Potential Vaccine Generates Enough Antibodies To Fight Off Virus (independent.co.uk) 120
Slashdot readers schwit1 and Futurepower(R) are sharing news about a potential coronavirus vaccine that has been found to produce antibodies capable of fighting off Covid-19. The Independent reports: The vaccine, which was tested on mice by researchers at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, generated the antibodies in quantities thought to be enough to "neutralize" the virus within two weeks of injection. The study's authors are now set to apply to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for investigational new drug approval ahead of phase one human clinical trials planned to start in the next few months. [T]he Pittsburgh research is the first study on a Covid-19 vaccine candidate to be published after review from fellow scientists at outside institutions. The scientists were able to act quickly because they had already laid the groundwork during earlier epidemics of coronaviruses: Sars in 2003 and Mers in 2014. What's also neat about this potential vaccine is that it can sit at room temperature until it is needed and be scaled up to produce the protein on an industrial scale.
The fingertip-sized patch of 400 tiny microneedles "inject the spike protein pieces into the skin, where the immune reaction is strongest," the report says. "The patch is stuck on like a plaster and the needles -- which are made entirely of sugar and the protein pieces -- simply dissolve into the skin." While long-term testing is still required, "the mice who were given the Pittsburgh researchers' Mers vaccine candidate developed enough antibodies to neutralize the virus for at least a year," reports The Independent. "The antibody levels of the rodents vaccinated against Covid-19 'seem to be following the same trend,' according to the researchers."
The fingertip-sized patch of 400 tiny microneedles "inject the spike protein pieces into the skin, where the immune reaction is strongest," the report says. "The patch is stuck on like a plaster and the needles -- which are made entirely of sugar and the protein pieces -- simply dissolve into the skin." While long-term testing is still required, "the mice who were given the Pittsburgh researchers' Mers vaccine candidate developed enough antibodies to neutralize the virus for at least a year," reports The Independent. "The antibody levels of the rodents vaccinated against Covid-19 'seem to be following the same trend,' according to the researchers."
Big Pharma (Score:1, Insightful)
Damn Pharma companies. They are the worst.
Re: (Score:1)
You must be new here, Slashdot has always been anti-science. Doubly so since the Anonymous Cowards were disabled by the rule of the "show us your papers" mentality.
Re: (Score:2)
When did you low-IQ anti-science idiots become common on slashdot?
This is not the website for you.
Can't mod you up, but at least I can quote your comment against the censorious troll moderation.
Then again, yours was not such a substantive comment. This is actually the only feelgood story of the day and I regard it as unfortunate that the discussion was so thoroughly wrong-footed.
Re: (Score:2)
This isn't the website you're looking for.
Move along.
Re: (Score:1)
Annual payments to big Pharma? (Score:1)
"the mice who were given the Pittsburgh researchers' Mers vaccine candidate developed enough antibodies to neutralize the virus for at least a year," .
Big Pharmas dream, the year vaccine. Gotta keep paying.
Re: (Score:3)
Let me guess, you've got a cheap alternative you cooked up in your own multibillion dollar lab?
Re: (Score:1)
Let me guess, you've got a cheap alternative you cooked up in your own multibillion dollar lab?
How does a Pharma company make more money? With a cure administered once or a treatment that needs to keep being paid for over and over for the rest of your life? Yep a repeated treatment is where the money is, and where the stable income flow is. Which do you think a Shkreli type pharma CEO would want?
Re: (Score:2)
How does a Pharma company make more money?
By selling a product people want/need to buy.
With a cure administered once or a treatment that needs to keep being paid for over and over for the rest of your life?
Feel free to try and sell your yearly treatment when people can just buy my cure instead.
Too greedy you get zero, welcome to a competitive market.
Re: (Score:1)
Feel free to try and sell your yearly treatment when people can just buy my cure instead.
Too greedy you get zero, welcome to a competitive market.
Competitive market? Then how did Shkreli (and others) get monopoly power over OUT OF PATENT drugs to charge prices only the very rich can afford?
Re: (Score:2)
Feel free to try and sell your yearly treatment when people can just buy my cure instead. Too greedy you get zero, welcome to a competitive market.
Competitive market? Then how did Shkreli (and others) get monopoly power over OUT OF PATENT drugs to charge prices only the very rich can afford?
Of course you don't have a free competitive market in drugs. But now you've been forced to admit where the problem actually lies. Maybe some one else will get it too.
