Scientists Publish Letter Saying, "We Need More Scientific Mavericks" 126
coondoggie (973519) writes "Gotta love this letter published in the guardian.com this week. It comes from a number of scientists throughout the world who are obviously frustrated with the barriers being thrown up around them — financial, antiquated procedures and techniques to name a few — and would like to see changes. When you speak of scientific mavericks, you might look directly at Improbable Research's annual Ig Nobel awards which recognize the arguably leading edge of maverick scientific work."
Hire/promote dont just complain (Score:5, Insightful)
If "scientists" want more maverick's in science...then they need to **hire** and **promote** more mavericks...then write and *publish* papers about their theories
Right now, anyone who doesn't toe the institutional line will get put with the Graduate Advisor who is either A) insane or B) can't speak English and only was hired to get more full-tuition-paying foreign students
If you want the pedigree you have to 'drink the kool-aide' of whatever academic is above you
Don't get me wrong, TFA is a good start, but they need to do alot more than this to make academia right again
Why would anyone want to ruin their career (Score:4, Insightful)
by being a maverick in science?
Face it, the scientific establishment has ruined science.
NOW they realize this (Score:3, Insightful)
This is a lot of hand-wringing over a situation these guys created.
We have a system created by and for established academics. These guys have displaced both the great individual scientists of the past (think Feynman), but also the great scientific managers (think Oppenheimer). In combining these two roles, they have created hierarchies capable of continuous and low risk scientific advancement. Think about how steady and predictable scientific advancement is these days. This is an amazing and great achievement, but it also sucks the spirit and excitement out of being a scientist. And along the way certain fields just have to wait.
So, ok, let's talk about what happens if we want to fix this.
The main thing that needs to be reversed is to restore the separation of management and science. Scientists who want to manage large groups get to be management. They have to be able to content themselves with just being the grant writer, and not being in charge of the science, marketing, data presentation and every aspect of their colleague's career development. Scientists who don't want to be management have to be ok with allowing other people to be in charge. Running your own group can't be all of our goals. Professors need to get back to doing the actual work that got them their position.
Not so easy to do (Score:5, Insightful)
Now find the "mavericks". You have to have a ranked list by tomorrow afternoon.
Re:Quoting Einstein (regarding computer science) (Score:2, Insightful)
A madman's ravings are absurd in relation to the situation in which he finds himself, but not in relation to his madness.
Re:Hire/promote dont just complain (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Hire/promote dont just complain (Score:5, Insightful)
The rest of it is pretty much spot-on, but not really any different than in business or anywhere else. You've got to convince your bosses to keep from firing you, after all.
Open the libraries (Score:4, Insightful)