Putin Says Russia Will Resume Lunar Program (arstechnica.com) 190
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica: Putin said Russia is working on a "next-generation transport ship," as well as a nuclear-powered space tug. And, according to Russian media reports, Putin added, "We will resume the lunar program." The next-generation ship presumably refers to the "Orel," or Eagle, spacecraft that would be capable of launching cosmonauts into low Earth orbit as well as to the Moon. The problem with this is that Orel, under various guises and names, has been in development for nearly two decades and is likely years away from flying -- if it ever does. And the nuclear-powered space tug is a concept that is years or more likely decades-to-never away from launching.
That leaves the lunar program Putin mentioned. He is referring to a series of three robotic missions planned for launch to the Moon, Luna 25, Luna 26, and Luna 27. These missions, too, have been in the planning stages for a long, long time. Luna 25 was originally scheduled to launch on a Soyuz rocket a decade ago, and its current launch date is now August 2022. There is reason to be skeptical about all of the above happening, because even before the war in Ukraine, Putin significantly slashed Roscosmos' budget. Now, more resources than ever will likely be devoted to the war effort. Hours after Putin made his announcements, the European Space Agency (ESA) Council agreed to discontinue cooperative activities with Russia on the three Luna missions. "The Russian aggression against Ukraine and the resulting sanctions put in place represent a fundamental change of circumstances and make it impossible for ESA to implement the planned lunar cooperation," the space agency said in a statement.
Instead, the council said it would now work with NASA and its commercial partners.
That leaves the lunar program Putin mentioned. He is referring to a series of three robotic missions planned for launch to the Moon, Luna 25, Luna 26, and Luna 27. These missions, too, have been in the planning stages for a long, long time. Luna 25 was originally scheduled to launch on a Soyuz rocket a decade ago, and its current launch date is now August 2022. There is reason to be skeptical about all of the above happening, because even before the war in Ukraine, Putin significantly slashed Roscosmos' budget. Now, more resources than ever will likely be devoted to the war effort. Hours after Putin made his announcements, the European Space Agency (ESA) Council agreed to discontinue cooperative activities with Russia on the three Luna missions. "The Russian aggression against Ukraine and the resulting sanctions put in place represent a fundamental change of circumstances and make it impossible for ESA to implement the planned lunar cooperation," the space agency said in a statement.
Instead, the council said it would now work with NASA and its commercial partners.
"Oh look, a puppy! Look at the cute puppy!" (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah... I was going to post ``Look at the Wookie!'' but it's the same sort of diversion/distraction. And obvious as hell to everyone why it's being done. Do Putin and his propagandists really think anyone can't see why they make announcements like this?
Re:"Oh look, a puppy! Look at the cute puppy!" (Score:5, Insightful)
Sure, it's a good distraction, but I think it also speaks to his mental state. Putin seems to be pining for the glory days of the USSR, complete with their substantial victories in the space race - at least up until the moon landings. The man is dangerously delusional, living for past glories by a brutal, repressive regime.
Seriously, Russians need to stop letting these mad butchers take control of their country.
Re: (Score:3)
Seriously, Russians need to stop letting these mad butchers take control of their country.
Eh, the poor fuckers haven't had a non-dictatorial government in their entire history. They like it that way or something.
I think it has something to do with the weather.
Re: (Score:3)
My observation is that after the industrial revolution and communist revolutions and democratic revolutions, after every country has moved into modernity, they still keep their ancient form of government. Thus China has the decorations of a soviet regime, but in practice acts more like an ancient dynasty. The French, after their revolution, turned to autocratic leaders. It took a century to really adapt to democracy. Even in the US, George Washington tried to act regally as a president, and after he retired
Re: (Score:2)
Eh, the poor fuckers haven't had a non-dictatorial government in their entire history.
Kerensky was not a dictator, nor was Yeltsin.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeltsin shelled the parliament in 1993.
Re: (Score:2)
How long did they last?
Re: (Score:2)
As for Kerensky? Give me a fucking break.
The Provisional Government never had control over the country.
Re: (Score:2)
They made substantial progress the same way SpaceX and Tesla did - by having a lone genius not tied down with the usual corporate crap that lowers intelligence and ability, but gives them a single point of failure that's guaranteed to go insane and/or die because lone geniuses do that when they're pushed too hard or when the system is too extreme (regardless of the extreme). Russian education currently precludes that kind of lone genius, so Putin is in trouble. You also can't predict when one will arise, it
Re: (Score:2)
Mod parent funny.
My related joke of the day:
Putin: "The Ukraine war situation is not necessarily developing to Russia's advantage."
