Amazon To Hire 100,000 Warehouse and Delivery Workers Amid Coronavirus Shutdowns (wsj.com) 39
An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Wall Street Journal: Amazon plans to hire an additional 100,000 employees in the U.S. as millions of people turn to online deliveries at an unprecedented pace and Americans continue to reorient their lives to limit the spread of the new coronavirus. Amazon plans to deploy the new workers to fuel its sprawling e-commerce machine and is raising pay for all employees in fulfillment centers, transportation, stores and deliveries in the U.S. and Canada by $2 an hour through April. In the U.K., it will go up $2.45 per hour and approximately $2.24 an hour in many EU countries, according to the company. Amazon now pays $15-per-hour as a starting wage to workers in its fulfillment centers around the U.S.
The tech giant's decision to go on a hiring spree and boost worker pay shows the dual challenge companies such as Amazon face as they seek to meet surging demand for food and key household items and also take care of employees at the front lines of the pandemic. Amazon employed nearly 800,000 full and part-time employees as of Dec. 31. More customers are turning to online shopping for everything from grocery delivery to paper towels, cleaning supplies and daily needs. Amazon, which also owns grocery store chain Whole Foods, was one of the companies Mr. Trump mentioned Sunday during his update on the coronavirus outbreak. Amazon accounts for 39% of all online orders in the U.S., according to eMarketer, and is shouldering a lot of those needs. Last week, Amazon asked employees at its New York and New Jersey offices to work from home. This came soon after the company told employees at its offices in the San Francisco Bay Area and the Seattle area to work from home, following reports that an Amazon employee in Seattle tested positive for the virus.
"On Wednesday, Amazon expanded its sick-leave policy to include part-time warehouse workers and set up a relief fund, with an initial $25 million for delivery partners such as drivers and others affected by the outbreak," adds The Wall Street Journal. "The company earlier eased its policy for unpaid time off, offering workers the option to take unlimited unpaid time off through the end of March without penalties."
The tech giant's decision to go on a hiring spree and boost worker pay shows the dual challenge companies such as Amazon face as they seek to meet surging demand for food and key household items and also take care of employees at the front lines of the pandemic. Amazon employed nearly 800,000 full and part-time employees as of Dec. 31. More customers are turning to online shopping for everything from grocery delivery to paper towels, cleaning supplies and daily needs. Amazon, which also owns grocery store chain Whole Foods, was one of the companies Mr. Trump mentioned Sunday during his update on the coronavirus outbreak. Amazon accounts for 39% of all online orders in the U.S., according to eMarketer, and is shouldering a lot of those needs. Last week, Amazon asked employees at its New York and New Jersey offices to work from home. This came soon after the company told employees at its offices in the San Francisco Bay Area and the Seattle area to work from home, following reports that an Amazon employee in Seattle tested positive for the virus.
"On Wednesday, Amazon expanded its sick-leave policy to include part-time warehouse workers and set up a relief fund, with an initial $25 million for delivery partners such as drivers and others affected by the outbreak," adds The Wall Street Journal. "The company earlier eased its policy for unpaid time off, offering workers the option to take unlimited unpaid time off through the end of March without penalties."
No RIghts Employees? (Score:2)
I wonder how many of the UK workers hired for this will be No Rights Employees (what HMRC calls "employed for tax"). That is they're paid via payroll, pay all the same taxes as permies, but receive *no rights* of any kind. Yep, they can be fired for anything, no reason or notice given. No holiday/sick pay, no pension, no redundancy protections. If you thought zero-hours was bad, this is waaay worse.
For those not aware, the "No Rights Employee" was created in Finance Bill 2017. Before then, you could only be
Tell me please (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
"Well you have about 100,000 unemployed waiters, actors.."
Aren't those the very same thing?
Re: Tell me please (Score:2)
Re: Tell me please (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Where are they going to get 100,000 workers?
If you think there aren't 100,00 people that have been put out of work by now, wait another five minutes.
