it 1 in 3 that makes it to actual approval. (again, we're being very round, here).
Total sales of that one drug needs to cover the costs of its siblings, as well.
And production cost of that drug may well be a small fraction of what it cost to develop it.
Just to pull
Re: (Score:2)
Total sales of that one drug needs to cover the costs of its siblings, as well.
Sure but we can always work around that with some form of tax break or helping cover costs for other things they are developing, especially if those are also important. Also if the drug worked and was so important that this rule would come into affect chances are the government also is going to be purchasing a large amount of it (Medicaid is pretty much the #1 drug buyer in the country) so we could also give them that contract exclusively and let everyone else deal with generics.
Like the #1 killer is still
Re: (Score:2)
Wow. It's unusual to encounter this level of naivete. The fact that you think the high drug prices in the United States have anything to do with R&D is adorable.
Look up the history of the "epi pen" and why Mylan raised the price by FIVE HUNDRED PERCENT in 2016, when the original product was developed and brought to market 33 years earlier.
Merck's cancer drug Keytruda costs $100,000 more in the U.S. than it does in France, according to a committee analysis. Bristol Myers Squibb's blood thinner Eliquis costs almost 10 times more in the U.S. than in Germany. Johnson & Johnson's arthritis drug Stelara costs five times more in the U.S. than it does in Japan.
If you have EVER had as much as a single episode of atrial fibrillation (the most common heart arrhythmia in the world), then there is a very good chance that your d
Re: (Score:2)
The epi-pen is a point in my favor lol .. did you even READ what I wrote .. read my last sentence 10 times slowly. The epi-pen price is entirely due to government. It's 33 year old tech right? You should be able to make one with a 3D printer or something really cheap .. right? So try doing it and get back to me from prison.
Re: (Score:2)
Actually, CVS and a few others made a clean-room implementation of the epipen.
If you had been a bit more direct, and said that the patent laws need to be reformed, I'd have agreed with you.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
That's good to hear and I see them getting advertised a bunch now and I've read positive results, I just haven't kept up with any long term studies. I also figured there are newer formulations on the way as well.
If they really work then then that's exactly my point, even if it cost $50B to buy it from them if it reduced obesity a measurable amount it'd probably be a "profitable" investment in medical savings alone. So take your $50B check Novo and try to put on a smile about it.
This could turn into an ins
Re: (Score:2)
I haven't dug into what the real results of semaglutide are but if this is a real measurable reduction in obesity with an acceptable prevalence of side effects and with obesity being the growing problem that it is then just buy the patent and make it cheap for everyone to take.
For important drugs with wide implications I think the public should reserve the right to say "this is too important to have under a single provider at a premium price" so just pay them for their dev costs and little more on the top for their trouble (and they are still welcome to sell it) but then allow it to go generic for easier access. Even if we got a 10% reduction in the rate of obesity that would pay for itself in the long run.
And we are Americans so we talk a big game about personal responsibility and yes, everyone should eat right and exercise and blah blah blah but people ain't doing that and asking millions of people to change ingrained lifelong behaviors is a recipe for failure at a policy level so the American thing to do is use pills and money to get us out of a jam.
What is your metric of acceptable side effects? Thyroid cancer? The claim is that Ozempic causes thyroid cancer in rats, but not in humans. Okay, they tell people who have relatives that had thyroid cancer not to take it. Pancreatitis is a possibility, and the list is a pretty long on of the more common side effects https://www.drugs.com/sfx/ozem... [drugs.com]
And perhaps it is time to remind people again that despite the popular narrative, there are actually people other than Americans who are obese. In the EU, a m
Re: (Score:2)
What is your metric of acceptable side effects?
