Strange Video of Dancing Cloud Explained By Electric Discharge 91
The Bad Astronomer writes "A few months ago I was sent a really weird video showing a cloud snapping around suddenly, far faster than wind could explain. I asked a meteorologist about it, who told me it was due to ice crystals re-aligning when the cloud's electric field discharged. It's pretty amazing to watch, and a great example of how many cool things happen right in front of us that we never notice."
Re: (Score:2)
I hope the cloud Franklins his ass.
Re:Mythbusters! (Score:4, Insightful)
And since they won't be able to do it, the conclusion will be "busted" (even though it is actually possible).
I love the show, but when they conclude stuff because they can or can't do something it kind of pisses me off :(
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
No, it's just some ghosts. Call the ghost busters.
Re: (Score:2)
I pitty sad people like you with no vision. (Score:1)
There are new discoveries everyday. The day will come when we can cross stellar distances as easy as we now cross an ocean, Of that I have no doubt. Maybe not in my lifetime or my children's or even great grand children. But someday it will happen. How do I know this? All you have to do is look from where we have come. Each society in history has thought they knew all there is to know about the universe. We are not different I laugh in the face of any one who is pompous and arrogant enough to say It is impo
Re: (Score:1)
Religious? There was nothing religious in my post.
I am glad that people like you are in the minority or we would still be using stone knives.
People like you are a waste of the Earth's resources.
For you tomorrow will be like today, and the day after tomorrow will be like the day before yesterday. Your remaining days will be a tedious collection of hours full of useless actions. People like you think no new thoughts, and you forget what little you have known. Older you become, but not wiser. Stiffer, but not
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
I am simply pointing out there there is some "connection" that bypasses the universal speed limit. Once we understand and exploit this who knows what doors will open.
Re: (Score:2)
He goes by Quantum Apostrophe on other sites, but Slashdot's karma system makes having an account impractical for him...
Ohhhh, that explains it (Score:2)
Now all we have to do is figure out why the aliens are causing electric discharges and we can call this mystery solved!
Re: (Score:2)
It's a side effect from their cloaking field malfunctioning. Obviously, the meteorologist is an alien plant trying to cover up the truth.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Interesting, so what your saying is that aliens are also the source of lighting? Things are stating to make more sense now...
In all seriousness, thanks for sharing the videos. very cool.
I studied meteorology (Score:3)
Re:I studied meteorology (Score:5, Funny)
Speaking as someone who took a couple meteorology courses in college, I can confirm the Bad Astronomer's observation: it is weird.
Obviously you didn't go on to get a meteorology degree. If you had, you would have stated that there was an 80% chance of it being weird.
Re: (Score:2)
No. If he had taken meteorology courses in college, he would have said that there is an 80% chance that such an event would not be observed, even though we are watching it happen already.
Re: (Score:1)
Speaking as someone who took a couple meteorology courses in college, I can confirm the Bad Astronomer's observation: it is weird.
Obviously you didn't go on to get a meteorology degree. If you had, you would have stated that there was an 80% chance of it being weird.
And if you had gotten a mathematics degree, you would have stated that there is a 95% chance of there being an 80% chance of it being weird.
electrical charge. (Score:1)
i love how scholastisizm in academia got to a level of 'explaining' things without doing ANY research or experiment these days.
Re: (Score:2)
Why couldn't a natural phenomenon be unique?
Re: (Score:2)
Natural implies repetition. Repetition is needed for naturalness because without repetition you cannot analyze it and place it in the context of a larger systems, thus providing "explanation": "it's natural"
Re: (Score:2)
Natural implies repetition.
Yeah, not buying that, so not reading the rest of your thought.
Re: (Score:2)
I am guessing you are not using calculators with Polish notation.
Re: (Score:2)
I am guessing you are not using calculators with Polish notation.
When I was a juvenile I heard a racist joke; it was something like Q: "What do you find in a Polack's nose?" A: "Fingerprints." Of course, at this young age I did not know different nations, but I did know fish. So I thought it was exceedingly odd that, first, the fish pollock has noses; second, that people wanted to look inside them; and third, that they would find that other people had already been digitally exploring in there! (Later I learned the national meaning, and the joke became a lot less stup
Re: (Score:2)
I do not know what to make out of your comment, but just in case you or somebody else does not know and is too lazy to look up the term:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish_notation [wikipedia.org]
In some ways Polish_notation is opposite to the way we usually do arithmetic. That is why when I first formulated the thesis and then brought the argumentation, I brought the allusion to Polish notation, implying that NatasRevol did not recognize the structure of my comment (the other possibility of course is that this user simply
Obligatory (Score:2)
http://xkcd.com/645/ [xkcd.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
That's an interesting way to define natural.
