Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system


Forgot your password?
Education Science

Start-Up Wants To Open Up Science Journals and Eliminate Paywalls 74

First time accepted submitter ryanferrell writes "Not even Harvard can afford to subscribe to every academic journal. For scientists at small institutions, lack of access to journals specific to one's narrow field can be painful. Individual articles can cost $30 to $50 each, which is paid out of personal or grant funds. The Boston Globe profiles a start-up that is piloting an 'iTunes' model with Nature Publishing Group and the University of Utah. In the pilot program, researchers pay nothing to download articles and their library foots a smaller bill for a la carte access from the publisher."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Start-Up Wants To Open Up Science Journals and Eliminate Paywalls

Comments Filter:
  • Re:Pipe Dream... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Phillip2 ( 203612 ) on Tuesday October 09, 2012 @04:18AM (#41594091)

    Many scientists do. As well as the expensive options like PLoS, there are many who just publish on their own blogs, or use tools like arxiv. At the moment, though, the credit structures don't acknowledge the cheap options, so we have to pay for the more expensive process, whether before or after.

    Scientific publishing is on a knife edge at the moment. There is a lot of flux in the system. I hadn't heard of ReadCube -- there is also Mendeley and Zotero which offer good reference management capabilities. Then, in terms of journals which are, or are about to appear, there is Elife, F1000 Research, PeerJ. Then there is Figshare which is also NPG now. It's quite an interesting time. Some very big names are going to crash (Elsevier is kind of high on that list of possible losses; fingers crossed Springer goes as well).

    The risk is, and I think it is a very real risk, is exactly that what this article suggests. We end up with iTunes; a single, dominant publisher who can define the publishing model, control the sytem regardless of the other stakeholders. It has happened in many other areas: google, facebook, amazon are all obvious examples.

    I dislike the status quo intently, but this does not mean that replacing will necessarily produce a better result.

As of next Tuesday, C will be flushed in favor of COBOL. Please update your programs.