I mean that's up to the FDA and the actual doctors. We do have criteria for the percentage and severity of side effects and what the cost/benefit should look like. Is thyroid cancer 1:100k? 1:1m? 1:100m? If the risk of pancreatitis is non-specific enough and common enough then no, I would not implement this. I might put out a prize call or ease the process for a safer formulation. That said if you are obese you are already at high risk for several conditions so we have to weight the side effects again
Re: (Score:2)
Well I only spoke to America because we end up fronting so much of the cost for these products even though the world gets to take advantage. I haven't looked up how those health systems are working with GLP-1 drugs but I imagine if they are effective they will make them available in their systems but my point is those people will probably pay way way way less than Americans will.
Also if GLP-1 really is so successful then at that point it could make the WHO vital medicine list eventually.
Now the next question. If the metric of health is being at the proper weight, what if a person doesn't want to take the drugs. Perhaps they should be punished? There was a professor at an Eastern University who claims that as little a 5 pounds overweight makers for health problems.
I can imagine some believing that we should embark on a large scale shaming program like they do for cigarette smoking. Why not?
And then there is myself. According to the charts, I am morbidly obese. Yet it is overwhelmingly m
Re: (Score:2)
Now the next question. If the metric of health is being at the proper weight, what if a person doesn't want to take the drugs. Perhaps they should be punished? There was a professor at an Eastern University who claims that as little a 5 pounds overweight makers for health problems.
Nope but If it works and made accessible I think the majority will use it, nobody want's to be obese really, its culturally ingrained in us today. I think that's a "cross that bridge when we get there". It will take decades for the numbers to trend downwards so continued downward trend is the target, edge cases are when they are edges.
I can imagine some believing that we should embark on a large scale shaming program like they do for cigarette smoking. Why not?
We do, as much as the "healthy at any size" group tries to do generally a good thing fact is you are effectively shamed indirectly all the time and directly pretty often. I
Re: (Score:2)
Trying to extend that all on the old age side of life might not be as great as people think, as we turn into chemical people, taking drugs that might just kill us.
I mean sure but that's also why there's some Nobel's just waiting for someone to come up with an effective Alzeimer's treatment. I think we're actually getting pretty good at people living excellent lives well into their old day's and to me that's a worthy goal, we can wax poetic for sure but time only moves on direction so we don't really have an option. I for one welcome our cyber-pharmo-kinetic future, to me it's a modern luxury to have to think about the fact we might have too much access to things that are literal miracles just a couple centuries prior, everything on that WHO list is a triumph of mankind in my opinion.
We have more people living older before they die, but we haven't actually extended lifespan, only the average age at death.There are no 200 year old people, and I doubt there will be. Lots of things like bones are not designed to live those sort of spans. We wear them out. Shoulders, knees, hips, titanium people.
Even so, have you spent much time around Nursing homes? A lotta people there that cry all day long. But fear not, their doctors prescribe them more pills to keep them crying longer.
Anyhow, if yo
Re: (Score:2)
> so just pay them for their dev costs and little more on the top for their trouble
Last I heard about 10 $3B dev cost drugs fail for every one that succeeds.
So your solution would rapidly bankrupt Pharma companies. Maybe that's for the best, but we're close to curing most cancers.
Re: (Score:2)
That can also be addressed, we can ease the trial process in a number of different ways since that is a shared burden (OWS did a lot of good things there).
This isn't something I would apply to even a minority of pharma products, the criteria would be pretty strict but it should be on the table for something that would have immediate positive effects on a large portion of society.
Another option is a voluntary prize system "if you develop this drug, you get this money". The US already does something similar w
Toxic levels of blood sugar are turned into fat (Score:2)
Once you understand that you quit carbs, eat fatty meat, drink water (ideally spring water), and most of the time the pounds come off. They lied about red meat and animal fat being bad for us. But you can't keep the Sickcare Industrial Complex at 20% of GDP if people eat correctly.
Bonus points for finding local farms raising livestock on pasture and patronizing them. Their animals are healthier and they're building soil without herbicides, pesticides and synthetic fertilizer. Best way to put Monsanto etc ou
Re: (Score:3)
Giving up carbs is hard over a long duration. I have tried it and it inevitably leads to weight off to weight on cycles. You end up feeling crappy and losing muscle mass. I think it is too extreme. For most people, I think they can make incredible long term strides by just giving up the worst, most unnatural, and most addictive carb: refined sugar.
