Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Biotech United States

US Approves Chicken Made From Cultivated Cells, the Nation's First 'Lab-Grown' Meat (apnews.com) 110

An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Associated Press: For the first time, U.S. regulators on Wednesday approved the sale of chicken made from animal cells, allowing two California companies to offer "lab-grown" meat to the nation's restaurant tables and eventually, supermarket shelves. The Agriculture Department gave the green light to Upside Foods and Good Meat, firms that had been racing to be the first in the U.S. to sell meat that doesn't come from slaughtered animals -- what's now being referred to as "cell-cultivated" or "cultured" meat as it emerges from the laboratory and arrives on dinner plates. The companies received approvals for federal inspections required to sell meat and poultry in the U.S. The action came months after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration deemed that products from both companies are safe to eat. A manufacturing company called Joinn Biologics, which works with Good Meat, was also cleared to make the products.

Cultivated meat is grown in steel tanks, using cells that come from a living animal, a fertilized egg or a special bank of stored cells. In Upside's case, it comes out in large sheets that are then formed into shapes like chicken cutlets and sausages. Good Meat, which already sells cultivated meat in Singapore, the first country to allow it, turns masses of chicken cells into cutlets, nuggets, shredded meat and satays. But don't look for this novel meat in U.S. grocery stores anytime soon. Cultivated chicken is much more expensive than meat from whole, farmed birds and cannot yet be produced on the scale of traditional meat, said Ricardo San Martin, director of the Alt:Meat Lab at University of California Berkeley. The companies plan to serve the new food first in exclusive restaurants: Upside has partnered with a San Francisco restaurant called Bar Crenn, while Good Meat dishes will be served at a Washington, D.C., restaurant run by chef and owner Jose Andres.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

US Approves Chicken Made From Cultivated Cells, the Nation's First 'Lab-Grown' Meat

Comments Filter:
  • Just LABEL IT (Score:5, Insightful)

    by cayenne8 ( 626475 ) on Wednesday June 21, 2023 @03:46PM (#63621806) Homepage Journal
    Hey, ok if they want to market this.

    And I'm not one much for too much govt. rules and regulations, but one I do agree with is food labeling laws.

    Please require any dish or raw ingredient sold made with this, be labeled as such...boldy pronounce it as "Lab grown".

    Let the customer decide if they want it or not based on information.

    • It'll be cruelty-free meat or some gobbledygook like that.

      The euphemisms will abound, it's their marketing pitch.

      If it were up to me, i'd label it lab-grown dinosaur meat, but i'm told that isn't very appetizing sounding.

      • Re: (Score:2, Insightful)

        by CAIMLAS ( 41445 )

        Whatever terminology they settle on will be fundamentally deceptive and try to "build trust" in the product.

        "Cruelty free" is perfect, as it tries to take the virtue of more natural animal husbandry while at the same still castigating the eating of meat as a cruel endeavor.

        As far as I'm concerned, "meat" is the muscle fiber from a once-living animal. It has a very narrow scope of definition and does not involve "science". The same for "milk" (produced from the mammary glands of mammals). Everything else is

        • by HBI ( 10338492 )

          I hadn't thought of it that way, but you are right. These are literally cancer - if such a thing were growing inside an animal, that's what we'd call it.

          50 years ago, we'd probably say there was zero chance of *getting* cancer from eating meat sourced from a tumor, but some of the stuff we hear today about viruses causing cancer...not so sure anymore.

          • As others have said, I assume they will begin using the synmeat in such a way I cannot be certain of my food's origins. At that point, I'm definitely not eating it. You know they will crow about how great it is right up until everyone gets cancer from it and they cannot deny it anymore.
          • Re:They won't. (Score:5, Interesting)

            by ChatHuant ( 801522 ) on Wednesday June 21, 2023 @06:01PM (#63622182)

            50 years ago, we'd probably say there was zero chance of *getting* cancer from eating meat sourced from a tumor, but some of the stuff we hear today about viruses causing cancer...not so sure anymore.

            Do you imagine the meat you get from the butcher or supermarket is magically cancer-free? Given the kinds of chemicals used in the farming industry (especially in America), you can be sure animals do get cancers. Small or microscopic cancers won't be detected optically, nobody does biomarker analysis of slaughterhouse animals, and I expect even suspiciously large growths still end up in the sausage mix.

            So if you've been eating meat for 50 years, you probably ate any amount of cancer cells. Your putative viruses had lots of chances to have a go at you.

            • by HBI ( 10338492 )

              You make a good point as well. As for viruses causing cancer, i'm thinking like HPV with cervical cancer and things like that.

