Wolves May Be 'Re-Domesticating' Into Dogs (sciencemag.org) 95
sciencehabit quotes a report from Science Magazine: It happened thousands of years ago, and it may be happening again: Wolves in various parts of the world may have started on the path to becoming dogs. That's the conclusion of a new study, which finds that the animals are increasingly dining on livestock and human garbage instead of their wild prey, inching closer and closer to the human world in some places. But given today's industrialized societies, this closeness might also bring humans and wolves into more conflict, with disastrous consequences for both. To find out how gray wolves might be affected by eating more people food, Thomas Newsome, an evolutionary biologist at the Deakin University in Melbourne, Australia, and his colleagues examined studies of what's happened to other large carnivores that live close to people. Newsome's 2014 study of a dingo population in Australia's Tanami Desert showed that the wild dogs' habit of dining almost exclusively on junk food at a waste management facility had made them fat and less aggressive. They were also more likely to mate with local dogs and had become "cheeky," says Newsome, daring to run between his legs as he set out traps for them. Most intriguingly, the dumpster dingoes' population formed a genetic cluster distinct from all other dingoes -- indicating that they were becoming genetically isolated, a key step in forming a new species. Is this happening to gray wolves? The conditions are ripe for it, says Newsome, noting that human foods already make up 32% of gray wolf diets around the world. The animals now mostly range across remote regions of Eurasia and North America, yet some are returning to developed areas. The paper has been published in the journal Bioscience.
It's nice to be the apex predator (Score:5, Insightful)
But given today's industrialized societies, this closeness might also bring humans and wolves into more conflict, with disastrous consequences for both
How could that have "disastrous" consequences for humans? If a group of wolves say inflict a few deaths on humans (nothing like the numbers from say boating accidents let alone road deaths) then the wolves will be wiped out. That may be a shame or even a tragedy but the potential disastrousness from conflict here is only for the wolves.
Re: It's nice to be the apex predator (Score:1)
I don't know how true it is. But studies have been done that say wolves are definitely good for the environment. The help keep the elk population in check.
I would think that wolves would stop hunting if they have found a constant food source though such as a garbage dump. They would just become a menace.
Re: (Score:2)
Perhaps that dead wolf on his head is controlling him?
Re: (Score:2)
Bartender raises his eyebrows and says, "What's the deal with that?"
The amphibian replies, "I don't know. it started out as a wart on my arse."
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Humans, not humanity. "If a group of wolves say inflict a few deaths on humans" it IS disastrous for said humans
Re: (Score:2)
But given today's industrialized societies, this closeness might also bring humans and wolves into more conflict, with disastrous consequences for both
How could that have "disastrous" consequences for humans?
I should introduce you to my next door neighbor.
Obligatory (Score:4, Funny)
It happened thousands of years ago, and it may be happening again
So bark we all!
Re: (Score:2)
It happened thousands of years ago, and it may be happening again
So bark we all!
Especially the cheeky dingos!
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
There are several breeds of dog that look not much different from wolves, such as German Shepherd and Husky. People aren't greatly scared by German Shepherds in most cases. Wolves already cross-breed with domestic dogs and many people own the hybrids as pets; some people own wolves as pets.
Fear of wolves is taught or the result of an attack; it's not inherent in human nature.
Re: (Score:3)
many people own the hybrids as pets; some people own wolves as pets.
The number of people killed (often including the owners) by these "domesticated" wolves likely exceeds the number killed by wild wolves. Keeping a wolf as a pet is a really bad idea. In a wild wolf pack, only the alpha male and female reproduce. So a wolf has a genetic imperative to eventually challenge the alpha, and take over the pack. If you own a wolf, you are the alpha, and one day, possibly when you are sick or injured and the wolf senses your weakness, your "pet" is going turn on you.
"Domesticate
Re: Failed logic (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Pit bulls are way more common than "pet" wolves or hybrids.
So it is no surprise that there are more pit bull incidents.
Pit bulls are selectively bred to be vicious, so comparing wolves to pit pulls isn't much of an endorsement.
