67% of Americans Use Social Media To Get Some of their News 71
Shan Wang, writing for Neiman Lab: Sixty-seven percent of Americans report getting some of their news via social media at some point, according to a Pew Research survey of just under 5,000 U.S. adults conducted last month and published Thursday. That overall percentage is only up slightly from 62 percent in 2016, in the run-up to the November election. But among specific demographics, using social media for news has increased: 74 percent of non-white U.S. adults now get news from social media, up from 64 percent of that group who got news that way in 2016. Fifty-five percent of Americans 50 and older say the have gotten news from social media, up from 45 percent (older people are also driving the increasing percentage of people who get news via mobile). Facebook is still the dominant social media source for news. But when Pew looked at the percentage of users on each social media platform who were using it for news, it was Twitter, Snapchat, and YouTube that saw increases (remember that user bases are vastly different sizes, from YouTube to Facebook to Tumblr to Twitter):
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
what the heck is this crazy stuff?
You must be new here.
Re: (Score:2)
> That explains so many of the misinformed idiots I've met.
You do realize that ALL the major media outlets publish on Facebook, right?
It's not all just dank memes from The 98% and it's dopplegangers.
Is /. social media? (Score:4, Interesting)
Is /. social media?
Re: (Score:2)
I would argue that it is. Many come for the comments and discussions. /. helps facilitate those discussions by having articles to start the conversations as compared to following specific people or accounts to hear what they have to say.
Re: (Score:2)
My apologies. Ima go take a shit. I will be sure to post pictures for those demanding proof.
Re: (Score:2)
One mans shit is another mans fetish.
Re: (Score:1)
He's a spy. Blow him up.
Re: (Score:2)
But you didn't comment while informing us about how many times you used the bathroom today, or posting a youtube video of your cat.
No, but I do have some choice comments about the uptime of my linux server.
Re: (Score:2)
lol, thanks for the giggle.
Would you be able to comment on emacs?
Re: (Score:2)
Can people add their thoughts/opinions and additional facts to the press releases, marketing blurbs and occasional actual reader submission that make up the "stories" here?
>> Yes.
Then...yes, SlashDot is social media. [Close: Solved]
Re: (Score:2)
I would say yes also because the primary goal here is to read about the topic of the story rather than the story link itself.. there's pretty much no headline I see on Slashdot I've not already seen elsewhere.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
The basement is a cold and lonely existence indeed.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Is /. social media?
Also... what counts as news?
I get a lot of car news via facebook. New model releases, updates, spectacular crashes, so on and so forth from various sites I've subscribed to. Every now and then you even get something news worthy through that no-one else picked up on like that time a few million quid of Jaguar/Land Rover engines got stolen. The Daily Mail and their ilk were too busy with a massive story in France where SOMEONE IN A BURKA stole a hundred Euro to bother with a piffling story such as millions
Re: (Score:1)
> Russia spread lies using social networks and gullible people,
Quite frankly, I found the nonsense that Democrats were posting on Facebook to be far more influential. The appalling nonsense made me want to have nothing to do with them.
They managed a level of bat shit insane craziness that none of my fundie tea bagger relatives could match.
Its funny that liberals think that tea baggers and fundies or even moderate Republicans were ever going to vote for Hillary.
Comment removed (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Sadly, many people do not move on, and that's all it takes for Left Shark to become reality.
Full disclosure: I'm a fan of Left Shark. Really liked his work there.
Is it really "News"? (Score:3)
I see people say that, and then try to talk to them to see what they know. They tend to have a great grasp of memes and basic fallacies like ad hominem and appeals to emotion, but no facts. "News" is supposed to provide you facts so that you can form an opinion. We seem to have lost that very special distinction over a pretty short time.
Just to one up your use of social media for news, I had a guy tell me all kinds of crazy stuff a particular politician said in a speech. I went and listened, it took all
Re: (Score:2)
More seriously, the only way to gauge news today is to read a wide variety of sources and ignore the slanted ones.
I guess you'll be ignoring /. then. That / is definitely slanted.
depends upon the definition of "news" (Score:3)
5000? (Score:2)
5,000 people seems a bit small to actually be representative of 300,000,000 people. I would also point out that this is only representative of people that actually agree to take a survey. I'm not saying their claim is incorrect, I'm just saying one small survey shouldn't be taken as gospel.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
At least, the garbage polls for 2016 that had Hillary in the lead by 8-10 points.
The sample size is big enough that it almost certainly was not a statistical fluke. If people didn't answer truthfully because Trump was such a controversial candidate you could have called 7000 or 70000 or the whole fucking country and you'd still have a poll that was way off compared to the voting booth. It's a limitation of polls, not of the sample size.
Re: (Score:3)
Or it was intentional (oversampling Ds, non-representative). To swing the 1 or 2% that simply want to have voted for 'the winner'.
Re: (Score:2)
It seems to me that the polls made people overconfident that Clinton would win. I'm not sure what's important about voting for "the winner" but maybe that appeals to some people.
I think it's more likely people who wanted Clinton (or just didn't want Trump to) to win didn't bother to vote because they believed she was a shoe-in.
Re: (Score:2)
I don't understand it either, but about 1 or 2% of the population treat elections like 'big games'. They just want bragging rights for having voted for 'the last 6 winners'.
You know 100% voted Hillary.
'They' were overconfident, it did come down to turnout. The elephant in the room is that racist black voters didn't turn out for a crooked white woman like the did for a crooked black man.
It was close enough, I don't think many stayed home (in most states) because they thought it was a done deal. They j
Re: (Score:2)
Bad polling is something the people involved try to avoid. It's embarrassing, and leads to reduced credibility.
Re: (Score:2)
Internal polls attempt accuracy. Public polls are glorified ads.
If what you said was true, would the 'push poll' even exist? Polls are used to push agendas all the time. It's all how they ask the question. can get any answer they want.
Re: (Score:2)
Most organizations that live on their polling results live off their reputations. This shouldn't be confused with organizations that live on something else and use slanted polls to try to convince people.
Re: (Score:2)
accounts or users??? (Score:2)
67% of Americans are STUPID. (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
...says another /. reader in response to a news story...
Re: (Score:2)
urgent: mouse wanted to baby bell the word "news" (Score:2)
There are many places on the Internet where I stick a wet finger in the air, to assess weather conditions.
Where I "get" my meteorology is from professionals over a broad spectrum (I actually prefer Chris Wallace and Shepard Smith over Joe and Mika when Chris and Shep are taking their jobs seriously). And then I often cross-check the professionals against Wikipedia (mostly for leaving important shit out) and Google Scholar (for careful treatment of what they chose to include).
Where it comes to meteorology, h
Re: (Score:2)
Slashdot mainly serves to keep my severed finger wet.
Doh!
Somewhere inside I just knew I was one word away from the perfect ending. I stared and stared at the video replay until I finally got it. Damn. Two beautiful bumps from Chomsky and Harris, and then I flubbed the spike.
And no, it wasn't an accident that team Chomsky, Harris and Will were lined up against Hannity, Limbaugh, and Carlson—those shrill wind-up drawls that blow nobody good—(Frum Jr. must then, perforce, be the odd-man-out stripe-
Scary number or...? (Score:1)