Let me know if you find an example of an OUT OF PATENT drug that just happens to be a vaccine for coronavirus.
Big Pharma didn't want to pay for it (Score:2)
I'm sure Big Pharma will be there to patent the results and sell it back to us, but that's really on us for letting them do it, isn't it?
Hope it works (Score:2)
Many things can go wrong so it is, unless shit really hits the fan, at best year away from approval unless the situation becomes even more desperate than it is now.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Many things can go wrong so it is, unless shit really hits the fan, at best year away from approval
C19 is already killing 3000 people per day. It is past time to take our foot off the brake. We need to find a cure or vaccine. The emphasis needs to shift from caution to urgency.
Re: (Score:2)
Many things can go wrong so it is, unless shit really hits the fan, at best year away from approval
C19 is already killing 3000 people per day. It is past time to take our foot off the brake. We need to find a cure or vaccine. The emphasis needs to shift from caution to urgency.
Yeah. This could easily result in more deaths than World War II. Don't be flippant about this. This is the biggest crisis since then.
I am in a high-risk population for bad complications to this disease, and probably a great many Slashdotters are. Come on, we don't generally lead the healthiest lifestyles.
Give me one of those stickers now. I'll take my chances. Someone's got to be the test pilot for every new fighter jet design, right?
Re: (Score:2)
Don't be flippant about this.
What is the proposed connection between people dying, and not being flippant?
Does humor kill people, or make them feel better?
Have you died of terror even before catching the pandemic?
The Governor already told me what to do; be prepared to isolate for up two months, stay isolated unless you need supplies or are doing something important, don't panic, etc.
There was nothing in the instructions about the death of humor.
Oregonians are pumping their own gas. I saw what I thought was a cloud of locusts but don't
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Are you suggesting we start mass immunizations before we know whether the vaccine kills more than it saves?
I am suggesting that determining whether a promising candidate vaccine kills more than it saves can be done in a few weeks by testing on a few hundred people.
The CDC estimate of 18 months is ridiculous.
3000 people are dying every day. Next month, the death rate is forecasted to be 10,000 per day.
Delaying a solution because we are fretting over a handful of lives is silly.
The precautionary principle of "do no harm" needs to be abandoned. By far the most harm is caused by delay.
Re:Hope it works (Score:4, Insightful)
The CDC estimate of 18 months is ridiculous.
18 months is already far shorter than the many years it usually takes to develop and test a vaccine. That leads me to suspect they've already cut every corner they reasonably can.
Delaying a solution because we are fretting over a handful of lives is silly.
And how do you know it'll only be a handful, without adequate testing?
Re: (Score:2)
The precautionary principle of "do no harm" needs to be abandoned. By far the most harm is caused by delay.
So, your previous assertion to this site...
What was it, SHANGHAI BILL?
It's a wash.
Re: (Score:2)
Never wash your hands in a wet market, and never ask why not.
No, those are not croutons. Keep walking.
Re:Hope it works (Score:4, Informative)
You should know that an untested vaccine design can make things worse right?
For example, previously designed HIV and Dengue fever vaccines actually increased susceptibility and made things worse -- and it wasn't found out instantly.
Re: (Score:2)
...The precautionary principle of "do no harm" needs to be abandoned. By far the most harm is caused by delay.
In these troubled times, you're right.
To retask Oscar London's famous line, "Kill as Few Patients as Possible."
Re: (Score:2)
Are you suggesting we start mass immunizations before we know whether the vaccine kills more than it saves?
I am suggesting that determining whether a promising candidate vaccine kills more than it saves can be done in a few weeks by testing on a few hundred people.
I worry about getting enough recruits for the dozens, or maybe hundreds of projects needed to test the various possibilities and combinations of chemicals. As a class, the poor are a logical pool of testees, a pool that is indeed increasing, perhaps logarithmically. That would certainly work, at a certain cost. Somewhat more economical would be prisoners, I suppose, with the added benefit that verbal persuasion would not be needed for recruitment.
The precautionary principle of "do no harm" needs to be abandoned.
While I agree that governments should abandon this maxim, I d
Re: (Score:3)
Many things can go wrong so it is, unless shit really hits the fan, at best year away from approval
C19 is already killing 3000 people per day. It is past time to take our foot off the brake. We need to find a cure or vaccine. The emphasis needs to shift from caution to urgency.
