Scientists Found Rust on the Moon (vice.com) 66
Rust requires oxygen, water, and the right conditions, all of which the Moon lacks. So where did a newly discovered iron oxide come from? Earth is one possibility. From a report: Contrary to what was thought to be a scientific impossibility, scientists detected rust -- a product that requires oxygen, water, and oxidative conditions -- on the surface of the Moon, a famously oxygen-poor, liquid water-less, and reducing environment that prohibits oxidation. The scientists speculated that the oxygen needed for the reaction that forms rust had been carried to the poles of the Moon by wind from the Earth, and a paper detailing the discovery was published on Wednesday in the journal Science Advances. Rust is the reddish-brown material left behind when iron atoms react with oxygen and water in what is known as an oxidizing, or electron-losing, reaction. The Moon's very thin atmosphere does not trap much oxygen, and solar winds constantly blast the surface of the Moon with charged hydrogen, causing it to have highly reducing, or electron-gaining, conditions.
So while rust is common on Earth, its discovery on the Moon caught researchers by surprise. "I don't think anyone expected this on the Moon's surface," said Shaui Li, the first author of the paper and a researcher at the University of Hawai'i at Manoa. "This is basic chemistry -- we all know that the lunar surface is highly reducing, so there is no reason you would be able to see a high-valence iron like hematite." By comparing reflectance data collected by the Indian Chandrayaan-1 mission to pure samples of rust, Li's group identified material at latitudes above 60 degrees on the Moon's surface as hematite, or iron (III) oxide. Li said that the comparison was fairly straightforward, and he is very confident that the reflectance spectra were of hematite.
So while rust is common on Earth, its discovery on the Moon caught researchers by surprise. "I don't think anyone expected this on the Moon's surface," said Shaui Li, the first author of the paper and a researcher at the University of Hawai'i at Manoa. "This is basic chemistry -- we all know that the lunar surface is highly reducing, so there is no reason you would be able to see a high-valence iron like hematite." By comparing reflectance data collected by the Indian Chandrayaan-1 mission to pure samples of rust, Li's group identified material at latitudes above 60 degrees on the Moon's surface as hematite, or iron (III) oxide. Li said that the comparison was fairly straightforward, and he is very confident that the reflectance spectra were of hematite.
Maybe the Apollo Missions (Score:2)
Re:Maybe the Apollo Missions (Score:5, Funny)
Re: BREAKING NEWS (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Wasn't that a John Mellencamp song?
Rust on the moooonn...
Blood on the ploow...
Re: GEE WHIZ (Score:1)
A better second line would be:
Blood on the pillow
Re: GEE WHIZ (Score:5, Insightful)
Let's start with basics : for a science story, linking to some journalist's babbling is wasting people's time. The paper is here [sciencemag.org], with a damned paywall to Sci-hub around.
Someone cooed about Apollo - irrelevant. Those sites were near the equator; these are at high latitudes. For the geographically challenged, that means "near the poles". Also on equator- and east- facing sites, which is the interesting thing.
Haematite (Fe2O3, in it's commonest crystal forms) isn't rare in igneous rocks on Earth, even ones from the deep regions where free oxygen is pretty rare (a low oxygen fugacity, if you want fancy words), so the *detection* of haematite isnt a big deal in itself, geologically. What strikes me, as a geologist, is that reported directional preference for it to be seen on sites facing the equator and to the east (where, by definition, the Sun rises, and for programme satellites like the Moon, where the primary (Earth) also rises. *That* is the interesting bit, that got this from somewhere like G.C.A. And into /Science/.
Ye gods, but Slashdot's mobile version stinks.
Re: (Score:2)
What strikes me, as a geologist, is that reported directional preference for it...
Just the sort I was looking for. Can you discuss how sensitive to variance in reflectance the Chandrayaan-1 instrument is, and possibly characterize how much variance in reflectance there is in Lunar surface rock? I'm curious how solid this result is. Getting published in Science is nice and all, but the opinion of a (probably) disinterested third party expert in the field is always interesting. Historically, it's what has made Slashdot worth reading.
Re: (Score:2)
Nope. I'm a geologist, not an instrumentation physicist. I've done my instrumentation work over the decades, but back in the mid-90s I made a concerted effort to move away from instrumentation and drilling engineering optimisation and back towards looking at and describing rocks, then correlating them to offset data.
But that is w
Re: (Score:2)
All we have to FeO is FeO itself (Score:3)
We know that oxygen compounds abound on the Moon, but there must be some process liberating oxygen somewhere on or near the surface.
Re: (Score:2)
Probably UV giving the energy.
Re: All we have to FeO is FeO itself (Score:2)
A side bet on ions/ electrons from the solar wind, but most of my money on UV.
Some contraception-failure Muppet of a journalist heard "ions" and wrote "irons", and at least three sets of eyes with editorial duties (2 in the Slashdot corner) didn't notice it, or couldn't be bothered to correct it.
Re: (Score:2)
This hypothesis should be easy to test by doing some digging.
Re: (Score:2)
Wrong valence, man. Fe2O3.
+3 or not +3, that is the question.
They're really pushing it, aren't they? (Score:5, Funny)
First Mozilla
Then the kernel (maybe)
Now the moon?
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
"That's no moon. It's a space station."
Re: They're really pushing it, aren't they? (Score:1)
*That's no browser! It's an operating system!
