'Discovery of the Century': Mysterious Void Discovered In Egypt's Great Pyramid (nationalgeographic.com) 299
New submitter klgds writes: The cavity is the first major inner structure discovered in the pyramid since the 1800s. Egypt's Great Pyramid of Giza -- one of the wonders of the ancient world, and a dazzling feat of architectural genius -- contains a hidden void at least a hundred feet long, scientists said. The space's dimensions resemble those of the pyramid's Grand Gallery, the 153-foot-long, 26-foot-tall corridor that leads to the burial chamber of Khufu, the pharaoh for whom the pyramid was built. However, it remains unclear what lies within the space, what purpose it served, or if it's one or multiple spaces. The void is the first large inner structure discovered within the 4,500-year-old pyramid since the 1800s -- a find made possible by recent advances in high-energy particle physics. The results were published in the journal Nature. "This is definitely the discovery of the century," says archaeologist and Egyptologist Yukinori Kawae, a National Geographic Emerging Explorer. "There have been many hypotheses about the pyramid, but no one even imagined that such a big void is located above the Grand Gallery."
Well duh (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
That's where the grain is stored.
Re:Well duh (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
is it ring shaped?
Re:Well duh (Score:5, Informative)
Arabs and women....
The ancient Egyptians were not Arabs. The Arabs arrived in the 7th century [wikipedia.org] ... from Arabia. The pyramids had been built more than 3000 years earlier.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
0123456789
Re: (Score:2)
Don't forget algebra and, arguably more important, distillation.
Re: (Score:3)
Alchemy yes, but not distillation.
Alchemy means "The way of Egypt" because Egypt is the land of Khem. Yes, that is also where the word "Chemistry" was derived from.
Also Fermentation, because they really, really, really, reeeaaaally loved BEER!!!
Re:Well duh (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
They did. Credit for their invention belongs to the Indians.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Are you familiar with algebra (al-jabr)?
Re: (Score:3)
They were also the storehouse for much of the world's scientific and mathematical knowledge while Europe was going through the Dark Age. Without the Islamic areas preserving (and building on) science/philosophy/math, we'd probably have been set back hundreds of years once science caught back on in Europe.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
While Europe was 'going through the Dark Ages' it wasn't going through the Dark Ages. The Dark Ages is modern revisionist history. During 'The Dark Ages' scholars in monasteries all over Europe were studying and transferring knowledge to each other. It didn't all just pop out of nowhere in the Renaissance.
Re: (Score:2)
Bullshit.
The Dark Ages were during the Ice Age when the Sun was dimmer you insensitive clod, WTF about "Dark," don't you understand?
Re:Well duh (Score:5, Interesting)
Then have the arabs contributed anything to this world besides destruction, murder, rape, torture, fear, and hatred?
Arab civilization had a golden age [wikipedia.org] when math and science (especially astronomy) flourished. That came to an end in the 13th century for a number of reasons, but mostly because of the repercussions from political and military failure. The Mongols destroyed Baghdad, and almost reached Suez. The Spanish Reconquista was pushing the Moors out of Iberia. Then the Turks showed up.
When civilizations are threatened with decline, they tend to become less tolerant, turn inward, and look for scapegoats ... which tends to accelerate decline. Finding parallels for this in the modern world is left as an exercise for the reader.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm a reader and I see close parallels to the decline of current civilization (see Aztecs) where deforestation, climate change (drought) and overpopulation and top-heavy wealth accumulation contributed.
Re:Well duh (Score:4, Interesting)
Looks like we're going to be in a fight, sarge," said Nobby, as the painter very carefully started on the final 'k'.
"Won't last long. Lots of cowards, the Klatchians," said Colon. "The moment they taste a bit of cold steel they're legging it away over the sand."
Sergeant Colon had had a broad education. He'd been to the School of My Dad Always Said, the College of It Stands to Reason, and was now a postgraduate student at the University of What Some Bloke In the Pub Told Me.
"Shouldn't be any trouble to sort out, then?" said Nobby.
"And o'course, they're not the same colour as what we are," said Colon. "Well... as me, anyway," he added, in view of the various hues of Corporal Nobbs. There was probably no–one alive who was the same colour as Corporal Nobbs.
"Constable Visit's pretty brown" said Nobby. "I never seen him run away. if there's a chance of giving someone a religious pamphlet ole Washpot's after them like a terrier."