That's what I thought too at first.
Make sure you know which is the brake and which is the accelerator first though before you start stomping on something.
Thanks again ranton [slashdot.org]
Search for "vaccine-induced enhancement of viral infections" for more info.
Re: Hope it works (Score:2)
The primary danger of a partially tested vaccine is the likelihood of vaccine-induced enhancement of the viral infections. This is the most significant reason these vaccines need to be tested thoroughly (or at least the most significant reason for a coronavirus vaccine). Four categories of infections where this is particular problematic are flavi-, paramyxo-, lenti-, and coronavirus. HIV vaccines have similar problems as well.
Re: (Score:2)
I take it you are volunteering to be a test subject?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The news here is full of stories of local old guys who recovered.
One was a 104 yo WWII veteran.
It is a bad time to be sick with something else, though. Don't get sick for a few months.
Re: (Score:2)
Lets just give it to CowboyNeal now and see what happens. We don't have a year.
Mice are not people (Score:2)
How did they test it on mice? I thought only people could get CoVID-19?
And if the vaccine works on mice then still it has to be tested on people.
Re:Mice are not people (Score:5, Informative)
How did they test it on mice? I thought only people could get CoVID-19?
Transgenic mice are created that have the same receptors (or specific receptor) as humans, which make the mice susceptible to the same infection.
Re: (Score:2)
Mice get COVID-19/2019-nCoV/SARS-CoV-2? Yikes.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I know a human named Mouse(y). Does that count?
Re: (Score:1)
Also, SARS-CoV-2 affects cats, ferrets, and possibly dogs, so they may not have even needed to use transgenic mice for this one.
Re:Mice are not people (Score:4, Informative)
They injected mice with foreign (for mice) proteins and tested whether their immune systems responded to it by generating antibodies. The mice weren't infected with Covid-19.
Here is the full scientific paper:
E. Kim et al., Microneedle array delivered recombinant coronavirus vaccines: Immunogenicity and rapid translational development, EBioMedicine (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebio... [doi.org]
As a not-immunologist I find it very difficult to read. The test of immunity involved human kidney cells and something called "pAd". I can't tell whether this is generally known to be a reliable technique to test for immunity against a full virus, with the protein attached in a specific way to the virus.
.
Re: (Score:2)
That's interesting. I don't know more about biochemistry than what I learned in my first two years at University (1989 and 1990) but I will try to read it. Thanks!
Re: (Score:2)
Slashdot is not filtering out Facebook tracking (Score:2, Informative)
The OP of this story has had his personal privacy violated because Slashdot didn't filter out the fbclid=xxx data from the URL.
This info should be scrubbed from any URLs submitted to any web site.
WTF, Slashdot? Respect user privacy.
Re:Slashdot is not filtering out Facebook tracking (Score:5, Interesting)
so you're saying slashdot should keep an up-to-date spec of the html query string parameters of every social media website and eliminate them for posted URL?
Are you a fucking moron, or just play one on TV?
Submitting a URL to slashdot without your personal poop in it is 100% on you, luser.
Re: (Score:3)
There's not need to know every permutation. It everything after the ? in the url is removed, this issue is fixed. And it's quite normal to do this, and could even be automated.
Re: (Score:3)
The OP submitted the link, he 'outed' himself. It's not Slashdot's job to babysit.
Alright, cool. (Score:1)
I remember reading something a while ago (and this was written by the people who actually think it's a good idea, not foilhats) about how they were thinking of pairing this vaccine with an RFID chip so people could confirm themselves as safe.
Will we be allowed to get the vaccine WITHOUT that? Will it only be free to people who accept it? Because I really, really don't want them to fucking chip me. The fact they'd want to even makes me leery of the vaccine itself. I generally don't put stock in people who ta
Re: (Score:1)
I generally don't put stock in people who talk a bunch of shit about "the mark of the beast," but I think everyone can agree that lots of stuff that's going on right now makes the foilhats seem pretty smart.
You already have your Mark of the Beast which is increasingly being required. It's called a cell phone.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
I tried to go the weed store without my jeejah but they were only doing phone orders with curbside delivery so I had to go home and come back.
If you tried to make the infected people wear a zombie warning sticker, the sticker would just become the new fashion.
But turn off push notifications, or you might already be a zombie either way. And don't install that. No, don't install that either. Stop apping.