            • Can you clone a cow from a cheeseburger from McDonalds? No. Do you know why? Because cooking the meat destroys the DNA. Sure, we have been eating meat all our lives, and probably have eaten more than a few tumors. These mythical cancer-causing viruses of which you speak can't survive the grill.
              • These mythical cancer-causing viruses of which you speak can't survive the grill.

                Maybe, but what about beef tartare, or sashimi, or the "blue rare steak" some misguided people insist it's the only way to grill meat?

        • Still, at least it'll more than likely "taste like chicken."
        • by gtall ( 79522 )

          Meat is anything biochemically the same as the freshly killed stuff. And you clear have no idea about what constitutes cancer. It isn't just wildly growing cells. It is a specific dna pathway.

        • by myrdos2 ( 989497 )

          I'll be avoiding their controlled-chicken-cancer protein products, personally.

          Why? The muscle cells don't remember where they came from. Also, is using deceptive terminology good or bad? You can't have it both ways.

          "Cruelty free" is perfect, as it tries to take the virtue of more natural animal husbandry while at the same still castigating the eating of meat as a cruel endeavor.

          Well, imagine you can have a hamburger at McDonald's, or you can have the same hamburger and they'll kill a small animal for yo

          • by CAIMLAS ( 41445 )

            Just like many other things, you can't simply assert something is something and have it be so.

            Meat is the edible part of an animal, or if you're playing loose, the edible part of -something else-. It is not its own thing.

            It must first be a part of an animal (or plant).

            This stuff is grown in a lab. It is not "cloned", it is grown - like a mold/mould.

            You speak about 'genetic pathways', but a cancer is an abnormal cellular growth - cells growing outside the context of where they're supposed to grow, due to a d

        • Meat applies to fruit, veg, and nuts, too you natural idiot.
      • Did you say lab-grown dinosaur meat? T-rex steak/burger?! Shut up & take my money!!!
      • Re: (Score:2, Funny)

        by gtall ( 79522 )

        I see, so you would rather some critter get whacked so that your pretty little head is not forced to accept something new.

        • by HBI ( 10338492 )

          What makes you think the individual cells of chicken are any less feeling and dreading being killed and eaten than an actual chicken?

        • Re: (Score:2, Interesting)

          by jythie ( 914043 )
          Why do you think people are so invested in this bit of culture war? It isn't just about cruelty, but place in the world. Moving away from meat literally threatens their self image and perceived place in the natural order since it brings into question their rights as beings with more power than others.
          • Why do you think people are so invested in this bit of culture war? It isn't just about cruelty, but place in the world. Moving away from meat literally threatens their self image and perceived place in the natural order since it brings into question their rights as beings with more power than others.

            No, I prefer to eat pretty much like my ancestors to date have eaten....something of this earth, not grown in a lab with God knows what all chemicals and manipulations are being done.

            That all being said, now

          • How is this moving away from meat? All that changes is the cultivation method for producing the meat. Unless the quality/taste is worse than existing commercially raised meat, or this is considerably more expensive there's not any reason to care. Maybe rich people will still insist on pasture-raised animals just because it's a status symbol, but if they perfect lab-grown meat and I can get a $5 sirloin that has been specifically grown to have just the right amount of marbling and other desirable characteris
          • I don't really care, but I think for many it's weird that non meat is being made to seem like meat. As odd as it sounds, veggie burger seems less weird than an impossible burger, which is less weird than a Cancer-cell burger. But it's certainly not a mountain I'd die on, or stake my self-image on.
        • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

          Not to mention the impact on the climate of farming animals. Thing is though, we will still want hens to produce eggs. Is there a good alternative to eggs?

          As Picard and later Riker put it, in the future we no longer enslave animals for food.

          • by tragedy ( 27079 )

            Is there a good alternative to eggs?

            Well, egg whites are mostly a form of albumin and the yolks have phospholipids in addition. If we can grow meat in a vat, we can certainly produce albumin and phospholipids. Whether it's worth encapsulating that into some nested artificial membranes and a shell to simulate real eggs, I don't know, but a product similar to a container of egg whites or scrambled eggs should be quite possible.
            No good reason we can't grow a decent milk in vats either.

    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      by Petersko ( 564140 )

      Can't call it "lab grown". It almost certainly won't be grown in a lab. Have to come up with a name that's still descriptive, but more accurate. "Vat grown" probably comes closer.

      • Re: (Score:1, Flamebait)

        by gtall ( 79522 )

        How about just "meat". That's what it is.

