ESA Ends Attempts To Pick Up Phobos-Grunt Signals 40
Spaceflight Now reports that hope has faded in the attempts to hear from the troubled Phobos-Grunt probe, and the listening project has been shuttered. After the craft's launch, says the article, "ESA continued trying to establish communications this week with tracking stations in Australia and the Canary Islands, but the 29,000-pound Phobos-Grunt spacecraft never responded. ... The agency's communications site in Perth, Australia, contacted Phobos-Grunt at least twice Nov. 22 and Nov. 23, but the probe has remained mysteriously silent since then." (Similar coverage also at the BBC.) See RussianSpaceWeb.com for a more detailed timeline.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Gesundheit!
QC vs FSB (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:QC vs FSB (Score:4, Informative)
When the tests of the flight sequence finally started, the flight control system reportedly was not able to score a single clean run of its entire flight program without experiencing some sort of problems.
http://www.russianspaceweb.com/phobos_grunt_2011.html#bku [russianspaceweb.com]
So onboard computer which controls the flight basically did not pass any pre-flight test. "Let's try, if it fails also in real, not only during testing..."
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
"As a time-cutting measure, the spacecraft developers reportedly discussed the possibility of launching the spacecraft with only partially completed flight software. The rest of the code responsible for later phases of the mission could be uploaded into the spacecraft's memory en-route."
Yes, that sounds like a great idea!
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
"As a time-cutting measure, the spacecraft developers reportedly discussed the possibility of launching the spacecraft with only partially completed flight software. The rest of the code responsible for later phases of the mission could be uploaded into the spacecraft's memory en-route."
Yes, that sounds like a great idea!
Well, if it cuts cost enough to be able to afford a second try it is.
Re:QC vs FSB (Score:4, Interesting)
That is an incredibly damning report. No prototype. Minimal testing. Rewiring the steering controls (and I mean soldering and unsoldering) while the fueled craft is on the pad. Whatcouldpossiblygowrong? If that report is to be believed, hell, if half of it is to be believed, there is no way that probe would have made it there.
One thing that really bothers me - no description of sterilizing the craft. In fact, if you're rewiring on the pad, that implies that it's not sterile (and your staff isn't particularly sane). It's fine if the Russians want to play around blowing up things around earth. It's what humans do - but it would be much better if they behaved responsibly.
in space, (Score:5, Funny)
Phobos is in a huff . . . (Score:3)
Controller: ". . . Phobos . . . ? Hello, . . . Phobos . . . ? . . . "
Phobos: No response
Controller: " . . . Phobos . . . is it something I said . . . ? . . . "
Phobos: No response
Controller: "Listen, if you don't tell me what's wrong . . . I can't do anything about it . . .Phobos . . . ?"
Phobos: No response
Controller: "I tried to call you . . . really . . . many times . . . but you didn't answer . . . "
Phobos: No response
Controller: "Look, I know what you're thinking, but that Chinese Probe means nothing to me. I was just monitoring it . . . Phobos . . . ?"
Re: (Score:3)
Maybe they should let Siri try and talk to it.
Re:Refusal by United States to help? (Score:5, Informative)
Please see official answer to this from NASA:
http://www.marstravel.org/2011/11/response-from-nasa-regarding-assistance.html [marstravel.org]
Re: (Score:2)
It's good to know that's one Bad Thing my government actually hasn't done. Now if they'd just stop doing the dozens/hundreds of other Bad Things, the forecast would be truly rosy.
Re: (Score:1)
At least were not china, or india, or thailand, or indonesia, or rwanda, or uganda, or... most places.
Re: (Score:2)
I notice your short-list of examples conveniently excludes ALL reasonably comparable nations with similar values, lifestyles, and economies.
Re: (Score:2)
If what I read at the russianspaceweb,com site is true, that NASA refused (or was prohibited) to help revive this craft merely because of the presence of a Chinese componen
In NASA's defense, they probably couldn't do a thing about it and probably weren't asked to. I doubt the story is legit.
Re: (Score:1)
It's not, read the other reply!
Re: (Score:1)
Sad day (Score:1)
I was in the control room here in Darmstadt when this conversation was ongoing. It's never a happy moment when you stop trying, but that's nearly 4 weeks now.
This might set back Russian space programs (Score:1)
for another 15 years, just like Mars96 did.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mars_96
I guess... (Score:2)
...the Leather Goddesses got it.
Doom (Score:3)
This sounds strangely familiar..
Pretty sure this covers it (Score:2)
by Strong Bad
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JwZwkk7q25I [youtube.com]
Coming Down ~ Early January (Score:4, Interesting)
From satellite orbit data posted at http://www.n2yo.com/?s=37872 [n2yo.com] I'm estimating it will re-enter in the first few days of January. Current decay rate is 1 km per day in average altitude from an orbit that is 215 km low x 310 km high points. This will double in about 14 days as it encounters thicker atmosphere, with doubling times cut in half each 20 km of height until it hits 120 km or so on it's last orbit. Since it has a large amount of fuel in tanks not protected by heat shields, it will a unique and spectacular "rapid disassembly" whenever reentry heating causes the tanks to fail. My best guess is around 80 km altitude.
Bummer. (Score:2)
Our Future in space exploration (Score:1)