Chinese Researchers Propose Asteroid Deflection Mission 198
wisebabo writes "Researchers in China have proposed sending a solar sail-driven probe to hit the asteroid Apophis to make sure it has no chance of going through a 'keyhole' near earth in 2029. If it goes through the keyhole, then it will hit the earth seven years later. The reason why they need to use a solar sail is because they want the very small probe (~10kg) to hit the asteroid in the opposite direction, a retrograde orbit which would otherwise require an insane amount of fuel (after being put on an escape trajectory, it would need to first cancel out the earth's orbital momentum and then basically speed up to a likewise high velocity in the opposite direction). They are doing this to hit the asteroid at a very high impact speed. While Apophis may not literally be capable of wiping us out (it 'only' weighs 46 million kilograms), it might be able to wreck our civilization."
Read on for the rest of wisebabo's thoughts.
wisebabo continues, "Rather than putting the fate of our species into the hands of an untried technology (no solar sail has yet imparted substantial delta-V to its spacecraft) may I suggest an alternative? By using Jupiter as a gravity assist, we could send a much heavier probe to hit it at comparable speeds. For example, the Juno spacecraft, recently launched to the gas giant weighs almost 8000kgs. Jupiter could sling a spacecraft around so as to completely cancel its orbital momentum (with no fuel expenditure!). Then it will fall directly towards the sun and, if guided correctly, could hit Apophis broadside. Considering it will be falling from a height of several hundred million miles, it would pack quite a wallop. Admittedly, the impact will be on the side rather than head-on, but that should be okay since all we have to do is assure that Apophis doesn't pass through the keyhole, which is only 600m wide. Don't get me wrong, I hope solar sails become widely used for the (slow, cheap) transport of cargoes in the solar system. It's just that I wouldn't base the defense of earth on them."
Comment removed (Score:3, Insightful)
"falling" and "height" lol (Score:3, Funny)
> (it 'only' weighs 46 million kilograms)
No it doesn't. Kilograms are a unit of mass, not of weight.
Yes, this also made me very amused:
Considering it will be falling from a height of several hundred million miles ...
Re:"falling" and "height" lol (Score:4, Informative)
Can you not say that however high something is is its distance along the normal of the object you are measuring relative to?
It may have amused you, but I think it's correct usage for both words.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Moving in the direction of gravity without additional propulsion.
That presumes you're only looking at the gravity vector, and not the speed vector it already has. That's as misleading as saying that a probe on its way to Pluto is falling towards earth. Sure it is, but that it's moving away from earth much faster.
Re: (Score:3)
Sure, but in informal writing by earthlings, kg as a unit of weight pretty clearly is taken to mean "the weight that a 1 kg object would have at sea-level earth gravity".
Re: (Score:3)
Sure, but in informal writing by earthlings, kg as a unit of weight pretty clearly is taken to mean "the weight that a 1 kg object would have at sea-level earth gravity"
Maybe they calculated the actual weight the object will have in 2036, when it'll be at sea level..
Re: (Score:2)
What? And you're saying this number is coincidentally exactly the same as it's mass?!?
I think I'm gonna go hide under a rock in 2036.
Re: (Score:2)
If you step on a scale at sea level, your weight will be 80Kg*. If you to then go into space, your mass would be... 80Kg.
*for this example, natch.
Re: (Score:2)
err, assuming it had the same acceleration as gravity at sea level.
"Weighs" is polymorphic (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Why do we continue to count weight in terms of mass?
Didn't do physics at school? Because F = mMG/Rexp2 and we're all mostly at comparable radial distances from the Earth's center of mass. So weight scales as mass to a good-enough approximation.
All this mass != weight is a bit disingenuous and frivolously pedantic in the OP's journalistic context anyway. Anyone sensible knows the OP was using metaphors that most readers could follow. It's not as if trajectory calculations will be erroneously based on weight = mass.
Apophis (Score:5, Funny)
Don't worry. Teal'c will take care of Apophis.
Re: (Score:2)
That's two i's?
Re: (Score:2)
Its an L. Teal'c is a character in Stargate - one of the good guys, as is Apophis (one of the bad guys).