        • So, you'd rather be deceptive about it, then? You don't want any of those nasty market forces deciding on your "socially-important" issue, eh?
          • I like how this is not actually an argument against it being 'meat', just a mishmash of unrelated big words you vaguely remember from that YouTube video you watched about economics, presumably as it related to vaccines or something. You people are truly an inspiration to improve access to education.
          • So what the fuck do you think meat is, small angry child?

            Something running around, eating and shitting? Sorry, that's an animal. Meat is the flesh that powers its skeleton.

            And that's what this is, sans animal skeleton and organs.

            • So, then you think it's okay to be deceptive about it? Should folks just lie to people about the source of the meat and take away their power to choose? I mean if it's sooooo fantastic, then people will naturally gravitate to it, right? Sounds more to me like lab-grown meat advocates know damn good and well a significant portion of the population would reject it if given the choice and thus, don't want to give that choice.
      • by Anonymous Coward
        Plant-based meat [twimg.com]
    • Labelled? You mean like GMOs? Yeah, good luck with that. The EU had the good sense to see that one coming & nipped it in the bud with labelling laws. Also, having a stricter definition of what "organic" means. That's made it very difficult for US companies to export foodstuffs to the EU while making EU foodstuffs more attractive to US consumers, at least for the higher profit-margin luxury goods.
    • by gtall ( 79522 )

      Why? If it is chemically identical to fresh killed meat, why the fuck do you care how its labelled? Maybe a few courses in biochemistry could help you over your phobias.

      • Re:Just LABEL IT (Score:5, Insightful)

        by cayenne8 ( 626475 ) on Thursday June 22, 2023 @07:38AM (#63623052) Homepage Journal

        Why? If it is chemically identical to fresh killed meat, why the fuck do you care how it's labelled? Maybe a few courses in biochemistry could help you over your phobias.

        Actually, my degree was in biochemistry...and I don't wanna eat this shit.

        I want my dead animal meat to come from....dead animals.

        Hey, more power to you if YOU want it....I prefer to eat in the manner that has worked for humans from the beginning of time to date.

        I just want to know what I'm buying at the store...as long as you have your vat grown "meat" why the fuck do you care if I continue to eat normally?

        What do you have against informed choice?

    • How about flipping that and making the producers who kill animals put a picture of the animal(s) that had to die to get its meat?

      Now THAT would be interesting

      • How about flipping that and making the producers who kill animals put a picture of the animal(s) that had to die to get its meat?

        Fine with me...hell, give it a name too.

        I'll still eat it.

        Personally, I enjoy being at the top of the food chain.

        Geez, people have become WAY too abstracted from their food.

        This is nature. This is how life and the cycle of life works.

    • by jythie ( 914043 )
      This should apply the other way then too, with companies having to list on their packaging things like chlorine and antibiotic use. Labeling has always been a political tool since consumers are easy to manipulate.
    • Just curious, how granular does this labeling with irrelevant information need to get? Do we need to provide the names of the workers who processed the animal carcasses, just in case a consumer really hates people named Todd? How about what company made the processing equipment? More importantly, maybe the consumer needs to know the brand of truck used in hauling, in case those Peterbilt fans want to make sure their chicken never touched a Freightliner.

      I agree, we definitely need to attach lots of trivia
    • by ceoyoyo ( 59147 )

      Since it's still more expensive than slaughtered animals, they'll be sure to mention the lab grown part. That's the draw.

      • It's more expensive for now, but costs have come down rapidly. Another factor of ten or so and it will be competitive with slaughtered meat. That last ten is a steeper hill than the first ten, but the very first cultured meat burger, cooked and tried on live TV ten years ago this August, cost $300,000 for a small patty. From what I've seen elsewhere, that same patty might cost around $30 now. If they can get it to $3, it can go into update fast food burgers. Chicken has come down even faster.

    • by dasunt ( 249686 )
      Should we also mandate labels for meat that was the result of CAFO? And mandate labels for meat that had antibiotics? Just to let the customer decide? Because it seems weird to single out lab grown mat, when consumers would likely be interested in all of that.
  • by d0ran$ ( 844234 ) on Wednesday June 21, 2023 @03:49PM (#63621812)

    The first thing that I thought of when seeing the headline for this article was the man made chicken in Eraserhead (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eraserhead)
    A movie that has to be the strangest most surreal movie I have ever seen.

  • Sure. Why not? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Petersko ( 564140 ) on Wednesday June 21, 2023 @03:55PM (#63621824)

    I'm not their consumer of course. I don't have an aversion to eating meat, the ecological impact concerns are pretty far down my list of "concernables", and I don't share any ethical or moral objections to it. So there's no compelling reason for me to pay a premium for it. But technically, and in principle, I have no objection. Given how far removed from the source form factor the average chicken cutlet is, I'll be you'd mostly be hard pressed to tell the difference.

