Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive


Forgot your password?
Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices. Also, Slashdot's Facebook page has a chat bot now. Message it for stories and more. ×

No Higgs Just Yet 190

gbrumfiel writes "Last month, scientists reported a number of 'excess events' that could be caused by the appearance of the long-sought Higgs boson inside the LHC. But it looks like they'll have to put the champagne back on ice. New data presented at a conference in India shows no new signs of the Higgs. The signal was probably just a statistical fluctuation."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

No Higgs Just Yet

Comments Filter:
  • Probably (Score:4, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday August 22, 2011 @03:28PM (#37171134)

    just a higg-up.

  • "probably just a statistical fluctuation"...or is that exactly what the Higgs Boson WANTS us to think???

    That sneaky particle...

  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday August 22, 2011 @03:40PM (#37171300)

    I did bump hunting for my PhD in particles a decade and a half ago. This is the way life goes -- you get a signal that almost has enough significance to really believe -- then it collapses when you pile in more data. If a journal is filled with papers each having a single p=0.05 result, then one out of 20 of them is reasonably expected to be wrong!

  • They need more energy credits. I know that Chairman Yang has repeatedly suggested that a series of three boreholes are completed near the capital, which would allow the commencement of discovering the secrets of pre-sentient algorithms. Once this happens, it's only a matter of building enough condensers to harvest the required food to grow a larger population of Thinkers. With a viable mind/machine interface in addition to the overwhelming benefits of telepathy in battling the the Hive drones, transcendence
  • My Bet is that the Higgs doesn't exist. It's only in the standard model to support Massless particles like Massless Neutrinos, but the Solor Neutrino Problem [] already puts serious cracks in that assumption. So my bet is that there is no such thing as a massless particle.
  • It's probably nothing... probably... but... well, no... we're well within normal bounds again. Continuing sequence.
  • ...there is no news to report regarding the higgs boson particle.
    • At what point does the lack of finding it where the models predict it "should" be become news in itself?
    • "The previous news was wrong" is news.

      Also, each day that people don't find it puts us farther away from the Higgs bosson. In a year or two the information that "researches still didn't find the bosson" will be very newsworth.

  • I'm pretty sure there's one under my couch...
  • Slashdot the bastion of brilliance, trolldom, general opinionated discourse, Not-RTFA, IANA*. Holy crap people get on the ball, with the program!

    I know you're not particle theorists but I do expect some entertainment! Where are your stones! Man up and spew some malarkey!
  • Why am I not surprised?
  • New data presented at a conference in India shows no new signs of the Higgs. The signal was probably just a statistical fluctuation."

    Has anyone considered that the Higgs may actually be just a statistical fluctuation, a mathematical artifact required to both satisfy the symmetry of the fundamental particle structure and at the same time insure the uncertain nature of... well, nature.

    I know this may sound like (and it may actually be) a silly question, but I am serious in asking it.

    We have had to learn to d

Each new user of a new system uncovers a new class of bugs. -- Kernighan