Thick Dust Alters NASA Mars Rover Plans 97
coondoggie writes "NASA's long-running Mars rover Opportunity is getting ready for the harsh Martian winter, but this year for the first time in its nearly eight-year history it needs a sunnier location to continue its work. NASA said the rover, which depends on solar power for energy, is sitting just south of Mars' equator and has worked through four Martian southern hemisphere winters. Being closer to the equator than its now defunct twin rover, Spirit, Opportunity has not needed to stay on a Sun-facing slope during previous winters but now its solar panels carry a thicker coating of Martian dust than before."
Windshield wipers (Score:5, Interesting)
Windshield wipers! My kingdom for windshield wipers!
A good guess is that, going forward, all new Mars landers will have either a wiper system or the ability to compress Martian atmosphere and then go POOF on the solar panels. Yes, more weight, but when the payoff is potentially many more functional months of service, it'd be worth it.
Re:Windshield wipers (Score:5, Informative)
A good guess is that, going forward, all new Mars landers will have either a wiper system or the ability to compress Martian atmosphere ...
The new rover Curiosity currently en route to Mars has nuclear power.
Re:Windshield wipers (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Windshield wipers (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Windshield wipers (Score:5, Funny)
One wonders why they did not just use the nuclear power for the rest of the rover.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
That could put an eye out!
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Then the windshield wipers should work really well.
Woosh!
Re: (Score:2)
OH NOES!!!! NUKES!!! Evil!!!
Seriously, now... I'm assuming it's an RTG? Or is it some other form of nuke powerplant?
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
yeah, RTG:
http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl/mission/rover/energy/
http://www.ne.doe.gov/pdfFiles/MMRTG_Jan2008.pdf
Re:Windshield wipers (Score:5, Funny)
OH NOES!!!! NUKES!!! Evil!!!
It's okay. Mars is the definition of "Not In My Back Yard," so Earthlings are all for it. And if the little grey dudes wanted us to stick to solar, they should have just blown the dust off the previous rovers.
Re:Windshield wipers (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
"Mars attacks"
Re: (Score:3)
Haven't you seen Apollo 18?
No, I was waiting for 14 through 17 so that I wouldn't have to worry about big late arrival spoilers [tvtropes.org] in 18.
Re: (Score:1)
RTG is a pretty safe bet. It'd be rather more noteworthy if they send a fully functional plant with staff to operate it.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Thinking about this: The old rovers were not designed to operate as long as they have. The mission was intended to go for only a few months, if I recall correctly. I think that the operators were surprised that they survived the first martian winter, and knew that dust build-up was going to be a problem for solar power generation.
Nuclear power, however, has a known and predictable lifespan. Curiosity's going to definitely run out of RTG power at some known point in time: X. And that's it. Mission's over
Re:Windshield wipers (Score:5, Funny)
NASA Engineers: "There we go, fellas, the rover's done! Nothing to do now but stick it on a billion dollar rocket and send 'er off into space! Just have to hope it doesn't get too dusty too fast."
NASA Janitor, passing by: "Uh... couldn't you just stick, I dunno, some windshield wipers or somethin' on it?"
NASA Engineers:
:O
...
:|
...
>:*
...
*thump*
Re:Windshield wipers (Score:5, Informative)
I mean the panels can be rotated already no? Otherwise you don't even need windshield wipers, just a brush going over the panel once every few weeks...
No, the panels are fixed in position. They were folded during the flight and were spring loaded to unfold. Once deployed, they were locked into position. Also, since the rovers were only meant to last for 90 days, the extra complexity of a wiper or blower (or my favorite, a spool of cellophane, like an overhead projector) was deemed unnecessary.
Re: (Score:1)
You say that like its a bad thing.
Re: (Score:2)
So you're saying, instead of blowing air across the panels, you move the panels fast through the air... Brilliant. Except...
Have you ever driven a car that's been parked for a long time, and the windshield has gotten very dusty? If you haven't, and you've only cleared a spot to see from, you'll notice the rest of the windshield is dusty. Now if you were to drive at say 55mph for as long as you'd like, when yous top again the windshield will still be dusty. Well, assuming
Re:Windshield wipers (Score:5, Informative)
They thought of all these solutions, and in the end it just made more sense to make the solar panels larger than do anything complicated.
Don't forget these rovers were designed for a 90 day mission.
