China Launches Second Space Lab (space.com) 88
Reader hackingbear writes: China's next space laboratory, Tiangong-2 launched from the country's Jiuquan Satellite Launch Center today at 10:04 a.m. EDT (1404 GMT) on a Long March 2F carrier rocket. Like its predecessor Tiangong-1, Tiangong-2 is an orbiting space lab -- but this latest model has made several improvements in the series. Among the advances: astronauts can remain on the station up to 30 days; New systems allow in orbit refueling of propellant; and 14 new experiments in a wide range of sciences including composite material fabrication, advanced-plant cultivation, gamma ray burst polarization, fluid physics, space-to-earth quantum communications. The space lab is also equipped with a cold atom space clock, that has an estimated precision of 10 to the power of minus 16 seconds, or a one-second error every 30 million years, enhancing accuracy of time-keeping in space by one to two orders of magnitudes. This exactitude will help measure previously undetectable fluctuations for experiments conducted in zero-gravity.The Tiangong 2, while is an experimental space station, is still operational. The astronauts that would come on board next month are to spend a full month up there -- a longer period of time than possible on Tiangong 1.
piracy? (Score:3)
I've often wondered what prevents (aside from stupendous cost) someone from launching up to one of these and taking it over while it's not occupied?
At what point will this actually become an issue?
-nb
Re:piracy? (Score:4, Funny)
Of course, it might just be worth it for that alone, to go down in history as the first Space Pirate.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Priates are hung by the neck (Score:2)
Pirates were, customarily, hung by the neck until dead. Can't do that in zero-gravity...
Throwing one out of an airlock is rather cruel — and unusual too. Wasting your own crew's sole means of evacuation on transferring the captured pirates to Earth is not only wasteful, but may well condemn the said crew to death.
Keeping the detained pirates up there — and feeding them food at $17,000-20,000 per kilogram [quora.com]? Talk about
Re: (Score:2)
"Pirates were, customarily, hung by the neck until dead. Can't do that in zero-gravity..."
Sure. Set the noose and twirl them around.
"Throwing one out of an airlock is rather cruel — and unusual too. Wasting your own crew's sole means of evacuation on transferring the captured pirates to Earth is not only wasteful, but may well condemn the said crew to death."
As if hanging isn't cruel if not done quite right. Twirling will require some acceleration, which will be cruel.
"Keeping the detained pirates up
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
"Oh, the sights you'll see..."
Re: (Score:2)
Soviet Green is people!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I've often wondered what prevents (aside from stupendous cost) someone from launching up to one of these and taking it over while it's not occupied?
It will have to be Russia or India. The US doesn't have its own ride.
Re: (Score:2)
As far as I know, India has not yet put any people into space. They are at the same level as SpaceX and Boeing. They have launched unmaned vehicles.
My guess is SpaceX will put a human into space long before India does.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You have bins specifically for fucking?
Re: (Score:1)
A telegram from the SpaceShark (SNL reference).
Re: (Score:2)
If you could put a person into space, you could just as easily put your own station into space.
I think you are entirely unaware of how few manned space programs there are right now.
Heck, it took a ton of effort just to get spacecraft from different countries to be able to dock with each other during Soyuz-Apollo and Space Shuttle-Mir missions. Nobody in Russia, US, or India would even have the equipment to link up to a Chinese station.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm quite aware, thank you.
I just enjoy the thought experiment. Every time one launches, all the way back to Skylab, I've had the same thought.
-nb
Re: (Score:2)
Sandra Bullock did this once. She didn't seem to have any problems getting into the station and launching the return module.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, and she did it all while winning the Miss Congeniality title.
Re: (Score:2)
And while maintaining speeds over 50. She's amazing.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Actually, there are weapons on the ISS too, if inadvertently.
The Soyuz capsule has a 9mm on-board for use in self defense if it lands in the middle of, say, a lake surrounded by somewhere with wild animals.