"Ah, but Omnians are more like us," said Colon. "Bit weird but, basic'ly, just the same as us underneath. No, the way you can tell a Klatchian is, you look an' see if he uses a lot of words beginning with “al”, right? 'Cos that's a dead giveaway. They invented all the words starting with “al”. That's how you can tell they're Klatchian. Like al–cohol, see?"
"They invented beer?"
"Yeah."
"That's clever."
" wouldn't call it clever," said Sergeant Colon, realizing too late that he'd made a tactical error. "More, luck, I'd say."
"What else did they do?"
"Well, there's..." Colon racked his brains. "There's al–gebra. That's like sums with letters. For... for people whose brains aren't clever enough for numbers, see?"
"Is that a fact?"
"Right..."said Colon. "In fact," he went on, a little more assertively now he could see a way ahead, "I heard this wizard down the University say that the Klatchians invented nothing. That was their great contribution to maffs, he said. I said “What?” an' he said, they come up with zero."
"Dun't sound that clever to me," said Nobby. "Anyone could invent nothing. I ain't invented anything."
"My point exactly," said Colon. "I told him, it was people who invented numbers like four and, and–"
"–seven–"
"–right, who were the geniuses. Nothing didn't need inventing. It was just there. They probably just found it."
"It's having all that desert," said Nobby.
"Right! Good point. Desert. Which, as everyone knows, is basically nothing. Nothing's a natural resource to them. It stands to reason. Whereas we're more civilized, see, and we got a lot more stuff around to count, so we invented numbers. It's like... well, they say the Klatchians invented astronomy–"
"'Al–tronomy," said Nobby helpfully.
"No, no... no, Nobby, I reckon they'd discovered esses by then, probably nicked' em off'f us... anyway, they were bound to invent astronomy, 'cos there's bugger all else for them to look at but the sky. Anyone can look at the stars and give 'em names. 's going it a bit to call it inventing, in any case. We don't go around saying we've invented something just because we had a quick dekko at it."
"'I heard where they've got a lot of odd gods," said Nobby.
"Yeah, and mad priests," said Colon. "Foaming at the mouth, half of 'em. Believe all kinds of loony things."
They watched the painter in silence for a moment. Colon was dreading the question that came.
"So how exactly are they different from ours, then?" said Nobby. "I mean, some of our priests are–"
"I hope you ain't being unpatriotic," said Colon severely.
"No, of course not. I was just asking. I can see where they'd be a lot worse than ours, being foreign and everything.
"And of course they're all mad for fighting," said Colon. "Vicious buggers with all those curvy swords of theirs."
"You mean, like...they viciously attack you while cowardly running away after tasting
Re: (Score:2)
The Arabic numbers you struggle to count your 6 toed feet with for a start.
To be fair, those actually came from India. The numbers, not the troll's feet.
Re: (Score:2)
It's where the dead rich guy's servents sealed his 200 concubines so they could starve to death rather than be treated as humans. Arabs and women....
Ancient Egyptians weren't Arabs.
idiots and rascism........
Re:Well duh (Score:5, Insightful)
It's funny that very few racists are smart enough to be racist properly. It requires good knowledge of history and anthropology to know where to direct the irrational hatred.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
I can't tell if you are serious. There were no Arabs in Egypt when the pyramids were built. Or maybe you don't know what an Arab is, or what the difference between Arabs and Egyptians is. Do you think Hittites are Arabs too?
Re: (Score:2)
Well, the Hutterites are Arabs, so it stands to reason the Hittites are too. Right? As technophobic bearded men who are very religious, Hutterites are more Arab than a lot of Iranians are.
Re: (Score:2)
I can't tell if you are ignorant or a troll. I'll assume ignorant. Hittites were not Arabs by any stretch of the imagination.
Re: (Score:2)
Well yeah. That far East they were more likely Prussian, like the Iranians.
Re: (Score:2)
"And they are so cute too!" [cattime.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Exactly. The same bastards that caused WWI. Well, they are Polish, Austrian, Russian, and German now. Sad that Persia doesn't exist anymore, but I guess they deserved it.
Re: (Score:2)
You do know the Arabs predated Islam, right?
Re:Well duh (Score:5, Insightful)
Who do you think built the pyramids, idiot.
Like another poster already pointed out, the ancient Egyptians, which lived thousands of years before arabs even existed.
Or did you think mohamed invented arabs when he invented allah?
Allah means "God" in arabic, and Islam is based on Judaism and Christianity - in many ways it's the same religion worshiping the "one true God". So Mohammed didn't invent Allah. Nope.