@ZelenskyyUa : "Shut up, Vlad. You lost. Now get your stinking war criminals out of #Ukraine."
Bozo Putin: "Is not war crime. Is potato."
Re: (Score:2)
Re:"Oh look, a puppy! Look at the cute puppy!" (Score:4, Insightful)
"the illegal terrorist attacks on Ukraine and the crimes against humanity/genocide" is just shitbag demagoguery. Cut it the fuck out.
Is there any particular part of that quote that you actually disagree with, or are you just objecting to its tone?
Granted, it's incendiary phrasing, but it's describing incendiary behavior. There's no need to sugar-coat anything.
Re:"Oh look, a puppy! Look at the cute puppy!" (Score:5, Insightful)
Russia's entire invasion is totally illegal. Even according to Russian law (starting aggression war is illegal. Renaming it to "special operation" is bullshit.)
In Bucha every male in age making them capable of fighting was killed, combatant or not.
Discoveries like a pile of corpses of children with signs of rape. Oldest aged 10. Women kept for a month in cellar as sex slaves - subjected to most depraved tortures.
Intercepted communications of Russian command, endorsing rape and theft of property, giving orders to kill all civilians.
But because the perpetrator has veto power in UNSC "legality of the operation under UN charter can't be determined, legally"
Your attitude disgusts me. You aren't human. You are a disease.
Re: (Score:2)
Note: I'm not neutral or unbiased. Those with more power have a greater obligation to meet the national and international standards and laws that govern them, so that's one bias. Evidence-based accusations of war crimes are not equal to evidence-free accusations, so that's another. And criminals are not the same as the innocent, so there's a third. I am heavily biased against those who abuse power or authority, but also against those who coerce and manipulate, extremists who use fear and intimidation to con
Re: (Score:2)
Under current Ukrainian law, technically all males in that age range ARE combatants,
You have lots of good comments, however your comment has two key things wrong with it. a) Ukranian males 18-60 are required to be avaliable to become combatants, however many have not been called up and until they are called up, trained and armed you can't reasonably call them combatants, just "potential future combatants" or something. b) The Russians have reportedly regularly been killing children in e.g. the 14-18 year age group whilst the military age in Ukraine is 18.
The facts of the crimes shouldn't g
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Russia's entire invasion is totally illegal. Even according to Russian law (starting aggression war is illegal. Renaming it to "special operation" is bullshit.)
Oh give me a fucking break. Get your third-grade understanding of legal systems the fuck out of here.
This is 100% clear from the Nuremberg trials and plenty of other precedents. Wars of agression are illegal.
In Bucha every male in age making them capable of fighting was killed, combatant or not.
In the thick of an invasion of cities, the line gets very blurred between combatant or not. Have you seen a picture of a German city in WW2?
There are different levels of this. At one level is targeting a civilian who you think is a military person - probably not illegal in a "war" but likely illegal in a "special operation". Another level is carelessly, without "due dilligence" targeting civilian targets; that's clearly illegal but quite common. The Russians have been targeting people who have surrendered to them. This is a completely di
Re: (Score:2)
s/bunkers/basements/ - unfortunately hundreds of children were killed in a basement that didn't have enough protection [independent.co.uk] though to be clear, bunkers known to house children would also be illegal targets.
Re: (Score:3)
This is 100% clear from the Nuremberg trials and plenty of other precedents. Wars of agression are illegal.
Again with your gradeschool horse-shit.
Russia has a casus belli. It's dubious as fuck. Just as the US has on several dubious occasions.
Russia has, and will say that their casus belli is legitimate, because we wrote the fucking book on legalizing what you call "wars of aggression".
There is very little evidence of Ukranian misinformation
Holy fucking balls, you're an idiot.
Tell me about the Ghost of Kyiv.
Tell me how about the Russians being in Chernobyl being another fucking 1986.
Tell me about the 13 heroes who died defending that little island on the Black S
Re: (Score:2)
God damn you just keep doubling down on being an asshole towards those you disagree with. What a fucking clown you are. Do you realize that with basic communications skills and human decency, you could be ten times as effective at getting your ideas across? You're being deservedly fucking demolished here. You know that, right? You have that much self awareness, don't you? And you just get more and more obviously angry that literally everyone keeps disagreeing with your genius insight.
It's fucking hilrious b
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Not only is the casus belli a deliberate and clear lie, it has explicitly been ruled so by an international court [theguardian.com].
Oh I agree 100%. But that's just not relevant here, at this juncture.
That same court would absolutely rule that Russia is not engaging in "genocide".
One dirty fucking war, ya, I think we can all agree on that.
