Watch Live: SpaceX Launches NASA Astronauts to ISS (geekwire.com) 116
"Crew Dragon's hatch is closed, securing @AstroBehnken and @Astro_Doug in the spacecraft ahead of liftoff," SpaceX tweeted an hour ago.
Livestreaming of the launch has already begun, with liftoff scheduled in about 41 minutes.
GeekWire reports: If liftoff from NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida occurs today at 3:22 p.m. ET (12:22 p.m. PT), it'll be a feat that America hasn't been able to perform since NASA retired its space shuttles, nearly nine years ago. "We are going to launch American astronauts on American rockets from American soil," NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine declared during a launch-eve briefing at the space center's countdown clock.
But even Bridenstine acknowledged that's not a sure bet for today. "Weather challenges remain with a 50% chance of cancellation," he tweeted this morning. A drenching rainstorm swept over Florida's Space Coast overnight, but the skies cleared up this morning... The launch can be scrubbed at any time, all the way down to the last second, if the weather doesn't cooperate or if a technical glitch arises. If the gumdrop-shaped Crew Dragon doesn't lift off today, Sunday is an option. The chances of acceptable weather are expected to improve to 60%. The weather outlook is even better for a June 2 backup opportunity...
Hurley and Behnken, who are both experienced shuttle astronauts, are scheduled to rendezvous with the space station on Sunday and move in alongside its current occupants, NASA's Chris Cassidy and Russia's Anatoly Ivanishin. NASA hasn't yet decided how long the Dragon riders will spend in orbit. Their stay could be as short as six weeks, or as long as 16 weeks, depending on how the test mission proceeds. For the return trip, Hurley and Behnken will strap themselves back inside the Dragon and descend to an Atlantic splashdown.
This whole flight serves as an initial demonstration of the Crew Dragon's capabilities with an actual crew aboard. If the mission is successful, yet another Crew Dragon will carry four different astronauts to the space station weeks after Hurley and Behnken return.
Reuters reporter Joey Roulette also spotted NASA astronaut Garrett Reisman by the side of the road as his fellow astronauts drove by. He was holding a sign that said "Take me with you."
And GeekWire notes that NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine sees this event as historic. "I really think, when we look into the future, we're going to see these models of doing business with public-private partnerships apply not just to low Earth orbit... but we're taking this model to the moon and even on to Mars."
UPDATE: SpaceX just tweeted that the re-usable Falcon 9 booster rocket "has landed on the Of Course I Still Love You droneship!"
Livestreaming of the launch has already begun, with liftoff scheduled in about 41 minutes.
GeekWire reports: If liftoff from NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida occurs today at 3:22 p.m. ET (12:22 p.m. PT), it'll be a feat that America hasn't been able to perform since NASA retired its space shuttles, nearly nine years ago. "We are going to launch American astronauts on American rockets from American soil," NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine declared during a launch-eve briefing at the space center's countdown clock.
But even Bridenstine acknowledged that's not a sure bet for today. "Weather challenges remain with a 50% chance of cancellation," he tweeted this morning. A drenching rainstorm swept over Florida's Space Coast overnight, but the skies cleared up this morning... The launch can be scrubbed at any time, all the way down to the last second, if the weather doesn't cooperate or if a technical glitch arises. If the gumdrop-shaped Crew Dragon doesn't lift off today, Sunday is an option. The chances of acceptable weather are expected to improve to 60%. The weather outlook is even better for a June 2 backup opportunity...
Hurley and Behnken, who are both experienced shuttle astronauts, are scheduled to rendezvous with the space station on Sunday and move in alongside its current occupants, NASA's Chris Cassidy and Russia's Anatoly Ivanishin. NASA hasn't yet decided how long the Dragon riders will spend in orbit. Their stay could be as short as six weeks, or as long as 16 weeks, depending on how the test mission proceeds. For the return trip, Hurley and Behnken will strap themselves back inside the Dragon and descend to an Atlantic splashdown.
