Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Earth Science

Coffee Beans Are Good For Birds, Fancy Brew Or Not (sciencedaily.com) 32

Zorro shares a report from The New York Times (Warning: source may be paywalled; alternative source ): Birds are not as picky about their coffee as people are. Although coffee snobs prefer arabica beans to robusta, a new study in India found that growing coffee does not interfere with biodiversity -- no matter which bean the farmer chooses. In the Western Ghats region of India, a mountainous area parallel to the subcontinent's western coast, both arabica and robusta beans are grown as bushes under larger trees -- unlike in South America, where the coffee plants themselves grow as large as trees, said Krithi Karanth, who helped lead the study, published Friday in the journal Scientific Reports.

Arabica and robusta farms proved equally good for these creatures. "Some birds do better with arabica than robusta, but overall, they're both good for wildlife," she said. The difference is important, because data shows that more farmers in the area have been shifting to robusta in recent years, as prices rise for the variety, which is easier to grow. The researchers counted 106 species of birds on the coffee plantations, including at-risk species, such as the alexandrine parakeet, the breyheaded bulbul and the nilgiri woodpigeon. The findings show that farming is not incompatible with wildlife protection, said Jai Ranganathan, a conservation biologist and senior fellow at the National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, at the University of California, Santa Barbara, who was not involved in the research.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Coffee Beans Are Good For Birds, Fancy Brew Or Not

Comments Filter:
  • So...we needed a study to prove that seeds are good for birds? I'm glad they figured this out. Now the birds can be a little less stressed about the dangers of eating coffee beans. But then, this might be offset by the caffeine jitters.

  • Slashdot (Score:4, Funny)

    by freeze128 ( 544774 ) on Friday February 16, 2018 @10:40PM (#56139928)
    News for birds!
  • by Hal_Porter ( 817932 ) on Friday February 16, 2018 @11:04PM (#56140012)

    The coffee must flow!

    • I'm surprised that Indian coffee farmers let birds chow down on their precious crops. I don't understand . . . a country with > one billion people, and they don't have any shotguns?

      If I was an Indian coffee farmer, I'd arm the local urchins with Mossberg Youth shotguns, and send them out to patrol the coffee fields. In India, cows, monkeys, snakes, elephants and tigers are holy, so you can't go out and plink them, but you birds aren't holy, so can go out and blast as many as you like.

      I don't think hu

      • by aix tom ( 902140 )

        That's what Chairman Mao did in the 1950s. Turned out to be quite bad, when the insects the birds also feed on destroyed a lot of the crops, and it caused a famine in which 20–45 million people died of starvation.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]

      • We Indians are pretty tolerant people. We have been tolerating Pakistan for about 70yrs now. What's a few sparrows!! :J
  • ... results in nastier bird droppings on your car? Fund that research now!

  • Coffee PLANTS are good for birds. My birds like millet spray, I spray them and they like it.
  • I'll take all this with a large pinch of salt or even contend that it could be misleading. It only mentions bird variety, not bird numbers; if the diversity remains constant but the numbers fall that is not good. But much more important is insect and invertebrate numbers and diversity, which is more difficult to measure.

    I've walked through both coffee estates and natural or near natural forests in these mountains. The estates were essentially gardens or orchards. The natural forests were something else al

    • why would someone write such a report? hint: follow the money. I guess some coffee growers association paid/sponsored the report.
    • I've walked through both coffee estates and natural or near natural forests in these mountains. The estates were essentially gardens or orchards. The natural forests were something else altogether.

      And I've walked through a coffee plantation in Panama which was distinguishable from a natural forest in that country only by the amount of underbrush, which was decreased but still present. They call it "Shade-grown" coffee. If you want to minimize your environmental impact and still drink coffee, that's what to look for.

  • While it may be Industrial PR, it is good news as farming and nature can co-exist when toxic treatments aren't dumped on the crops& soil. This bit is positive for human consumers of coffee as well..if you like robusta, anyway.

There's no sense in being precise when you don't even know what you're talking about. -- John von Neumann

Working...