UAE To Build Artificial Mountain To Improve Rainfall (engadget.com) 216
An anonymous reader writes: The United Arab Emirates is in the early stages of developing an artificial mountain that would force air upwards and create clouds that could produce additional rainfall. While the Middle East and Africa continues to get hotter, researchers are further motivated and more desperate for solutions to maximize rainfall. "Building a mountain is not a simple thing," said NCAR scientist and lead researcher Roelof Bruintjes. "We are still busy finalizing assimilation, so we are doing a spread of all kinds of heights, widths and locations [as we simultaneously] look at the local climatology." The specific location has yet to be decided on as the team is still testing out different sites across the UAE. "If [the project] is too expensive for [the government], logically the project won't go through, but this gives them an idea of what kind of alternatives there are for the long-term future." Bruintjes said. "If it goes through, the second phase would be to go to an engineering company and decide whether it is possible or not."
Why not a wall (Score:2)
Re:Why not a wall (Score:5, Funny)
President Trump's brilliant plan to address climate change.
Re: (Score:2)
They could get Mexico to pay for it.
Re: (Score:3)
The funny thing about all of this is that Mexico wants the wall too and is willing to chip in for it.
A wall on the Mexican-American border will slow and possibly stop the drug trade which is devastating the northern parts of Mexico.
Re: (Score:3)
But for a wall, you need to do a heavy bit of engineering and a bunch of maintenance, too.
Re:Why not a wall (Score:5, Funny)
My guess: for a mountain, all you need to do is pile up dirt.
Even simpler, you could build a molehill and then invite the Slashdot comment section over to do the rest.
Re: (Score:2)
Dude, don't knock it. He's clearly a successful businessman and isn't a "bought" candidate.
Sure his ideas sound quirky but no one else is brave enough to try.
I'm sure that once he increase poverty rates, worsens inequality, creates an international diplomatic incident and possibly run the economy to self-serving interests to the detriment of all and eventually bring the country to brink of ruin a new candidate will emerge. People will then remember how he wasn't the guy they voted for and that he said a
Re: (Score:2)
My guess: for a mountain, all you need to do is pile up dirt.
Even simpler, you could build a molehill and then invite the Slashdot comment section over to do the rest.
I only regret that I cannot mod this higher.
Re: (Score:2)
Here are some man-made mountains under construction:
http://www.southernfriedscienc... [southernfriedscience.com]
Re: (Score:2)
There is more to it than that (though you are right with what you said). A wall is a relatively flat thing vertically. So all the weight is pushing straight down. The higher and taller it gets, the more weight it is - the stronger the base needs to be. There's an upper limit to what height and length a wall of a given material can be. Buildings are easier - they are essentially hollow structures, so there's a bit less weight, and even there we are basically at the limits of what our current building materia
Re: (Score:2)
A Super Aggro Crag you say? That would take some Global Guts to construct!
Re: Why not a wall (Score:3)
One word: skiing.
Re: (Score:2)
One word: skiing.
Too late. They already have that in the UAE: http://www.theplaymania.com/sk... [theplaymania.com]
Re: (Score:2)
In that...is that a Dune reference?
Garbage dump (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Why not a wall (Score:5, Funny)
To have a significant effect, it would have to be about as tall as the tallest building on Earth, if not taller.
Yeah, the UAE couldn't build anything that tall.
Comment removed (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3)
If you build it near the coast, it could be used to live on when the sea level rises and wipes out what you built the mountain to protect.
Re: (Score:2)
To have a significant effect, it would have to be about as tall as the tallest building on Earth, if not taller. Plus, you'll probably create some unintended effects like lots of dust devils and sandstorms. It's a really awful idea.
Look to the lee of every mountain. Your mountain will rob rainfall from somewhere else. Is that considered an "unintended effect"?
Re: (Score:2)
Do you mean matte? If your maths are equal to your literacy, this should be interesting. ;-)
This doesn't make sense. (Score:3, Insightful)
The engineering challenges for this are insane. Just trying to move that much materiel would break the bank. I wouldn't be surprised if the cost of desal + irrigating the whole country comes in at a lower price....
Re:This doesn't make sense. (Score:5, Interesting)
Hey, we're talking about the UAE here . . . unfeasible expensive building projects don't need to make sense . . . in the "Talking Heads" sense of the phrase.
The answer to the material question is really quite simple, actually. Just use trash. Make the mountain an above ground landfill. The world is awash in trash, that nobody wants . . . hell, the rest of the world will pay the UAE to stash their trash in an environmentally friendly climate changing mountain in the UAE.
Old cars, useless electronic gadgets . . . bring it on, and pile it up! The baking hot sun will fry it enough so that it won't stink.
