Russia Begins Work On a Lunar Lander (examiner.com) 67
MarkWhittington writes: Whether and when Russia will try to send cosmonauts to the moon is an open question. The Putin government has heavily slashed spending on the Russian space program, a measure brought on by declining oil and gas revenues. But, as Popular Mechanics reports, Russian engineers have gone ahead and have started to design a lunar lander for the eventual Russian lunar surface effort. When money is going to be forthcoming for such a vehicle is unknown, though Russia could partner with another country with lunar ambitions, such as China or the European Union.
well (Score:3)
I, for one, hail our Russian Mooning Overlords!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Obama's policy may be uninspiring but that's still an improvement over Bush's plan which was untenable.
A better option would be to have an inspiring goal (eg return to the Moon or go to Mars) but with a public-private funding model. The age of large-scale government-only space projects such as the Bush proposal are no longer feasible. Meanwhile we have a burgeoning private space industry that can make significant, cost-effective contributions.
Re: Obama's space policy (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Mate, I think you miss the point of exploration.
Not seeing any evidence that that is true,
I for one hope they find the money to fund this effort sooner rather than later, I've not yet seen a man set foot on the moon in my lifetime (born in 1990) and be it the Russians or the Chinese I don't particularly care.
I haven't seen a man swallow a pinecone either. Not sure that that creates a compelling reason for anyone to take up pinecone swallowing. From my perspective, I'd rather we went exploring - sent a robotic sub to the oceans of titan, or drilling into icy crust of europa. If I want to see a glorified meat van, I'd bling up the butchers ute.
One small step for man, one giant leap for mankind.
Now robots take those leaps on our behalf.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Humans aren't particularly well suited to the summit of Mount Everest either. Instead of trying to climb it, we should just send an ice climbing robot to reach the summit. It can chemically analyse the ice, and tell us how cold it is - mission accomplished!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Spain, 1492 - members of the public argued against organizing and achieving the treacherous and expensive journey filled with monumental and unknown dangers it would take to cross the ocean for unknown payoff. Instead they argued to send pigeons and donkeys because that made much more sense.
That's exactly what that comment will sound like in 500 years. Congrats!
Colonization of the moon (Score:1)
It is all important that the US resume plan put forward by President Bush so that the US can dominate colonization of the moon. Let the other countries realize they are in competition. Aren't you all tired yet of the bed-wetter Obama's space policy?
It doesn't work that way. The moon is not sovereign territory under international law, and may not be claimed as such.
"We came in peace for all mankind."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
Another benefit of low crude pricing (Score:5, Insightful)
This is good, because it opens up opportunities for cooperation with the proud Russian people that might not have existed at 80 Euro oil.
The sooner we cease petty tribal conflicts here on earth, the sooner we can get on with hating life forms on other worlds.
Re: (Score:2)
With a growing Russia China partnership, you claim seems pretty silly. Now guess why China abandoned the one child policy, hmm, now where can those extra Chinese citizens migrate to, to solidify a particular partnership, where could extra expertise come from to, hmm, spice up the population of China and get it advancing (Americans are such slow and shallow thinkers, multiculturalism produces quite significant social advantages and you quite readily seem to forget that).
So making public the lander without
Re: (Score:1)
Trade with the Australians is virtually guaranteed by the ChAFTA treaty, but the Russians are too crooked even for the Chinese Industrialists. Expansion goes West.
Nope. The two biggest economies stay that way in a mutually beneficial arrangement. Edward's destination would not be the 1st choice of very many who might be described by the prefix "sino-"
Re: (Score:3)
The sooner we cease petty tribal conflicts here on earth, the sooner we can get on with hating life forms on other worlds.
There are no life forms from other worlds that we will ever have to directly deal with. We know there is nothing within our solar system that is any danger to us. Interstellar space is too large and too hostile to life to make transport possible for any kind of life to get here or for us to get there, ever. So, your wish will never come to be.... Maybe we can stop hating, but I seriously doubt we are up to that.
Re: (Score:2)
The sooner we cease petty tribal conflicts here on earth, the sooner we can get on with hating life forms on other worlds.
There are no life forms from other worlds that we will ever have to directly deal with. We know there is nothing within our solar system that is any danger to us. Interstellar space is too large and too hostile to life to make transport possible for any kind of life to get here or for us to get there, ever. So, your wish will never come to be.... Maybe we can stop hating, but I seriously doubt we are up to that.
Come on. We could stop hating instantly.
We would simply have to give in to our innate sense of fairness and develop the ability to utilize our empathy skillset.
Re: (Score:2)
The sooner we cease petty tribal conflicts here on earth, the sooner we can get on with hating life forms on other worlds.
There are no life forms from other worlds that we will ever have to directly deal with. We know there is nothing within our solar system that is any danger to us. Interstellar space is too large and too hostile to life to make transport possible for any kind of life to get here or for us to get there, ever. So, your wish will never come to be.... Maybe we can stop hating, but I seriously doubt we are up to that.
