LIGO Will Make Gravitational Waves Announcement on Thursday 120
StartsWithABang writes: When we look out into the Universe, we normally gain information about it by gathering light of various wavelengths. However, there are other possibilities for astronomy, including by looking for the neutrinos emitted by astrophysical sources - first detected in the supernova explosion of 1987 - and in the gravitational waves emitted by accelerating masses. These ripples in the fabric of space were theorized back in the early days of Einstein's General Relativity, and experiments to detect them have been ongoing since the 1960s. However, in September of 2015, Advanced LIGO came online, and it was the first gravitational wave observatory that was expected to detect a real gravitational wave signal. The press conference on Thursday is where the collaboration will make their official announcement, and in the meantime, here's an explainer of what gravitational waves are, what Advanced LIGO can teach us, and how.
Re: (Score:1)
You'll still have to log in to Forbes to see it.
(it's left as an exercise for the reader to create his own malware joke).
Link to announcement (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Either the planet's warring tribes and factions come together to make the film according to the aliens' script, proving themselves worthy to begin a 10,000 year "unpaid internship" fetching space lattes for alien directors;
or,
They ignore the message, puttering along trying to make it on their own as an indy civilization, probably never moving out of their home system.
Re: (Score:1)
And the announcement will be (Score:3, Funny)
"We expect to find some any day now."
Re:And the announcement will be (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Harvey and Sheila [mp3lio.net] approve.
Ginger waves (Score:2)
Dean Kamen will announce the new levitating Segway. It's going to change the urban landscape forever.
Actually it turns out they have identified a concentrated emitter of Gravity waves. Yo Momma. She so fat.
Why they have to delay the announcement till Thurs (Score:2)
The real announcement is that they studying gravity waves using a device intended to electromagnetically reduce the weight of a suspended object. IN the process they discovered a strange mold that normally takes 1 year to grow a layer had completely covered their apparatus overnight. They built a larger machine and crawled inside of it with a tank of oxygen and found themselves at next thursday. Thus they can't actually make the announcement until time catches up with them. They could go back in time t
Re: (Score:2)
If you ditch work this afternoon, and promise to do the few small things I ask you; I will in return show you the most important thing that any living organism has ever witnessed.
Re: (Score:1)
Gravity is a lie. I've never seen it.
It's okay mate, jump over the cliff and you'll feel it alright.
Re: (Score:2)
heavy, man! (Score:1)
wow man, like really heavy stuff!
Re:heavy, man! (Score:4, Funny)
There's that word again. "Heavy." Why are things so heavy in the future? Is there a problem with the Earth's gravitational pull?
Re: (Score:2)
Apparently, there is variation in the gravity, which is detected by LIGO. I know, I'll show myself out.
Re: heavy, man! (Score:1)
Apk, you sad little psycho, give it a rest already and do something useful like wanking or suicide.
Capitalistic Toolbag (Score:2)
Solar Neutrinos First (Score:5, Informative)
StartsWithABang must think Forbes is a popular science magazine.
Well it would be nice if he got his science right then. The first astrophysical neutrinos detected came from the sun and were detected by the Homestake Experiment [wikipedia.org] in the late 1960s for which a Nobel Prize was awarded. Those from SN1987a were the first neutrinos detected from a source outside the solar system.
Re: (Score:2)
The problem with neutrino telescopy is that we don't have a neutrino-opaque material. So all our neutrino telescopes are whole-sky telescopes. The first generations of neutrino telescopes (e.g., the Homestake experiment that you refer to) had no dir
Re: (Score:2)
I'm sure StartsWithABang moved from Medium.com to Forbes.com for more money, and I'm still very interested in astronomy articles on Slashdot, but I refuse to read anything on Forbes. Thus we keep having these discussions about how horrible Forbes is and look for alternate links, like a parent poster graciously left us:
http://arstechnica.com/science... [arstechnica.com]
Re: (Score:1)
Re:Shame on you slashdot for this... (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Medium is a matter of personal taste. Forbes is just evil.