I think that for most people, that diet change alone along with light exercise, if done strictly and for a long period of time (lifestyle change), will get them f
Re: (Score:2)
>"Giving up carbs is hard over a long duration [...] .I think they can make incredible long term strides by just giving up the worst, most unnatural, and most addictive carb: refined sugar."
You don't need to get rid of ANY food or food type to lose weight. It might not be the most healthy or effective way to lose weight, but one can eat nothing but pizza and soda and lose weight. Ultimately, it is primarily about the caloric intake. Almost all cases of weight gain are simply eating more calories than
Re: (Score:2)
I recently (about 1 month ago) gave up all extra sugar, keeping my intake to below the USRDA, which is about 50 grams of sugar. It's been a real bitch to kick the sugar habit, but I've done it. Lost 2 pants sizes and 20 pounds just form that change alone.
Big Pharma profits... (Score:2)
That difference in price tells you one important thing: big pharma could make the real thing for that price, and ALL the rest is profit. And Him and Hers Health is guaranteed to be marking it up 100% from what they pay.
Nationalize big pharma. I mean it.
Re: (Score:2)
The government is a Huge part of the problem when it comes to pharmaceuticals, Because the FDA by design makes the Approval process Time consuming and extremely expensive before they can even create a sellable product.
The Average timeframe to get a drug approved before they can start selling it is 12 Years, for example.
That is 12 years after the company researched and developed a drug that can be Life-saving medication.
And the risk of this process is so extremely high of being denied approval and gettin
Re: (Score:2)
100% WRONG. You don't know what you're talking about.
You don't *want* them doing serious scientific testing? Really? Look up thalidomide.
And then there's the money they spend on drugs that do no better than an existing one... but whose patent is running out. Think I''m making that up, India refused a patent to a drug from big pharma for *exactly* that reason a few years ago.
On top of which, 60%? 80% of all basic research in the US on new drugs is FUNDED BY THE NIH (your tax dollars at work)(ObDisclosure: I
Re: (Score:2)
Sure, why not (Score:3)
What is the source of Semaglutide? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Right - article makes no sense.
Maybe it's smuggled in from China but that's not what compounding means.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
>"I don't understand how any pharmacy can legally acquire semaglutide in the USA. A compounding pharmacy could make cherry flavored [...]"
Thank you.
That is what I was going to post. I suspect this has nothing to do with "compounding" and sounds more like just illegally copying a patented medication, then illegally selling it.
You can't fool nature (Score:2, Insightful)
As soon as you stop taking these drugs, you immediately start gaining weight again. So as a permanent weight loss strategy, you will be on the drug for life. Thus the Total Cost of Ownership is ((Life Expectancy - Current Age) * monthly drug cost * 12). Example: a 40-year old who expects to live to 82 and pays full US non-insured rate of $1,000/month = ((82-40)*1,000*12) = $504,000. For comparison, the median home price in the US in 2023 was $412,000.
No thanks.
Re: (Score:2)
>"As soon as you stop taking these drugs, you immediately start gaining weight again."
If you continue to eat more calories than your body needs, yes. That will always be the case after any weight loss regimen.
>"Example: a 40-year old who expects to live to 82 and pays full US non-insured rate of $1,000/month = ((82-40)*1,000*12) = $504,000."
I think the generic will be out in a few years at a small fraction of the current cost. Of course, the alternative, eating less, not only averts all that cost, i
What could possibly go wrong (Score:2)
Buying knockoff pills with a very short track-record of human usage from a sketchy online 'pharmacy'...
Sure, why not.
Pro-Tip: Make sure you use a credit card so you can do a chargeback when these knockoff 'meds' make your kidneys stop working or cause your spleen to explode.
Desperate much? (Score:2)
Moral courage > College degree
If you’re currently protesting against the genocide of the Palestinian people & for your university’s divestment from Israel, keep going. It’s working.
