There Were Mega-Tsunamis On Mars (popularmechanics.com) 41
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Popular Mechanics: Today, a team of scientists has announced the first discovery of extraterrestrial tsunamis. A team of astronomers and geologists led by J. Alexis Rodriguez at the Planetary Science Institute in Tucson, Arizona has uncovered evidence of massive tsunamis on Mars billions of years ago. As Rodriguez reports, two separate mega-tsunamis tore across the red planet around 3.4 billion years ago, a time when Mars was a mere 1.1 billion years old and nearby Earth was just cradling its first microbial lifeforms. The two tsunamis created 150-foot-high shore-break waves on average, and some absolutely monster waves up to 400 feet tall. Rodriguez and his colleagues outline their tsunami findings today in the journal Scientific Reports. From the report: "Rodriquez and his colleagues stumbled across evidence of these tsunamis while scouring over images of Mars' relatively flat northern planes. Two regions called Chryse Planitia and Arabia Terra. Using detailed infrared maps rendered by the thermal camera on the 15-year-old Mars Odyssey orbiter, the scientists identified the high water marks of the tsunamis -- features that look a lot like ancient ocean coastlines." Within the last year alone, scientists have spotted the signs of flowing water on Mars, recently discovering how water flows on the red planet. NASA has detected atomic oxygen in the atmosphere of the planet, too.
Makes sense (Score:3)
And Keanu Reeves was the upcoming A-lister in Point Break.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Dude!!!
Yup (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Cowabunga! little pink Earth dude. Or, should I say, Marsabunga! [theinertia.com]
Re: (Score:3)
Bolides are moving fast enough that they do not even notice the atmosphere. The impact velocity is going to depend on the orbital dynamics of the planet and the rock.
Why are Mars oceans blue and not green? (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Actually the blue seems to be mostly the reflection of the Earth's sky. The actual ocean is kind of a dark muddy green on average. But if you look at the water from an angle, it's blue, like the sky, regardless of the water color.
I'm not sure the color of Mars' sky back then. Now the color is mostly driven by dust particles because there's so little actual air, but Mars had a thicker atmosphere in the past, before it lost its magnetic field.
Re: (Score:2)
This seems like an overly-simplistic... em... view... to me.
This may be relevant [scuba-monkey.com], though I'm second-guessing my intuition now.
I'm curious. Could someone with some advanced scientific knowledge on the subject chime in here?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
An excellent read - thanks for that! So my intuition was not altogether wrong, though I did find it fascinating (and unexpected) that suspended particles are required for the blue hue of water to be scattered back to the surface.
And it seems the GP of my original post was correct that a high Fe content may well have rendered Mars' oceans much greener in colour than what we observe on Earth.
Trading seasons (Score:1)
Mars was perhaps more Earth-like than Earth was for the first 2 billion or so years, by today's standards.
Earth was a volcanic and tide-driven* mess early on, while Mars' interior was cool enough to have semi-stable land masses and lakes or oceans.
It's why some speculate life first formed on Mars and then was blasted to Earth via meteor strikes. Mars was prime real-estate for life first.
* The moon was closer and Earth rotated faster back then. Faster rotation itself generally stirs up weather.
Re: (Score:1)
C S Lewis wrote about that in The Space Trilogy; the closer you got to Arbol, the younger the world was.
Re: (Score:3)
There's this real effort to portray it as more Earth-like, but I'm not buying it.
Let's just look first at that big deal made about the findings of atomic oxygen. Atomic oxygen occurs almost everywhere in the solar system. Wherever solar wind hits water vapour or ice, you get atomic oxygen. It's a complete nothing story.
The whole thing about "signs of flowing water"? It's beyond an exaggeration to call that "flowing water". A better description would be "transient flows of organics-destroying rocket pro
Roll Tide (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Uh huh, sure. (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
What'll they find next, giant canals?
Re: (Score:1)
It matters not what they can and can't detect. It only matters what someone can and can't refute.
Re: (Score:1)
There was a Routemaster bus on the moon. I saw pictures of it. Then someone stole it which was even bigger news than the discovery. Well, for just one paper...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I've detected evidence of the complete text of the Wikipedia article on paraedolia [wikipedia.org] carved into the surface of Mars. ;)
You know what they say... (Score:1)
...when you're desperate to discover water on Mars, everything looks like a beach.
Calculate age of mars? (Score:2)
I have creatinists on my family, so I’m always looking for more simple and direct arguments about the age of the universe. SN1987A is one example.
So, if there were tsunamis on Mars, that means there was lots of water at one point, so
- How conclusive is it that the observed features had to be caused by water?
- What is the minimum amount of water necessary to have caused these features?
- Where did all the water go?
- At what rate was the water lost?
- What, therefore, is the minimum age of the planet pla
Re: (Score:2)
I have creatinists on my family
I've known many cretins, but never a whole family that had them on them. How do you get them off?
Re: (Score:2)
I have creatinists on my family, so I’m always looking for more simple and direct arguments about the age of the universe ...
- Where did all the water go?
- At what rate was the water lost?
- What, therefore, is the minimum age of the planet planet on the basis of this analysis?
Answer: God took it away to test our faith, and it disappeared instantly. You're fighting a losing battle here. In the same way that you can't prove religion with logic, you can't disprove it with logic either. They are unrelated concepts.