After Successful Launch, India's Mars Orbiter Is On Its Way 166
neo12 writes "India has successfully launched a spacecraft to the Red Planet — with the aim of becoming the fourth space agency to reach Mars."
As our previous mention of the launch notes, getting to Mars by rocket is a long haul: if all goes well, it will be about 10 months until Mangalyaan reaches orbit.
0.37% of India's total budget (Score:5, Insightful)
That is the cost of India's entire space program. The Mars mission is obviously a much smaller percentage of that. So, to the inevitable critics about how poor India should not be investing on a space program, 0.37% of the total budget will not solve poverty problems. Rather, it benefits India more than being a drag on the economy.
Re:0.37% of India's total budget (Score:5, Insightful)
PR stunt that leads to being paid to launch commercial satellites at cheaper rates than the US/EU/Russian alternatives. As their market share grows, the profit increases, and that can be invested in the country itself, either directly or via tax on employees' wages.
That's one possibility anyway.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1, Flamebait)
You forget that according to the Libertardians there are no benefits ever from taxes, except for the military.
Re: (Score:2)
That's not fair. Someone has to be around to enforce contract law and property rights too.
Re: (Score:1, Interesting)
Absolutely not... with 1 Billion people and one of the highest rates of population growth, they need greater area more than better infrastructure. Mars is perfect.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Mars is perfect for what? It's an unimaginably distant dead rock with nothing on it. Antarctica is a billion times more hospitable.
Yeah, and the moon is another dead distant rock. What could we possibly learn by going there, hmm?
Re: (Score:2)
Perhaps you need to actually look before opening your mouth. Just a thought.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Yes because no one but a very select few are affected by communications costs like the telephone, tv, and internet. I don't have the numbers, but I'm pretty sure that you are right that it only "benefits the tiny amount of people".
Mod racist parent down (Score:3)
Stop modding up racist comments.
Re: (Score:1)
First of all fianna, Indian isn't a race, so it isn't a racist comment by definition.
Secondly, it isn't racist when you turn a true unbiased fact (a larger than natural distribution of convenient stores are owned/run by those of Indian ancestry).
Now go away.
Re: (Score:3)
PR stunt that leads to being paid to launch commercial satellites at cheaper rates than the US/EU/Russian alternatives.
[citation needed]
Re: (Score:3)
How does one cite a hypothetical?
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
It puts India on the list of space-capable countries instead of a tech support jobs stealing country?
Re:0.37% of India's total budget (Score:5, Insightful)
India isn't stealing anything. It's your corporate overlords who are moving the jobs away to be done more cheaply.
Don't blame India for that.
Re: (Score:1)
yes that is entirely true, you could blame india for the horrendus poverty levels that enable an american corporation to pay slave like wages to india and be considered a salvation.
Re:0.37% of India's total budget (Score:5, Insightful)
I certainly can't blame then for wanting to fix it. And since America also has horrendous poverty levels in some places ... I wouldn't recommend falling off that moral high ground.
But I can blame corporations for what they do -- if an American corporation wants to cut American jobs so they can be done cheaply elsewhere, why would Americans keep buying from them? Loyalty? Pride? Stupidity?
Americans are fond of talking about 'the market' -- this is just that. For better or worse, this is the globalization everyone has been crowing about for years, and is pretty much exactly what we've been told to expect.
Someone is willing to do it cheaper than you are -- and the race to the bottom continues.
Re:0.37% of India's total budget (Score:5, Insightful)
if an American corporation wants to cut American jobs so they can be done cheaply elsewhere, why would Americans keep buying from them? Loyalty? Pride? Stupidity?
No, none of the above (although that doesn't preclude people from having those qualities). Americans buy from companies that offshore (american) jobs because those companies have lower prices as a result.
You must realise that patriotism comes in a very poor second when the alternative is 5 cents off.
Re:0.37% of India's total budget (Score:5, Insightful)
First of all, American poverty doesn't compare to Indian poverty. Anyone would give an important body part to be upgraded from Indian poverty to American Poverty.
Second of All, consumers usually act in their own immediate self interest when making a purchasing decision. Where a product was made does not usually factor into that.
Beleive it or not, its not a zero sum game. There are winners and losers, and the profits of the winners seem to be rather concentrated.
Re: (Score:2)
India->China->Africa
I'd learn French if I were you. And learn to like sunscreen.
Re: (Score:2)
I already know French. And sunscreen helps keep my pasty-white complexion. ;-)
Re: (Score:2)
What does learning French have to do with India or Africa?
Re: (Score:2)
France was a major colonial power in Africa, and much of western Africa still speaks it as an official language.
