Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Medicine Science

Proven Against Coronavirus, mRNA Can Do So Much More (cnn.com) 108

A long read in Wired argues that the mRNA vaccine revolution is just beginning.

CNN explains why scientists are so excited: When the final Phase 3 data came out last November showing the mRNA vaccines made by Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna were more than 90% effective, Dr. Anthony Fauci had no words. He texted smiley face emojis to a journalist seeking his reaction. This astonishing efficacy has held up in real-world studies in the U.S., Israel and elsewhere. The mRNA technology developed for its speed and flexibility as opposed to expectations it would provide strong protection against an infectious disease has pleased and astonished even those who already advocated for it...

This approach that led to remarkably safe and effective vaccines against a new virus is also showing promise against old enemies such as HIV, and infections that threaten babies and young children, such as respiratory syncytial virus and metapneumovirus. It's being tested as a treatment for cancers, including melanoma and brain tumors. It might offer a new way to treat autoimmune diseases. And it's also being checked out as a possible alternative to gene therapy for intractable conditions such as sickle cell disease.

In fact, Moderna is already working on personalized cancer vaccines, the article points out — and that's just the beginning. Two researchers whose technology underlies both the Modern and BioNTech/Pfizer vaccines are now also working on two vaccines against HIV, another one to prevent genital herpes, and two targeting influenza, including a so-called universal influenza vaccine that could protect against rapidly mutating flu strains, possibly offering years of protection with a single shot.

And researchers have also studied mRNA vaccines to fight Ebola, Zika, rabies and cytomegalovirus.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Proven Against Coronavirus, mRNA Can Do So Much More

Comments Filter:
  • by GimpOnTheGo ( 6567570 ) on Sunday June 06, 2021 @10:40AM (#61459672)

    Not that I was around to see that, but this seems like a similar medical step up to the adoption of antibiotics.

    Maybe in the future they'll add mRNA tech to the list of great medical advances such as germ theory and anesthesia ?

    • by ceoyoyo ( 59147 ) on Sunday June 06, 2021 @11:27AM (#61459752)

      Probably.

      There are some remaining problems. The biggest one is maybe that the liver tends to eat the lipid carrier bubbles, so vaccines work well, and you can treat things in the liver, but it's (so far) hard to get them to go anywhere else efficiently.

      If you combine in vivo mRNA tech with ex vivo t- and b- cell tailoring, plus on-demand designer monoclonal antibodies, you've got a medical revolution.

      • by Rei ( 128717 ) on Sunday June 06, 2021 @12:06PM (#61459814) Homepage

        It seems if you want persistent protein production, you want DNA plasmid treatment rather than mRNA treatment. But for brief exposures to train the immune system to attack specific compounds, mRNA seems to do a bang-up job.

        Either way, my favourite part of all of this is.... all of this infrastructure we're building out applies to any mRNA treatment. And whatever comes, we can rapidly reallocate this new infrastructure to produce treatments for it. It's not specialized processes, but rather, generalized processes Create whatever plasmid you want, insert it into bacteria, breed in bulk, harvest and isolate the plasmids, mass produce mRNA from the plasmids, process it into lipid nanoparticles and combine into a stabilized solution, then bottle. Same process for whatever you want to produce, you just change the contents of the initial plasmid.

        • by ceoyoyo ( 59147 )

          Everything except the lipid encapsulation is now a DIY garage lab activity. You can order your custom bacteria/fungus off the internet. Some YouTuber made glowing brewer's yeast.

      • by hey! ( 33014 )

        That would make sense if you were trying to deliver a drug to directly to the site of the disease process, but a vaccine doesn't work that way. It has to ring the innate immune system alarm that wakes up the adaptive immune system, then present the adaptive immune system with an antigen it can learn to recognize. It doesn't have to be where the disease is going on because the immune system is ubiquitous. That's why you get your Pfizer jab in your arm muscles, not up your nostrils.

        The problems they *have*

        • by ceoyoyo ( 59147 )

          so vaccines work well

          Yes.

          No, you haven't "unlocked the door to the immune system." The immune system is complicated. You've created an extremely useful tool, but vaccines aren't the end all and be all.

          • by hey! ( 33014 )

            I never said they were the be all and end all. But there's a huge vista of possibilities that opens up when you can program lymphocytes to target molecules of your choice.

      • by HiThere ( 15173 )

        Actually, the vaccines are injected intro-muscularly, not into the blood stream, which is what your argument applies to. Yes, if injected into the blood stream most of it ends up in the liver. If injected into a muscle, much of it stays in that muscle. (My upper arm ran a fever for nearly a week after the second injection...but the rest of me was fine.)

        FWIW, it's my expectation that after further research the doses given will be strongly reduced. But they wanted to make sure this first batch worked.

        OTOH

  • ...like 5 minutes and look into a cure for ulcerative colitis? The IV is really getting in the way of reaching the toilet in time and the hospital bed is extra uncomfortable...

  • ... the chip shortage is going to keep us from immediately taking advantage of mRNA vaccines.

