Experiment Suggests Monkeys Can Do Basic Math 87
sciencehabit (1205606) writes "It looks like a standardized test question: Is the sum of two numbers on the left or the single number on the right larger? Rhesus macaques that have been trained to associate numerical values with symbols can get the answer right, even if they haven't passed a math class. The finding doesn't just reveal a hidden talent of the animals—it also helps show how the mammalian brain encodes the values of numbers. Previous research has shown that chimpanzees can add single-digit numbers. But scientists haven’t explained exactly how, in the human or the monkey brain, numbers are being represented or this addition is being carried out. Now, a new study (abstract) helps begin to answer those questions."
Re: (Score:2)
The problem in America is that we USED to have 3rd parties that at least put pressures on the pubs/dems to keep them moderates.
However, when Poppa Bush lost due to Perot, the GOP announced that they would no longer allow 3rd parties to debate, and they would no longer use the league of women voters. Sadly, the fucking dems went along with the fascists.
So, now America has either idiots with the dems, or fascists with the gop.
Re: (Score:2)
You guys should really learn how to vote for 'none Of The Above'
The vast majority does vote for "None of the above". It hasn't helped.
Re: (Score:1)
JFK was a Republican?
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1, Insightful)
Never knew math was so political...
Re: (Score:1)
Sure it is, remember when W said, "Make the pi higher"?
Re: (Score:2)
He was talking about heaping more meringue on the lemon meringue pie.
Re: (Score:2)
The ex-Aussie PM was worth a bonk, even if she was a rustymuff.
Re: (Score:1)
It seems to mostly apply to men also. Congressmen as a whole look like a Crypt Keeper gathering.
Re: (Score:2)
WTF is with all the political bashing on this site lately?
It's gotten frankly absurd. Look, /., intelligent people disagree on some key cultural issues. There may be interesting discussions to be had where that's on-topic, but merely repeating abuse or over-used talking points on every freaking story is really dragging the site down.
Restrain your missionary zeal; it's not helping your cause folks!
Re: (Score:2)
WTF is with all the political bashing on this site lately? Never knew math was so political...
The crazies left the Yahoo message boards - guess they ended up here.
Re: (Score:3)
Apparently, you neo-cons/tea* are not capable of math or facts.
Comment removed (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
If you are truly interested you should do some reading.
Re: (Score:2)
Hmm... quantitative comparisons (this type of problem) were eliminated from the SAT some years ago because they were too hard or too abstract or maybe because they required abstract reasoning which was not taught directly in schools or something.
Anyhow, now we've demonstrated that a trained monkey can do these kinds of questions. Anyone else wonder what that says about our expectations regarding abstract reasoning for even high school kids?
So this is how it starts... (Score:2, Insightful)
...of the Rise of the Planet of the Apes.
Dangerous experiments... (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
we are that is unless you see monkeys smelting iron tools or dolphins living in skyscrapers or lab rats reading war and peace, whales flying to low earth orbit.
It is easy to see that some animals have some rudimentary intelligence like being able to tell the difference between small bowl of food and big bowl of food, but you would be a moron to not see that we are light-years past them in almost any cognitive test we can devise. Call me when a chimp wins game of chess against any human that has played more
Re: (Score:2)
This story is about monkeys that can do symbolic addition. They're not identifying whether one pile of food is bigger than another.
There are several tasks that various animals, generally primates, dolphins or various birds, can do that children of various ages can't. It seems more and more unlikely all the time that our brains are really much different than those of many other animals. We've just got a little more capacity (eventually) and a whole lot of nonlinear network effect.
Re: (Score:1)
Don't know, but to most people, math seems to be nothing more than "money see, monkey do". Understanding never comes into it.
Re: (Score:2)
Don't know, but to most people, math seems to be nothing more than "money see, monkey do". Understanding never comes into it.
Public schooling was never intended to encourage curiosity and deep understanding. People like that would be too difficult to manipulate via advertising, PR, carefully cherry-picked news, and other forms of propaganda. No one in politics or business wants that.
Re: (Score:3)
You work in marketing?
Wrong focus (Score:1)
Fine, but doing the Macarena well is much more profitable for a monkey.
Re:Slashdot sociopaths, as usual... (Score:4, Funny)
Your compassion is overwhelming. What is it like, not being able to feel the suffering of others? Do you think that when you pretend to care about people around you, that they believe you?
"The question is not, Can they reason? nor, Can they talk? but, Can they suffer?"
Jeremy Benthan
I conjecture the better question is do they taste good with a side of sauteed onions and peppers?
Re: (Score:1)
Let's see if he retains that skill in the Hague.
One of the monkey failed that test (Score:2)
Scientist: If I give you three bananas, then another two bananas, how many bananas do you have?
Dr. Zira: I don't like bananas!
Obviously (Score:2)
Who didn't know this? (Score:2)
My accounting department and midmanagement is full of 'em.
Re: (Score:2)
You should be ashamed of yourself, calling accountants and (likely) MBAs monkeys...
Do you have any idea how much it depresses monkeys to be compared to such creatures?
Re: (Score:2)
I know, right? They get so depressed it's all they can do to fling poo!
Who wants a half-hearted poo-flinging monkey?
They can do more than Math... (Score:2)
I've seen research experiments where they did more than simple math but could play simple games against human opponents and win more often than not (of course they could practice and the humans didn't get any). I've also seen them do simple sign language (arguably mimicking but they could clearly sign things they wanted). They also create and use tools.