There are plenty of companies & CEOs eager to hire you, regardless of university discipline.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
I think the current generation is largely screwed, but we should probably refocus our efforts in ensuring that future generations don't wind up in such a precarious state in the first place.
Too late https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/o... [harvard.edu].
Turns out parents who can't manage their own weight aren't good at managing their children's weight either.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Gluttony Is A Mental Disorder, Right? (Score:2)
That makes zero sense. Our bodies don't work that way, and where they reach homeostasis is dynamic. You're raising the bar to a ridiculous point that is not supported by anything, not science, history, evolution, nothing.
Your strength training goal is great, but the first problem people have is consuming too many calories for their current metabolic rate. They are not at risk of wasting away ...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
This man didn't eat for 328 days. https://www.diabetes.co.uk/blo... [diabetes.co.uk]
In freedom units he weighed 456lbs. The USA has enough fatties to produce a show called My 600lb Life https://go.tlc.com/show/my-600... [tlc.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
What kind of lift? and at what age? I don't know many people over 30 that lift that type of weight and the risks of doing so regularly can outweigh the benefits. The healthiest people I know of are distance runners and cyclists. I am pretty confident that when looking at life expectancy, aerobic conditioning is more beneficial than strength. I know that strength matters, but you mostly just need enough strength to maintain stability as you age.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Gluttony Is A Mental Disorder, Right? (Score:5, Interesting)
Metabolic control requires a minimum amount of muscle mass. Most people don't have it. Restricting calories reduces the muscle mass further. The minimum amount of muscle needed is enough to deadlift twice your body weight. If you have that strength, the body will need 3k-4k calories per day just to stay alive and the challenge with food will be that eating enough is uncomfortable. Dietary restriction leads to nothing but bone loss. Then those same people who followed medical advice and didn't get enough nutrition will be chastised for having osteoporosis.
A calorie-restricted diet, says the science on primates, "reduced the incidence of age-related conditions, such as cancer, heart disease, and diabetes." No clear data yet on whether it extended their lifespan or not. In simpler animals it was also shown to extend lifespan. So far the data on humans isn't clear one way or the other. https://www.nia.nih.gov/news/c... [nih.gov]
I think your sentence "dietary restriction leads to nothing but bone loss" is flat out wrong, per the evidence.
Re: (Score:2)
If the same person lifts heavy weights, their body composition will
Re: Gluttony Is A Mental Disorder, Right? (Score:3)
That's outright bullshit. Our bodies don't need 4000 calories a day to prevent bone loss. What fucking morons come up with this stuff. Ed, get off TikTok ffs. Strength and resistance training do help maintain bone density, so does almost any other regular exercise and all that can be done well below a resting metabolic rate of four thousand fucking calories.
The obesity epidemic absolutely is from overeating and prevalence of high calorie density foods combined with sedentary lifestyles. We still need to exe
Re: (Score:2)
Where are my points when I need them to raise your score :( !
Re: (Score:2)
Dieting sucks the big juicy one! (Score:3)
The more I diet the hungrier and grumpier I feel. Some claim that feeling eventually goes away, but I'm skeptical. As soon as I smell bacon or fries while dieting, my body throws a hissy fit. At my age fries can feel better than sex, or at least make me happier longer.
There's a reason fat people are more jolly. A dieting Santa would shout, "Git your own damn presents! I'm not your slave!"
Gimmie knockoff skinny pills and tell the regulators to shove a fry up their bacon!
Re: (Score:2)
>"The more I diet the hungrier and grumpier I feel."
Then you are doing it wrong? Perhaps you are denying yourself some foods? Eat whatever you want, but make sure your daily calories are considerably lower than your "ideal neutral", and you will lose weight.
>"Some claim that feeling eventually goes away, but I'm skeptical."
I think that varies a lot by person. But, generally, once you start caloric restriction, it is important to also eat much slower. Your stomach will shrink and the hunger won't b
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, that's what they do.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)