This whole flight serves as an initial demonstration of the Crew Dragon's capabilities with an actual crew aboard. If the mission is successful, yet another Crew Dragon will carry four different astronauts to the space station weeks after Hurley and Behnken return.
Reuters reporter Joey Roulette also spotted NASA astronaut Garrett Reisman by the side of the road as his fellow astronauts drove by. He was holding a sign that said "Take me with you."
And GeekWire notes that NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine sees this event as historic. "I really think, when we look into the future, we're going to see these models of doing business with public-private partnerships apply not just to low Earth orbit... but we're taking this model to the moon and even on to Mars."
UPDATE: SpaceX just tweeted that the re-usable Falcon 9 booster rocket "has landed on the Of Course I Still Love You droneship!"
Weather looks decent on live stream (Score:1)
Some clouds, but a lot of blue sky...
Not commented on in the summary, but I also like the new space suits a lot - even if they are kind of reminiscent of a Sony Asimo [wordpress.com] robot... :-)
Re: (Score:2)
Congrats to the SpaceX team and the KSC ground crew for a successful launch!
I think what the astronauts are wearing are better described as "vacuum-safe flight suits" not "space suits", as they're not constant-volume and it would be very fatiguing to move your arms or legs in a vacuum. Still, it's great to see the right gear for the purpose.
If anyone's interested in the follow-up of the Starship SN-4 explosion, Scott Manley did a good analysis video [youtube.com] from all the available footage of the incident. Certainly
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, Manley's video was really good. SpaceX has had more trouble with the GSE for Starship than with the vehicle itself so far. Dealing with densified methalox is clearly a learning experience. That fuel-air detonation was impressive.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, the GSE is all more improvised than anything at this point. Guess they learned it needs more attention. The fuel-air detonation was too fast and energetic IMO to have been methane with atmospheric oxygen - it never mixes evenly enough to get a sharp bang like that. Makes me think both methane and lox were spilled. It certainly looked like SN4 itself blew from the inside, but I guess it would, however things started, once the common bulkhead ruptured.
Totally different cases (Score:4, Informative)
Didn't they just lose a test rocket on Friday?
It wasn't even the whole rocket, the upper half was not there - it was one of many such test rockets they are building to test out the new design of the Starship rocket.
The ship the astronauts are going up in, has a twell-tested crew capsule (including the important escape test [space.com] in case something goes wrong) being put into orbit by the extremely well tested Falcon 9 rocket - and not one that has even landed before...
Moving fast and breaking stuff to get a a stable initial design that then you test extremely carefully and more slowly, is a great mix of approaches.
Plus it gives them a head start on producing the Starship in large numbers, which is the eventual plan. They are also developing a rapid assembly line for the rocket at the same time as they are proving out the design.
Re: (Score:2)
Usually corporations give a shit about PR. Especially in nascent markets where a single bad translation from global metric to US imperial can kill hundreds or thousands of voiceless civilians.
Musk is just Narcissus Icarus.
Anti-PR a very good move these days (Score:1)
Usually corporations give a shit about PR.
And that has brought us to a world where people hate corporations, because of the evolution of spineless corporate speak...
The whole reason why Musk has such devoted fans of various companies, is that they are refreshingly blunt (Ha! See what I did there), and not prone to doing what looks good, but instead things that make the company better and make what the company is doing better for others
On a side note though, I don't even see how it can be seen to be bad PR
Re: WTF (Score:3)
That's a little like saying that you wouldn't get into a [insert manufacturer here] car because a prototype car of theirs exploded in a test cell.
Re: (Score:3)
The problem is that a fuel-air explosion from a ground support equipment failure taking out a prototype rocket is a wee bit more visible than a prototype car exploding ;)
On the upside, they make these rockets ridiculously fast. So they lost SN4, but they've already started building as far as SN7. Mass production and the use of cheap stainless steel works out great in this regard. They'll have a brand new one with the latest design iterations on the test stand a month from now.