    • Given how far removed from the source form factor the average chicken cutlet is, I'll be you'd mostly be hard pressed to tell the difference.

      I'm guessing the $149.99/lb tag will be the dead giveaway

      • by jythie ( 914043 )
        Eh, people will pay all sorts of high prices for something with enough marketing behind it. Just look at the whole market around extra-expensive beef. People will pay insane prices for something that has particular branding associated with it since the high cost an exclusivity make it attractive, though of course they will simply claim whatever arbitrary properties it has make it worth the price.
    • pretty much this, as long as it's not used as a cudgel to ban (overtly or through 'soft' price/tax measures) real beef/poultry; But i think it's a fair bet to say that's exactly what the outcome eventually will be. And at that point it'll be time to raise my own chickens and a couple of cows (assuming we're not all living in FEMA pods or something.)
      That and, who knows what unintended oopsies will be discovered 10-15 years down the line regarding the health impacts of this product vs the real thing..

    • Re:Sure. Why not? (Score:4, Interesting)

      by gtall ( 79522 ) on Wednesday June 21, 2023 @04:33PM (#63621934)

      It will also be a damned sight safer given how animals are treated and slaughtered, not to mention any toxins they consumed in their feed or the chemicals and antibiotics with which they are injected.

      • Let's see... of the things most likely to kill me or dramatically shorten my lifetime..

        1. Heart disease / COPD (family history, although I've never smoked)
        2. Auto accident

        ...

        144. Accidently saw "Hardware" again, gave up on life
        145. Stabbed by mime for mean-spirited imitation behind his back
        146. Components in the feed and care of the livestock I eat ---------- Here you go.

    • Re:Sure. Why not? (Score:4, Interesting)

      by doug141 ( 863552 ) on Wednesday June 21, 2023 @05:41PM (#63622138)

      I don't have an aversion to eating meat

      Me neither. Ethically raised chicken is more expensive than the cheapest stuff, which is produced with the goal of profitability over animal welfare. The worst offense IMO is the chickens have to lie (because their breast meat is too heavy for their tiny legs) in ammonia/shit constantly, and suffer a lifetime of red swollen burning diaper rash on their breast and feet. There's more information here for the curious, or google your own results:
      https://www.farmforward.com/is... [farmforward.com]

      • I'll pass, thanks. I cannot possibly pay attention to every issue that somebody else thinks is important. There are far too many things wrong in the world to devote time to all of it.

        So I put this one down and left behind. Somebody with the conviction and the time can pick it up.

  • We need real solutions. This sounds like a novelty for the uber-elite pricks that run around the world several times a week on private jets while bitching about how the commoners take too long of hot showers, flush their toilets every time they go to the bathroom (THE HORROR), and drive their cars to and from work too often. Do the uber-rich need yet more reason to look down their noses at us?

    In the not too distant future:

    "Why, I heard they eat real meat, not vat grown? Can you believe it?"

    "What utter peasants. They're ruining the planet with that nonsense. Hand me the overnighted Champaign would you? My overnighted beluga caviar is stuck in my teeth again."

    • Oh what a nonsense. It's still expensive because it is made in small batches, it will take a while for the technology to become cheaper and adjusted for mass production, by then this type of meat will be much cheaper as from a live animal.
      • you're welcome to eat lab grown franken food and hope nothing bad happens to you because of it.

        the rest of us will have a fucking chicken killed. there is nothing precious about a chicken. totally sustainable too, a chicken for every pot.

        • There can be many things wrong with real chickenmeat, they are chuckfull of garbage pumped into them to keep them 'healthy', but a lot of that junk isn't really good for humans.
          • What "garbage" specifically? US Chickens do not receive growth hormones or steroids, that was done away with in 1950s.

            • by dgatwood ( 11270 )

              What "garbage" specifically? US Chickens do not receive growth hormones or steroids, that was done away with in 1950s.

              Up until 2017, they used antibiotics for growth promotion instead. I suspect they've come up with some other alternative now that the law finally caught up with them. :-/

              • no one was harmed by antibiotics in chicken. A lot of hot air out there about fear of breeding superbugs in chicken but combine the antibiotics that kills most the bad things with proper cooking that kills all bacteria... and there is no problem.

            • by jbengt ( 874751 )

              What "garbage" specifically?

              Well, for one, they are typically prophylactically given a lot of antibiotics.

              • that's so we don't eat diseased chicken like a third world toilet dweller. Also cook your chicken thoroughly.