Re: (Score:2)
Such animals are vermin and not domesticated. They are wild animals that live within proximity to humans which carry with the negative effects. In the case of pigeons their poop is a health hazard. In the case of wolves you would increase the probability of attacks on humans as well as them potentially hunting potentially easier prey like actual domesticated animals such as chickens, pigs, or cows. A wolf in this circumstance is no different from a coyote.
Re: Failed logic (Score:1)
Oh my God are you dumb. WOLFS? Active breeding with what .. other WOLVES? Birds don't domesticate so I don't know what drugs you are on man..
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Birds don't domesticate? Colonle Sanders disagrees.
Re: (Score:2)
The domestication into dogs was the result of introducing wolfs into society from when they where puppies and active breeding. Just having wolfs living closer to humans won't domesticate them, just like birds and other animals that practically like on top of us aren't domesticated.
They are talking about the genetic isolation part of evolution. You are correct about the final steps of becoming domesticated dogs.
If I know people, and I do, there will likely be a wolf rescue, and in some number of generations, we'll have fully domesticated wolfdogs. We do have semi-domesticated wolves already, a few in my neighborhood, just not ones from dumpster diver variety. Gorgeous critters.
Re: (Score:2)
Will some domesticated dogs go feral and become dogwolves?
Re: (Score:2)
Will some domesticated dogs go feral and become dogwolves?
They can if they haven't been too messed with by breeding. A Pug or Bulldog is going to have problems. From what I understand, natural breeding of feral dogs tends to bring them back in a few generations to the archetype known as the long-term pariah morphotype. This resembles the original dog breeds which are a subspecies of wolves, so they aren't likely to "re-wolf".
The Dingo is a pretty good example of this.
The long-term pariah morphotype of dogs is probably good to keep around, because we have a t
Re: (Score:2)
Interesting. I knew that feral pigs start to look like wild boar within a few generations but I wasn't aware of a similar thing with dogs.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
The secret to producing a dog is to encourage continued juvenile behaviors; neoteny. A wolf is actually a pretty useless pet, while they are a social animal, they are high strung and unreliable. However, as likely happened the other times wolves have been domesticated, those wolves who are a little less high strung, who can form even a marginally stronger social bond with humans, will be tolerated, whereas the wilder members will either be killed or driven off. And really, it actually only takes a few gener
Re: (Score:2)
If we did the same thing with wolves wouldn't we just be reinventing dogs?
I do like the idea of a pet fox, though.
I would choose a buffet over foraging any day (Score:2)
This isnt domestication, (Score:5, Insightful)
and it wont result in dogs 2.0
It wasnt just proximity to humans that cause the first domestication event in wolves (or really, several parallel events), but conditions that also resulted animals with less aggression, which was then amplified by captive breeding.
this event isnt structured to provide that reduction in aggression.
but it will provide an increase in guile.
this isnt dogs 2.0
this is coyotes 2.0
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Any dog can bite.
Plenty of dogs bite, but they rarely bite their owners.
This kid was mauled by his own "pet".
Re: (Score:2)
Not that I am saying that this is a fair sampling. But typically when you hear about pit bulls killing things those things are its owners and owners children.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
"Meant" by whom?
You first.
"Better" by what standard?
Your attitude is an excellent illustration of why environmentalists are bad for people.
Re: (Score:2)
You should live in Beijing were people who hate the environment live.
The EPA made sure we have clean clear air, clean water, etc. As a business will only do what is profitable for them. If they can make more money posioning their own workers they will. See every single environmental catastrophy.
The EPA makes polloution expensive. And creates new business opportunities.
Your attitude is why a business will take every thing you have leaving nothing for your kids. 95% CV hance that it will be a medical com
Re: (Score:2)
( ... though he mostly acts like he thinks he owns me, and considering that I'm the one who has to pick up his poop ...)
Re: (Score:2)
I take him out often just as much for my own health as his - though when it's snowing or raining he refuses to go. It's a great way to meet people who share the same interests - or at least one interest. Having to retire early (which sux), it gives me something to do (that doesn't suck so much).
