Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Science

Scientists Create One-Atom-Thin Magnet That Works At Room Temperature (scitechdaily.com) 45

Mogster shares a report from SciTechDaily: A one-atom-thin 2D magnet developed by Berkeley Lab and UC Berkeley could advance new applications in computing and electronics. The researchers synthesized the new 2D magnet -- called a cobalt-doped van der Waals zinc-oxide magnet -- from a solution of graphene oxide, zinc, and cobalt. The new material -- which can be bent into almost any shape without breaking, and is a million times thinner than a sheet of paper -- could help advance the application of spin electronics or spintronics, a new technology that uses the orientation of an electron's spin rather than its charge to encode data. And unlike previous 2D magnets, which lose their magnetism at room temperature or above, the researchers found that the new 2D magnet not only works at room temperature but also at 100 degrees Celsius (212 degrees Fahrenheit).
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Scientists Create One-Atom-Thin Magnet That Works At Room Temperature

Comments Filter:
  • by AidanApWord ( 691712 ) on Tuesday July 27, 2021 @05:52AM (#61624599)

    ... hard enough to find as it is. :)

  • by AndyKron ( 937105 ) on Tuesday July 27, 2021 @06:00AM (#61624615)
    Let me know when they get down to a half an atom thick That will be impressive
  • magnetic tape? (Score:2, Redundant)

    by quenda ( 644621 )

    In normal English, A magnet is a material or object that produces a magnetic field. [wikipedia.org]
    and Magnetic tape is a medium for magnetic recording. [wikipedia.org]
    This seems to be the latter, and TFS will confuse people.

    "Nature" has the better headline:
    Tunable room-temperature ferromagnetism in Co-doped two-dimensional van der Waals ZnO [nature.com]

    • by dhaen ( 892570 )
      Are you suggesting there are no magnets on magnetic tape?
      • I think the OP is suggesting that we mere readers don't know what a magnet is. :(

        The summary also calls this a 2D magnet, as if that other dimension that just happens to be 1 atom thick is not a dimension! It's no different than saying a 1.6 meter tall 2D car...

        a new technology that uses the orientation of an electron's spin

        So they re-invented the magnetic hard drive. Err floppy disk. Err magnetic tape.

        -Holes in descriptions everywhere!

      • Re:magnetic tape? (Score:4, Interesting)

        by quenda ( 644621 ) on Tuesday July 27, 2021 @07:34AM (#61624859)

        Are you suggesting there are no magnets on magnetic tape?

        It has magnetizable material, so sort of. Is every pin or paperclip a magnet? What about if you stroke a paperclip with a magnet - is the paperclip now a magnet?
        It would be less confusing to call it "magnetised".
        You and I know how magnetic tape works, but it is not, in common language "a magnet", even if the individual domains are aligned.
        In a sense everything contains magnets. Every electron is a magnet.

        You really don't think the language in TFS will be unclear to many people for no good reason?

  • by Alain Williams ( 2972 ) <addw@phcomp.co.uk> on Tuesday July 27, 2021 @06:43AM (#61624719) Homepage

    what happens when one of these whizzes through and destroys the magnet? Is the memory device then useless ? Small is good for high density but it is also fragile.

    • Error correction.

    • Re:Cosmic rays (Score:4, Insightful)

      by jellomizer ( 103300 ) on Tuesday July 27, 2021 @08:01AM (#61624957)

      Well what happens on your traditional media. Paper tape and cards, get torn and clogged. Magnetic Tape can get interfered and oxide scraped off. Heads crash on Magnetic Hard disk, Solid State has a low limit number of writes....

      I am not sure if you got the picture yet, but you need Error correction and backup in digital storage, because none of it is going to last forever.

      • Well what happens on your traditional media. Paper tape and cards, get torn and clogged. Magnetic Tape can get interfered and oxide scraped off. Heads crash on Magnetic Hard disk, Solid State has a low limit number of writes....

        I am not sure if you got the picture yet, but you need Error correction and backup in analog storage, because none of it is going to last forever.

        FTFY. Digital storage is really analog storage with a wide noise margin (with the possible exception of punch cards - we'll ignore hanging chads for the moment :) ).

        • Still with Punch Cards, you have metal to metal switch which isn't a perfect square wave, and the reason why it was a slow way to process the data was because you needed enough time for the connection to be made long enough to register the High.
          Optical scanning was faster, but still if you went too fast that light may not have enough time to create the charge to be registered.

          Keyboards buttons are more than just a button on a spring, but have a snapping action that would make the on to off state as quick as

          • In full Internet Pedant Mode, I was talking about the storage medium, not the readout apparatus.