A win--win for the whole world.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Right, cuz waste management isn't a thing.
It is a thing, but a lot more gets landfilled than you would like to see. They don't break open every bag on purpose, and they are not scrupulous about even getting things out of the pile. At my local landfill I have seen electronics get pushed into the compactor with everything else. Most of them just get thrown into the trash when they break, and if they're small enough they go right into a bag and nobody ever sees them.
Re: (Score:2)
But GP was too lazy or too stupid to make that point...
Re: (Score:2)
Agreed. It would be so much easier and cheaper to buy land elsewhere, and move the Emirates.
"If the mountain can't come to the Mohammedans then the Mohammedans must go to the mountain."
Re: (Score:2)
Just trying to move that much materiel would break the bank.
We already move that much material with mining operations.
I wouldn't be surprised if the cost of desal + irrigating the whole country comes in at a lower price....
Yeah, you're probably right.
Re: (Score:2)
And you could make the mountains from the left over salt :D
Or sell it to the europeans as "pure sea salt".
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
How high and how wide would it have to be? Superpit in Australia is 3.7km long, 1.5km wide but only 470m deep and it is one of the largest open pit mines in the world. Would that amount of material be enough to have any measurable impact on the climate? And then there comes the challenge that any material that you use in this mountain will be loose aggregate, so you would need to retain all of it or have a really shallow slope dramatically increasing the volume of material needed. This is a major differ
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Bingham canyon is deeper, and Hull Rust is biggest overall, but even those open pit monstrosities aren't enough material to build a climate changing mountain.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Median cloud cover in UAE ranges from 0% to 24% depending on the time of year. The air is very dry most of the time, so to have any measurable impact on rainfall you would need to raise the air a long way. There is a big step between creating localised wind and achieving rainfall
Re: (Score:2)
Well, think out of the box. Just locate an asteroid of the required girth, and drop in on place. You have time to get it to the right orbit. Use several hundred EmDrives powered by sun cells to do that. Then a bit of atmosphere braking, not too much, careful not to get it broken. For the final braking, I'd use a crude version of the project Orion system, explode a couple of nuclear bombs on the underside of the asteroid.
Hey! Bonus idea! If the asteroid is partly ice (see Asimov's "The Martian Way" for refer
Re: (Score:2)
That would be even more difficult to build and even more expensive than just piling the material up. Bulk material transfer conveyors and then stone blocks acting as a bund would likely be the most cost effective way of building it. Even assuming a labour cost of zero if the structure was hollow and self supporting it would be an unparalleled technical achievement. If you were just piling material it would be a massive logistics feat not so much a technical one.
Re:This doesn't make sense. (Score:4, Informative)
Re:This doesn't make sense. (Score:5, Insightful)
The problem is the exponential increase in material required to gain any useful elevation.
The increase in material would not be exponential. It would be a quadratic function of the height.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It's quadratic with height for a solid mountain. If you use a porous construction (steel beams with a roof), it's probably exponential, but with a tiny prefactor. I wouldn't know which is more expensive; both are astronomical in cost.
Re: (Score:2)
The problem is the exponential increase in material required to gain any useful elevation.
The increase in material would not be exponential. It would be a quadratic function of the height.
Maybe he wants an inverted pyramid?
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
You have got to be kidding.
A quadratic function (or polynomial of degree two) is indeed on the form you specified.
But x to the 2nd power is not exponential, rather it's just an example of the quadratic function you mentioned, with b and c equal to zero and a equal to one.
f(x) = ax^2 + bx + c, which with a = 1, b = 0 and c = 0 becomes f(x) = x^2, which is quadratic and the same as "x to the 2nd power"
What IS exponential, is something like 2 to the xth power, or 2^x. But that's not what you wrote.
Re:Exponential: Exponent=2. Big laugh. (Score:5, Informative)
X to the 2nd power is exponential.
No. X^2 does not increase exponentially with X. It is not "exponential" in any meaningful sense. Would you say that X=1 is "exponential" with an exponent of zero?
When mathematicians, or algorithm designers, say something is "exponential", they mean it is a function with the variable of interest (in this case, the height of the hill) in the exponent. The volume of a hill, as a function of its height, is NOT exponential.
"Exponential" shows a problem of making mountains. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
There are some things you just learn to ignore. One of those things is the horrible misuses the word "exponentially" suffers. It's along the same line as "literally" which has, somehow, come to mean the same as "figuratively."
Hmm...
I have seen an exponential increase in the misuse of the expression! Just smile and nod, literally.
I'm going to hell, if there is one. ;-)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The volume of a hill, as a function of its height, is NOT exponential
It is if you make the width an exponential function of the height!