We who? Russian supporting trolls on Slashdot? Random rude people? The set of people who make unsupported assertions rather than answer specific clear supported facts?
The US, you stupid fuckwit.
Russia in it's invasion of Hungary in 1956 [wikipedia.org]? Hitler with his false flag [wikipedia.org] events in 1939? Perhaps Genghis Khan [wikipedia.org] with his fully justified war to stop environmental damage. Sorry, bit lost here. Seems there are lots of candidates.
Na, let's keep it relevant you disingenuous cum-stain.
Vietnam, Yugoslavia, Iraq, Iraq, Panama, Grenada. Seriously. Get the fuck out of here, you fucking toolshed.
There ware some fighter pilots. Some Russian planes got shot down. Some hopeful people living in the middle of a massive invasion by a group of genocidal maniacs started a myth about one hero. Suddenly Russian trolls all over the internet have been driving this all around the place as if claiming six air-to-air kills by one pilot is a massive shock of misinformation. Looking at claim to actual kill ratios in WWII, or for that matter almost every war since, this looks like Ukraninans are somewhat happily optimistic.
No. It was propaganda. I loved reading this attempt at dressing it up, though. I hate it when people take over [twitter.com]
Re: (Score:2)
fucking war ...
stupid fuckwit....
disingenuous cum-stain....
fucking toolshed..
fucking television..
intellectually stunted lemming...
bad shit...
fucking bad guy...
Are you having a bad day? Can I give you a big hug or something to make it feel better?
We are currently talking about a war and you seem to expect BBC level perfectly impartial reporting of truth from a bunch of people who are actively being bombed. If the Russians are so upset about not being perfectly fairly represented then they should 1) ceasefire 2) withdraw totally, completely and unconditionally, 3) offer Ukraine that, on cessation of further hostilities they will 3a) hand over to the appropriate Uk
Re: (Score:2)
Are you having a bad day? Can I give you a big hug or something to make it feel better?
Nope. I like to swear for emphasis. Deflection may seem clever to you after how badly you've been shot down, but I assure you, it's not.
We are currently talking about a war and you seem to expect BBC level perfectly impartial reporting of truth from a bunch of people who are actively being bombed. If the Russians are so upset about not being perfectly fairly represented then they should 1) ceasefire 2) withdraw totally, completely and unconditionally, 3) offer Ukraine that, on cessation of further hostilities they will 3a) hand over to the appropriate Ukranian authorities all people who crossed the Ukranian border (including Crimea, Donbas and so on) 3b) hand over all equipment and evidence that may have been used during illegal border crossings and/or aggressive actions into Ukraine, including but not limited to all members of the FSB, the Russian Duma, the Russian presidency and any other Russian or Belarusian organisations that may have been involved in an illegal conspiracy to attack Ukraine. 4) pay an immediate ex-gracia payment towards compensating and rebuilding Ukraine 5) put themselves at the mercy of the Ukrainian court system with respect to any further damages due.
Fuck the Russians. I couldn't care a rat's ass about them.
I care how they're represented. And I care how Ukrainians are represented. And I care about who is representing each. I care, because this what this entire fucking thread demonstrates is a mob of fucking morons circle jerking each other to re-enforce their propaganda-fed opinions, and that stupid fucking horseshit,
Re: (Score:2)
You have proven yourself to be an angry fuckwit with no communications skills. Congratulations, you have convinced no one of anything but your own mental instability.
Re: (Score:3)
Nah, morons like you carry water for dictators under the guise of.. what? Pedantry? Just out there sowing a little FUD, are we? Yeah, you aren't helping. What do you think you are doing? What's your damn purpose here? I can think of only one, and it isn't pretty.
Re: (Score:2)
You don't say? [theintercept.com]
Ya, you so dumb, indeed. [thenation.com]
Go get me some fries you fucking waste of skin.
Re: (Score:2)
"Weasel words" are words like "there are no current resolutions against them in the UNSC", "the legality of the operation under the UN charter can't be determined, legally", "claims of illegality and terrorism are dubious", "value judgements of a complex geopolitical framework", need I go on?
Stating up front and clearly that the actions are illegal (under Russian law, at that, no need to invoke any "framework"), that they are intended to destabilize and oust a democratically elected government (thus terrori
Re: (Score:2)
"Weasel words" are words like "there are no current resolutions against them in the UNSC", "the legality of the operation under the UN charter can't be determined, legally", "claims of illegality and terrorism are dubious", "value judgements of a complex geopolitical framework", need I go on?
No you koolaid-drinking fucker, those are called facts.
