US Spy Satellite Buzzes ISS (arstechnica.com) 121
The spy satellite that SpaceX launched about six weeks ago appears to have buzzed the International Space Station in early June. The fly-by was made by a dedicated group of ground-based observers who continued to track the satellite after it reach outer space. Ars Technica reports: One of the amateur satellite watchers, Ted Molczan, estimated the pass on June 3 to be 4.4km directly above the station. Another, Marco Langbroek, pegged the distance at 6.4km. "I am inclined to believe that the close conjunctions between USA 276 and ISS are intentional, but this remains unproven and far from certain," Molczan later wrote. One expert in satellite launches and tracking, Jonathan McDowell, said of the satellite's close approach to the station, "It is not normal." While it remains possible that the near-miss was a coincidence due to the satellite being launched into similar orbit, that would represent "gross incompetence" on the part of the National Reconnaissance Office, he said. Like the astronaut, McDowell downplayed the likelihood of a coincidence. Another option is that of a deliberate close flyby, perhaps to test or calibrate an onboard sensor to observe something or some kind of activity on the International Space Station. "The deliberate explanation seems more likely, except that I would have expected the satellite to maneuver after the encounter," McDowell said. "But it seems to have stayed in the same orbit."
The fly-by was made by a dedicated group (Score:2)
Re: The fly-by was made by a dedicated group (Score:1)
a dedicated group of RUSSIAN HACKERS!
Re: (Score:1)
Trump (Score:1, Funny)
Trump probably decided he could declassify it to the Russians on board ISS, and let them have a good look.
Still waiting for the "expected" US response. (Score:3)
Had it been a Russian spy satellite, the USA would be screaming "irresponsibility & recklessness" on part of the Russians.
Question is: Am I wrong?
Re: (Score:1)
Have you been asleep for the past year? The current administration believes Putin is God.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
The orbit of spacecraft is determined by analysis of their radio transmissions. The trajectory of debris is determined by radar which is a much less accurate method.
Well, (Score:4, Interesting)
Now we know what this new satellite does. It aims at other satellites and buzzes them (and/or photographs them, or destroys them, either by smashing into it, or by using some sort of weapon on the platform itself).
Re: (Score:2)
What should we conclude about you, from this one comment taken in isolation? That what you "do" is post inane comments on the Internet?
Re: (Score:2)
Why is a plane change even needed? That's why they are excited about SpaceX's quick turnaround and rapid launch abilities. They just launch into the plane of the space object they want to check out or take out on demand.
Re: (Score:1)
Because flying non-stop is just too expensive sometimes.
Re: (Score:2)
Or someone got metric to imperial wrong again?
The approach ellipsoid was avoided and its ok?
Coincidence? A mistake or some mil math got done?
Re: (Score:1)
Or, just like people, they're passing each other on the sidewalk.
One an assassin, the other a research scientist.
They pass each other with zero interaction, but the drama-queen on the corner who spend his day pointing fingers at others sees a tremendously big deal.
Re: Well, (Score:2)
But why test it on a manned satellite, when there are so many unmanned satellites to choose from?
Re: (Score:2)
U.S. now risks the lives of people on the ISS? (Score:1)
What a disgusting neglect and gross lack of responsibility. The UN and world governments MUST act on this, it's unprecedented and can not be tolerated. If another country had done this, the U.S. would've thrown a huge circus about it themselves.
Re: (Score:2)
Nice try, Chinese guy sitting in a room full of other media manipulators. Thanks for keeping the tard level at a high enough level to be obvious.
lol. You think the Chinese government are trying to win hearts and minds on slashdot with psy ops? And correctly using contractions like "would've" whilst doing it?
I can't get my head around how fucking stupid you'd have to be to think that.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1, Flamebait)
Jesus did have a brother and sister, Mary only had a virgin birth the first time.
Yeah, it was right after she spun the straw into gold for the king and just before she fell asleep for a hundred years. Because this stuff really happened. lol.
Re: (Score:1)
> Mary only had a virgin birth the first time.
Or, as some bible scholars argue, the interpretation should be that it was OK not to stone the woman who'd given birth out of wedlock because she was betrothed to the father at the time of conception.
Re:what if jesus had been a girl or had a sister? (Score:4, Informative)
The Immaculate Conception actually refers to Mary, not Jesus. The belief goes that Mary was absolved of 'original sin' by God so that later when she bore Jesus she would have a clean soul. This belief started in the 12th century and became official Catholic doctrine in 1854. The belief that Mary was a virgin when she became pregnant is the Doctrine of Incarnation.
Re: (Score:2)
The Immaculate Conception actually refers to Mary, not Jesus. The belief goes that Mary was absolved of 'original sin' by God so that later when she bore Jesus she would have a clean soul. This belief started in the 12th century and became official Catholic doctrine in 1854. The belief that Mary was a virgin when she became pregnant is the Doctrine of Incarnation.
In actual fact, Mary got knocked up by Amnon down the street after too much mead at the tavern and couldn't think of a better story to tell Joseph.
"Immaculate conception... are you certain dear?".
never heard that in catechism school.. (Score:1)
but now that you mentioned it.. was there an attending md of record? still leaves out the speculative merit of the question.. as well as the hoopla about the missing monkey hymens... thanks..
You must wait a little bit before using this resource; please try again later. wtf?