If the flock of chickens in my yard happen to stand such that they clearly spell out the word "unique", is that unnatural or just chance? What if they make a pattern that doesn't happen to be significant, but that we can't expect them ever to make again?
If there's only one universe, is it unnatural?
Re: (Score:2)
Not natural does not imply unnatural. In other words, "unnatural" needs another definition. I am offering you a consistent definition of "natural" as a set of things that could be a subject of a scientific method.
Unnatural in common usage means something that seems to be created by intelligent will, going in some way against the natural order of things. But we have to know that to claim that. For most of the things that are unique we simply do not know anything to imply either intelligent will or some unkno
defining "natural" (Score:2)
I see. You're defining "natural" jargonistically, rather than for everyday (or even casual philosophical) conversation. For a second there I thought you were being philosophical.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
That's because nobody will live long enough to scientifically get to a single origin of anything (if there's one), so we draw the line somewhere until somebody advances it further.
Someone famous once said (I hope you can place it ;) ) : "To make an apple pie from scratch first you need to create the universe."
Re: (Score:1)
I know who said that! It was Agent Smith! [youtube.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Carl Sagan
http://www.quotationspage.com/quote/26980.html [quotationspage.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
During my college orientation, among other activities, we were shown some kind of presentation where this woman claimed that pouring water into a red glass imbued it with some attributes associated with the color red. I knew it was bunk and raised my hand. When I was called on, I explained that the glass was red because it allowed all colors t
Re: (Score:2)
When I was called on, I explained that the glass was red because it allowed all colors to pass through it except for the color red. This color was reflected back to our eyes.
Nice theory, except that red light is transmitted through a red glass, not reflected off it, as you could verify by the simple experiment of holding that glass up to a light source. So, the opposite of what you just said is the case. No wonder your teacher was annoyed with the question.
Re: (Score:2)
if it was a natural phenomenon, it should have happened before elsewhere, and it should have happened again.
Here you go: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xK1g_5x2jBU [youtube.com]
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
'before' not being in the past 2 years. 'way before'.
Who says it hasn't?
Re: (Score:1)
Reflection (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Reflection (Score:5, Informative)
> ...something ... reflecting at just the right place...
Yes. Ice crystals.
Re: (Score:2)
No, it stays at the same place when the camera is moved.
Re: (Score:2)
Parallax FTW!
Sure, sure (Score:1)
That's just what those weather controlling, HARP using, economy crashing, illuminati would say.
Re: (Score:2)
HARP nothing, it's the Chupacabras that are doing it. With their minds. To communicate with bigfoot... who lives partway down the holes to hell and who are generating EM ghost signatures. With their minds. To confuse the witches that call in to Coast to Coast (formerly with Art Bell) into thinking they are possessed. All of which means NASA has been hiding evidence of life on mars from us. In order to misdirect our attention from the faked moon landings. [runs away, foaming at mouth]
Re: (Score:2)
Actually, it's been quite documented the moon landings were in fact real.
It just wasn't our moon.
Froth over that one buddy!
Sprite Lightning (Score:2)
Ice halo? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It doesn't seem to move all that much. The crystals probably stay where they are, they merely twist to align with the electric field. Think ice electrometers. Millions or billions of them...
A miracle (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Clearly, this is just a glitch in The Matrix.
It seems I've already read this several times in this thread ... oh wait, seeing the same thing again is a sign of a glitch in the Matrix. So you are obviously right! :-)
looks more like some light effects (Score:2)
especially as it looks like repeated patterns.
fake (Score:2)
As suggested by a comment to the video, it appears to be some water on top of a piece of glass in front of the camera, being blown around.
I HAVE SEEN THIS (Score:2, Informative)
I watch thunderstorms very closely. 2 summers ago I saw a thunderstorm over my hometown of Baltimore and saw exactly this kind of behavior. It was like the entire side of the cloud tower suddenly bent and twisted around. It looked impossibly huge and fast moving at the time, like a huge piece of sheet metal snapping around suddenly. It definitely smacked of some kind of electrical related effect. Very cool to see this confirmed.
Um, Photoshop? (Score:2)
I've seen better fakes on ghost hunting shows.
vertical video (Score:2)
Why the fuck do people record video on their phone in the vertical position? There are so many cases of this.. morons.
Re: (Score:1)
Electrification studies with radar (Score:2)
There was a rather large field campaign called The Severe Thunderstorm Electrification and Precipitation Study [noaa.gov] (STEPS) to study electrification done around the year 2000 that involved the use of polarimetric weather radar to observe electrified storms, in conjunction with the New Mexico Tech Lightning Monitoring Array [nmt.edu] (LMA).
One of the nice things about polarimetric radar is the ability to measure the aggregate orientation of particles, including ice crystals. When scanning active electrified storms, the rad