Stating up front and clearly that the actions are illegal (under Russian law, at that, no need to invoke any "framework"), that they are intended to destabilize and oust a democratically elected government (thus terrorism) and that the piles of bodies of non combatants found in the street combined with the rhetoric of Putin that Ukrainians are simply Russians who have forgotten they are Russian makes it clear the goal (and actions) are genocidal... that's not "weasel words", that's calling a spade a spade.
Oh give me a fucking break. If it were illegal under Russian law, Russian law would handle it. It's obviously not. Your interpretation of "Russian Law" is obviously that of a fucking moron.
You are the fucking problem. You're how we get Trumps and Putins.
Re: (Score:2)
If it were illegal under Russian law, Russian law would handle it. It's obviously not.
You were doing fairly well until you got here. This was a spectacularly stupid thing to say.
Re: (Score:2)
You were doing fairly well until you got here. This was a spectacularly stupid thing to say.
No, it's really not.
Do you remember that time when the Russian lawmakers didn't bother to change law, after law, to make sure it was legal for Der Putin to stay in office? They care very much about legality, even if they're unable to communicate without propaganda, a lot like the motherfucking braindead shit-for-brains polluting every single discussion about this fucking war.
The fact here is that what is being called a "war of aggression" externally (an assessment I absolutely agree with) is not being ca
Re: (Score:2)
The fact here is that what is being called a "war of aggression" externally (an assessment I absolutely agree with) is not being called that domestically, and ergo, is not afoul of law.
Except that it is a "war" and in order to pretend that it's something else Putin is lying to the Russian people. News reports are suppressed, military actions are only reported in part or not at all. Many Russians know that, and so are complicit in so far as they support the action. Many Russians, probably even most, really only have access to the official news sources and so they may believe that this is not a war. That doesn't mean it's true. The level of military action and engagement of forces from more
Re: (Score:2)
Except that it is a "war" and in order to pretend that it's something else Putin is lying to the Russian people.
Ignore all the propaganda, and you can distill the war down to 1 thing, that's going to be near impossible to ignore for any measure of legality.
The breakaway republics in the Donbas are officially recognized by the Russian state, and defense on their behalf is absolutely a "Just War" by any definition.
Of course everyone is well aware that the Donbas nightmare was pumped full of materiel until it turned into a full on fucking military conflict, but that doesn't change anything. That cat's out of the bag.
Re: (Score:2)
Oh give me a fucking break. If it were illegal under Russian law, Russian law would handle it. It's obviously not. Your interpretation of "Russian Law" is obviously that of a fucking moron.
The interpretation that "law is what the legal system decides it is" is naive and dangerous. It is clear that judges in Russia give judgements which are directly contradicted by the texts of the laws they judge against. They are not merely interpreting, they are lying. What they are doing should be named. If, in future, democracy and the rule of law arrive in Russia, those judges can reasonably expect to be judged for their illegal acts. Possibly extenuating circumstances, such as clear threats from other p
Re: (Score:2)
The interpretation that "law is what the legal system decides it is" is naive and dangerous.
Dangerous yes, naive, no.
That concept is the very fucking foundation of western democracy.
Rule of Law.
It is clear that judges in Russia give judgements which are directly contradicted by the texts of the laws they judge against.
Na, it's really not. Russia is rather careful to make sure most of their bullshit is passed into law before doing it.
The willingness of a number of US, conservative, Trump appointed, Judges to stand up for what the actual law is and ignore the fact that Trump put them into position is one of the key reasons we don't have Trump currently. If we do get him in future it will very likely be because criminals have replaced decent conservatives in key positions of power.
The willingness of a human to throw critical thinking out the window, any sense of nuance or proportionality and to foam at the mouth while repeating stupid party lines is what leads here. And that's what's happening here.
Russia's absolutely the bad guy, but the fucking pond scum spreading
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I agree. Russia is a fascist state. I think any sane person agrees with this.
I even agree they endorse terrorism. But then again, so does most of the first world when it suits their political goals.
And therein lies the problem.
Re: (Score:2)
Fucking idiot. It is illegal under treaties Russia is a party to. The UN doesn't have to vote. It is terrorism as defined by international law.
Stop being a dick about it, have a polite conversation, or get treated like the trash you are.
Re: (Score:2)
But seriously, go fuck yourself. That is an entirely accurate portrayal of what Russia is doing, with the full support of the populace.
What you are doing is shitbag demagoguery. Pretty easy to say you are team fuck-vlady and then turn around and carry water for him, isn't it?
Cool (Score:2, Troll)
I support space research, even by crazy people.
btw Putin is an ok guy, he just needs to be a barista not a president. I bet he'd have crazy stories to tell.