I wonder where the guy found all the time between his mass rape sessions.
It's a common accusation from more base-minded people that Mohammed was a pedophile, which I guess is what you're hinting at. While it might be true that Mohammed had sex with what we consider to be children in the 21st century - I honestly don't know that - I think it's safe to say that this was happening all over the world in the 6th century and would not be some "perversion" unique to Mohammed. It might be inconceivable to you, but moral and ethical standards do change over the centuries.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Be fair: One child. Very much a child when they married, but it was a political thing to tie families together. In accordance with custom he didn't consummate the marriage until she was menstruating, and thus considered an adult by the standards of the time. Today, he would be considered guilty of statutory rape - but those were very different times, and what he did was not really out of the ordinary for a man of some wealth and political importance.
Re: (Score:2)
... considered guilty of statutory rape ...
In some places, yes.
Re: (Score:2)
Mohammed married his child bride when she was 5 years old, not 20-30. He had plenty of actual women to direct his attention to until she grew older.
Re: (Score:2)
Agreed, the jews invented the "one true God" unless you considered them to have borrowed their deity from the Egyptians since the occult inner teachings of their priesthood tend to support that idea even if the simplified version for the masses of their people was quite different than anything in Egypt.
"It might be inconceiva
Re: (Score:2)
I think it's safe to say that this was happening all over the world in the 6th century and would not be some "perversion" unique to Mohammed. It might be inconceivable to you, but moral and ethical standards do change over the centuries.
Human standards do, religious standards supposedly don't. The ten commandments are still the ten commandments, unchanged for thousands of years and it is not up to man to change God's rules. Now I'd say both the churches and their believers do a lot of creative selection and interpretation of what the Bible says to make their beliefs compatible with their own moral compass and modern society, but they never put themselves above God.
The problem in Islam is that the Quran is not a story retold by disciples of
Re: (Score:2)
Yes.
Egyptians married and bred with siblings and offspring.
What we deem unacceptable now was the norm back then.
The Hebrews, Christians and Muslims worship the God of Abraham.
Jews worship the God of Abraham, Christians and Muslims, acknowledge the main man, but have prophets (Jesus, Muhammad) as amending filters.
All of the above are batshit crazy.
Re:Well duh (Score:5, Informative)
Where are the laws of Moses in Islam? Where are the teachings of Jesus in Islam? Nowhere because they were incompatible with it.
Read these, they might be illuminating:
Like all prophets in Islamic thought, Jesus is also called a Muslim (i.e., one who submits to the will of God), as he preached that his followers should adopt the "straight path". Jesus is written about by some Muslim scholars as the perfect man.
Mûsâ ibn 'Imran - known as Moses in the Hebrew Bible, considered a prophet, messenger, and leader in Islam, is the most frequently mentioned individual in the Quran.
Sure, the specifics of both are viewed through a quite different lens, but the myth, history and basic teachings are all there.
Being an atheist, I have no stake in either of the many sides -- but at least I try to pay attention to what is and is not in the various beliefs, lest I not just be believed a fool, but let my words prove it. :D
Re:Well duh (Score:4, Funny)
Yeah.
Some dipshit was quoting verses from the "Bible" that supported killing LGBTQ people.
I quoted the lobster and shrimp and "divorced women should be put to death" crap and he said, "All that was replaced by the New Testament.
???
I replied:
BREAKING NEWS: TEN COMMANDMENTS NO LONGER APPLY
Re: (Score:2)
So if they all worship the same "one true God", why do the mohamed-psychos believe they need to kill everyone else for the glory of their "one true God". Because it's not a religions it's a murderous cult of crazy nuts.
The reason is always the same: power and money. Diligent people with an agenda have always taken advantage of weak-spirited individuals to serve their purpose. Islamic extremism is just one example of how faith can be used to radicalize people. The Nazis used the argument of racial superiority, Mexican drug lords use the more immediate promise of wealth and power to lure young, impressionable people... religious extremism is not really about faith... that's just the means to recruit the foot soldiers. The r
Re: (Score:3)
Who do you think built the pyramids, idiot. Or did you think mohamed invented arabs when he invented allah? I wonder where the guy found all the time between his mass rape sessions.
I see someone doesn't know their Middle Eastern history. The Great Pyramid at Giza was built around 2580–2560 BCE. Arabs didn't exist in Egypt until after 600 BCE (almost 2000 years later) because Arabs are descended from the Neo-Assyrian empires that didn't conquer Egypt until then.