WORKING AS INTENDED (Score:2)
http://trenchescomic.com/comic... [trenchescomic.com]
I dunno .. (Score:2)
Here's a thought, why not wait until Thursday for the actual announcement instead of feeding shill accounts that link to ad block un-friendly sites who have been known purveyors of malware via ads???????
Re:I dunno .. (Score:5, Informative)
Here's a thought, why not wait until Thursday for the actual announcement...
So that we'll know to go to an actual news site on Thursday instead of waiting until Monday for Slashdot to run it.
Re: (Score:2)
What?!? Gravity is a communist conspiracy.... the matter all just collects together and in extreme cases fuses to become a single entity!
Real americans support big bangs, let the invisible hand of the universe guide your particles.
Re: (Score:1)
Catholicism is the largest Christian denomination in the world and its official stance is that the Big Bang theory is just fine with them.
My mother is an Anglican priest and, like most of her congregation, she accepts the Big Bang theory along with natural selection and pretty much every other established scientific theory.
I think the perception of Christians as anti-science is largely an American thing. Not completely - we do have that type here in New Zealand too - but apparently not to the extend as in t
Re: (Score:2)
Catholicism is the largest Christian denomination in the world and its official stance is that the Big Bang theory is just fine with them.
That's irrelevant here in America, we don't care about what the rest of the world thinks. Just look at our measurement system.
The fact is, here in America, most Christians are fundamentalist or close to it ("evangelical"), and are very much anti-science any time science conflicts with their religious beliefs.
I think the perception of Christians as anti-science is largely
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Most modern American Christians would say he wasn't a true Christian and that he was working for the devil.
In fact, a lot of American Christians don't believe Catholics to be Christians at all.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
This. A million times this.
Re: (Score:2)
Oh no! Not again! (Score:1)
How much is Forbes/StartsWithABang paying Slashdot?
Here we go again (Score:5, Interesting)
StartsWithABang and his Forbes bullshit again. So much for new management. The more things change, the more they stay the same.
Re:Here we go again (Score:4, Interesting)
They probably have an existing contract in place that they can't just kill off without being sued.
Re:Here we go again (Score:5, Informative)
There's no contract. Or any communication aside from the actual submissions. If you want different astronomy/science stories on Slashdot, you have easy recourse; submit your own!
Re: (Score:2)
Plenty of people submit worthwhile things that just sit at the firehose, while plenty of shilled crap gets front paged.
I dare you to explain how it is decided which things are front paged, including the names of the people who make the decisions.
And I defy you to directly state that you still work for Slashdot and that advertising or other promotional deals do not affect what is posted to the front page.
Re: (Score:2)
Plenty of people submit worthwhile things that just sit at the firehose, while plenty of shilled crap gets front paged.
Unfortunately, everybody's definition of "worthwhile things" is different. If there are specific examples you'd like to discuss, I'd be happy to post my perspective on why they may or may not have been posted. I realize that submitting to Slashdot can be like screaming into the void; it's something I always wanted to change. But there are often good reasons why submissions were declined.
Shilled stories get to the front page for a few reasons. Here's how CmdrTaco explained it to me when I joined Slashdot. Th
Anoying Forbes Link! (Score:2)
WTF have you been? (Score:2)
The "news about the news" has been out there for the better part of a week. Did you really just hear about it?
Re: (Score:2)
Slashdot doesn't release "scoops", really. That's not necessarily a bad thing, although it is amusing at times to see them beaten out for tech news by CNN.com. As an aggregator that relies on posting from other sites, it's always going to lag a little.
On the other hand, perhaps that means the Slashdot needs to stop reporting on mainstream crap and return to a more specialized set of news.
Praise science! (Score:3, Funny)
Can you imagine the quality of Yo Mama's So Fat jokes that will come out of this? You don't get that kind of entertainment without spending some cash on science.