Re: (Score:1)
From what I gather SpaceX had 6 prototypes of the Raptor engine (SN1..SN6)? So that would leave 5 engines for a next test. Don't know what's more expensive - an engine prototype or ground facilities. But in terms of time lost, damage to any ground facility might be more costly that losing one of the engine prototypes. Let's hope damage to the test facility isn't too bad.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yes this is clearly a much better waste of trillions of dollars and man hours than building fair housing or place-based food solutions for EARTH.
Yeah, actually it is.
Re: WTF (Score:5, Insightful)
Yes this is clearly a much better waste of trillions of dollars and man hours than building fair housing or place-based food solutions for EARTH.
Given that there actually are trillions being spent to keep the banks afloat, this is a rounding error and your anger is misplaced, or at least badly prioritised.
put his space swords to use building plowshares for America's fields and legacy housing for its black diaspora.
Again, this stuff wouldn't do much compared to what could be done by cutting the military budget by 5%. If America was poor you would have a point. It's rich; the problem is will, not resources.
Re: (Score:2)
+1
Re: (Score:2)
"Trillions of dollars?"
Okay Karen.
Re: (Score:1)
Yes this is clearly a much better waste of trillions of dollars and man hours than building fair housing or place-based food solutions for EARTH.
Musk is acting like he's already not from here, and has diplomatic immunity because he's an emissary from Mars. Cut his fucking head off already, and put his space swords to use building plowshares for America's fields and legacy housing for its black diaspora.
I will give you that building plowshares is a more productive goal in the long run than using huge amounts of resources to entertain the public with incrementally slow scientific progress into space flight by rocket propulsion. However how soon we forget the global importance of this picture [nasa.gov] and the real meaning of it to all mankind. When this incredible image was taken US was at war, though technically undeclared and spending upon that war many times as much on that God forsaken military enterprise than th
Re: (Score:2)
I don't ride in cars at all because I don't use the devil's dinosaur blood magic, you fucking hippie.
Exploding cars (Score:2)
I think that it'd be like refusing to fly in a 787 because the wings broke during testing.
Mind you, the wings broke during a deliberate "to failure" test. They were going to bend those wings until something broke.
My impression of space-x testing is that they're pretty much explicitly testing to destruction in the early stages.
It seems that it is actually cheaper to blow stuff up than to do the level of lower level engineering and backroom testing to avoid assemblies blowing up on test stands and su
Re: (Score:2)
your comment was both stupid and ignorant, congrats!
Re: (Score:2)
Is that you, Musk?
Why are you just giving away your SID# like it doesn't matter?
Go baby go! (Score:5, Insightful)
Look at that thing to! Good to see USA back into space.
But to me the real party trick is landing a rocket on its feet, like in 1930's science fiction. That is truly a thing to behold.
Von Braun and Oberth and Goddard are all smiles right now, as is every kid who ever launched a model rocket and dreams to be among the stars.
Godspeed, and may the winds be at your back.
Yeah too bad that got cut! (Score:2)
But to me the real party trick is landing a rocket on its feet, like in 1930's science fiction. That is truly a thing to behold.
I agree, that is amazing every time I see it... it was pretty funny the satellite live view on the platform cut out JUST as it was about to land, returning a few seconds later showing the rocket already landed...
I hope that doesn't fuel too many conspiracy theories about the rocket not actually landing and them swapping in a fresh one on the pad while the video was out. :-)
So aweso
Re: (Score:3)
it was pretty funny the satellite live view on the platform cut out JUST as it was about to land, returning a few seconds later showing the rocket already landed...
This is normal. Apparently, having a 70m-tall rocket to a landing burn right next to your ship causes some instability, and the directional transmission antenna can lose aim.
Who'd have thought?
Landings at the launch site, rather than at sea, are not affected like this.
Re:Go baby go! (Score:5, Interesting)
During the live feed, the SpaceX rep pointed out that relanding the first stage is not entirely about reusability. Each of these relanding attempts is practice for landing on the Moon and planets. In fact, the altitude at which the Falcon first stages relights approximates conditions at Mars. This is why SpaceX is going to the trouble of a full landing burn, rather than just parachuting into a "pencil cup" capture device for the last part of the descent.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
They would have to do that initial post-separation burn, to slow down into the upper atmosphere, but they could have used steerable parachutes for the final landing.