Of the Century... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Of the Century... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Especially considering this century is only 17 years old.
Not in Egypt. According to the Islamic Calendar [wikipedia.org] this is the year 1439. The ancient Egyptians had two calendars [wikipedia.org]: a lunar calendar for religious purposes, and a civil calendar for government administration, but they didn't have leap years so it is hard to project their calendars to the present.
Of the millennium... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Of course, saying "of the Millennium" would have been ten times worse.
Maybe it's a safe space (Score:2, Interesting)
I wonder whether, in today's climate of tearing down statues of famous slavers and imperialists (Jackson, Rhodes etc), people would advocate tearing down the pyramids which, for all their architectural genius, were built at a cost of thousands of lives. They're like Qatari football stadia x1000.
Re: (Score:2)
that only applies to the west, you should know better than that.
Re:Maybe it's a safe space (Score:5, Interesting)
Actually, I believe current thought is that pyramids weren't built by slave labour, and Egypt had the wealth to afford it when they didn't need their farmers in the fields.
I mean, yeah, I'm sure a lot of people died because workplace safety standards weren't really a thing then, but I don't think it was due to throwing away the lives of whip-driven slaves.
Re: (Score:2)
Evidence points to the pyramids being built by Egyptian government contractors. Evidence also shows they were supposed to be giant cubes.
Re: (Score:2)
I always thought that the Pyramids had all the architectural genius of a pile of dirt.
A large, regularly shaped pile of dirt demonstrating some limited knowledge of astronomy.
It's like Soviet era construction, but more so: The bigger and thicker you build it, the longer it will stand.
Re:Maybe it's a safe space (Score:5, Interesting)
I always thought that the Pyramids had all the architectural genius of a pile of dirt.
And that is where you would be wrong. To a lot of laymen looking at the pyramid as nothing more than a stack for block stacked on top of each other. Then they give it no more thought.
There was a lot of thought that went into the shape of the pyramids before they build the 3 big ones. It took a lot of trial and error before they could get the 45 degee slope in the those. All around Egypt there are actually dozens of pyramids where the Egyptians where trying to figure that out. Lots of the attempts failed.
The first step would be getting the blocks there, most of them weighing several tons, from far away locations by barge. Then there is the moving of those stones across land, up ramps and positioning them in place. Did you know that each stone was shaped for the position that it was being placed in. Think about that for a moment. The stones themselves had complex coding systems that said where they went. The even have markings on them that say "this end up."
Then there is the grand gallery itself. The load bearing stones around that that keep the gallery open are holding up thousands of tons of stone. The shape and fitting of the support stones has to be nothing short of perfect or the whole thing would come down.
We should talk about the moving parts of the pyramids. Yes, the pyramids have or had moving parts. Once the pyramids where closed up they did this by sliding 100+ ton blocks into place. Blocks, as in more than one. You know those scenes in the Indiana Jones movies where they would break the rock, sand pours out, and the big door comes down? That is probably how they did it.
I could go on and on but I think you see what I mean. There was the aligning of the pyramids with he stars. Did you know the pyramids had a outer limestone coating? When they where built the pyramids where coated in limestone and the sides where smooth and bright white. The case stones where fitted with such perfection that you couldn't get a playing card between the seems.
The building of the pyramids for the Egyptians was a task that was on par with the moonshot of the '60's.
Re:Maybe it's a safe space (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
I think the real question here is: Where did they get the playing cards?
Re: (Score:2)
Typical of Man's hubris, to look at the Alien Space Bong and claim "I built that"!
Re:Maybe it's a safe space (Score:5, Interesting)
While I'm pretty sure you are being funny, so the following rant isn't directed at you.
This is really one of the things that pushes all the wrong buttons I have. Attributing something like the pyramids or Stonehenge to aliens because they think early man was to stupid to figure out how to do it, or some such bullshit. The Egyptians where primitive, not stupid. They where just as intelligent as anyone alive today.
Actually, now that I stew on it, calling them primitive is bullshit too. They Egyptians at the time had and extremely complex society. They had a complex social order, economic system, and production capacity. What they didn't have was technological advancement.
Re: (Score:3)
I always thought that the Pyramids had all the architectural genius of a pile of dirt .. .A large, regularly shaped pile of dirt demonstrating some limited knowledge of astronomy.
Part of architecture is the design. Part of architecture is the execution or construction. At the time, constructing them was a feat.
Re: (Score:3)
Don't forget you are comparing them to the modern spectacle of skyscrapers and whatnot, and looking at them after thousands of years of looting and theft.