Re: piracy? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Can you access the docking port without assistance from the ground? Can the ground control remotely lock it or otherwise make the station uninhabitable? Might need some hacking but I bet they could sabotage it pretty well remotely.
Re: (Score:2)
I've often wondered what prevents (aside from stupendous cost) someone from launching up to one of these and taking it over while it's not occupied?
I'm just guessing, but what prevents someone from launching up to one of these and taking it over while it's not occupied is probably the stupendous cost.
I can't wait (Score:1)
I just can't wait until we catch up with China and have the ability to launch astronauts into space!
Re: (Score:1)
Why? At this point it's just a spectacle. There's no purpose to putting people into LEO. It's been done. It achieves little to nothing.
Re: (Score:1)
Yes, but currently we rely on Russia to be our Astro-Uber. It's embarrassing and gives Putin more ways to mess with us.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Why? You rely on China to be your Manufacturing-Uber. You aren't embarrassed by that! As long as it allows more taking and taking by the billionaire leisure class, it's OK, right?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
China has enough of a space program to let them quickly bootstrap up to levels they feel are socially, scientifically and militarily appropriate. There is plenty of opportunity for China to go way beyond what the US / European Space Agency / Russia has done. A decade or so of 'just enough' could get them in deep space.
Yes, they're re-purposing Russian Soyuz craft. That sounds like a really intelligent way to .... jump ahead. You just don't make some 3D computer models and run out and build a space prog
Re: (Score:2)
I don't think China can ramp up that quickly. The US and Russia both have decades of experience. China literally is nominally at where the US and Russia were in the 70s, in some regards, but other technologies, like landing on other bodies, they're still back in the 1960s. They do get some benefit because they can review what the Russians and Americans did, but that still means they have to build an entire generation of engineers capable of building their own variants.
Re: (Score:2)
Actually it puts them ahead of the US (for MANNED spaceflight) at the moment because the US has no means of putting people into space anymore. Non-manned spaceflight they have a long way to catch up.
Not many countries have put their own independent space labs in orbit though. China is moving forwards all the time. Given this progress a decade or two from now and they will surpass the US in just about everything "space".
Re: (Score:2)
Hmm, where does that leave us then. Because they can now do more than the US can do right now when it comes to manned flight and launching space stations. We have the ISS, true, but we couldn't build another one. And we certainly can't build small space laboratories like we used to in the 70s. Personally I'm a bit jealous that the Chinese are going to do this. I think having multiple, short-term space stations would be more economical and get more science done than the one big expensive one we have now,
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
forty years behind everyone else?
who is this everyone else you speak of?
How many countries have the capability to send humans into space? Russia and China. Anybody else I missed there?
That puts them ahead of the US, Europe, India, Africa, the Middle East, and the rest of Asia, none of who can send people into space. All of those counties send people to hitch rides with one of the few countries who can do it.
Looks like China is ahead of everybody arguably except the Russians.
"exactitude" (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
I think 'it "embiggens" their experiments' is more appropriate. And less grammer snobberastic.
Re: (Score:2)
There's nothing wrong with the word exactitude.
I'd use precise rather than accurate though. It can measure time intervals very precisely, but if it was set to the wrong time in the first place it isn't accurate.
Re: (Score:2)
"while is an experimental" and "is still operational" is supposed to mean what?
And the sentence "The astronauts that would come on board next month are to spend a full month up there"
Verb modality? Use of commas?
Re: (Score:2)
Whether native speakers or non-native speakers, it'd be nice if people learned some grammar of the language they're going to use, before working as authors on a site such as slashdot.
try again
Time? (Score:2)
The space lab is also equipped with a cold atom space clock, that has an estimated precision of 10 to the power of minus 16 seconds, or a one-second error every 30 million years
Einstein proved that time is relative. So accuracy is also relative.
Re: (Score:2)
Clocks in satellites already need to be re-synched periodically. The velocity of a satellite orbiting the earth is enough to make clocks go noticeably out of sync with earth.
