Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Earth Medicine United States Science Technology

Life Expectancy Set To Hit 90 In South Korea, Study Predicts (nature.com) 108

According to a study published in the journal The Lancet, researchers have predicted that South Korea will likely become the first country where the average life expectancy will exceed 90 years. The researchers led by public-health researcher Majid Ezzati at Imperial College London used data from the World Health Organization and a suite of 21 statistical models they developed to figure out how life expectancy will change in 35 developed countries by 2030. Nature reports: Life expectancy is expected to increase in all 35 countries, in keeping with steady progress in recent decades, the team found. But it is South Korean women who will be living longest by 2030: there is a nearly 60% chance that their life expectancy at birth will exceed 90 years by that time, the team calculates. Girls born in the country that year can expect to live, on average, to nearly 91, and boys to 84, the highest in the world for both sexes. The nation's rapid improvement in life expectancy -- the country was ranked twenty-ninth for women in 1985 -- is probably down to overall improvements in economic status and child nutrition, the study notes, among other factors. South Koreans also have relatively equal access to health care, lower blood pressure than people in Western countries and low rates of smoking among women. As for the United States, the life expectancy is "predicted to be among the lowest of these countries by 2030; 80 for men (similar to the Czech Republic) and 83 for women (similar to Mexico)."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Life Expectancy Set To Hit 90 In South Korea, Study Predicts

Comments Filter:
  • by Dutch Gun ( 899105 ) on Friday February 24, 2017 @02:48AM (#53922507)

    How much do you want to bet that North Korea releases a report of their own stating that life expectancy in their country now exceeds 95 years, only exceeded by their glorious leader, who is expected to live for two centuries?

  • by thinkwaitfast ( 4150389 ) on Friday February 24, 2017 @02:58AM (#53922523)
    and it still sucks
    • by javilon ( 99157 )

      Absolutely. Most people don't like the idea of living that many years in poor health, limited and frail. But the current situation is we patch the problems that come with age and keep people alive.

      On the other hand, if you look at the SENS strategy (http://www.sens.org), what they are trying to achieve is to revert the damage that age inflicts on people, so you live in good health and active and strong. What is important here is to increase the "healthspan". If lifespan is increased it is good too.

      Please su

  • Calculating age (Score:2, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward

    Let's not forget that in South Korea, you are considered to be 1 year old on the day you are born and your age increases by 1 on January 1st regardless of your date of birth. The average 5-year-old South Korean is 1.5 years younger than the average 5-year-old American.

    While this has probably been accounted for, I wouldn't be so bold as to put such an oversight past today's "scientists".

  • by hcs_$reboot ( 1536101 ) on Friday February 24, 2017 @03:45AM (#53922603)
    since SK's Samsung stopped selling the Note 7
  • On Aurora and Solaria life expectancy has hit 350 and nobody seems to worry about it.

  • by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Friday February 24, 2017 @05:32AM (#53922781)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • I think it is their diet. Who would have thunk eating dogs and cabbages improves longevity?
    • by dcw3 ( 649211 )

      While dog (Kaygogi) is eaten, it's rather uncommon. I lived there for six years, and only came across it once when my landlord invited me to their elderly grandmother's birthday.

      I haven't read the article, but my knee-jerk reaction to the headline is disbelief. Korea is highly polluted, with a very large smoking population, and tuberculosis was much more common there than in the US. Many homes are heated using "Ondal", a form of charcoal, smoking out into the open air. Of the roughly 50 countries I've bee

  • by Trailer Trash ( 60756 ) on Friday February 24, 2017 @08:08AM (#53923087) Homepage

    So, America might have a lower life expectancy but we make it up by weighing three times as much. If you use "pound-years" as a metric, America on average is probably more than triple Koreans.

    • I wonder how much of the difference is due to High Fructose Corn Syrup? That stuff will kill you (in excess).
      • by hey! ( 33014 )

        Why single out one cause, when there's obviously many.

        Take food. I live near a supermarket that is probably three times the size of the one my parents went to, but the produce section is smaller, the meat and dairy sections about the same size. The surplus acreage is taken up with cheap, calorie dense, no-preparation convenience food.

        Or the fact that Amercians spend more time in cars than they used to, on average over 290 hours a year.

        Here's another interesting fact: research shows that the portion size y

  • Fan death (Score:4, Funny)

    by HalAtWork ( 926717 ) on Friday February 24, 2017 @09:09AM (#53923245)

    That's what the rest of the world gets for not taking fan death seriously!

    • I wanted to mod you either +1 funny or +1 informative, but instead decided to post instead.

      My first thought was "who's killing sports fans in Korea?" as I remembered a story about a stadium with robot audiences there.

      Then I googled the phrase and found immediate hits (p'raps previous /.'s like me looking it up primed google's cache).

      So I thought that it maybe was related to the warnings about their charcoal stoves and heating. When I was in SK in a previous millennium we were seriously briefed about keeping

      • Haha interesting, I would have never thought of sports fans killing each other... Sad to find out that is real and causes actual death. That takes the concept of sore winners and sore losers much too far.

  • But will they be using email? [slashdot.org]
  • You'd think scientist would be pushing for LOWERING the lifespan of humans...well, the "right" humans that is. The so called "smart" people would be exempt from it of course.
    • Longevity is not correlated with overpopulation. Most of the countries with over population problems are among those with the lowest life expectancy and vice versa.
    • by XXongo ( 3986865 )

      You'd think scientist would be pushing for LOWERING the lifespan of humans...

      I'm not sure why you would think this. In general, scientists are not assholes, despite what the blogosphere would have you believe.

      I can't assert that about Slashdot commenters, on the other hand.

      • plenty of scientists and engineers are "assholes" and are engaged in work that shortens human life. think harder about all the products that shorten human life, ruin environment, enable war for power and profit rather than defense, etc.

  • ...America continues to be the only country in the world that reports stillborn children (age 0) as part of their statistics to the WHO.

Do you suffer painful illumination? -- Isaac Newton, "Optics"

Working...