Re: (Score:3)
Python 3 ? (Score:2)
Can we find Python 3 on the moon ? Python gets everywhere, i'm pretty sure there is much of it on the moon already.
Re: (Score:2)
Rust on the moon (Score:2)
Re: Rust on the moon (Score:1)
VAX machine code or GTFO!
*twitches with nightmare flashbacks*
Earth wind?! (Score:4, Insightful)
I don't doubt it's rust but I have a hard time believing that there was enough "loose air" thrown off the earth that did NOT get pulled back to Earth but somehow enough of it made its way to the moon to cause detectable rust.
I'd go with underground water/moisture.
Re: Earth wind?! (Score:3)
Yes, there should be oxygen "spalled" off Earth's atmosphere by solar radiation, and thus impacting the Moon. And the distribution (equator-facing & east-facing sites, see the abstract link I posted a few minutes ago) is what you'd expect for that. *But*, there should also be comparable if not larger amounts of hydrogen spelled off the Earth's atmosphere, which would counteract the oxidizing ability of such a flow from the Earth. So ...
Re: (Score:2)
Is there rust on the dark side of the moon? That would answer it.
Re: (Score:2)
Umm, [reads full paper]. The mapping is more-or-less global - it's fairly hard to confine a satellite's field of view to one hemisphere :
Re: (Score:2)
I have a hard time believing [...] but somehow enough of it made its way to the moon
You would be mistaken. Earth's outer atmosphere extends way beyond the moon [earthsky.org]
And also... (Score:2)
rust -- a product that requires oxygen, water, and oxidative conditions
and iron.
The moon has plenty of iron. Still, just sayin'...
Re: And also... (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Right here [wikipedia.org].
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
If you had read the very Wikipedia article you link to (heretical, I know), you'd have seen this:
In 2010, a reanalysis of the old Apollo seismic data on the deep moonquakes using modern processing methods confirmed that the Moon has an iron rich core
Also this a bit further up:
the lunar mantle is more iron-rich than that of the Earth
Finally, nobody's talking about the core. Scientists aren't observing rust in the core, but at the surface.
Frankly, I don't even know why I bother replying...
You don't say? (Score:2)
Obligatory Nicolas Cage meme t-shirt on Nicolas Cage meme [pinimg.com].
Obvious answer (Score:2)
The Moon Nazis have been neglecting their base maintenence again.
What a mess (Score:2)
Looks like we'll have to paint it before it gets worse. I'm thinking off-white.
That's no moon (Score:2)
It's a space station... obviously.
Oh thank God! (Score:2)
Ok Gotta give the people what they want (Score:2)
He's not wrong (Score:2)
The left wing is good and correct, but that doesn't make them competent. You can be the most brilliant scientist in the world but if you can't convince people to believe in and use your science then it's pointless. They'll brand you a witch and weight you against a duck.
Read the actual paper (Score:2)
Just needs a little WD-40 (Score:2)
Probably hasn't been lubed in ages.
Re: (Score:2)
Probably hasn't been lubed in ages.
WD-40 is almost entirely solvent and water-repellant alkanes. There's very little in it that can be called a lubricant.
Re: (Score:1)
Probably hasn't been lubed in ages.
WD-40 is almost entirely solvent and water-repellant alkanes. There's very little in it that can be called a lubricant.
Man you're right. I keep running into this when teaching about Gun cleaning. People use WD-40 on their barrels and other metal parts and wonder why they rust and don't work right. Once I explain it they know how to use it properly. WD-40 is great at what it was designed for - water displacement.
Re: (Score:2)
Probably hasn't been lubed in ages.
WD-40 is almost entirely solvent and water-repellant alkanes. There's very little in it that can be called a lubricant.
Man you're right. I keep running into this when teaching about Gun cleaning. People use WD-40 on their barrels and other metal parts and wonder why they rust and don't work right. Once I explain it they know how to use it properly. WD-40 is great at what it was designed for - water displacement.
Thanks! I been edumacated.
I'm thinking (Score:2)
The Apollo missions and various probes that were sent to the moon may have been the cause.
I find it very hard to believe that the winds on Earth would be enough to propel dust very far out of the Earth's atmosphere if it can at all, let alone the dust being able to break orbit and float to the moon, all while not dissipating along the way to the point of being undetectable when it does land.
One question remains is how did any of the landers or probes carry enough rust on their surfaces to deposit a
Re: (Score:1)
(Crappy movie.)
It's remains of the super villain's moon base (Score:2)
what else could it be?!
Moo (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
I wonder when cows' moo will get it too.
Rust is for cows. Moooooo!
Very cool paper (Score:2)
The discussion section at the end of the paper is pretty interesting.
https://advances.sciencemag.or... [sciencemag.org]
tldr:
They found hematite (rust) on the Moon but why it is there is still in the hypothesis stage.
- Iron from igneous basalt. The hematite is probably micron-sized particles.
- Oxygen from plasma of Earth's atmosphere -- the Japanese Kaguya mission shows it is plausible, and the paper calculates it would be sufficient amount. Also oxygen is liberated from the Moon's surface from constant bombardment byb micro
Mine isn't as good (Score:2)
Damn, I came here to post a joke about Go to the Moon, but all the other language jokes already posted are much better.
It was there, inbetween... (Score:2)
Who knew? But this may end Oracle's attempt at exclusive rights over the Moon.
Re: (Score:2)
Dammit! I knew we shoulda kept that under a tarp (Score:1)