Re: (Score:2)
Von Braun and Oberth and Goddard are all smiles right now
A friend said these guys are more of physicists rather than engineers considering propulsion, attitude control, etc. These guys had to get 100% funding from governments to carry out their visions. These days not so much so new space has more leeway on vehicle design and what to do in space. They still need a boost of tax payer money but Dennis Wingo pointed out that going with pure govt funding it can all come to a halt when govt policy changes i.e. Apollo.
However the new space people stand on the shoulde
Re: (Score:2)
They still need a boost of tax payer money but Dennis Wingo pointed out that going with pure govt funding it can all come to a halt when govt policy changes i.e. Apollo.
This is why I keep telling Dennis that we need to focus on getting private space going. He continues to suggest that it is a waste of money. Yet, by getting private space stations going AND getting multiple nations up to them, it does the private funding that CONgress will no doubt try to kill. Again.
As to fuels, the new space is WAY AHEAD of national systems, including NASA's. For example, it was SX and BO that really pushed Methane, and these will be the first that have put it into production.
In addi
Re: (Score:2)
I don't think Dennis said private space was a waste of money, unless I missed something of his concept that space should be considered an economic development with both govt and industry play a role. I thought some of the stuff he wrote was interesting but like others i.e. Paul Spudis we will have to see how this all works out.
Methane, it must have considered by those of the Berlin Rocketry Club pointed out by by TigerPlish that dinked around with all sorts of nasty propellants. I've read elsewhere these
Re: Go baby go! (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
A friend said these guys are more of physicists rather than engineers considering propulsion, attitude control, etc.
Long before Apollo, Gemini, Mercury, the A4/V2 and all that, Oberth and Von Braun were members of what I call the "Berlin Rocketry Club" - the Society for Space Travel https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
Both of them were hands-on hobbyists before they got to be physicsts. Goddard was all hands-on too. All of them blew up a lot of stuff. It happens in rocketry, old or new, small or big.
The Berlin Rocketry Club scared people with their little hobby, so they were ran out of town on the basis a trumped-up unpa
Re: (Score:2)
Not the USA (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
This isn't the USA going back into space. This is private business going into space. The US government gave up on going back to space.
An american business (SpaceX)
The astronauts are American.
The craft flies the American flag.
You're just the life of every party you go to, aren't you?
you DO REALIZE that even in the stone age of the the Space Race, 10 years before I was born, everything was made by private industry, right? Rockwell, North American Aviation, Rocketdyne, Grumman.. MIT made the computers. Yeah, grad students building computers that guided us to the moon and back. What were *you* doing in grad school?
The US Government *never*
Re: (Score:3)
This isn't the USA going back into space. This is private business going into space. The US government gave up on going back to space.
They're spending billions of dollars each year on that with the SLS. Now I know you can claim it'll never fly, but that's the plan and they're funding it which doesn't look like giving up to me.
Re: (Score:2)
This isn't the USA going back into space. This is private business going into space. The US government gave up on going back to space.
USA is much more than the government. It's the people: you know, the whole reason for a government in the first place. For bonus points, can you tell who and or what runs businesses?
I rate your post 4/5 stars, would respond to troll again.
Success! (Score:2)
The entire launch and 1st stage landing were flawless!
Re: Success! (Score:1)
Re: Success! (Score:5, Funny)
They obviously cut to another drone ship where a mockup of the landed rocket was already installed. And if you watch the camera view from inside the crew capsule there was almost no movement from the crew that would indicate g forces. This whole thing was clearly faked. :p
Re: (Score:1)
They obviously cut to another drone ship where a mockup of the landed rocket was already installed. And if you watch the camera view from inside the crew capsule there was almost no movement from the crew that would indicate g forces. This whole thing was clearly faked. :p
Are you joking, or are you completely retarded?
Serious question.
Re: Success! (Score:2)
Miss the :p at the end of my post?
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
I figure he just thought that your post was poely written.
Re: (Score:2)
Are you joking, or are you completely retarded?
Serious question.