Come on. We could stop hating instantly.
I don't think the nature of mankind has that capacity and history is chuck full of examples of hate being expressed by mankind. Where I believe that individuals may overcome their propensity to hate and stand as an inspiration to others in this regard, I also recognize that each person is born with the propensity to be selfish, uncaring which is the precursor to hate. It's here to stay.
Re: (Score:2)
Fortunately you are wrong. Interstellar travel could be possible with current technology, just the investment would be massive and the people picked to travel would likely be on a suicide mission. Don't discount the discovery of future technology. We know barely the basics of physics. Though interstellar travel is certainly difficult it is not impossible.
Re: (Score:2)
Oh it's impossible...
I suppose Einstein might be wrong and we might discover a way to go faster than light, but until we have even a hint that there are cracks in the theory of relativity any ideas that we might be able to traverse the void of interstellar space and survive even one way is no more than wishful thinking. Even a one way trip will take to long and the environment of space will render the space craft junk and it's contents lifeless before they could possibly get to anyplace that can support li
Re: (Score:2)
While you're probably correct, making declarative statements about things you can't possibly know about because of your minuscule sphere of experience is a fool's game.
Re: (Score:2)
This isn't all that hard to understand. The environment of Space is deadly, it kills all life. You have to carry along a little bit of earth to make living in space possible and doing this long term, without resupply from earth is not possible. We may be able to move around in the Solar system and scavenge resources here and there, but interstellar space is generally huge and empty, devoid of all material. Think of it as a huge, bottomless void between solar systems, much like a moat isolated a castle, s
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
The level of arrogance and ignorance in both your post and the grandparent would be astounding if it wasn't for the fact that it appears to be all-too-common. That "landlocked Asian minor country" has the largest coastline of any nation in the world. They are in the midst of rapid deployment of technologies to exploit the resources and opportunities of the arctic region including many new icebreakers in an effort to open a northern sea route (which may become very viable if the global warming predictions
Re: (Score:1)
They are growing increasingly capable while we appear to be stagnating.
said no military expert ever.
Suggesting Russian military capabilities or tech is anywhere near the level of US or European levels is hilarious. Sure, tech wise they're doing an impressive job on the budget they have, but that's about it.
Re: (Score:2)
It's also worth noting that Russia can put humans in space, and the only other country with that capability is China. Chances are the next person to set foot on the moon will be Chinese or Russian, and the best hope the US has of getting to Mars first is Elon Musk.
doubtful (Score:2)
America, otoh, has 4 companies working (Score:3)
/. Poll opportunity (Score:3)
Poll 1: Which nation/organization do you think will be next to land people on the moon?
* China (CNSA)
* USA (NASA)
* Japan (JAXA)
* Europe (ESA)
* India (ISRO)
* Russia (RFSA)
* North Korea (KCST)
* Privately funded (e.g. SpaceX, Blue Origin or Cowboy Neal without direct state support) (ETLA)
Poll 2: Which nation/organization do you want be next to land people on the moon?
(same options)
Predicted it years ago (Score:2)
It's a box full of monkeys with the words "peekaboo perfect space explore!" written on the side.
European Union (Score:2)
Just to be precise: the European Space Agency (ESA) is not part of the European Union.
The former is about science and the later about forcing neoliberalism through unwilling People's throats. Current EU rules would probably forbid the creation of a ESA-like thing today.
But to be fair, EU also contribute to ESA budget.
Lander is all they need. They have the other parts (Score:5, Informative)
Honestly, Russia is in the enviable position of already having the critical parts needed for a crewed lunar mission.
They have Soyuz for crewed launches, Proton for heavy uncrewed, plus Angara coming on line to replace the troublesome Proton. Soyuz was originally designed for lunar missions, and could be fairly simply modified for lunar return. Russia also regularly does propellant transfer and autonomous docking and have a large array of storable-propellant upper stages to use, so they could launch the lander partially filled using Proton into a distant lunar orbit and refuel and/or reposition using a Progress vehicle (perhaps tweaked to allow bigger propellant tanks).
Soyuz could dock with a couple of full Briz-M stages in LEO, push out a lunar orbit and meet with the pre-place lander. ...I suspect Russia will not build a mega-rocket like SLS. They don't need to, since they're very good at docking and propellant transfer (something they do regularly on ISS). Which is good because they don't exactly have a lot of money right now.
Mr. Putin, President Trump is on the line... (Score:1)
"Yes?"
"The race to put a man on the moon is over. You lost. Loser!"
Landing is easy. Now build one that re-launches... (Score:2)
>> Russia Begins Work On a Lunar Lander
Landing is easy. Now try building something that can re-launch itself back OFF the moon and I'll be impressed.
The EU is not a country... (Score:2)
... despite the aspirations of some politicians.
Re: (Score:2)