The Gospel of Mark 6:3 and the Gospel of Matthew 13:55-56 state that James, Joses (or Joseph), Judas, and Simon were the brothers of Jesus, the son of Mary. The same verses also mention unnamed sisters of Jesus. Another verse in the Epist
Lots more information here (Score:1)
looks like the orbit was planned this way; observers were predicting close passes...
http://spaceflight101.com/falcon-9-nrol-76/secret-nrol-76-iss-flyby/
Gravity (Score:1)
What this means is the movie Gravity may be possible after all. Take that Neil deGrasse Tyson!
Did the US ~leak~ the plans to Russia? (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
fly-by (Score:2)
The fly-by was made by a dedicated group of ground-based observers
Was it? Or did they merely observe it?
Thanks for posting this piece of news... (Score:2)
...it remembered to me that I have to renew my car insurance.
Somewhere a young satellite operator (Score:1)
Editor Fail (Score:2)
The fly-by was made by a dedicated group of ground-based observers who continued to track the satellite
No it wasn't.
after it reach outer space.
Wow.
Nit (Score:2)
LEO is not "outer space" - not even close to it. You're still in the atmosphere.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Quite a number of people in pre-independence America disagreed. You're a couple hundred years late to the party.
If you genuinely believe that, I want to hear your stance on knives, baseball bats and rocks. A trivial google will show large numbers of attacks using those weapons that are clearly too dangerous for the public to own.
It's almost as if the demon spirit in each gun that makes it evil (and takes over the mind of whoever touches it) is actually present in other objects too, but that's silly talk.
Re: (Score:2)
ya'll all -1 offtopic here (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
And nobody can.
Re: (Score:2, Offtopic)
Any single trigger pull, multiple discharge weapon requires special licenses from the federal level. Any firearm sold in the US legally without this license is single trigger pull, single discharge. As a firearm enthusiast myself, I don't even know where one would start to try to acquire a full auto or burst fire weapon.
You start by saving up about $15,000, the $200 tax and 9 month wait are a piece of cake.
Re: (Score:2)
You can get an AK from any shady arms dealer for ~$500.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Much less. AKs in sub saharan africa go for about $20/each. But they are typically worn out, you don't want them, even without the potential for 10 years federal, just for possession.
After the fall of the USSR, the world was glutted with AKs.
Re:sounds like a non-story (Score:5, Interesting)
Idiot.
4-6km at 10-20,000 mph is a near miss. That's literally seconds away, or a tiny angle error because you completely destroy both objects in question.
Even in aviation terms, that kind of distance is probably needing reporting for most places. 4-6km isn't exactly "far away" at even aircraft speed.
In orbit, it's just downright dangerous.
Re:sounds like a non-story (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
They didn't say km/s, they said km.
That's distance, not speed.
It was a near miss.
Re: (Score:2)
~3.4 meters/second (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
> 4-6km at 10-20,000 mph is a near miss. That's literally seconds away, or a tiny angle error because you completely destroy both objects in question.
That would be one hell of an error with two objects on ballistic trajectories, considering how accurate even non-modern radar systems are. A resupply mission, non-ballistic, is a far worse danger for the ISS.
> Even in aviation terms, that kind of distance is probably needing reporting for most places. 4-6km isn't exactly "far away" at even aircraft speed
Re: (Score:2)
Yet aircraft almost never collide above even the busiest airports.
But isn't that exactly because they maintain minimum distances between aircraft?
Re: (Score:2)
... a tiny angle error...
I'm not saying mistakes don't happen (think Viking 1 antenna adjustment) but we have a pretty good record for not making tiny angle errors.
And as others have pointed out, the relative velocity isn't anywhere near the rates you cited. (and great way to mix KM and MPH).
Personally I think you're being just a teeny bit alarmist.
Re: (Score:2)
Commercial airliners regularly fly 1km separation, and as little as 1500' altitude difference when going "head to head" in a controlled commercial flight lane.
Poor comparison (Score:3)
Commercial airliners regularly fly 1km separation, and as little as 1500' altitude difference when going "head to head" in a controlled commercial flight lane.
Commercial airliners also are flying at speeds two orders of magnitude less than the speeds of satelltes (500mph vs 17500mph), with human pilots on board, the ability to quickly change course, and active air traffic control in most cases. Kind of comparing apples to oranges here.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
When two objects have highly similar orbits which frequently coincide it implies very low velocity difference and very precise planning to synchronize the orbits. Yes, they are mutually moving very quickly but their relative velocities are lowest when they are nearby. This isn't two objects zipping by each other, they are more like in a ballet. Yes, it's extremely counter-intuitive.
The real story here isn't about some risk of collision, it's that there's some purpose in having them orbit together because th
Re:sounds like a non-story (Score:5, Interesting)
Don't call people idiots unless you yourself are willing to talk about the whole story. Direction is very important. NASA does not draw a sphere around the ISS, they draw a "pizza box". The pizza box is 50 km wide, but only 1.5 km tall. This is because stuff in space is not likely to change altitude very quickly, but it is moving very quickly within it's orbit. So, the AC is actually correct and a 4-6km altitude difference would take this thing well out of harms' way. If it was anywhere within the pizza box at any time, which it does not appear was the case, then yeah - it would be a near miss by violating NASA's safety zone.
Re: (Score:2)
"The pizza box is 50 km wide, but only 1.5 km tall."
Hi, just stopped in to say thanks for the info. I knew that differing orbit altitudes are not as "close" as common sense might guess, but didn't know the scale. Oh, and kudos for the mental sight picture of a giant pizza.
--
I'm inexplicably reminded of Douglas Adams...how did he put it?
How do we eat?
What should we eat?
Where shall we have lunch?
--
But I digress.
Re: (Score:2)
Ha! I wish it was my analogy - I think "pizza box" is the NASA term :) Douglas Adams would approve.