Imagine instead that you saw them on the horizon, their sides polished smooth white limestone (stolen to pave roads in Cairo), their peaks covered in hammered gold/electrum, reflecting the light of the Sun. As you approach the sheer enormity of these objects, made by man to praise their God, would strike you in awe. Yes there are temples and other large s
Re: (Score:3)
I always thought that the Pyramids had all the architectural genius of a pile of dirt.
Then you obviously don't know very much about them because the Pyramids are a wonder of math. They are *the* most culturally significant works our entire race have ever produced. The genius they encapsulate are so mind boggling in scope that it shows we are spiritual infants and mathematical simpletons by comparison.
I don't think our society could produce this quality of work. Ancient Egyptians had the Left brain school of Mathematics and the Right Brain School of Spirituality and the Pyramids are the w
Re: (Score:2)
I wonder whether, in today's climate of tearing down statues of famous slavers and imperialists (Jackson, Rhodes etc), people would advocate tearing down the pyramids which, for all their architectural genius, were built at a cost of thousands of lives. They're like Qatari football stadia x1000.
I hope you're not legitimately having trouble differentiating structures built thousands of years ago to celebrate gods with statues built a little over 100 years ago to remind black people that the whites were still in charge.
Re: (Score:2)
I hope you're not legitimately suggesting that those confederate statues were built to frighten the blacks. Might as well say that statues of JFK were built to glorify womanizing and to terrify women.
Re: (Score:2)
I wonder whether, in today's climate of tearing down statues of famous slavers and imperialists (Jackson, Rhodes etc), people would advocate tearing down the pyramids which, for all their architectural genius, were built at a cost of thousands of lives. They're like Qatari football stadia x1000.
Other than the difference that confederate statues have a much smaller footprint than the pyramids and would require lots of labor and equipment to remove. That and many statues were erected long after the Civil War to intimidate the local African-Americans.
Wouldn't bother me in the slightest (Score:2)
But even as symbols there's strong evidence that they were built for one of two reasons:
a. Religion. And I don't hear anyone calling to tear down the sistine chapel.
b. As a show of power to other nations. To say "Look what we can do, don't mess with us".
Now, as for those famous slaver monuments, they were built during the 'Jim Crow' era when the south was trying to oppress black people. They sent a ve
Re: (Score:2)
... people would advocate tearing down the pyramids which, for all their architectural genius, were built at a cost of thousands of lives.
Definitely tear it down. Carefully cataloging every piece and location. Measure and photograph exhaustively and then re-assemble exactly.
Then we'd know. No more guesses or conspiracies. We'd just know.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Slavery still exists, but it's called "9 to 5".
The clues for this have been around for a while? (Score:4, Interesting)
I thought that when the robot that was looking to the end of one of the "Star Shafts" (back in 2002), a chamber like this was hypothesized because the robot came to the "door" at the end of the shaft.
I haven't keep up with the research for a while, but I think saying that this is the "discovery of the century" is simple hyperbole.
Re:The clues for this have been around for a while (Score:5, Funny)
Nonsense. It is easily the hyperbole of the century.
Re:The clues for this have been around for a while (Score:4, Funny)
Physicists are proud of their new portable mountain scanning X-ray machine, let them have their moment.
Re: (Score:3)
There have been theories of more chambers in the great pyramid for over a hundred years. There are also theories about chambers beneath the Sphinx.
The problem is the politics with government Egypt and it's people. They are a very proud people. They want their own scientists to make all discoveries. They want to promote the theories of their own scientists. They are a Muslim nation researching ancient blasphemous religions.
Next you have international archaeological politics. There are lots of crack pots out
Re: (Score:2)
> "Science" isn't very scientific and it full of politics and prideful people that decree acceptable theories.
"Science progresses one funeral at a time -- Max Planck [wikiquote.org], originator of quantum theory
--
Science, noun, trading one set of dogma for another set of dogma.
I expect something silly like budget cuts. (Score:2)
Perhaps it was suppose to be a much bigger chamber, but for some reason they were not able to complete it, so they made a smaller one. However they left the remains of the bigger one in place, as no one would see it or know.
Ben was right! (Score:2, Troll)
It is empty (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Awesome $22B - now, share that among all the citizens of the country and they can each pay for a month of cellphone service.
What is it they found? (Score:5, Insightful)
Dictionary: void = a space containing no matter
So they found literally nothing? Must be certainly the discovery of the century.