But every hour? We're out for up to an hour or more each time (bad weather excepted), so forget it. 4 hours a day is enough. I get my 10,000 steps in, and he (with those tiny legs) gets his 70,000 steps in.
Re: (Score:2)
Unsafe to own. All should be wiped out
http://q13fox.com/2017/04/03/3... [q13fox.com]
Oh gee, a dog bit someone! Using your logic, there wouldn't be many animals left on earth.
Re: (Score:2)
Imagine if it was a gun that shot someone.
xD
That's different.
Re: (Score:2)
The growth is growing exponentially? Fucking rubbish. Learn to math.
These people don't get around much (Score:3)
Alaska, Bears will enter a bus to eat workers lunches.
Deer, suburbs are entering their area so they have to raid what they can till captured as someone will call about them.
Yellowstone, Bears have entered cars through windows forcing people to exit while it searches for food.
One doesn't feed or allow animals to find a source of food or they will make it a habit.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Rangers can't figure out how hat happened.
Simple, actually. Building codes in Canada encourage (require?) the installation of door handles instead of knobs. But bears have figured out how to operate the handles to gain access to the soft, chewy goodies inside [economist.com]. Mom probably opened the door and the cubs walked in.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Canadian codes don't require it as of yet. But other municipalities and the federal body responsible for codes are "open to considering the measure".
Don't know where you got that from.
From the article I linked.
but then again, it's Vancouver. They live in a different world.
Vancouver is to Canada as California is to the rest of the USA. They are a bunch of clueless, stoned hippies. But sooner or later, whatever they do starts to seem like a good idea to everyone else. And so the rest of the country follows.
Re: (Score:2)
Vancouver is to Canada as California is to the rest of the USA.
Wow, please look at a map. Vancouver is a city, not a state, territory, or province.
Re: (Score:2)
Vancouver is a special snowflake, just like California. Geopolitical terminology doesn't matter when they are going to get their way or throw a hissy-fit.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Looks like a fraternity prank to me.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Not just bears [youtube.com]
Only because humans are stupid. (Score:2)
People are too fucking lazy to buy a proper garbage can that is animal proof, they also think feeding the wildlife is helping. The problem is the education level of the population has continued a downward spiral and will only get worse.
the dumpster dingos (Score:1)
Am I the only one that thinks "the Dumpster Dingos" would be a good name for a band?
No problem (Score:2)
Story of Life (Score:2)
People Abandoning the Human 'Niche' (Score:2)
Wolves' domestication is merely a step towards occupying the niche that has been held by humans over the past couple thousand years, which people are now abandoning as they increasingly begin to act like animals. I attribute this to the rise in 'furry' culture and animal avatars in Second Life, and the whole 'horse schlong' thing.
People have also been observed repeatedly making swiping motions on their smartphones to navigate endless Javascript scrolls on social media platforms like Facebook, which is a re
Global Warming! (Score:1)
We all know its because of global warming. thats what CNN told me. these scientists have just been paid by the Trump Administration to say this shit!
a hybrid coyote/wolf is happing too (Score:2)
Documentary: "Meet The Coywolf"
They looked in our windows (Score:2)
...and saw a cousin lounging on the couch and they want in on that.
Just "wolves"? (Score:2)
Want to stop this efficiently? (Score:2)
It can be done pretty easily -- let people kill any wolves that come into populated areas, like they used to be allowed to do. The wolves that survive will be those that fear people and stick to the wilds.
And it's not like it would actually endanger the wolves -- the IUCN listing for them is Least Concern. The "Endangered Species Act" listing of them as "endangered" merely indicated they were rare in the lower 48 states; Canada, Alaska, Russia, and China have plenty.
Ahh, bullcrap. (Score:2)
Second, the dependence on human garbage that the researchers posit is a fantasy of theirs. Wolf population density maps with their prey population density, not the garbage dump count.
If "normal", natural apex predators are desired, controlling their own numbers as apex predators do and avoiding humans sharing their habi
Pet Wolves (Score:1)