Re: (Score:3)
Accuracy and precision are not the same thing...
Re: (Score:2)
Accuracy and precision are not the same thing...
Please give us a simple but scientific definition of each.
I teach high school science, and I currently use the darts analogy but next year I want to find definitions that are either more accurate or more precise...
Re: (Score:2)
I see what you did there!
In case your post was a rare instance of internet sincerity, how about the old school thermometer analogy? The amount of markings on the tube represent precision (direct relationship here). The stability of the fluid (thick tube with a lot of sloshing vs thin tube with minimal sloshing) represents the accuracy. Or measuring the height of a hyper dog vs a calm dog. If you use the same tape measure you'll have the same precision but the accuracy will be very different.
In summary accur
Smaller than Mir (Score:2)
China plans to complete space station in 2022 and will have a mass of 64,000 kg. This is about half of the mass of Mir launched 30 years ago by USSR. Still a lot to catch up. The ISS launched in 1998 has a mass of 440,000 kg.
Re:Smaller than Mir (Score:5, Insightful)
Ladies and gentlemen, I give you Slashdot, where size is the only metric that some give a shit about when it comes to a non-US space program.
How about we stand in silent appreciation of the feat that China is accomplishing, like the geeks we should all be would do, k?
Perhaps China doesnt need a large station to achieve its goals - the Chinese don't seem to be bothered about taking it slow and steady with regard to their program, after all.
Re: (Score:2)
What if its made of graphene? ;-)
We banned them (Score:5, Interesting)
In many ways it's too bad USA banned them from the current station (ISS) due to possible military-related secrets.
ISS requires a lot of maintenance such that there's not much time left for science. If China participated, then there would be more time-slots for science instead of fixing toilets, etc.
By now the ISS's technology should be old enough to not be secret: it's decades old. Plus, Russia already has access to it and they trade secrets with China anyhow.
Why did US put sensitive tech in ISS to begin with? We F'd up.
Re: (Score:2)
As to accomplishing more science, that happens within another 1.5 years, if not sooner. SpaceX continues to work on their V2, so, that is a non-issue. IOW, they will likely be close to schedule
In the end, the real question is, can Bigelow put a BA-330 habitat on the ISS, which would allow for say 10-12 ppl to live there. That would make a HUGE difference.
Re: (Score:1)
Example? Space stations have been around since the 1970's (Skylab). It didn't need to contain anything secret. And if it did, why did we allow Russia on-board?
It just doesn't seem logical: You don't need cutting edge to make a station, and IF we by chance DID put cutting edge in for some unknown/silly reason, why let Russia in?
China asked permission roughly a decade ago IIRC.
Re: (Score:1)
Yes, but China can and does get space tech from Russia NOW.
Russia wants cash and China wants space tech, and they both want to spite the USA. Thus, Russia selling/trading space-tech with China is "natural".
The cat is already out of the bag.
And my mentioning Skylab was not really about Russia, but to illustrate that space-station technology is 40+ years old. Everybody and their dog already knows it. We could have built a space station without using anything new, secret, or special. (Maybe we did, but Congres
Re: We banned them (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Their capsule design hasn't changed much in 40 odd years. They incrementally improve it based on experience, and it's probably the safest ride out there.
K.I.S.S. + patience
Re: We banned them (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
That was just an excuse. The decision was made for political reasons. In the end it might have created a new space race.
wow (Score:2)
There are plenty of them that would rather see CHina succeed than to see Musk, Bigelow, or even bezo succeed.
Love how ppl think that US can not launch humans (Score:1)
Likewise, CST-100 could be ready in under 6 months or less. It would take money, but there is little issue about our ability to do so.
A second one? (Score:2)
Is their swimming pool big enough to hold two?
Warranty? (Score:2)
I hope they purchased some kind of extended warranty because I doubt that it will keep running past 10 years---let alone 1 billion years.