Re:Exponential: Exponent=2. Big laugh. (Score:4, Funny)
What about zero? Zero is an exponent. By that measure, my love life is improving exponentially...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
I know you're just joking, but I'm going to answer anyway. The answer is no. The whole point of this is to deflect massive amounts of air. A massive sheet deflecting air is a sail. A mountain sized sail is going to be vastly stronger than the most powerful helicopters on the planet. They would be hurled out of the sky.
Re: (Score:2)
". The structure(s) would be hollow."
The article lacks detail, but I've heard this scheme expressed as being a row of large balloons holding up a fabric sheet, which hopefully wouldn't blow away in the first haboob.
Re: (Score:2)
Actually any kind of mountain would be stupid. What you require is a mountain range, a ridge line perpendicular to the predominant moisture carrying winds. Loose aggregate would collapse, so it would need to be compacted in layers of 300mm and need to be something like 10 kilometres long and at least a kilometre high to have are real weather impact. A wall slope of 25 degrees is all that can be achieved and of course the big problem, collecting water means, water erosion tearing down the mountain range you
Re: (Score:2)
Or maybe the "global cabal" won't care because the effects are entirely local? Or maybe the evidence for it affecting the local climate of other regions will be found, and this will be addressed. Or you can keep making stuff up to try and feel better about the selfish way you live your life...
Re: (Score:2)
Call home depot... I would like 47 million 80lb bags of Quikrete... Do you offer free delivery on orders over a $100 million?
a lot of hot air (Score:2)
Thanks for the analysis.
> What to use as a lifting gas would be a big question. Helium ... Hydrogen ... Methane
UAE has a plentiful supply of hot air. If the fabric/skin were black, it may well keep the air hot enough.
One of today's jokes: (Score:2)
But wait! There's more! I was talking with a guy who would be happy to sell the UAE the entire Mt. Rainier in Washington State for, oh, maybe $10,000. Then there would be the easy problem of moving it.
Re: (Score:3)
If you made it a hollow cone 1 mile tall and 1 mile wide at the base and a surface of 6in think reinforced concrete, you would be looking at only ~450m for the concrete. Now you need to have a solid structure to support that, but even then you are only looking at maybe a x2 multiplier IF you can come up with some really slick methods of erecting a self supporting cone of steel.
that being said a 1m high and wide cone could be built for ~1 billion in material costs. And for the UAE, that is nothing more th
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It's incorrect for me to say that Google is your friend but I will point out that they're likely to be quite handy at this point.
Re: (Score:3)
Well, if the definition of "friend" is "those who know you best" then google may yet qualify again. If you add "and has your best interests at heart" though, it becomes more accurate to say "Google is your stalker".
Just the beginning? (Score:2)
I suspect we'll see a lot of similar geo-hacks and assorted other climate hacks in the coming decades as weather patterns continue to change. Climate science in general will evolve far beyond what it is today, and may supplant tech as a primary driver of the world's economies. It's time to start steering our kids towards climatology and related fields.
Re:Just the beginning? (Score:5, Insightful)
It's time to start steering our kids towards climatology and related fields.
This hill will be built by civil engineers, not climatologists.
Re:Just the beginning? (Score:5, Informative)
The two topics are not disconnected even at the very entry level. City microclimates from large flat areas etc are another issue that has been considered even at the introductory level for decades.
Re: (Score:2)
This hill will be built by civil engineers, not climatologists.
The hill will be built by civil engineers while climatologists sit at their desks with their feet up.
Re: (Score:2)
What we need to do is train kids to spray sulfur aerosols into the upper stratosphere! We have enough bad software engineers already.
Nope, it ends in War (Score:5, Interesting)
UAE creates man made mountain to grab rainfall. Every other country "close" will blame them for any change in rainfall and at least some of that is going to be legitimate. Impact from this is going to be felt far and wide, so anywhere between India, Italy, and Russia are potentially impacted. It is not far fetched that a country that used to be able to feed itself suddenly has a starving populace because they no longer get any rain.
Every country in the World threatens war over weather modification, and there are numerous countries that have long sought to master weather control for the purpose of war. UAE's intent may not be to harm neighbors but that's not always how things work out.
If the UAE was building desalination plants to irrigate with, it would be a very different story.
Re: (Score:2)
If only there was some methodology that could be applied to understand the effects of things. Maybe the methodology could involve other people reviewing the findings and making suggestions based on demonstrable evidence... Naah. The mighty S. Petry, Senior Sage doesn't make mistakes.
Re: (Score:2)
Agreed. Of note to me is that people would rather literally move mountains than move themselves out of a region that commonly sees temps of 50C (and has been at war for quite some time to boot). Something to think about if your answer for rising sea levels is "we can just move". To me, building out massive wind/solar/smart grid/storage capacity seems even easier than moving a mountain. Oh well, guess we'll see.