Re: (Score:2)
I think Putin's idea of a Lunar program involves using a trampoline to put political dissidents on the moon.
Re:Cool (Score:5, Funny)
btw Putin is an ok guy, he just needs to be a barista not a president. I bet he'd have crazy stories to tell.
Let me get this straight... you're suggesting Putin should be in charge of people's food and drink? I don't think there'd be a whole lot of demand for a Polonium Frappe...
Re: (Score:2)
Tastes like chocolate.
Re: (Score:2)
Why are you so judgemental?
Every time someone murders a bunch of people and launches a war, everyone ignores the good that they did.
The same thing happened to Hitler. Nobody talks about his paintings.
Re: Cool (Score:2)
An entire apartment in one afternoon. Two coats!
Re: (Score:2)
If Hitler had enough artistic talent to be a successful painter, the history of the twentieth century might have been radically different.
Re: (Score:2)
The usual worthless bluster (Score:2, Interesting)
It smells of Trump-style lies. Him and Putin had various unrecorded meetings, which I always took to be opportunities for trump to get his instructions straight from his handler. But maybe it was mutual lessons in confabulation.
Re: (Score:2)
They both need lessons from someone who is better at it.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
To use some personalities from Harry Potter, the former alleged president is a carbon copy of Gilderoy Lockhart, always ready to take credit for something that merely happened and had no connection with him, and then weenied out when presented with an opportunity to show what a "leader" (however dyspeptic) he was, i.e., claiming he *wanted* to march on the Capitol but was prevented by the Secret Service, what a crock.
The Great Putini is a clone of Lord Voldemort. He rules by fear and is above crime in the s
Essential vs. Accidental Complexity (Score:5, Insightful)
You know what makes it hard to land people on the Moon and then return them safely to Earth? Not having money or a high-tech industry, and being in the middle of a massive technology "brain drain."
Re:Essential vs. Accidental Complexity (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Feature?
Re: (Score:2)
It's just nationalism (Score:5, Insightful)
This isn't even bluster it's bald face propaganda. But he controls the media.
Re: (Score:3)
However, he doesn't need "money" in the sense that you're using it. When you get right down to it, the difference between a moonshot and LEO is just rocket size, and the Russians have experience making rockets big enough. They can devalue the ruble into the dirt vs external currencies, and it won't matter one tiny fucking bit if people inside keep exchanging their work for them.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
At this point, they're bound to run out even of imported chemicals necessary for Soyuz launches, not to mention their ability to design and build a much larger launcher.
Russia does not need to import RP-1 or Syntin- what the fuck are you talking about?.
They're the third-largest hydrocarbon producer in the world. They could supply the rest of the world with rocket fuel, if that was a business they wanted to be in.
Even Angara has been in development since 1990s, and it still hasn't been finished, and that was in peacetime.
That's pretty misleading.
Angara suffers from SLS-itis. That is, it's big and fucking expensive, and there are cheaper alternatives right here right now that fit the bill, so it's not allocated Cold-War era resources.
The N1 was a good rocket design that was scra
Re: (Score:2)
Russia does not need to import RP-1 or Syntin- what the fuck are you talking about?
As far as I'm aware, Russia has been purchasing very high test peroxide and related chemicals from Germany. It has been simply more convenient to purchase them from a Western manufacturer at a reasonable price than keeping such specialty industry alive. Sure they *could* replace it domestically, but not instantly, especially considering the current situation -- the last remaining manufacturer of HTP in Russia finally went bankrupt in 2019. And Russians themselves have warned about the issue. [archive.ph]
That's pretty misleading. Angara suffers from SLS-itis. That is, it's big and fucking expensive, and there are cheaper alternatives right here right now
Such as? As far
Re: (Score:2)
As far as I'm aware, Russia has been purchasing very high test peroxide and related chemicals from Germany.
Maybe. But that's not because they can't manufacture it. It's because it's cheaper.
On the other side of that, every space-faring country on the planet is getting their helium from Russia. That's just how economies work.
Unable to get helium from Russia hasn't shut down the US space program. It just made it a bit more expensive.
It has been simply more convenient to purchase them from a Western manufacturer at a reasonable price than keeping such specialty industry alive. Sure they *could* replace it domestically, but not instantly, especially considering the current situation -- the last remaining manufacturer of HTP in Russia finally went bankrupt in 2019. And Russians themselves have warned about the issue. [archive.ph]
No argument with any of this.
Once borders close, economics change, and things that weren't reasonable to produce domestically become reasonable again.
