Physicists Created 'Slits In Time' and Discovered 'Unexpected Physics' (vice.com) 47
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Motherboard: Scientists have discovered "unexpected physics" by opening up "slits" in time, a new study reports, achieving a longstanding dream that can help to probe the behavior of light and pioneer advanced optical technologies. The mind-boggling approach is a time-based variation on the famous double-slit experiment, first performed by Thomas Young in 1801, which opened a window into the weird probabilistic world of quantum mechanics by revealing the dual nature of light as both a particle and a wave. The new temporal version of this test offered a glimpse of the mysterious physics that occur at ultrafast timescales, which may inform the development of quantum computing systems, among other next-generation applications.
In the original version of the double-slit experiment, light passes through two slits that are spatially separated on an opaque screen. A detector on the other side of the screen records the pattern of the light waves that emerges from the slits. These experiments show that the light waves change direction and interfere with each other after going through the slits, demonstrating that light behaves as both a wave and particle. This insight is one of the most important milestones in our ongoing journey into the quantum world, and it has since been repeated with other entities, such as electrons, exposing the trippy phenomena that occurs at the small scales of atoms.
Now, scientists led by Romain Tirole, a PhD student studying nanophotonics at Imperial College London, have created a "temporal analogue of Young's slit experiment" by firing a beam of light at a special metamaterial called Indium Tin Oxide, according to a study published on Monday in Nature Physics. Metamaterials are artificial creations endowed with superpowers that are not found in nature. For instance, the Indium Tin Oxide used in the new study can change its properties in mere femtoseconds, a unit equal to a millionth of a billionth of a second. This incredible variability allows light waves to interact with the metamaterial at key moments in ultrafast succession, called "time slits," which produces a time-based diffraction pattern that is analogous to the results returned in the spatial version of the experiment. [...] In other words, the super-speedy changeability of Indium Tin Oxide finally made a time slit experiment possible, after many years of eluding scientists. To bring this vision to reality, Tirole and his colleagues used lasers to switch the reflectance of the material on and off at high speeds.
In the original version of the double-slit experiment, light passes through two slits that are spatially separated on an opaque screen. A detector on the other side of the screen records the pattern of the light waves that emerges from the slits. These experiments show that the light waves change direction and interfere with each other after going through the slits, demonstrating that light behaves as both a wave and particle. This insight is one of the most important milestones in our ongoing journey into the quantum world, and it has since been repeated with other entities, such as electrons, exposing the trippy phenomena that occurs at the small scales of atoms.
Now, scientists led by Romain Tirole, a PhD student studying nanophotonics at Imperial College London, have created a "temporal analogue of Young's slit experiment" by firing a beam of light at a special metamaterial called Indium Tin Oxide, according to a study published on Monday in Nature Physics. Metamaterials are artificial creations endowed with superpowers that are not found in nature. For instance, the Indium Tin Oxide used in the new study can change its properties in mere femtoseconds, a unit equal to a millionth of a billionth of a second. This incredible variability allows light waves to interact with the metamaterial at key moments in ultrafast succession, called "time slits," which produces a time-based diffraction pattern that is analogous to the results returned in the spatial version of the experiment. [...] In other words, the super-speedy changeability of Indium Tin Oxide finally made a time slit experiment possible, after many years of eluding scientists. To bring this vision to reality, Tirole and his colleagues used lasers to switch the reflectance of the material on and off at high speeds.
Re:Is this another boring science experiment (Score:4, Funny)
-Science!
Re:Is this another boring science experiment (Score:5, Insightful)
60 years ago, the inventor of the laser called it "a solution in search of a problem". Something will come up.
Re:Is this another boring science experiment (Score:5, Funny)
He probably couldn't have guessed that the problem turned out to be bored house cats.