Re: (Score:1)
The off shoring of US jobs has been declining and will most likely continue to decline. There has even been an increase in the number of foreign corporations setting up new or expanding current operations. The growth in US energy production will also attract foreign businesses looking for lower energy prices. The countries that rely on low wages and high growth will have problems maintaining the same level of productivity as the low wage workers start demanding the higher wages necessary to support the the
Re:0.37% of India's total budget (Score:4, Insightful)
So you're blaming India for being poorer than America, with lower wages, lower standard of living and lower costs of living? Interesting spin on things. Damn you, poor person. Just quit being poor already! Why can't you demand a bigger wage, with bigger houses, cars and TVs, like the rest of us?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Why can't you demand a bigger wage, with bigger houses, cars and TVs, like the rest of us?
A good first step would probably be demanding basic sanitation.
Re: (Score:2)
That's true; immigration fraud [slashdot.org] is not the same thing as stealing.
Re:0.37% of India's total budget (Score:4, Insightful)
Right. Greedy douchebag corporation skirts around rules to act like greedy douchebag corporation ... following the template well established by greedy douchebag American corporations. Film at 11.
Sorry, but America perfected this particular kind of capitalism. That they're now victim to is is neither surprising, nor sympathy inducing.
Re: (Score:2)
India isn't stealing anything. It's your corporate overlords who are moving the jobs away to be done more cheaply.
The "corporate overlords" are not stealing jobs either. Claiming that they are is just a variation of the Lump of Labor Fallacy [wikipedia.org]. Economies are not zero sum. Economies expand in response to the resources available, even if those resources are overseas. So most of these jobs are new, not replacements. These overseas employees, or the firms that employ them, are paid in US dollars. Since India is running a current account deficit, these dollars flow back to America in exchange for goods and services that
Re:0.37% of India's total budget (Score:4, Insightful)
Basic Science.
People have tried to quantify the benefits of basic science but have largely failed – but that does not mean it is not important. By pushing the boundaries of knowledge two things happen. One is the development of elite intuitions which tend to churn out more scientists who tend to go on and do other, different, interesting things. The other is that they stumble onto new weird things which have other applications.
People have tried to quantify the benefits of basic science but have largely failed – but that does not mean it is not important. The spillover effects are hard to measure. There tends to be a long lag time between new discoveries and everyday applications.
Now, off hand, I would think something in genetics or biology would have a bigger impact then space but that is just my 2 cents.
Re:0.37% of India's total budget (Score:5, Insightful)
Basic research is the cornerstone of pretty much all technological developments of the last two centuries. Do you seriously imagine that our materials technologies would be anywhere near where they are now without basic research into chemistry and physics?
Let me guess, you're one of those people who thinks that all development is just a series of Eureka! moments.
Re: (Score:3)
I am confused by your comment – where did you get the idea that I was against basic research? “Hard to quantify” does not mean “Not Important”. What it means is that one has a very hard time picking one’s way from George Heilmeier work in 1964 through all of the intermediate steps (and dead ends) to my computer monitor.
Re:0.37% of India's total budget (Score:5, Interesting)
People have tried to quantify the benefits of basic science but have largely failed – but that does not mean it is not important.
1900: "Electrons? Quantum physics? Can you eat that?"
1948: The transistor.
2013: Hell, look around yourself...
Re: (Score:2)
Is it an apple?
Re:0.37% of India's total budget (Score:5, Informative)
India has used satellites to improve weather and crop forecasting, fisheries management, and just plain ol' land use data gathering and other metrics. Their space program largely serves their people by making government and commerce more productive and efficient.
This mission will further develop their technical capabilities, and if it leads to more commercial paid-for launches, they will probably piggyback their own birds on these, saving more money and letting India further exploit space technology to their benefit.
There may be more examples. I just hit the easy ones.
Re:0.37% of India's total budget (Score:5, Informative)
Poor India with it's 1.842 trillion USD GDP. It's a G20 member with the 9 largest economy in the world, ffs.
Re: (Score:2)
Oh, dear lord. I fucked up that post quite horrendously, didn't I?
Re:0.37% of India's total budget (Score:5, Informative)
Are you disingenuous on purpose? 1.8 trillion isn't exactly a huge GDP, much less for a nation the size of India. Let's look at a few examples
___GDP (USD)...population...per-capita GDP
US.......15.68T......313M.....$49,965
UK.........2.44T.......63M.....$38,514
China.....8.23T...1,351M.......$6,091
Nigeria....262b......168M......$1,555
India......1.82T...1,237M......$1,489
So basically India has an economy the size of Brasil, spread across 6x as many people, or alternately a population the size of China, but with 4x less money. I'd call that pretty poor unless you're using Africa as your measuring stick.
Re:0.37% of India's total budget (Score:5, Interesting)
If they can pull it off, it tells Pakistan, "We can land a nuke on Islamabad just as easily as we send a probe to Mars." This is exactly how the US-USSR space race played out. The Apollo and Soyuz programs were all about demonstrating the capacity of missile technology.