Metal production in the US is
Re: (Score:2)
Those are the cheaper alternatives I speak of.
But they're not good enough for lunar flights. Had they been, the Soviets would have actually used them for a lunar mission. Except the whole Soyuz-A/B/V thing was scrapped early on.
Are you honestly claiming, with a straight face, that they lacked the capability to produce a better flight computer?
Actually, the reason why I brought up the analog guidance was to point out that Soyuz was so simple that it didn't *need* a better one. *That* is why I'm saying that it's difficult to imagine something simpler than Soyuz. It's so dumb and simple that you never needed even the simplest digital circuitry for it to work.
In the same breath, I want you to tell me that he SLS uses 1980s engines because the US lacks the capability to make better engines.
The problem
Re: (Score:2)
But they're not good enough for lunar flights. Had they been, the Soviets would have actually used them for a lunar mission. Except the whole Soyuz-A/B/V thing was scrapped early on.
No, they're not. But the moon wasn't a goal until now.
Actually, the reason why I brought up the analog guidance was to point out that Soyuz was so simple that it didn't *need* a better one. *That* is why I'm saying that it's difficult to imagine something simpler than Soyuz. It's so dumb and simple that you never needed even the simplest digital circuitry for it to work.
Correct. So what's your point?
The problem is that the best thing that the US has is Falcon, not SLS. A single full engine set for a Falcon costs less nowadays than a single RD-191 engine. Clearly the US has by now mastered both insanely cheap manufacturing (previously the domain of Russia) AND economical reuse. There's literally no other way to beat this than to exceed SpaceX on both parameters, and no project in Russia is headed in that direction.
You can't get people to the moon on a Falcon, either.
Cost-wise, ya, Falcon is rad.
But even a FH isn't going to get anything more than a couple tons into lunar orbit.
So again, SLS uses shuttle engines.
Do you also claim we can't engineer new engines for it?
Re: (Score:2)
Correct. So what's your point?
That the claim that "there are cheaper alternatives right here right now that fit the bill" is not quite true for Russia. They do need something better than what they have, yet the only country in the world that currently has something at least marginally useful for a lunar program is the US (with the number of such systems potentially increasing from 1 to 3 in the next few years).
You can't get people to the moon on a Falcon, either.
Debatable. Any Soyuz-A/B/V-like plan would work much better with a Falcon, given its double payload and fractional cost relative
Re: (Score:2)
That the claim that "there are cheaper alternatives right here right now that fit the bill" is not quite true for Russia. They do need something better than what they have, yet the only country in the world that currently has something at least marginally useful for a lunar program is the US (with the number of such systems potentially increasing from 1 to 3 in the next few years).
That was said in reference to why more money wasn't thrown at Angara. Angara's primary purpose was not the moon. It was a replacement for Soyuz. A replacement that really... just wasn't needed.
Debatable. Any Soyuz-A/B/V-like plan would work much better with a Falcon, given its double payload and fractional cost relative to Soyuz. So would a simple refuel-in-orbit system.
Cost is not relevant here. Not even a tiny little bit. I don't get how you could possibly think it is.
The cost is important from the perspective of SpaceX's business, because they're hoping to be in the commercial launch business.
The most expensive launches in history didn't even stress the books. They're just not t
Re: (Score:2)
Angara's primary purpose was not the moon. It was a replacement for Soyuz. A replacement that really... just wasn't needed.
Actually, it was more a replacement for Proton, since that's what they wanted to transition all of their Proton launches to. But the point is that *they can't manage to even accomplish that*. Lunar missions are simply out of reach for them.
Cost is not relevant here. Not even a tiny little bit. I don't get how you could possibly think it is.
Cost is absolutely relevant, since bringing 1 kg to the surface of the Moon is many times more expensive than just bringing that 1 kg to low Earth orbit.
The point of SLS is not to consume money. It's to create a launch vehicle that there is a perceived need for and no existing alternative for.
There *absolutely* are alternatives, but people in power are fighting very hard against them [twitter.com]. The only people saying th
Re: (Score:2)
Actually, it was more a replacement for Proton, since that's what they wanted to transition all of their Proton launches to. But the point is that *they can't manage to even accomplish that*. Lunar missions are simply out of reach for them.
I assume you mean manned lunar missions, in which case, they're out of reach for... everyone, since nobody is making the Saturn V anymore, the SLS isn't online, and Starship isn't anywhere close, and Soyuz-2 is perfectly suitable for TLI.
Cost is absolutely relevant, since bringing 1 kg to the surface of the Moon is many times more expensive than just bringing that 1 kg to low Earth orbit.
Again, no, it's not, since the cost of a launch isn't even a rounding error for even a poor government.