So we are surprised they can seemingly do simple math? Really?
Now I don't figure they will be taking college algebra anytime soon, but I really am not all
Re: (Score:2)
They seem to have some grasp of economics too.
http://www.zmescience.com/rese... [zmescience.com]
Even so, chickens (& geese) worry me more.
Arithmetic != Math (Score:1)
Let me know when one of them provides a novel proof that the square root of two is irrational.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Arithmetic != Math
No, but Aritthmatic \in Maths.
When one makes claims about whether one can do maths or not, one is not referring to being able to do everything in the entirety of mathematics. One is making claims about a rather small subset. Arithmetic is a small subset of maths. If monkeys can do basic arithmetic, then it's fair to say they can do basic maths.
novel proof that the square root of two is irrational.
That's something almost no one in the entire world can do. So, if that's your definition of "d
Re: (Score:2)
Wow that's amazing (Score:2)
But they don't do logarithms. (Score:2)
One prevailing theory on number representation—dubbed logarithmic encoding—had proposed that the brain always underestimates the value of larger numbers in a systematic and unchangeable way
But, it turned out, they did not underestimate any number systematically. They did it only when it was the smaller argument to the add() function. So, the take away is, meh, they can add single digit numbers, but can't do logarithms. Right?
Re: (Score:2)
The conclusion is that whoever wrote that has little to no idea what a logarithm is.
Re: (Score:2)
That's what we smartass reviewers call a conclusion unsupported by the evidence.
Re: (Score:2)
In fairness to the monkeys, I'm not sure I could anymore either. ;-)
Sure (Score:2)
Even I can do basic math, and I'm a fairly stupid monkey.
It does not look like it at all. (Score:2)
"It looks like a standardized test question: Is the sum of two numbers on the left or the single number on the right larger?
It does not look like standardized test question at all. The typical standardized test question would be, "Represent these two number in the number line. Use the $latest_fad to find the total of the two numbers. Explain how you would use the number line to select to whether to be chased by hyenas or cheetahs. Or Draw a picture of a flower".
The child that writes, "I talked to my brain about the number line and the brain said the test is dumb. So I am off playing super mario cart" makes it to the Colbert S
No surprise - Dogs can do math (Score:3)
We have livestock working dogs. They do guarding and herding as well as other jobs on our farm. They do math. They can differentiate less, more, count, know numbers (we use numbers with them) and do simple addition.
Yes, these are not your ordinary pet dog - they're bred for intelligence and work at their jobs from a very young age so this may not be representative of all dogs. However, if our dogs can do math I'm not at all surprised monkeys can and I expect apes including chimpanzees and dolphins can probably do math too. These are social, cooperative animals and most of them are hunters which tends to develop brain hardware and skills.
Re: (Score:1)
Note there is a layer removed; the experiment used a 25-number range of symbols, so there's no counting involved, and summation has to be done on two abstract representations while their translations are held in mind. TFA suggests they may not be summing, but considering the two-symbol labels to be "modified bigSymbol", then TFA delves into neuro subjects above me.
This isn't to say dogs/other higher mammals are incapable of the same degree of forethought/translation. -AC.Falos
Re: (Score:2)
Livestock working dogs. They do it all the time in their work of herding and guarding.
Alas, poor arithmetic (Score:2)
I bet those bastards have known all along exactly how many typewriters they need to write Hamlet.
Re:Alas, poor arithmetic (Score:4, Funny)
Oh, they've already written it ... they're just holding out for more bananas.
Ever since monkeys started getting MBAs it hasn't been the same. Now they just want to outsource the whole Shakespeare thing.
Dogs (Score:2)
Show your dog three biscuits. Give him two. See if he goes and lays down or if he calculates the number of biscuits in your hand to be larger than zero.
Re: (Score:2)
Our "doorbell" is actually three rings on the telephone. Normal calls (one ring) and intercom calls (two rings) get ignored by the dogs.
Three rings and they start to bark to let us know that someone is at the front door.
Re: (Score:2)
Our "doorbell" is actually three rings on the telephone. Normal calls (one ring) and intercom calls (two rings) get ignored by the dogs.
Three rings and they start to bark to let us know that someone is at the front door.
That's more interesting than you would guess; your dogs know Morse. Dah = [t]elephone, dah dah = "[M]r. Watson—Come here—I want to see you", dah dah dah = [o]vert burglary attempt.
On a more serious note, I would guess that your dogs perceive the three ring modes as three different sounds, they're not actually counting rings. Dogs are good at responding to learned sounds. Sorry for the earlier snarkiness :)
Not news (Score:2)
I know many who can even code
Proof of Soul (Score:3)
I used to be in math-heavy secondary school, with non-trivial math curriculum. On one of our religion lessons, priest when presented with the question "Do dogs have souls" answered clear "No". By my friend was pressing - "But when you look into dog's eyes, you can see a thinking, sensitive being there, doesn't that suggest it has something like a soul", priest desperately looking for "shut up" answer, replied "No - see, if you give the dog your math exercises, it will not manage it, so it doesn't have a mind and soul". To that, reply was short "Neither will you..."
So, according to my religion teacher, we can rename the headline to "Experiment suggests monkeys might have souls" ;)