Sadly, I can assure you this won't take long. If you thought people were overreacting, wait until businesses start laying off by the thousands.
So this is where all the government money is going (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Um, we already have that.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Do you assume much, asshole? I see them every day, and help feed them. My comment is to the fact that this country should be ashamed of itself. Richest country in the world, can't do universal healthcare, can't do social safety net, can't do anything except corporate welfare. All because this country is owned and operated by sociopaths who have no shame. Notice that I did not say one party or the other -- it is both.
Re: (Score:2)
Silly. If you dropped him in the middle of the Congo a snake, cat, hippo or amoeba would get him long before Ebola did. Probably the amoeba.
Are you utterly deluded? (Score:2)
Corona is *extremey* close to the common cold or flu, harm-wise.
No, the flu isn't harmless either! It killes 25,000 people during flu season 2017/2018 in Germany alone! So nobody says Corona won't kill (already vulnerable) people!
But Ebola does not belong with any of those whatsoever!
You're completely deluded, to the point of being mentally ill. Get a therapy.
And read up on the Dunning-Kruger effect, you medically certified retard.
I was shooting for Funny, but OK. (Score:2)
Whatever floats your triggered moderator powerpenisboat...
Unionize! (Score:3, Insightful)
First, that they can make this decision confirms what was already obvious: they can afford to pay more per person, and they can afford to pay more people. This is an enormously profitable business, and if they're not going to pay any taxes, they should at least pay more in wages.
Second, turns out workers willing to take these jobs aren't so disposable after all, eh? Form a union and strike some fair terms (like not having to work without goddamn bathroom breaks, or when you're injured). People are already willing to pay for this service, and I don't think the demand will drop off *that* much after this is all over. People are going to get used to having 4000 rolls of toilet paper show up at their door without having to fight some soccer mom and a retired general at the Costco.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Unionize! (Score:5, Insightful)
they can afford to pay more per person, and they can afford to pay more people.
Which has fuck all to do with the actual value of labor in the marketplace. The wage is set but what the entire market place can pay for that type of work not what Amazon *could* pay and still be profitable.
Second Amazon can hire now precisely because they are already profitable and have access to either reserves or credit. Do you think Sears or anyone else could add 100K people to the payroll today? You are basically complaining Amazon is a well run company.
Finally Amazon is liking expecting to 1) take market share from brick and mortars during this crisis, as places are either closed or people don't want to go out. 2) The probably want to offer excellent services and fast deliver because my guess is their intent is to hang on to that market share after the crisis. There are people who still preferred traditional retail that will now be pushed toward Amazon. There are people that used to prefer traditional retail for certain classes of goods they wanted to see in person that will now be pushed toward amazon. If they have good experience they might not go back to traditional retail.
Amazon might well be anticipating these are permanent hires.
Re: (Score:2)
...Amazon can hire now precisely because they are already profitable and have access to either reserves or credit. Do you think Sears or anyone else could add 100K people to the payroll today? You are basically complaining Amazon is a well run company...
Amazon is a Federally-recognized and supported monopoly who doesn't have to play by the same rules as their competition (no federal taxes, no B&M overhead, etc.), which is the entire reason Amazon IS doing so well as it consumes 1 out of every 2 American consumer dollars. People have plenty of legitimate reasons to complain about Amazon, which you cannot readily dismiss.
As far as those delusions about permanent hires, let's also remember Amazon's intent with automation. If Amazon could deliver everyth
Re: (Score:2)
My understanding is that Amazon makes almost all of its margin on offerings like AWS (where most employees are already making much better than average salaries + very valuable options) and that the margin on product deliveries is very low and sometimes negative - losing very significant amounts of money in many years.
Amazon can only afford to pay more now because AWS is pretty much able to print money. Subsidizing one part of the model (fulfillment of goods orders) with another (web services) isn't a viabl
My Girlfriend (Score:1, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Please. Not even someone that desperate would touch you.
do the deliveries drivers get full commercial insu (Score:2)
Or are they one crash away for losing there home if they get sued when the auto plan does not pay out.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)