There *absolutely* are alternatives, but people in power are fighting very hard against them [twitter.com]. The only people saying that "there is no alternative for SLS" are people who are either ignorant of the alternatives, or have a financial interest in SLS being funded.
No, the people saying there is no alternative for SLS are people who are relaying a literally incontrovertible fact.
Are there alternatives that could be developed? Yes.
Re: (Score:2)
Again, no, it's not, since the cost of a launch isn't even a rounding error for even a poor government.
That is a barefaced lie. The immense cost of spaceflight stems from the immense cost of putting things into space. And any government short of a dictatorship has to justify its costs to taxpayers.
No, the people saying there is no alternative for SLS are people who are relaying a literally incontrovertible fact.
Are there alternatives that could be developed? Yes. Nobody claimed otherwise.
Uh...pick one? You can't simultaneously claim that there are no alternatives and that there *are* alternatives.
There are plenty of potential alternatives
All alternatives are potential. [wiktionary.org] They're the things you could be doing instead but aren't doing at the moment.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Making short-range missiles when you're firing dozens a day is hard for any country to keep up. Can Russia keep up with the attrition of their war? Of course not.
That's hardly a problem when producing a rocket for a space program, however.
Re: (Score:2)
They are depleting stockpiles you Russian troll.
Stockpiles of rocket fuel? How fucking stupid are you?
They can't make virtually any military equipment, tanks, helicopters, jets, missiles.
Sure they can. The just can't keep up with the rate at which they're expending them. That's a normal part of warfare.
It's not a matter of keeping up.
Says who? Dumbfuck AC on slashdot?
I suppose you think they'll just build a new flagship after Ukraine destroyed the current one :).
Ya, I expect they'll do precisely that. And then hopefully someone comes along and sinks that fucking thing too.
Newsflash- people who point out that you're dumb as fucking bricks aren't necessarily Russian trolls. They're just smarter than you.
Re: (Score:2)
I get that you don't like them, but try to keep your head out of the fantasy reality that's held aloft by the hatred over their bullshit foreign activities currently.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, they also were first with their Sputnik orbiting the Earth. So what? Pay attention to wording - were.
Read again:
Horseshit. We rode Russian rockets up to the ISS for a decade.
They are still riding Russian rockets up, today.
Corruption is integral part of the whole country not just their military. Rockets that took cargo to ISS were paid by other countries. The ones that are now sanctioning russia. ragozin is tweeting bullshit and empty threats.
The cost of those rockets was piddly. Russia is spending more money on propaganda right now. The fact that they got other countries to pay for them doesn't in any way provide evidence that they could not pay for them.
You're completely detached from reality. Again, I get that you don't like them. But inventing a fantasy reality to help you feel better about it all doesn't help a fucking thing.
Re: (Score:2)
The RD-180 is 20 years old. Whether they can still build them is one question, to which I presume the answer is yes. Whether they can design and build anything new at this point is another question. So the question is then whether they can accomplish their mission using engines they can currently build, and vehicles they can currently afford to build, using all Russian parts — because not only will they find little help for a lunar mission at this point, they will find even less help for building any
Re: (Score:2)
Can they still build them? Of course. They do.
Can they build anything new? That is absolutely a legitimate question.
I think it's pretty silly to think no, though.
Russia's problem is the production of advanced technology. They're doing quite fine there.
Russia's problem is that they have confused 60 years of stockpiles as their ability to continue producing materiel.
At the end of the day, they're a country with a tiny ass GDP and very little manufacturing capac
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I look forward to Putin being relegated to a hermit king in his shithole country.
Propaganda is not all the Russians have left. They're still quite capable of building rockets.
Just like all you have left is accusing people who think you're stupid of being Russian trolls.
Re: (Score:2)
They were analog for ages, went digital only a decade ago.
Accurate. For the Soyuz, anyway. You think that has something to do with capability?
All Russia is doing, is IKEA methods of remaking Soyuz rockets based on a recipe on paper. Cookie cutter manufacturing.
Oh, absolutely.
They're poor as fuck. They're doing the best-bang-for-the-ruble.
Zero improvements on 1970s design.
Still right.
But again, because why?
The US hasn't had a significant improvement in rocket design since the 80s.
There simply wasn't a fucking need.
In the mean time, we have Su-57s, as examples that their scientific programs are still functioning just fine, even if they can't afford to make more than a dozen of the fucking things.
You're tryi
Re: (Score:2)
Does Russia even have a working version yet after Ukraine halted development after Crimea and the old sanctions?
Of course they do. Because those engines aren't manufactured in Ukraine.