Yeah it's hard to tell when people are joking if they don't put a smiley face in to indicate sarcasm. ... Oh wait.! ;-)
Re: (Score:2)
What about the launch, orbit, dock, etc.? :P
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
The feed cut out right at the landing part :(
If you've been watching the landings, you'd know they always lose signal from the fact that a rocket is landing on the deck. Sure it kind of sucks, but you can always watch the video later.
For idiots that think they are hiding something, you might look harder and see that they crash those first stages a hell of a lot of the time and have never pretended otherwise. Sometimes Musk even jokes about it.
Re: (Score:2)
I was on the edge of my seat, hoping for a safe voyage and realizing I was watching history being made. Thankfully, totally flawless. Congratulations, SpaceX! Looking forward to the future of space.
USA at its best (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
They need no help with that.
Re: (Score:2)
They need no help with that.
Actually, they do. They have no common enemy to unite against since our Soviet tovarishchi steppe'd back to regroup. There's China, ofc, but everyone buys all their stuff from there. What to do? What to do.
Re: (Score:2)
No, the dream of America is being able to exploit people and not pay taxes.
America dreams of exploiting and not paying taxes to whom?
Re: (Score:2)
No, the dream of America is being able to exploit people and not pay taxes.
Dude, really? Sometimes good things happen. Let's roll with it.
I'll submit that the dream of all humans is to unite with a common dream/purpose of some kind. We can argue OT on all the other political articles posted on /. Do we really need to belabor America's and/or human faults in *every* *single* *thread*?
Re: (Score:2)
Brother, look around you. We have 20% unemployment in the US, we're in a deep recession, the budget deficit is a record levels, and motherfucking police are kneeling on people's necks until they're dead.
Doing something that's already been done 55 years ago is not some manifestation of our common dreams. What Martin Luther King did was trying to unite humans under a common dream/purpose. This is nothing more than
Re: (Score:3)
"...And this too shall pass."
1919 "America's Burning! How shall we ever survive?"
1968 "America's Burning! How shall we ever survive?"
1992 "America's Burning! How shall we ever survive?"
2020 "America's Burning! How shall we ever survive?"
And we looked, and it was bad. And we wailed and gnashed our teeth.
AND...we also saw humans fly across an ocean for the first time, humans fly to the moon for the first time, place a huge space station for humans outside of our planet, and, now, BACK TO THE TOPIC...first tim
Re: (Score:2)
Just don't look at the major cities burning, divisive rhetoric turning left vs right into a blood feud.
AMERICA AT ITS BEST!
Interestingly enough, this kind of shit was going on during the year of the moon landings.
Amazing and yet feels unreal (Score:5, Insightful)
now looking at Dragon sep from 2nd stage. [break] Old guy here, I remember watching Apollo and early Shuttle launches, always 4 am pacific time! At least this time it is reasonable time for me. Plus video better, cool onboard video views, speed and altitude indicators.
Go back to 1981 watching STS-1 on a small B&W TV set with rabbit ears in the dormitory, many came to my room because the ghosting effect was minimal. And yes we all got up really early to watch the launch. There was that first launch attempt of STS-1 which I never did understand why the computers never synced at T-20 min. Later that morning in the math class I noticed everyone trying their best to not snooze off because everyone didn't get that much sleep that night.
Fast forward to now, better viewing options. I notice Falcon leaves the ground slowly unlike Shuttle that leaps off the pad. Logically I know reasons why (liquid engines, solids) but still interesting perspective. Overall interesting to see the actual stuff SpaceX has delivered as most stuff presented before comes in bits and pieces
Re: (Score:2)
But the exact worst time of day to launch from Florida, where the afternoon stormy weather is at its height. This mission had to launch at that exact time to sync orbits with the ISS.
But the mission was perfect, and amazing. I love living in the future.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The overall requirements are open water to the east, as close to the equator as possible, and easy access for barged large components. I have always thought that Brownsville, TX would be a better spaceport site than Florida. And sure enough, that's where SpaceX is going to launch its next-generation manned ships from.