            But you have a point :) That's what debounce capacitors and algorithms are for.

  • For 25 Bonus points, explain the quantum mechanical variable spin.
    • They'll need more government funding grants for that.
      • Mmmmm the lucrative funding grants where if you’re lucky you get to split $100k among a room full of PhDs for a five year project. Last government research grant I worked on, because of the low pay and insane hours, the running joke was we worked our asses off to afford degrees so we could make less than a minimum wage fast food worker because of how smart we were.
  • by robi5 ( 1261542 ) on Tuesday July 27, 2021 @07:20AM (#61624801)

    Could it be made slightly thinner though?

  • by mark-t ( 151149 ) <markt AT nerdflat DOT com> on Tuesday July 27, 2021 @08:02AM (#61624963) Journal
    Article does not describe just how strong that is. A measurement either in gauss or at least relative to the strength of other types of magnets would have actually been welcome.
    • Is the point here to make it strong enough to detect state ... not to attract things ... for storing data ... so strength only needs to be "just anough to work at near atomic-level distances"?

      • by mark-t ( 151149 )
        That would make it magnetized, not a magnet. They are two very different things. It's damn frustrating when releases like this are made about advances in science don't use the right terminology. It can be uninfomative at best, outright false at worst.
    • Probably.

      On the other hand, the average Joe doesn't know magnetic strength units from Adam's house cat....

      • by mark-t ( 151149 )
        If they had said, for example, about as strong as a fridge magnet, I'm sure most people would be able to mentally identify with that. If it was more weakly magnetized, they could compare it to the strength of the earths magnetic field
  • but all my magnets work at room temperature.

  • Turning a baloney Cold War into a Very Cool War.

  • Would you cut your finger trying to peel it off the fridge?

  • by xanthos ( 73578 ) <[xanthos] [at] [toke.com]> on Tuesday July 27, 2021 @09:25AM (#61625203)
    From Wikipedia [wikipedia.org]: "Bubble memory is a type of non-volatile computer memory that uses a thin film of a magnetic material to hold small magnetized areas, known as bubbles or domains, each storing one bit of data."

    Ended up being too expensive to implement, too power hungry, and too slow.
    • by narcc ( 412956 ) on Tuesday July 27, 2021 @11:11AM (#61625617) Journal

      This technology has absolutely nothing to do with bubble memory.

      Bubble memory worked a lot like old mercury delay line memory. A large coil 'pushed' magnetic 'bubbles' along several parallel tracks until they reached the other side where they could be read, then rewritten at the beginning of the track.

      Bubble memory was fantastic for the time. The only real drawback (and not until late in its development) was that it was a bit slow compared to alternatives. It was non-volatile and offered massive capacity at an affordable price. It was also solid-state -- no moving parts -- and that meant extreme reliability. It simply didn't wear out. That was huge.

      The demise of bubble memory was surprisingly slow, and can be narrowed down to two causes: First was the cost of RAM dropping dramatically. RAM ended up being about 1/10 the cost of bubble memory, even as the cost of both continued to drop through the early 80's. Still, that wasn't enough to kill it. It still had many advantages over RAM. No, what finally killed it was flash memory, which would eventually take over bubble memory's last niche applications.

      It was used in the military and AT&T all the way through the late 1980s. It's long outdated now, though I wonder why you'd think a modern version would suffer from the same problems? HDDs don't have the same problems as drives from the 80's, after all.

  • ... my 10 petabyte hard drive?

  • Is it just me, or does that actually sound like one molecule thick and not one atom thick?
    • BINGO !
      Someone needs a basic physics refresher course on definitions - MORE THAN ONE ATOM in a substance ==> MOLECULE.

      What I want to know is why none of the GENIUS readers have asked about the spin-orientation capability/control of the electrons - - - can this be modified to either generate or propagate Cooper pairs?

      Now THAT would be REAL NEWS - and an actual room-temperature superconductor, producible as a process stream (instead of batch) similar to fiber optic cables.

      cheers

      • LOL, I don't even know very much at all about physics, or chemistry, or have that much math background (although I wish I had more of all the above) and I knew better. Guess maybe people just don't slow down and read every word?
    • by spads ( 1095039 )
      If it's a planar ("2D") molecule, then they are the same thing.
  • Scientists are always researching hidden sources to solve existing problems. I think providing every source that they need to speed up scientific investigations is an integral process. https://www.biologybrain.com/ [biologybrain.com]

No spitting on the Bus! Thank you, The Mgt.

Working...