Physicists Start Detecting Signs of Neutrinos At Large Hadron Collider (phys.org) 34
"The international Forward Search Experiment team, led by physicists at the University of California, Irvine, has achieved the first-ever detection of neutrino candidates produced by the Large Hadron Collider at the CERN facility near Geneva, Switzerland," reports Phys.org.
Long-time Slashdot reader fahrbot-bot shared their report: In a paper published Friday in the journal Physical Review D, the researchers describe how they observed six neutrino interactions during a pilot run of a compact emulsion detector installed at the LHC in 2018. "Prior to this project, no sign of neutrinos has ever been seen at a particle collider," said co-author Jonathan Feng, UCI Distinguished Professor of physics & astronomy and co-leader of the FASER Collaboration. "This significant breakthrough is a step toward developing a deeper understanding of these elusive particles and the role they play in the universe."
He said the discovery made during the pilot gave his team two crucial pieces of information. "First, it verified that the position [480 meters] forward of the ATLAS interaction point at the LHC is the right location for detecting collider neutrinos," Feng said. "Second, our efforts demonstrated the effectiveness of using an emulsion detector to observe these kinds of neutrino interactions...."
"Given the power of our new detector and its prime location at CERN, we expect to be able to record more than 10,000 neutrino interactions in the next run of the LHC, beginning in 2022," said co-author David Casper, FASER project co-leader and associate professor of physics & astronomy at UCI. "We will detect the highest-energy neutrinos that have ever been produced from a human-made source."
The article also points out that in future experiments the researchers hope to explore dark matter — and how it interacts with normal atoms.
Long-time Slashdot reader fahrbot-bot shared their report: In a paper published Friday in the journal Physical Review D, the researchers describe how they observed six neutrino interactions during a pilot run of a compact emulsion detector installed at the LHC in 2018. "Prior to this project, no sign of neutrinos has ever been seen at a particle collider," said co-author Jonathan Feng, UCI Distinguished Professor of physics & astronomy and co-leader of the FASER Collaboration. "This significant breakthrough is a step toward developing a deeper understanding of these elusive particles and the role they play in the universe."
He said the discovery made during the pilot gave his team two crucial pieces of information. "First, it verified that the position [480 meters] forward of the ATLAS interaction point at the LHC is the right location for detecting collider neutrinos," Feng said. "Second, our efforts demonstrated the effectiveness of using an emulsion detector to observe these kinds of neutrino interactions...."
"Given the power of our new detector and its prime location at CERN, we expect to be able to record more than 10,000 neutrino interactions in the next run of the LHC, beginning in 2022," said co-author David Casper, FASER project co-leader and associate professor of physics & astronomy at UCI. "We will detect the highest-energy neutrinos that have ever been produced from a human-made source."
The article also points out that in future experiments the researchers hope to explore dark matter — and how it interacts with normal atoms.
time to stock up on crow bars? (Score:3)
time to stock up on crow bars?
Re: Fusion power in 30 years!!!! (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
And why the anti-fusion propaganda, Mr. Anonymous Coward (AKA Fossil fuel shill?)
I'm sure he'll change his tune when it becomes necessary for crypto-miners to have a fusion reactor to power their rigs -- to complete one block ... :-)
...and a firework is like a Hydrogen Bomb (Score:5, Informative)
Re: Fusion power in 30 years!!!! (Score:2)
You morons keep changing the amount you claim we always say fusion as being away. Sometimes you say 50? Other times 30, 25, 10, or 5. What is constant is your (often successful) attempts to defund it. Oil shill. Nevertheless, and in spite of the budget cuts, progress is being made. What is remarkable is the fact that progress is made in spite of all the negativity, disinformation, and budget cuts.
Re: (Score:2)
It's like you didn't even bother reading the title lol
Wow! (Score:2)
They must have generated to a crazy number of neutrinos to actually detect any of them! Very impressive.
Re: (Score:2)
And have crazy dense detector, of course
Apparatus was alternating lead and tungsten plates with photographic emulsion between them
Re:Wow! (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: Wow! (Score:5, Insightful)
Even little Pinewood Derby tungsten weights (the hot tip, since lead's no longer allowed) are impressively dense. Flipping them around in my hand gives me a "how can this be?" feeling.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
The higher the energy, the more likely neutrinos are to interact. The typical "can go through x light years of lead" ones are low energy from fusion reactions. CERN wants to study high energy ones.
Just Interesting (Score:3)
The only thing new here is that the accelerator is operating in collider mode which is interesting but the neutrinos will not be any higher in energy than the ones produced if they had run the accelerator in fixed target mode. There is no real physics benefit from collider-mode neutrinos that I can think of but it does mean that they can study high-energy neutrinos while the LHC is r
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
In a collider, there is no net momentum since you have two beams with equal and opposite momenta. Hence, if a neutrino shoots out in one direction there have to b
Re: (Score:2)
https://www.wtamu.edu/~cbaird/... [wtamu.edu]
Re: (Score:2)
Thank you for that explanation. Physics has always been fascinating to me.
What are neutrinos? (Score:1)
Re:What are neutrinos? (Score:5, Funny)
Aye, but what is a "wall of text"?
Jesus dude, use paragraphs.
Re: What are neutrinos? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You: Alex, I'd like paragraph breaks for $800:
Alex: Okay, they break text into manageable chucks so normal people will want to read it.
You: Uh. . .damn. . .I know this one, What is punctuation?
Alex: Ooooo, sorry, you don't get to enter the Kingdom of G-d, but thanks for playing.
Confusing headline (Score:5, Informative)
When this headline popped up I thought it was phys.org being confused again, but it's technically correct. Neutrinos are routinely produced and detected at particle accelerators shooting protons at stationary targets. This seems to be the first time they've been detected from a particle collider, shooting particles at other particles.
This may be very good (Score:2)
The science of neutrinos is still fairly crude. Now that they can generate and detect neutrinos at will, we may to be able to understand why there don't seem to be any sterile neutrinos.
Re: This may be very good (Score:2)
Because we don't know how to neuter neutrinos... yet?
Neutrinos are fine (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Higgs field, neutrinos and many, many other theoretical works had had no experimental basis ... till they had.
Strings theory maybe is not right, but it explains gravity in a straightforward way.
Re: Neutrinos are fine (Score:2)
I have never heard anyone claiming string theory explains anything in a straight forward way. ELI5, how does string theory explain gravity.
Re: Neutrinos are fine (Score:2)
:) Since I couldn't resist a 'straightforward ' explanation/cause of gravity I went looking and ended up here:
https://ncse.ngo/gravity-its-o... [ncse.ngo]
Started off nice n simple as expected from a 'national center for science n education' and then it went to full implosion in like 2.3 seconds. Must read.
And to think I had already fwd to 2 guys I keep having disputes with (regarding gravity)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Good clarification, thank you.
My point was that any theoretical work had to wait for prove - it was the same with the General Theory of Relativity among others, and the deeper "we" go the rabbit hole the more difficult it is to collect the evidence in physics just by the shier barrier of energies involved.
The String theory is a neat theory, yet complicated and unresolved in details, theoreticians are free to pursue ideas and it's good for science. Einstein himself stated that many predictions of his theory