Re:0.37% of India's total budget (Score:5, Informative)
it tells Pakistan
You don't need a Mars misson for that. All of India's (and China's, too) neighbours are very well aware that the space-faring nations already have the abillity to drop anything they please on them.
No, this mission is an advertising campaign to promote India's already successful space launch industries. The fact that this mission is so much cheaper (if not yet successful: a major factor in the cost of american missions is employing all those 1,000's of staff at western rates of pay. And if the mission does make it to Mars, and continues to run to well past it's planned failure date then the mission just costs more) is part of the "we can launch your satellites AND we have much lower costs" message that the world will hear and take note of.
It might even do some science, too.
Re:0.37% of India's total budget (Score:4, Interesting)
Maybe to the politicians and generals, but not to anyone else. Sergey Korolev told a Soviet general, "What we are doing is much more important than your bombs." The Saturn V was useless as a weapon, nothing about the Apollo launches was useful militarily except the spinoff technology, and the general public in both countries didn't cower in fear. Historical revisionism is fun and entertaining, though not always all that accurate.
Re: (Score:1)
India already is a nuclear power with rocket capability. Going to Mars doesn't tell Pakistan anything new.
Re: (Score:2)
A Pakistan / India war would not need weapons that enter orbit.
It would be like Nevada building ICBMs to get to Idaho.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, but that was back in the 60ies. Today both Pakistan and India own nukes. See the comments from the others below for the actual reason.
Re: (Score:1)
it would build hell of a lot of sewers.
just saying.
and dunno if the total number is that low even.. most of their space related expenses are actually ballistics etc. military stuff they don't actually need(they do need however plenty of footmen, because it isn't exactly a pinnacle of stability, something that building sewers would actually help).
Re: (Score:2)
The launch cost less than a steel magnate's daughter's wedding just a couple of years ago. If the problem is just money that's the place to go to get it, not robbing the country's future development. Were you one of the people who scoffed when Indira Gandhi revealed the country's plan to expand the secondary and educational system and universities, squawking that "They're wasting money while people are starving"? Now those educated people bring vast amounts of income into the country, which their space p
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
At $72m (£45m), the mission is comparatively cheap, but some commentators have still questioned whether a country with one of the highest rankings for childhood malnutrition in the world should be spending millions on a mission to the Red Planet.
If you are talking about this budget, then it does not really mean anything. This is the budget for this testing project but is not comparable to a real project. When it comes to a real project, launching is only a small part and cost for the whole project. Yes, the country benefit for this test, but is it really worth to put a lot more money into another program for a real thing? That is my big question...
Re: (Score:2)
Allow me to be the first to say ... (Score:4)
Jai Hind!!
Awesome work guys. Hopefully in 10 months we'll be seeing stories about how it's entered orbit, and not stories about something going wrong.
Re: (Score:2)
They are a democracy and use metric at home. We're in uncharted territory when it comes to first-time to Mars.
Re: (Score:3)
What makes you think that it's lack of money causing the poor sanitation? Or that the money for this particular program was the only money that could have been diverted? Or that you shouldn't congratulate the engineers who worked towards this pretty awesome achievement, even if their government/religious leaders are idiots?
Re:Allow me to be the first to say ... (Score:4, Insightful)
India has a population of over 1.2 billion people. There will always be other things to spend money on. This gives India both technology, future industry, and hopefully something to make the next generation of Indian rocket scientists happen.
You can't stagnate a country until you've mopped up everything else -- because you'd never be done. This was done for something like under $75 million dollars -- it's not like that would have completely alleviated the problems. It likely wouldn't even put a dent in them.
Find me one single country which has solved all of their problems before also focusing on other things. The reality is, you can't, and all countries need to do more than one thing.
Re: (Score:3)
And I would like to know why the US does anything it does when I have a road not a mile from my house that has a pot hole in it. OMG, we should stop funding everything until that is fixed!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
That would be quite an achievement... it would mean that Mangalyaan would be traveling an order of magnitude faster than the Voyager probes, by accident!
Getting to Mars by rocket is a long haul... (Score:2)
If getting to Mars by rocket is a long haul, does that mean there is a shorter way?
Re: (Score:2)
yes, a continuously powered non-ballistic trajectory. possible with alternative technologies to chemical fuel rockets
Re: (Score:2)
The vacuum of space (Score:1)
Just because they Indians they cant do it right? (Score:2, Insightful)
The amount of racism in some of these posts disgust me.
Re: (Score:2)
Me too.
If there's a fault... (Score:1)
... I hope mission control don't mind waiting on the phone for 20 mins to Helpdesk , then going through a 5 level automated menu which asks them all their details , only to be finally put through to a human who asks all the same details again in an unintelligable accent and then be asked if they're sure the spacecraft is heading for the correct planet and could they double check, Then be put on hold once more and be passed to the customer satisfaction survey dept by mistake.