Lyulka was indeed Ukrainian. However, the engines aren't designed and built by Lyulka, because that no longer exists, and hasn't for a long time. They're manufactured by NPO Saturn, in Russia.
Russia did have some things built in Ukraine (gas turbines for their ships), and the Ukrainians did indeed stop manufacturing them after 2014. Contracts were given to Saturn to manufacture them, and they have.
Re: (Score:2)
It will matter when they need to buy materials from outside Russia. Even back in the days of the USSR's space programme they needed to buy stuff from other countries, and of course back then they had all those eastern European states to supply them too.
Re: (Score:2)
If that happens, it will be the first time the western world has ever successfully accomplished that, in spite of 70 years of trying.
Re: (Score:2)
However, he doesn't need "money" in the sense that you're using it.
He does if he wants to pay people, who rarely do their best work while being forced at gunpoint. It tends to become a preoccupation. And right now the ruble is bumwad.
Re: (Score:2)
Right now the ruble is working just fine in Russia.
The full effect of the sanctions will be a 25%-or-so reduction of their GDP.
That's a huge fucking deal, but it's hardly post-Versailles Germany.
Right now, today, people are still working for rubles. No guns needed. They're still buying shit they need with rubles. Non-domestic shit is of course problematic, so they can look forward to the good ol' insular Soviet economy again, but no, Russia is not dependent
Re: (Score:2)
Right now the ruble is working just fine in Russia.
Great, so people can purchase Russian goods which don't depend on foreign supply. I hope they enjoy their beets. It's kind of hard to attract the best talent on that basis.
Russia is not dependent on other countries for subsistence.
No, but Russians prefer to subsist on imports. Russia only became a net exporter of food when they forced it to happen.
The moon is old hat (Score:3)
Mars, Venus, Europa, Titan, Io, Ganymede -- those are the places to go. But yeah we definitely need a permanent moon base.
Re: The moon is old hat (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
https://www.themoscowtimes.com... [themoscowtimes.com]
How about going to a grocery store instead? (Score:5, Insightful)
Why doesn't he take on a more difficult mission for Russia, like finding a grocery store with well-stocked shelves? https://www.newsweek.com/russi... [newsweek.com]
Russia to the Moon? (Score:2)
What he really meant (Score:5, Interesting)
Space rockets are pretty much the same as ICBM's. He's really saying "We're very serious about our nuclear program, but that would be admitting we want war, so instead I'll say we're working on something completely peaceful and good for national prestige"
Re: (Score:2)
They aren't serious about their nuclear program. They haven't been maintaining their stash. It costs too much money and isn't really worth it.
Re:What he really meant (Score:4)
That was true at the start of the space race. The R-7, Redstone, Atlas, Titan all had their origins in ICBMs. Pretty soon they started to diverge though. Every ICBM nowadays uses solid fuel and is tiny compared to the liquid-fueled rockets used for spaceflight (and especially the sort of rocket that can get a decent payload to the Moon).
So: different type of engine, very different size, different launch method. The overlap is pretty small.
After invading the Ukraine (Score:2)
So: India or China? (Score:2)
Who will Russia pair off with?
Russia gets new broomsticks (Score:2)
Same sticks as the old sticks.
Lunar special operation or invasion? (Score:2)
With you and what economy? (Score:2)
The Russians wouldn't be able to even source parts/material to build all this stuff, or be able to afford it.
Russia should have opened with this (Score:2)
Russia should have opened with peaceful space exploration. Instead of invading all their neighbors. Georgia, Azerbaijan, Moldova, Chechnya (it's complicated), Ukraine, Syria (Russia joined one islamist group to fight another islamist group), .. I'm sure I'm leaving a few out.
But Russia was able to help fight the CPC in the Central African Republic and put an end to hundreds of thousands of refugees fleeing the violence there. Of course in Ukraine they managed to cause 10x more refugees.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Saddam was a sadistic thug whose regime was already being infiltrated by Islamic nutjobs. Admittedly the reasons for going in were bollocks, but I don't rue him getting his neck stretched or the Saudis being confronted with the necessity to get along with a Shi'ite neighbor.
Re Afghanistan, the U.S. gave it the ol' college try to turn it into a respectable country rather than an Islamic fanatic factory. It turns out the Afghanis didn't want to form a respectable country and would rather let the Islamic nutjo
Re: (Score:3)
Re Afghanistan, the U.S. gave it the ol' college try to turn it into a respectable country rather than an Islamic fanatic factory.
We tried to integrate a country full of competing religious sects without any respect for history. If that's the college try, then the college must be Trump University.