Re: (Score:2)
That serves other beneficial purposes to me, I have some control over its behavior, and if I really need to, I can throw it in a dumpster. I don't want to get chipped.
Re: (Score:2)
This was supposed to be a reply to the post saying that my cell phone is already a "mark."
In 18 months we won't need a "vaccine" anymore (Score:1)
In 18 months we won't need a "vaccine" anymore. Everyone will get the bug, a few million people worldwide will die. Trillions of dollars will be set on fire. What use is a "vaccine" if we can only have it a year and a half from now? Give everyone Trump pills and newer antivirals, completely isolate everyone 60 years old and up, and let 'er rip. The UK had the right idea early on.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Horseshit. It'll be fractions of a percent _of those admitted to the hospital_ for those under 60, and those 60 and over will be isolated and on Trump pills.
Ferrets were supposed to provide a better model (Score:2)
Re: Ferrets were supposed to provide a better mode (Score:2)
I suppose that ferrets are more expensive (to get and keep) and harder to get in a large number on short notice (reproduction cycle and permits).
Note that they only tested whether the mouse immune system responded with antibodies; they didn't need to infect the mice with Covid-19.
"At least one year" is too conservative. (Score:4, Informative)
If you look at the plots in the paper (fig. 4, link below), they have data for the MERS virus for 55 weeks and no significant drop in antibody counts over that period. The immunity is likely to last far longer than one year, longer than the life span of a mouse. With SARS-CoV-2, the tests are still running, but at least the immunity buildup in similar to what's seen for MERS.
E. Kim et al., Microneedle array delivered recombinant coronavirus vaccines: Immunogenicity and rapid translational development, EBioMedicine (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebio... [doi.org]
Boost immune system (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
It's possible (Score:3)
This is likely built off that work, and we might get lucky. That said the doctor from that video expected it to take another 18-24 months to finish the work. So yes, we should be wary. Trust but Verify, as the saying goes.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Can't they just inject the mice, and feed them to the patients?
That's how snake oil works, after all; the snake is immune to the virus, so the snake oil will protect you too!
I'm not allowed to sell it to you right now, because the market price is considered too high, so if you see me out behind the convention center between 8 and 10, don't even ask, because the mouse juice is not for sale. Especially not between 8 and 10 behind the convention center.
Re:It's possible (Score:4, Funny)
Maybe if they blended the mice with apple juice?
I see you're working in the hospital food industry.
Re: It's possible (Score:1)
So we should use bats! It brings the whole thing full circle!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
there was a ton of work done and then abandoned [youtube.com] on a general purpose Corona virus vaccine (it wasn't profitable and governments didn't have money to fund it).
This is likely built off that work, and we might get lucky. That said the doctor from that video expected it to take another 18-24 months to finish the work. So yes, we should be wary. Trust but Verify, as the saying goes.
Okay; not guaranteed to work yet, I get it. But already scalable to mass production, unrefrigerated transportation in the form of a flat sticker in the mail, and basically a "Place on clean hairless skin anywhere on your body. Leave sticker on until it falls off." is a hell of a lot faster/cheaper/safer and with more population compliance than an injection campaign. Even if it only protects 25% of patients, it's already a game-changer in herd immunity or herd isolation. So what are the chances that this is
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
Well something that looks promising in mice is far from a miracle cure.
Honestly I look for a couple of things in these stories. First is the story in a reputable publication? Are the people doing the work at a reputable institution? What experience and background do they have? And what do the researchers themselves say about the finding (since the media sometimes gets stuff wrong).
In this case, I see no red flags. They are applying to the FDA to start human trials in a month or two, and testing could
Re: Within *two weeks*?? (Score:1)
GP is missing the point of immunization in advance of exposure.
Re: (Score:1)
Sounds fine if you can give the person the vaccine a few weeks before they get infected.
Re: (Score:3)
Sounds fine if you can give the person the vaccine a few weeks before they get infected.
Yes it does. And then
"the mice who were given the Pittsburgh researchers' Mers vaccine candidate developed enough antibodies to neutralize the virus for at least a year,"
It protects you for a year.
Aren't you sitting at home trying to avoid the virus for those 2 weeks anyway?
Or are you complaining the miracle cure isn't miraculous enough.
Re:Within *two weeks*?? (Score:4, Insightful)
Are you unclear on the purpose of vaccinations?