Mod racist parent down. (Score:3)
Stop modding up racist comments. They are not funny.
Re: (Score:2)
*sigh* The liberal lefty knee jerk repost of last resort. I hate to break the news to you but people just laugh at simpletons like you now.
Re: (Score:2)
Its a racist comment. Based on your defensive reply, you know it.
Being racist isn't OK becasue you were 'just joking'.
Re: (Score:2)
So which exact part was racist? Be specific. Are Indians a race now because I thought they were a nationality?
Re: (Score:2)
Don't give me your racist's last defense, the first amendment, because it doesn't work.
Here is the news, mad hatter. The first amendment only stops the government from censoring you. It doesn't stop a private citizen or organization from silencing you. I can still tell you to shut up. So shut your racist trap, you intellectually-challenged racist prick.
Re: (Score:2)
Is this the standard response now when racists are called on their bullshit? Start firing back with words like "liberal" and "lefty" as if they're insults?
Fuck you, you conservative racist prick. Fuck you to high heaven.
Re: (Score:2)
*yawn*
Save it for your school debating society sonny.
Re: (Score:2)
Like I said, fuck you.
Good Lord! (Score:5, Insightful)
Can't anyone just say "Good Job India, well done, best of luck on your launch and let's hope everything goes OK, welcome to the club"?
Slashdot is the last place I'd expect huge amounts of "Well, if we can't fix all our problem on Earth, we should never go into space".
Because YOU WILL NEVER SOLVE ALL YOUR PROBLEMS ON EARTH.
Sigh.
Re: (Score:1)
We can try. Fatalism is not for everyone.
Message to the racists posting here (Score:1, Flamebait)
Fuck you.
Good Job India! (Score:2)
Good luck.
A much more interesting title: (Score:2)
After Unsuccessful Launch, India's Mars Orbiter Is On Its Way.
For what subset of launches that result in the mars orbiter being on its way could NOT be described as 'successful'?
Feudalism (Score:1)
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/indiahome/indianews/article-2480424/VISUAL-EDIT-India-little-better-Ethiopia.html [dailymail.co.uk]
http://ibnlive.in.com/news/836-million-indians-live-on-less-than-rs-20-a-day/47645-7.html [in.com]
Re: (Score:2)
This will exactly meat the requested specifications,
As long as it's not beef.
Re: (Score:2)
>>This will exactly meat the requested specifications,
>As long as it's not beef.
No problem: it easily passed pear review.
Re: (Score:2)
Because most of the "real firsts" were done by Russia and the U.S. a long time ago. And you've got to start somewhere.
Re:Good Job, But... (Score:4, Informative)
Because most of the "real firsts" were done by Russia and the U.S. a long time ago. And you've got to start somewhere.
Most of the firsts were done by the Soviets.
First artificial satellite.
First living thing in space.
First astronaut.
First man to orbit the earth.
First space walk.
First woman in space.
First space station.
Plenty of broken records for long duration in space too.
Re: (Score:1)
Yeah, IIRC, Russia was once part of the Soviet Union.
Re: (Score:3)
Whoosh!
Jesus H Christ do I have to spell it out?
Most of the firsts were not achieved by the US.
Got it?
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
Soviet Space Program, NASA, and the European Space Agency.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I think the world's knowledge of shit-controlling technology is pretty up there. If they want to change their sanitation then they will need to demand it.
That's one of the things that the rivers of shit have in common with the US Congress: the only reason they're there is because of apathy.
Re:No brainer (Score:4, Interesting)
If I lived in India I'd take the first rocket to anywhere. Sign me up. It can't be much worse than the rest of their transportation options.
Actually, India has a very capable transportation network. Their railways are pretty good. Sure, you have the cheap seats that are not clean, but I've traveled a lot on their higher-class compartments, and they were clean and comfortable (air-conditioned sleepers).
The US has one of the worst PUBLIC transportation systems for a western country. Even air transport is horrible for an economy passenger. Frankly, the railway and bus network of India puts the US' public transport network to shame.
Re: (Score:2)
And that's a good thing! Racing to space for the future of Humanity should be shared by all.
Mod racist parent down. (Score:5, Insightful)
There's only one answer to that question. Fuck you, you racist piece of shit.
It cost only $83 millions ? (Score:2)
According to the various articles I got online, it is claimed that the cost for India's Mars expedition program is around $83 millions.
http://www.indiatvnews.com/news/india/india-to-launch-orbiter-to-mars-next-week--29838.html [indiatvnews.com]
http://www.firstpost.com/india/will-isro-mars-mission-start-an-indo-china-space-race-1211933.html [firstpost.com]
How can it be so cheap ?
Re: (Score:3)
How can it be so cheap ?
Outsourcing.