Re: (Score:2)
There are examples in the other direction as well: things people thought of as a major breakthrough, but then no notable results ever materialized. One of the reasons so much money gets spent on research and development, is because sometimes it pans out in a big way and more than pays for itself; but another reason is, because most of it doesn't pan out, so people want to have multiple lines of research going, in th
Re: (Score:2)
It literally tells you what some of the applications might be in the article , which you read right?
Re: (Score:2)
To save someone else the horror of actually RTFA:
“A double slit experiment is the first brick on the road to more complex temporal modulations, such as the much sought time-crystal where the optical properties are temporally modulated in a periodic fashion,” Tirole concluded. “This could have very important applications for light amplification, light control, for example for computation, and maybe even quantum computation with light.”
Re: (Score:3)
that gets newsified and twisted by journalists into something that it's really not?
It gets more clicks if it sounds like something that could possibly unleash a lovecraftian monster. [imgur.com]
And then you gotta send in some dude with a crowbar to deal with it. Hey, that sounds like it could make for a decent video game series.
Re: (Score:2)
Last I checked this is still a "News for nerds" site so yes a discovery that could have fundamental implications for quantum physics is seems pretty newsworthy. Are you sure your on the right web site?
Re: (Score:2)
Are you sure your on the right web site?
Are you sure you're on the right web site?
A year ago I spent 20 minutes searching for hi-res images of distant galaxies, but I couldn't find any.
Turns out I wasn't on the right Webb site.
Re: (Score:2)
that gets newsified and twisted by journalists into something that it's really not?
That seems to be an accurate assessment.
Re:Is this another boring science experiment (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: Is this another boring science experiment (Score:2)
Donâ(TM)t worry. Soon the high school rejects will be tossed out and replaced with ChatGPT
Also Not the First (Score:2)
Re: Also Not the First (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
> (the double-slit experiment is perfectly explainable in wave terms and Young's experiment was considered proof, at the time, that light does *not* display particle characteristics and is a wave)
For those who would like to read more on that without "delving into complex mathematics" - https://www.wtamu.edu/~cbaird/... [wtamu.edu]
Big deal. The Master discovered this in 1972 (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
No, I didn't start watching until the 4th doctor.
Re:Big deal. The Master discovered this in 1972 (Score:5, Funny)
Oh, right before Dr. Tristan Farnon.
Re: (Score:2)
You know what they say... (Score:2)
A slit in time saves nine!
Re: You know what they say... (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
I always switch my slits with a kill -9.
More research needed (Score:2)
Pretty close now just have to figure out how to turn the i into a u and we’ll have something useful.
Tighter Slits Make Observations Come Faster (Score:2)
So you say there's a pussy in the box.
I think you might be slightly mixed up on nomenclature, but we get the idea.
Why "slits" instead of "Tunnels"? (Score:3, Interesting)
A lot of us old fogeys would be more likely to favor funding Time Tunnels, lol.
The Time Tunnel EP 24 Chase Through Time (guest starring Robert Duvall!)
https://youtu.be/2_YgrsYjrUc [youtu.be]
a better summary (Score:5, Informative)
They found that they can change the reflectance about 10 - 100 times quicker than expected from theory. The reflected beam was frequency modulated. They measured the spectrum of the reflected beam. Some colours were enhanced and some were cancelled out. The level of this was controlled by the frequency of changing the meta-material reflectivity.
Non-paywalled paper on arxiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.043... [arxiv.org]
Re: (Score:2)
That makes me wonder if it's just the equivalent of phase cancelation/enhancement that you can do with sound waves. Changing reflectivity implies a change in the surface. What if, as the change occurs, some of the light colors are penetrating just the surface, and some are going a nanometer or more into the material before being reflected back? So you start with all light aligned in waves, and end up with waves overlapping each other, canceling some colors and enhancing others.
Anybody that's spent more than
Re: (Score:2)
I do not know whether it is similar. I did not look at the math. I was disappointed by the summary which hardly told anything useful. That is the reason I looked at it a bit more and posted.