Might explain something that's always mystified me (Score:5, Interesting)
One of the remarkable facts of Egyptology is how nearly impossible it was to prevent tombs from being robbed over the course of thousands of years. There's never been a tomb found that hasn't been robbed at some point, even Tutankhamen's tomb. Most are picked clean of anything that might be of interest to anyone other than an archaeologist.
But it always seemed to me, given the scale of the pyramids, that there was an obvious option for deterring robbers: make the scale of the engineering project necessary to find and reach the burial chamber more costly than the value of the goods in the chamber. It's not unreasonable; the cost of even a small pyramid must have outweighed the cost of the funerary goods in it by thousands of times. I'm not talking about sealing the burial chamber with a ten ton slab of rock; I'm thinking in terms of hundreds of thousands of tons.
It has to have occurred to anyone who's pondered the pyramids that there might be things still left hidden inside all that volume. The thing is there is no way to investigate such speculation without some means of being able to see through solid stone. For that reason the matter of undiscovered chambers in the pyramids has become to Egyptology a bit like questions about perpetual motions machines are to physicists. I even saw one Egyptologist say in response to this news that there was "zero chance" of anything remaining undiscovered in the Great Pyramid.
But maybe speculation isn't so pointless, now that we in the 21st century actually *can* in a fashion see through solid stone.
Re: (Score:2)
It has to have occurred to anyone who's pondered the pyramids that there might be things still left hidden inside all that volume.
The problem with the design is that there is little volume in the pyramid itself as it wasn't designed that way as it is the world's largest grave markers in a way. Most of the structure is used to support it's own weight. That's a problem with using only masonry as load-bearing members. If you look at medieval castles you'd find that the interiors are much smaller than you think because the walls have to be thick. Later castles that were not used as defense but more as manors or estate homes had much large
Re: (Score:3)
What you say may be true of smaller pyramids, but the Great Pyramid does have internal passageways and rooms. With 2.5 million cubic meters there's plenty of room.
The medieval castle analogy is apt; to a first approximation the Great Pyramid is solid rock. But you can leave plenty space for a burial chamber and it would still to a first approximation be solid rock.
Re: (Score:2)
For God's sake, DON'T OPEN IT! (Score:4, Funny)
They never learn, do they? Some things are better left alone, such as a mysterious void in the Great Pyramid.
Does anyone know what these are? (Score:2)
https://mdw-ntr.com/images/blo... [mdw-ntr.com]
Thing to thank The Arabs for: (Score:2)
And, most importantly:
Al-Literatation.
-----
Before you bitch-n-moan... seriously you're surfing slashdot while your sense of humor is in a coma?
Call Geraldo Rivera (Score:2)
Tell him this is Al Caponeâ(TM)s vault!
Big Void (Score:5, Funny)
> “There have been many hypotheses about the pyramid, but no one even
> imagined that such a big void is located above the Grand Gallery.”
Shouldn't that be long void?
long void is to void as long int is to int.
C'mon guys. Let's have consistency on this.
Slave Grave (Score:2)
I think we me have found resting place of the remains of those who built that pyramid.
So this means ... (Score:2)
... a cavity search.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/11/02/clinton-brazile-hacks-2016-215774
Re: So that's where Hillary hid all those E-mails (Score:2)
Pity HRC couldnâ(TM)t beat Trump in the general election - I bet she was surprised to learn there were no âoesuper delegatesâ to buy off in the general election!
Re: (Score:2)
One Person, One vote and we'd not have the orange alzheimer's patient running rampant with his diaper hanging out of his pants. That fat-fuck is so fat he can't even close his _tailored_ suit. There just is no way they can add enough cloth while still calling it a suit jacket.
Re: (Score:2)
The discovery of the century is Arduino-powered, 3D-printed bitcoin drones that upload 4K photos to the blockchain cloud.
Re: (Score:2)
As long as we nuke it from orbit.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
In recent light of the political climate, I think we should remove these Pyramids as they are monuments of slavery. Sorry I just could not resist.
You could not resist posting nonsense? There is no evidence that the pyramids were built by slave labor.
Re: (Score:2)
We know the Flood occurred in 2348 BC
Nope. That's nonsense, like the rest of your post.
Re: (Score:2)
I thought the Pyramids were built by Yule Bryner
One Night In Giza (Score:2)
I thought the Pyramids were built by Yule Bryner
No, the pyramids are a show with everything in it BUT Yule Bryner. The void is where Yule Bryner would go, if he were in it.
Re: (Score:2)