Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Space

Why Jupiter's Tally of Moons Keeps Going Up and Up (npr.org) 30

Scientists have spotted 12 more moons around Jupiter, adding to an already-huge number that just seems to grow and grow. From a report: There's so many moons around this gas giant planet that astronomer Scott Sheppard struggles to keep track. "With this new haul, we're up to, I believe, 92 ... actually, I have to check that," he says, leaning over to type into his computer at the Carnegie Institution for Science, Earth and Planets Laboratory in Washington, DC. " Yeah, so 92 is the number that we have right now." His team is currently tracking some more moons that, once confirmed over the next year or two, should put Jupiter over 100.

There's good reason to keep looking for more moons, Sheppard says: If one was found in a convenient orbit, a spacecraft on a mission to Jupiter could fly close by and take a peek, letting scientists figure out what the moonlet is made of. That's important because Jupiter's small, outer moons are fairly mysterious. Astronomers suspect that they are remnants of the original building material that got used to form the solar system's biggest planet. Sheppard has been discovering new moons around Jupiter for over two decades, leading some colleagues to jokingly call him "Galileo," after the famous astronomer who first discovered that Jupiter had moons in 1610. Every few years, Sheppard and his fellow astronomers take advantage of better technology and bigger telescopes to add more moons to the tally. At the moment, Jupiter holds the record for the most known moons, beating out Saturn, which has 83.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Why Jupiter's Tally of Moons Keeps Going Up and Up

Comments Filter:
  • Why Jupiter's Tally of Moons Keeps Going Up and Up

    Gee. we'll have to think on that one a bit.

    • Why Jupiter's Tally of Moons Keeps Going Up and Up

      Gee. we'll have to think on that one a bit.

      That's no moon. It's a natural satellite.

    • The answer is a bit of a two-parter.

      A) "Because this guy keeps looking for them"

      and

      B) "Telescopes keep getting better"

  • before they start bashing into each other ? OK: I know that Jupiter is large and that there is a lot of room around it, but many moons means gravitational interaction and disturbed orbits ...

  • we must rename all our satellites to moons
  • New rule: A moon is something that forms with the planet.
  • We probably need to have moonoids like planetoids. At some point a moon is just rubble.
  • by PPH ( 736903 ) on Thursday February 09, 2023 @12:19PM (#63279053)

    ... Jovians are at a loss to explain all of the objects orbiting the third planet (colloquially known as "Irth").

    "There just seem to be more and more of them. In spite of the natives propensity for shooting them down."

  • Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • Sheppard has been discovering new moons around Jupiter for over two decades, leading some colleagues to jokingly call him "Galileo,"

    Um, Galileo was not treated very well because those in power didn't like his conclusions. Not sure I'd want that moniker.

    As far as moon count, there are probably moons of every size category all the way down to pebbles and dust. Jupiter even has a thin ring. Thus, as telescopes and probes get better resolution, they'll find ever smaller moons, and that can go on all they down t

  • Empire owned manufacturing plant located.

  • Maybe they need to change the definition of a moon to require the shape to be a sphere/oblate sphereoid.

    That would filter out all the captured asteroids from moon counts.
    • by Anonymous Coward

      Maybe they need to change the definition of a moon

      That was a disaster the last time they did this.

      As telescopes massively improved in a short time, and we discovered millions of planets equal or larger in size to pluto, they sub-grouped "planet" into a few types of planets including the new "dwarf planet" category, which erupted into fierce opposition from laymen thinking "dwarf planet" wasn't a "planet" for some reason.

  • Tally is going up because we now have the ability to see smaller and smaller things and infer even more tiny things.
  • by Walt Dismal ( 534799 ) on Thursday February 09, 2023 @02:17PM (#63279519)
    There are just too many moons. That is why I am sponsoring a bill in Congress to keep the number down to a handful, and a rider to give the Ukraine $100 billion for moon defense. Surely all those moons cause climate change and fewer eggs being laid. Before becoming your Congressman I was a scientist with a doctorate from the Online University of East Southwest Beaver Falls, North Dakota. I know science. I hear there's a new programming language called 'COBOL' that has something to do with moon control. I will form a committee to study it.
    • This is a nice satire of how congress acts...on both sides of the aisle.

    • by twosat ( 1414337 )

      I remember telling my father many years ago about Jupiter's many moons. He replied "Why would God put so many moons there when there's nobody there to see their light?"

    • He would have gotten bonus points if he had used SNOBOL as programming language, after all it kind of rhymes with snow - ball.

Keep up the good work! But please don't ask me to help.

Working...