Re: (Score:2)
Like someone pointed out below they didn't know that certain wind conditions (basically dust devils) would clean the solar panels periodically. Had they know that I think they might have designed the rovers to last 900 days. NASA made a big PR number about how the solar panels would run out in a few months, which they then didn't thanks to the dust devils.
Now, I wonder if it's possible to make the cleaning events more effective, for example by coating the solar panels with a slippery coating, or by tilting
Re: (Score:3)
There is no such thing as criminally overdesigned. The only type of design that is downright criminal is planned obsolesence.
Re: (Score:1)
Why not take the easier option and drive the damn thing through one of the canals and get the water to wash it off.
Simple!
Dust Devils (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Their timing is not very reliable, however.
Re:Windshield wipers (Score:5, Insightful)
Many options were considered, none found effective and reliable against the fine, dry dust on Mars. In fact that was the whole reason the original mission was limited to three months, if they knew a good way to remove it they would have. Luckily winds clear the panels from time to time, the weather hasn't helped recently but it's still running after 8 years and tilting towards the sun is no big deal. Why would you bother to change a design that works so well? Maybe give it a slightly bigger solar panel so it has a bit better margins but overall there's no reason to change it. By the way, how many times do you think this exact suggestion has come up over the last 8 years?
Re: (Score:2)
I've accidentally switched on the car wipers when there was dust on the windshield a few times, and often it made the problem worse by compressing the dust more tightly against the windshield allowing more layers to settle. Without having sample Mars dust to test, it's hard to know what the result would be.
The dust-devil experience suggests that compressed air may be a better option, or at least the most tested one.
Anyhow, the next rover is "nuclear" powered so such studies are a non-issue for a while.
Re: (Score:2)
Many options were considered, none found effective and reliable against the fine, dry dust on Mars. In fact that was the whole reason the original mission was limited to three months, if they knew a good way to remove it they would have.
I find that hard to believe. There must be a half dozen good ways to do it. Just off the top of my head 3-4 transparent disposable sheets of film, perhaps with a drop or two of oil or alcohol between them to prevent sticking, would limit sunlight a little bit initially, but as they became worn could be discarded, restoring the surface to "good as new". You'd have to ensure little enough lubricant between the sheets so that when the new layer is revealed dust doesn't stick to them, but I can't imagine that's
Re: (Score:2)
That's thinking in Earth terms. This thing was in hard vacuum for more than a year.
Re:Windshield wipers (Score:5, Informative)
I believe one of the major problems is that dust on Mars can become very, very fine. There's no rain to clear dust from the atmosphere, so the little grains just keep hitting things and breaking apart, over and over. Martian fines can get down near 1 micron; for comparison, your red blood cells are about 8 microns wide. This stuff gets on everything. It goes through everything.
Re: (Score:2)
As I understand it calling it dust is technically a misnomer. Experts use the term "fines". Calling this stuff dust is like called fine talc gravel, except worse.
Re: (Score:2)
They use these motocross motorbikes goggles, and they work well. Sometimes a roller at each end so you can spool out a new section of clear film, other times they are just a stack of films.
Re:Windshield wipers (Score:4, Interesting)
One would think it would be like removing the extremely fine dust from an LP.
Back in the day, there was this thing called an "Ion Gun".
(Example product) [lptunes.com]
It basically compresses and slightly ionizes atmospheric gas, then directs it at the surface to be cleaned. The electrical charge in the gas causes the dust to be electrostatically repelled from the surface, and the forced air blows it off.
Surely such a toy could be attached to one of the arms of future solar powered rovers for periodic cleaning purposes, and even possibly for electrochemical experiments?
Re: (Score:3)
The ion gun cited charges one way, then the other to neutralize the surface. Ionic charge only persists a second or two.
Eg, it fires negative ions as the trigger is pulled, then releases positive ions as the trigger is released.
Persistent charge on an LP also promotes rapid resoiling, which is why commerical cleaning guns like this neutralize the charge after blowing the dust off.
Re: (Score:3)
Yes, I am in agreement. People at NASA are not, on the whole, stupid, though unfortunately NASA can be made to look stupid because of the political and economic conditions it has to work under. Often people point out the oft-repeated fable about NASA spending millions of dollars to develop a space pen whereas the Soviets just used pencils. It's a lot more complicated than that, see Snopes http://www.snopes.com/business/genius/spacepen.asp for an explanation. Too often slashdotters, and Americans in general,
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
lol, how did people miss this? We've known mars has storms since we got decent telescopes.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Nem fogom megvenni ezt a napelem, mert karcos.