Re: (Score:1)
Hide Forbes Option? (Score:5, Insightful)
Can I have an option to just hide any articles with links to forbes.com ? That'd be really handy, thanks.
Re: (Score:2)
I wrote a grease monkey user script that nuked all the bennett haselton shit from orbit.
Should be trivial to do the same for forbes.
(I switched machines and browsers recently - I didn't bother to bring the bennett haselton nuker with me because as far as I know his shit has stopped.)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Slashdot: new for nerds that can't write an userscript and prefer waiting for their corporate masters.
// ==UserScript==
// @name No forbes articles
// @description Remove forbes posts from Slashdot front page.
// @include http://slashdot.org/*
// @include http://.slashdot.org/*
// @include https://slashdot.org/*
// @include https://.slashdot.org/*
// @exclude https://.slashdot.org/story/*
// @exclude http://.slashdot.org/story/*
// @grant none
// ==/UserScript==
Edited from some other post
var elements = doc
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm beginning to believe that Forbes is the real new owner of Slashdot, and they just bought it through a front.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Actually, while it annoys me to see meta-comments about where the stories come from (like Forbes or StartsWithABang or whoever), it does seem to show a need for a forum where people can post these complaints and then perhaps show the site admins whether that is a common sentiment or not with some voting or at least discussion.
I agree that the Forbes articles are something I do not wish to disable my ad blocker to look at and it could be a reasonable request to not accept links to sites that require Ad Block
Re: (Score:3)
I don't know that the ad blocker can overcome some of the things Forbes has done to deny content to those who use ad blockers.
And to some extent, I don't necessarily blame Forbes for refusing to present content that is supported by something I am blocking, I just wish they'd have ads that I didn't need to block for the sake of mere safe browsing.
I do think that Slashdot might reasonably be asked to not post links to sites which use that sort of brute forced tactic. I don't personally care one way or anothe
Better non-forbes link (Score:5, Informative)
http://phys.org/news/2016-02-thursday-einstein-gravitational.html
When did this nonsense start? (Score:4, Insightful)
This "we're announcing that we'll be announcing something soon" crap, I mean.
The first time I was really aware of it happening was with "Ginger", that silly self-balancing scooter. Then, and every time since, the announcement has been underwhelming at best. Most of the time it's a complete waste of time - so I now let these pre-announcements go in one ear and right out the other.
We have the Internet. If something cool is announced, we'll know about it right away. Stop wasting our time - and yours - with pre-announcements about coming announcements!
Truly we live in the future... but, unfortunately, too often this future makes Futurama look like a prescient documentary.
Re: (Score:2)
This is a press event that is being announced. You are not press, so you are not required to care, but plenty of people do.
Re: (Score:3)
It not that there are announcements that there are going to be announcements. It's that setting up a schedule to make an announcement so that the relevant people can be there to ask relevant questions is being treated as an announcement itself.
Organizations like LIGO are not the problem; stenographers pretending to be journalists are the problem.
Re: (Score:2)
You're on my lawn again.
Misread title (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Same here. I thought "LEGO is doing what???" It's like clickbait!
Forbes.com must die (Score:2)
Here's an explainer... (Score:1)
Prior to the age of people being functionally retarded by sh!t ezines like Forbes, we called it an "explanation"
non-Forbes link (Score:5, Informative)
LIGO Scientists Will Make Gravitational Waves Announcement Thursday [rdmag.com]
Gravity is a myth; (Score:2)
The Earth sucks.
Re: (Score:1)
Let The Murph Count Begin (Score:1)
Thank Kip (Score:2)
Why wasn't I notified?! (Score:3)
LIGO Will Make Gravitational Waves Announcement on Thursday
This is all so sudden! They should have pre-announced this pre-announcement. I mean, officially.
Graviton (Score:2)
forbes, too bad (Score:2)
One of the LIGO programs is only 40 miles away, with a lot of luck the local newspaper might cover it.
Shades of Michelson–Morley (Score:1)