Re:Amazing and yet feels unreal (Score:4, Interesting)
Part of it is an optical illusion. Falcon 9 is a taller rocket than the Shuttle stack, which makes it look slower. Also, it has an initial hold-down (to ensure that everything is operating nominally), which the Shuttle didn't have.
To me, the biggest difference watching it was how much of a smoother ride it was. Shuttle really shook its occupants around.
Congratulations! (Score:2)
Everybody involved did a great job - they made it look easy.
Surreal (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The rocket exhaust looked pretty much the same as the Saturn 5's, beyond a few more engines. The Space Shuttle looked very different because of the huge solid rocket boosters, which have a very bright flame. Purely liquid fueled is the higher-tech approach.
Re: (Score:3)
The rocket exhaust looked pretty much the same as the Saturn 5's, beyond a few more engines. The Space Shuttle looked very different because of the huge solid rocket boosters, which have a very bright flame. Purely liquid fueled is the higher-tech approach.
Just my opinion, but I thought the rocket exhaust looked considerably different from any other staged rockets I had ever seen, including Saturn V's. But, you know, from far away, everyone looks identical. Two listening to or looking at the same thing do not hear and see the same thing. And I can't find a picture that illustrates exactly what I thought was so unique, but to attempt to describe it, from a suggested sliced of cross section, it was something like a triangle in a diamond, possibly a hexagram, wh
Congratulations, SpaceX and NASA (Score:1)
Historic first launch of a human crew on a Falcon 9 rocket.
Historic first crewed Dragon-2 space flight.
Also they got the F9 first stage landed on the drone ship OCISLY perfectly.
Lots of engineers have spent a decade working on this.
Best wishes Bob, Doug, and Mr. Musk.
E
Another blow for Boeing (Score:2)
It was mildly clever to have this unofficial "race" between Boeing and SpaceX and SX really pulled it off as the underdog. When Starliner launches it'll be nice to see sure but this really takes the wind out of their sails. Also the fact that apparently Starliner per seat is $35,000,000 more than Dragon ($90m vs $55m).
Damn FNN botched the live stream (Score:2)
The CNN "live stream" of the launch appeared to be edited. First you see the astronauts and the rocket still, then suddenly they show the rocket already up in the air. Likely, CNN was showing a broadcast that's 10s of seconds delayed, then somebody switched it to live when the rocket was already launched. Incompetents.
Re: (Score:1)
BBC almost ruined it.
They had a very large red banner covering the bottom 30% of the screen.
The NASA camera person kept rocking the camera and the rocket slipped into the bottom of the picture.
Obviously out of practice.
.
During The Live Feed I commented. (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Trump waffling. (Score:1)
Trump almost ruined it for me.
Going on about the Space Force and how America made this.
Glad to hear the BBC correct him about how international it was.
Imagine the live feed. (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
And a Alien Space craft just pops out of nowhere. The entire world see's it. Imagine...
The one thing that would convince the conspiracy theorists that aliens don't exist is solid proof of an alien spacecraft. They'd immediately start claiming that it was a trick/special-effect/distraction/whatever, because they don't care about the truth, they only care about opposing whatever they believe the "official narrative" is, so that they can feel special.
The U.S. needed this (Score:2)
It's been so sad to watch the U.S. follow its clearly downward spiral over the last couple decades. I grew up in a world where they were clearly on top, and they were clearly the "good guys." From the outside it's been a spectacular fall, like watching a cruise ship slowly sink while the passengers shit in the pool. I realize Americans exist in a bubble that reinforces the belief in their own greatness, but even that mirage must be dissipating now.
I hope this reinvigorates their faith in themselves, and
Re: China will ultimately win (Score:2)
and a government that can direct that enormous power at a snap of a finger to get whatever needs to be done
So did the soviets. So did every other authoritarian government in existence. I think we learned a long time ago that this is a double-edged sword ... but I guess a lot of people still haven't learned that lesson.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Hahahahahahaah, friggen hilarious, have you looked at your debt and cooked books?
I can't even say it's just the US, it's the whole western world.
Communism is a lovely concept, on paper, it doesn't work because people are assholes.