Re: (Score:1)
To Moderators. I called laejoh's bluff. I think his comment was a Monty Python reference about the Hungarian-English phrasebook sketch. BTW, there was no Hungarian actually spoken during the sketch.
Get Jony Ive on it! (Score:2, Funny)
If only the rovers had a smart cover, they could turn on and as you open it and it cleans the solar panels from finger prints every time! Martian finger prints in this case.
If only it could take a bath (Score:1)
Re:If only it could take a bath (Score:5, Funny)
Like a "meteor shower"? Ouch!
Paging K'Breel!!! (Score:3)
Our gelsacs hunger for the words of the mighty K'Breel on the battle against the invaders from the blue world.
Better Late-Breaking News Than Never! (Score:5, Funny)
Always willing to place the needs of his Citizens before his own, the Speaker replied: "What more needs be said? One invader lies immobile and frozen in the plains. A second lies buried in a slowly-accumulating layer of carbox at the northern pole, a third never left the blue world's gravity well and spirals ever inward to a fiery doom (our analysts suggest a 75% probability of any surviving parts being condemned to dissolve in the toxic blue soup!), and although a fourth may have recently escaped the blue world's gravity well, it is destined to spend the next season squarely in the crosshairs of our Orbital Defense Forces, and yet you still require a progress report against this - this last struggling holdout?"
"Let me reassure you personally, dear Citizen: as surely as dust continues to be distributed over the invader's solar panels, the Council sees no crisis, and barely an Opportunity. But even the dimmest of opportunities is worth seizing!"
~``~ideo~`ransmission fr`m news ~eport~~`~`hecksum mismatc~~``~~``
Having delayed a hungry Speaker from his return home after a Council meeting, it is reported that the equally hungry gelsacs of enthusiastic citizen #64226 were seized, freeze-dried, ground into powder, and then tossed into the winds as part of the DDoS (Distributed Dusting of Solarpanels) attack still being conducted by our brave forces against the remaining invader at Devaur's End.
"A shining example to all who live on our fair world, this enthusiastic Citizen took advantage of a rare Opportunity to take the battle directly to the enemy, and he shall be remembered fondly! EVER ONWARD TO VICTORY!" (Oh, and thank you for the excuse, Citizen. Don't worry too much. Sometimes they grow back!)
ugg splogs (Score:5, Insightful)
why are we reading stories about Nasa on some shitty "network" splog laden with adverts ?
we should be reading about this on Nasa's site the internet was supposed to cut out the middleman instead its full of shitty sites who do nothing but take without giving anything back.
news for nerds ? news for desperate blog owners
Re: (Score:3)
And for pointing out the truth that we could be reading about this story from the source - NASA - instead of a site you correctly characterize as a money-grubbing, ad-laden blog filled with 3rd hand information, you get modded "troll" in typical Slashdot style.
Bravo.
Re: (Score:2)
why are we reading stories about Nasa on some shitty "network" splog laden with adverts ?
Because we want to slashdot the shitty "network" splog, not NASA!
Thanks for pointing out that the splog was laden with adverts. Most of us wouldn't have noticed.
How does this affect my real estate values? (Score:1)
Well, if we had a manned Mars mission . . . (Score:3)
. . . we could send someone up to dust them off, right?
"Check your oil for you, sir? That left front tire could use a bit of air . . . "
Now I remember why we used to call them "service stations" instead of "gas stations" . . .
Re:Well, if we had a manned Mars mission . . . (Score:4, Funny)
. . . we could send someone up to dust them off, right?
"Check your oil for you, sir? That left front tire could use a bit of air . . . "
Now I remember why we used to call them "service stations" instead of "gas stations" . . .
Really? I figured they once had hookers or something...
Re: (Score:3)
You're thinking of truck stops. ;-)
The Plan has Been Altered (Score:2)
Pray that they do not alter it further.
Or that it does not have to be altered further.
What if: (Score:2, Interesting)
What if the martian winds were to un-bury spirit's wheels and make it mobile? Would it start sending data back to earth? Has it ever stopped sending data?
It would be super cool if they were able to get it working again with a little help from the martian environment.
Spirit is dead.. (Score:2, Informative)
yes, Spirit is not sending data. It either got too cold, or something, but it's gone silent. The folks at JPL spent several months trying to contact it, but no joy.
Re: (Score:2)
This is only part of the story (Score:2)