But it is not surprising that they observed interesting effects when you realize that the reflectivity was being changed with frequency of about 500 THz (the range of red light) and the probing signal frequency was about 230 THz (short wave infrared).
Maybe, the more interesting result is that the reflectivity was changi
Re: (Score:2)
Thank you!
I, for one... (Score:2)
...welcome our new Time Slit Overlords.
Re: (Score:2)
In Fluxbox Slit, I can at least control how time is displayed. So I can at least make these time overloords look the way I want them to.
https://www.dockapps.net/categ... [dockapps.net]
This is significant. (Score:4, Interesting)
I do not see how you could get time diffraction if the universe is 3+1 dimensional or if there's no past/future only the present. In the first case, time would behave differently than space and in the second case there'd be no time at all, only "now".
If this is correct, it's going to drive a lot of anti-Relativity fanatics on Quora into apoplexy, which would be a Good Thing*. There's simply no way of treating time as unique and totally different from space whilst also treating it as a spacial dimension with extra properties. Time has to be one of those two and time diffraction would seem to rule out the former.
The question I'd ask, though, is whether the interference pattern is symmetric or asymmetric. Regardless of which, the past can presumably affect the future. Otherwise, what's doing the interfering? You have to have two photons minimum before there's interference. A photon cannot (legally) interfere with itself. You need waves in time, not just in space, to get interference. If it is symmetric, the future can presumably also affect the past. The shape of those waves will determine the shape of the interference pattern and therefore limit what can interfere with what.
I could not fully understand the diagrams in the paper, so couldn't really follow what they actually observed, but I -think- they observed the latter, which would be very interesting. If I understand this correctly, it would imply quantum uncertainty applies to spacetime, not just space. But I could easily be wrong about that. Quantum Mechanics is hell for those outside the subject to fully understand. Mind you, it's not easy for those on the inside, either.
But if this experiment proves spacetime applies to QM, then that's going to do some interesting things to QM as I don't think they've got QM to work with time yet, only space. But if time is just the same as space at that level, then that should make a quantum spacetime a relatively simple** addition.
*See 1066 And All That
**Simple as compared to, say, either M-theory or grand unified quantum field theory. Not "simple" as in anyone with an IQ under 6000 could understand it easily.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
But if this experiment proves spacetime applies to QM, then that's going to do some interesting things to QM as I don't think they've got QM to work with time yet, only space. But if time is just the same as space at that level, then that should make a quantum spacetime a relatively simple** addition.
What I find more interesting is the particular way QM does work with time compared to how it doesn't.
QM does have relationships that take time into account, but so far the problem is none of those relationships are considered predictive because they lack any relationships to differentiate a "direction"
One of the more popular assumptions is times direction is a result of entropy, which QM has no relation between it and time.
That would imply by QM that there is no difference in yet is implied by physics that
Not Significant (Score:5, Informative)
A photon cannot (legally) interfere with itself.
A single photon going through two slits can and does interfere with itself because it is not localised to a point in space. I suppose it is possible that wherever you are there is a law against it doing that if but if the police are going to start arresting all photons then your local police state is going to be facing some dark times ahead.
But if this experiment proves spacetime applies to QM, then that's going to do some interesting things to QM as I don't think they've got QM to work with time yet, only space.
Yes we did, about 100 years ago - relativistic quantum mechanics started in 1932 with the Dirac equation. The Standard Model of particle physics is a fully relativistic quantum field theory, treating time and space together using Special Relativity, only GR cannot yet be fully reconciled with QM. You rarely hear about it from people who call themselves "Quantum Scientists" because they are dealing with low energy phenomena but in particle physics we work all the time with relativistic quantum mechanics.
Re: (Score:1)
A single photon going through two slits can and does interfere with itself
Weird, but totally true.
Link to non-paywalled journal article (Score:1)
Archiv: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2206.043... [arxiv.org]
Non-Academic article:
https://physicsworld.com/a/phy... [physicsworld.com]