                • Yeah, and there's no need for that with labgrown meat as it can be created in fully sterile conditions. Ofcourse there will be batches with which is something wrong, but they can be discarded immediately.

          • ... and what will corporations do if they discover they need to pump the same antibiotics and growth hormones into lab-grown meat? You think they are going to demure and be like "No, no, we want to keep it pure." Yeah, right.
            • Except the lab-grown meat can be created in fully sterile conditions, which is impossible with live-stock, which is why live-stock needs all kinds of medication etc.
              • Except the lab-grown meat can be created in fully sterile conditions

                You'd better hope so. One instance of contamination and the whole thing is going to wind up with a lot of injured reputation, especially early on. Despite not being grown in a dirty feed lot, the lab grown meat also does not have an immune system. Thus, any infection or contamination will face no opposition and spread rapidly. The meat will still need nutrients which will introduce risk of contamination.

  • by awwshit ( 6214476 ) on Wednesday June 21, 2023 @04:02PM (#63621846)

    You get cultured meat-product and what else?

    https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/U... [sigmaaldrich.com]

  • by nothinginparticular ( 6181282 ) on Wednesday June 21, 2023 @04:17PM (#63621870)
    While they had the chance
  • 'chicken made from cultivated cells' overlords!

  • It probably won't result in the complete elimination of naturally grown beef, pork, and poultry, but it may actually pave the way for an improvement of hygiene and living condition requirements for food animals by pushing natural meat into a "luxury" category. I would have expected more support for a development of this nature on a site that purportedly caters to tech professionals and nerds.
    • by ceoyoyo ( 59147 )

      on a site that purportedly caters to aging tech professionals and nerds.

      Fixed that for you. Explains why the typical comment on here now belongs to one of "wake me when I can buy it at Wal-Mart", "you'll pry the {traditional_product} from my cold, dead hands," "{US_politician} {conspiracy theory}" or "socialism!"

  • by freelunch ( 258011 ) on Wednesday June 21, 2023 @05:05PM (#63622024)

    Soylent Green is replicant chicken

  • i guess that's why we have mexico
  • by wakeboarder ( 2695839 ) on Wednesday June 21, 2023 @05:55PM (#63622162)
    Then I'd think you should shy away from lab grown meat.
  • This is truly the dumb age when people put so much work into recreating in a fossil fuel powered lab a creature that's naturally powered by insects and plants.

    Factory farming is horrible, yes, but since we don't need meat this is a truly staggering waste of time and resources.
  • LeeLynx remembers (Score:4, Insightful)

    by LeeLynx ( 6219816 ) on Wednesday June 21, 2023 @06:18PM (#63622228)
    Remember back when Slashdot was largely frequented by intelligent, scientifically minded people with critical thinking skills? Those were a nice few years.
  • I don't understand why you would go through all this trouble to make the cheapest animal protein available. They should have done lobster or blue-fin tuna instead.
    • Chicken is widely studied, biologically well-understood, and extremely widely used. The others will follow as the techniques are perfected, and endangered animals will be under less stress.

  • Like most unusual new products, I'll wait till it's on the market for a while before I try it. Just seems products are often put on the market before they are ready or tested by independent organizations. How long is long enough?
  • Tony Seba is a futurist who has correctly predicted a lot of stuff. He and his think tank ("RethinkX") are predicting huge disruptions coming in the next ten years or so.

    Wind and solar power (paired with batteries) will disrupt everything else. Electric vehicles will disrupt combustion vehicles. Self-driving vehicles will disrupt individually-owned vehicles. And: factory production of food products will disrupt traditional agriculture.

    Using "precision fermentation" (PF) it is already possible to mass-pr

  • by Eunomion ( 8640039 ) on Thursday June 22, 2023 @06:02AM (#63622956)
    Don't extricate humanity from the entire food web. We know very little, and pulling on that thread will have unforeseeable consequences. I'm not against GMO, but organisms should be able to survive in the wild if they're to be acceptable. If they can't, it's telling you something.

    We're not machines, not simple input/output functions where you can just replace part of the process. We're part of an interrelated biological network, and you can't know what will start to fail if you start just removing stuff from it.
  • by DERoss ( 1919496 ) on Thursday June 22, 2023 @10:13AM (#63623346)

    We are told that healthy eating requires avoiding processed foods. Lab-grown chicken has to be the ultimate in processed food, just like Impossible Meat and its like.

    My brother once asked: "If we are not supposed to eat animals, why are they made out of meat?"

  • I won't eat anything that isn't at least similar to the real deal. I'd love for this to be a thing, but step up your fucking game, people.

Avoid strange women and temporary variables.

Working...