    Thank you, I'll be here all week.

    • by hey! ( 33014 )

      What do you think all that chip production capacity was used for?

      • by Rei ( 128717 )

        This is a brilliant extension to the conspiracy theory ;)

        • by hey! ( 33014 )

          The most frightening book I ever read was Umberto Eco's *Foucault's Pendulum*. That's because gullible people working together are a scary and entirely believable monster.

  • It's a ... cold war? (Score:2, Interesting)

    by 4wdloop ( 1031398 )

    All good until life finds a way around it. And it will, again and again.
    Otherwise we would not be here to post.

    C'est la vie.

  • There is precisely ZERO data available on the long term effects of these "vaccines" (they are actually experiment gene therapies and NOT vaccines).

    What we do know is that there are quite a few adverse side effects that compromise fertility, cardiac functionality, severe arthritis, nervous disorders, and has even lead to death in thousands of cases so far.

    Important to remember, none of these vaccines has FDA approval. They only have emergency authorizations. So maybe we should save the fan fair for a coupl

    • It's a vaccine not an "experiment gene therapies". They just cut out one of the steps.
    • Are you getting paid by one of the twelve bastards that spread misinformation or are you just one of their useful idiots?

    • There is precisely ZERO data available on the long term effects of these "vaccines" (they are actually experiment gene therapies and NOT vaccines).

      First, the approach as been around for over a decade.
      Secondly, it is IMPOSSIBLE to have any long term effect from the mRNA. Why? Because the mRNA is DESTROYED over hours or days. As such, there can not be any long term effect. Ot even claim that on your part is about as loony as somebody that they do not know the long-term effect of sterile saline being injected into a body.

      Of course what the protein is that it codes for, is possible to have long-term effects, but that is on an individual basis, not t

    • What we do know is that there are quite a few adverse side effects that compromise fertility, cardiac functionality, severe arthritis, nervous disorders, and has even lead to death in thousands of cases so far.

      And this is just pure BS on your part. Another anti-vaxer who ignores facts, and does not have a clue of what the fuck is talking about.

    • No, they are NOT gene therapies; your genes are DNA, and mRNA *reads* DNA. It does not write DNA. Your genes are literally write-protected from mRNA.

      • by ebvwfbw ( 864834 )

        The old way - the J&M and Astra Zenica vax was a gene therepy that ends up doing the same thing as the mRna drugs do - if they work right. Problem with J&J is that it sometimes hit the nucleus and not outside in the cell and caused blood clots. Whole write up on it, that's the readers digest version. So mRna is way better.

        I wish they had more educational materials out there. So much misinformation. Some people think this will make it so you'll catch other stuff and die. IMHO the way our environment

    • There is precisely ZERO data available on the long term effects of these "vaccines" (they are actually experiment gene therapies and NOT vaccines).

      The components of the vaccine (the mRNA as well as the spike proteins produced by your cells when they read the mRNA strands) are gone from your system in a matter of weeks. We have people who were immunized with the Pfizer and Modera shots for about a year now from the trials and all of the symptoms manifest in the first few days as the immune system sees the sp

    • People spending their time yelling that this is a gene therapy are just clamoring around their ignorance regarding molecular biology.
  • This was as much of a stepping stone as when Dr. Jenner developed the first real vaccine by using cowpox to stop smallpox. This was the first live vaccine that was actually safe to administer.
    Now, mRNA treatment is one of the safest treatments and this will not doubt be used in the future for a number of vaccines and genetic disease treatment.

    Of course, all this is known in the biological/medical world, which is why China, Russia, India, etc are all demanding that not only should the patents be opened u
  • Reading this excerpt, you would think Fauci invented mRNA vaccines. I'll bet a shocking number of people believe this. Fauci is a grand-stander who can't answer a question without an evasive answer.

    • And now, my brethren, please open your books and turn to page 83, paragraph 2.

      And in this day and age the man Fauci was known as the serpent, as it was known that he cast the first spite against our Lord and Savior Trump. Let not your heart be weary for great will be our attacks upon his countenance. We will burn the soles and blister the fingers of those who corresponded with him and his ilk, and the world will know our fury! In this time our most faithful would utter the following chant upon any media of social:

      Fauci is a liar. Fauci is a liar. Fauci is a liar...

    • Why would you think this? Fauci wasn't mentioned in the excerpt at all.

  • All the diseases that are suggested as potential targets of mRNA-based vaccines are viral. Why can't mRNA vaccines target bacterial (or even plasmodium, like malaria) infections as well? By producing antibodies to proteins found in the bacteria. There must be a reason.

  • Can it cure the boil that's festering on the ass of America?
    • by ebvwfbw ( 864834 )

      Can it cure the boil that's festering on the ass of America?

      Unfortunately that'll probably take freedom pills that contain lead going at high velocities. That's what normally is required to get rid of the socialist/leftist virus. Easy to get, very hard to get rid of socialism. They just move on to another country with a bunch of "useful idiots" to support it.

There are two ways to write error-free programs; only the third one works.

Working...