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Within *two weeks*?? (Score:5, Informative)
You realize that the best time to take a vaccine is well before you're exposed to the virus, right? That's one of the things that differentiates a vaccine from a cure.
Re: (Score:3)
Re:Within *two weeks*?? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Within *two weeks*?? (Score:5, Insightful)
You mean the normal time for a person to get sick, have his immune system win the war, and him healing again?
Is this a joke?
Using your own words, can you explain how you believe a vaccine works?
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:3)
Why are you asking him that? Are you implying that all other beings in the Universe are not that stupid?
Re:Within *two weeks*?? (Score:5, Informative)
No. It means the vaccine takes about two weeks to be effective.
Vaccines don't work instantly, they require the body to produce their own antibodies. In some case this only takes a few days. In some cases it can take weeks.
This is where you get people who think they caught the flu from the vaccine. They already where carrying it, get the vaccine, but its too late, the virus is already doing its bad thing, and next thing they know they are sick. Although the evidence is the vaccine will still reduce the severity and length of the illness in those cases.
Re: (Score:2, Flamebait)
Re: (Score:2)
Better a weak infection than a strong one?
Are you an anti-vaxxer? Do you not know how this vaccine works?
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe read the summary at least... (Score:2)
Uhh - do you? It's in TFS you dolt. Inject the virus into a place where it would be the weakest infection - your skin, not your lungs. You know, a weak infection in your finger instead of a strong one in your lungs. I mean, I know you want to try to troll me and have some sort of weird, /. fetish for following me around - but really, do try to at least use a few brain cells!
As expected you are completely wrong. Again.
It's not even an infection dummy. It's some protein spikes to trigger an immune response silly.
"inject the spike protein pieces into the skin, where the immune reaction is strongest,"
Read the summary at least moron.
There wouldn't be an infection in either place. It's not infectious...
Maybe you feel I'm following you around? Maybe you just make more completely stupid comments that need correcting than most people here...
Accuracy has never been your forte.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
No, the joke is "we think this might possibly work, and we've tested it in mice".
This is just today's, or perhaps this afternoon's, miracle cure. Although this won't stop Trump from hyping it extensively within days, for everyone else it's just the miracle cure to fill the time slot from X..Ypm on DD/MM/YY. There'll be another one in the Y..Zpm time slot.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
This isn't a treatment, it's a vaccine. And 2 weeks til a full antibody response training of the immune system is fairly damn good...
A learning moment (Score:5, Insightful)
You mean the normal time for a person to get sick, have his immune system win the war, and him healing again?
Correct! Isn't that an amazing coincidence! The vaccine takes just as long to work as it takes the immune system to fight off the real virus. Now, think carefully about that for a minute: why do you think that is? How do vaccines work?
Re:Within *two weeks*?? (Score:5, Insightful)
Yes, minus the 2% fatality thing and the 10% needing the ICU and a ventilator thing.
Re: (Score:2)
needing the ICU and a ventilator thing
You know, the Chicago Valentine's Day Massacre had that whole ventilation and ICU thing perfectly down pat. Once you were ventilated, you didn't NEED the ICU.
How the younger generations has slacked off over the years. (Sigh...)
We all do it sometimes. It's cool (brain fart) (Score:3)
A few people have pointed out that it sounds like you may have had a brain fart. Which makes you - human. I thought I'd mention we ALL have brain farts. Everybody who replied to your post probably did or said something stupid today.
Welcome to the human race, where do and say dumb things from time to time.
Re: (Score:3)
The purpose of a vaccine is to have your immune system build up a sufficient number of antibodies to destroy an infection before it has a chance to actually make you sick. If you get infected without any antibodies already in place, then the infection can take hold before your body has enough time to build up sufficient antibodies to fight it off.
Re: (Score:1)
You mean the normal time for a person to get sick, have his immune system win the war, and him healing again?
Is this a joke?
How do you think the yearly flu vaccine works? It's not instantaneous either. It takes two weeks until your body creates enough antibodies to be effective with the the flu vaccine as well. This would be no different.
With the reported mortality rate from China being 4%, which most people are finding to be questionable I would prefer a vaccine that takes two weeks. With the current numbers out of Italy it's 12%, Spain, France, and the UK are 8 to 10%.
Even at 4%, I would think a vaccine that takes two wee
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
So, it reduces the severity of the infection Rei?
Re: (Score:2)
No, the severity of the Rei infection can only be reduced by reducing trollvertisement budgets globally.