They seem to have forgotten (Score:4, Funny)
'If the mountain will not come to Muhammad, then Muhammad must go to the mountain.'
Re: (Score:2)
going for the record (Score:5, Insightful)
Sounds more like the UAE is jealous of Qatar's single project death-toll record for the World Cup and is determined to take the crown. The ads are probably already going out in Malaysia, Indonesia, and the Philippines for the sorts of disposable slave labor the region favors for large civil projects.
Re: (Score:2)
It would be hard to beat the Panama Canal at 27,000.
Re: (Score:2)
"assimilation, so we are doing a spread" (Score:2)
Tornadoes? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Bah, that's easy. Just set up a series of trailer parks.
Possible solution to the CRT crisis (Score:2)
Remember when you proudly acquired your first bigscreen? You gave the old CRT set away to a thrift. A year or tw later, you replaced the bedroom set and the guest room set. What you found then is that charities no longer take working CRTs, and neither do landfills. Neither do recycling centers, even those special electronics days they have periodically. You can't throw a CRT away.
The garages of America can supply the "bricks" for the UAE's mountain. This is a business opportunity waiting.
Re: (Score:2)
If you have a fine old Eizo monitor that still has some life left in it, but what about all those plain broadcast TV sets?
Why not stop selling fossil fuels? (Score:2)
Nip the problem in the bud.
If that isn't gosh golly gee wiz shiny tech for hyou then how about:
1) set up solar panels and wind turbines
2) use to power desalination plants
3) take said water and split it into hydrogen and oxygen
4) burn hydrogen fuel to power irrigation pumps to take the waste water from the combustion and extra water from desalinization and pumpit in land
5) use said water for reforestation.
Re: (Score:2)
misleading title (Score:2)
a proper title would be "UAE Investigating The Possibility Of Constructing An Artificial Mountain" because they will likely find out it's far more costly than they expected.
Get with the program (Score:2)
How much taller than 1900 meters? (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
When I thought of this at first, I thought that the idea with a mountain is to chill the air, and there may be easier ways. Then, I thought desalination is going to be cheaper to make water than refrigerating the air, are they afraid they'll run out of sea water? But, sea levels rise with global warming, and my first impression of UAE was that it's pretty flat, so I thought, maybe they also want some artificial high ground to which they can retreat. Before commenting on that, though, I asked Google, what is the highest point in UAE? It turns out that Jabal Al Jais (over on the Eastern point, by Oman) is 1910 meters tall, and the satellite view shows that it doesn't have a wet side. Hawaii is closer to the equator, and mountains that are less tall have a wet side. This leads me to strongly think that the air may not be the best available resource for getting potable water. I'd try desalination of the stuff in which the artificial islands are built.
build the mountain out of salt blocks from the water desalination process.
Re: (Score:2)
glass dome (Score:2)
Pyramid (Score:2)
No, no they are not (Score:2)
They may build a big hill and declare victory, though.
In the process, a great deal of essentially slave labor will die.
At the end, they will have a big dirty hill that accomplishes nothing.
Doesn’t have to be solid all the way through (Score:3)
They want something that *functions* as a mountain. It doesn’t have to look like a regular mountain, and it doesn’t have to be solid all the way through. As someone else said, a wall might do the trick. And also, the structure could be hollow. Build a steel frame and cover it with inexpensive materials. As long as it has the desired effect, it doesn’t have to look like a mountain. And just imagine the uses that could be put to the interior as well. You could have an entire city in there in the shade. Presumably it would have to be mostly airtight, but if you made it out of translucent materials, then the amount of artificial light inside needn’t be extensive. Imagine a mountain made of plexiglass. Also, for something the size of a mountain, moisture would collect in the inner atmosphere, develop into clouds, and even rain sometimes. If the air inside is cooler than outside, they might want to limit air exchange (i.e. no active ventilation), requring that plants be grown inside to keep the oxygen levels up. Even pollution levels could be kept down if burning is kept to a minimum (no diesel or coal generators inside, but maybe short hydrocarbons like natural gas for cooking, if they even have a supply of it in there).
I’m sure there are a million caveats I’ll never think of, but if they’re going to build something that big, they might as well make it more useful than just a wall and even possibly make it give a return on the investment through taxes. It would require maintenance.
Re: (Score:2)
What you are talking about is building a Burj Khalifa times 100. No small feat.
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
Did you ever open a world map in your existence ???
Re: (Score:2)
why would that stop them?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
The point wasn't to feel smart, just average. Your (?) comment above shows you don't have any idea about basic geography. No need to be smart for this, just to be open and to show interest in other people by knowing at least where they live.
Re: (Score:2)