As someone famous famously said (I forget who) "Democracy is a terrible form of government, but it's the best we have" because it keeps the assholes in line.
For the most part, anyways.
With communism
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Honestly, the way China dominates anyone who puts a port in their country or uses them to mine their resources, I don't think they will be caught off guard. I think they are just trying to position themselves in such a way, that when they pull the trigger, the rest of the world will just ignore them
That trigger being Hong Kong and Taiwan. They have already laid the groundwork, fucking up their politics. All they need is the respective governments is to call on China to "save" them from the "oppressors".
There goes the magic (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Quite literally nobody wanted the rocket to explode with people on board for partisan politic reasons. Trump is doing enough to own himself on a daily basis.
Re: (Score:1)
I'm sure there are plenty of TSLAQ people who wanted to see it blow up. They're probably fuming over the model X being used to taxi the astronauts.
Re: (Score:1)
They are. [twitter.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Love it! TSLAQ tears are delicious, and every time Musk succeeds a communist has an existential crisis. Not that I'm a Musk fan mind you, I just think it's awesome that the private sector is delivering big feats of engineering that previously only governments could achieve, rather than focusing on stupid photo sharing apps. SpaceX is turning rockets into a commodity, which is wonderful. With any luck, you won't need to be a millionaire or be a member of some elite political circle in order to go on a space
Re: (Score:2)
I can't believe I'm typing this, but Donald Trump has absolutely nothing to do with any part of this story, outside of getting a photo op.
And nobody - not one person - hoped the rocket exploded. It might have been different had Trump been on board, of course. And it would have been pretty cool if the landing rocket came down directly on his bloated and mottled head, but he probably was well on his way back to
Re: (Score:2)
can't believe I'm typing this, but Donald Trump has absolutely nothing to do with any part of this story, outside of getting a photo op.
Funny, NASA Director Jim Bridenstine just said otherwise live on camera, crediting Trump's new oversight committee, led by Pence, for enabling things to move so fast. Also, Trump was the first President in history to watch a new rocket launch live from KSC, putting his reputation on the line alongside SpaceX's.
Re: (Score:2)
Who appointed Jim Bridenstine? You mean to tell me you haven't noticed that everyone Trump hires is required to praise him constantly?
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
First NASA direcotr this century to get NASA off its ass and moving forward, and all you can see is your Trump Derangement Syndrome.
Re: (Score:2)
First NASA direcotr this century to get NASA off its ass and moving forward, and all you can see is your Trump Derangement Syndrome.
" You mean to tell me you haven't noticed that everyone Trump hires is required to praise him constantly?"
I noticed that you did an immediate pivot. His one fact trumps your two opinions.
Re: (Score:2)
His only "fact" is Orange Man Bad.
Re: (Score:2)
Trump has as much to do with this launch as Nixon did with the Moon landing. That's to say, not a whole lot except letting what was set up by previous administrations and contractors go ahead without interfering. Hey look, he managed not to stick his nose in and cause problems some place. MISSION ACCOMPLISHED.
Re: (Score:3)
Dunno, that NASA guy they interviewed seems to think the current admin was pivotal for this happening. Just because Trump does a lot of ...nay...mostly does... stupid things, doesn't mean that everything he does is stupid. The NASA guy also seems to credit the current admin for the current progress on returning to the moon, thinking that it's going to be done by 2024.
NASA was created expressly for THIS purpose during the space race, and I think it is really appropriate for them to be focusing more on this t
Re: (Score:1)
So you didn't see him waffling on about his Space Force?
Re: (Score:2)
Re:The cowards cut the film before the landing (Score:4, Insightful)
ignorant imbecile. the exhaust from the rocket knocks out the wireless signal almost every time. it's not a deliberate cut. SpaceX is *NOT* afraid of failure. they parade their rocket crashes more than anyone else.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
...they parade their rocket crashes more than anyone else.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
I'll echo the other poster, great link. It's been a while since I've watched that. The Monty Python theme song adds just the right amount of...gravity.
Re: (Score:2)
You missed your chance for 'PooPal'.