Re:Apophis (Score:4, Funny)
Indeed.
(Filler to get around garbage filter...)
Re: (Score:2)
Seriously, two questions. One: why was that show so bad? Two: why did I absolutely love that show?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Pretzels (Score:5, Insightful)
Well I hear lots of organizations and governments have made plans to deflect an asteroid with a missile should one threaten to hit Earth. I think it wouldn't be a bad think to practice a little on asteroids that are passing close but not threatening us. I think we'd want to be ready for when a real danger shows up.
Re: (Score:2)
we could practice on it while its way out there. If we miss, we'd have many chances to try again.
But of course, we'll just ignore it due to budgetary concerns until its a real danger and then it'll be too late to do anything other than send Bruce Willis - and he'll be far too old by then!
Re: (Score:2)
groan.
but of course, you're forgetting just how massive a hollywood actor's ego can be :)
yeah and supposed they had a little "oops" ? (Score:2)
yeah and supposed they had a little "oops" in their practice run and deflected it the WRONG WAY?
Re: (Score:2)
Then we be glad we tested it on a little asteroid, kick back, and watch an awesome meteor shower?
semantics... (Score:2)
the man said --
Practice a little, not practice on little asteroids. That little oops is going to cause all seven billion of us to have a REAL BAD DAY (tm).
Re: (Score:2)
yeah and supposed they had a little "oops" in their practice run and deflected it the WRONG WAY?
Then instead of being no where near earth, it will be slightly less no where near earth.
For an asteroid already heading towards Jupiter or the Sun, there is nothing at all we could do to overcome the gravity pulling it to cause it to veer off towards Earth or anything.
Practice makes perfect, and waiting until we need it to even make the first attempt is a recipe for failure.
Do both (Score:2)
How out doing both? Even if one fails the other would succeed, and you'd test both technologies in a real-world setting. We're talking fairly cheap missions, relatively speaking, and they could almost be worth it just for the incidental research data if you let some of their mass be instruments and communications equipment.
Re: (Score:2)
Pointless (Score:3, Informative)
and china state tv will just show clips from movie (Score:2)
and china state tv will just show clips from movies or tv shows to show this off.
Re: (Score:3)
It's just a cover. They actually plan to redirect it TOWARD an earth-impact trajectory, unless we pay a hefty ransom. Say, one MILLION dollars?
Re: (Score:2)
Hopefully they still accept T-bonds
Re: (Score:2)
You are probably closer to the truth than you realise. It was no coincidence that shortly after China shot down a satellite with a ground launched missile the US decided to had to demonstrate the same thing on some random bit of space debris. If China can prove they have the ability to change the trajectory of an asteroid away from the earth then they can surely direct one towards it, basically an orbital bombardment mass driver.
Space is looking like the new battleground where the US and China are going to
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
But paper covers rock. That is a much better proposition than sending a pair of scissors.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
uh....
PAPER BEATS ROCK. Where were you when you were a kid?
mass wrong (Score:2)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/99942_Apophis [wikipedia.org]
2.7×10^10 kg
How difficult is it to copy paste?
2029 headline... (Score:2, Funny)
"Apophis pushed through 'keyhole' in space by solar sail. Seven year countdown begins."
Re: (Score:2)
Frighteningly enough, I can see this happening. It would almost be better to plot the sail's trajectory to screw with its trajectory if it passes THROUGH the keyhole, and glide by harmlessly if Apophis MISSES the keyhole. By all means get the hardware into position to avert disaster... but if it looks like disaster isn't likely to happen, for the love of ${deity} don't go screwing with it and risk making things worse just for the sake of Doing Something.
It's kind of like theoretical weather-control experime
Re: (Score:2)
With risk calculations, you have to multiply the risk percentage with the damage factor.
A 1% risk of 1 billion people dying is a much greater hazard than a 50% risk of 10 million people dying. If you had the chance to turn the former risk into the latter, you'd be a fool or a gambler (but, I repeat myself) not to take it.
Might make it worse? (Score:2)
Since we still don't even know that it will hit that keyhole (the last stat I saw was 1:250,000 chance), what are the chances that instead of a direct hit, we'll just make a glancing blow that ultimately nudges it through the keyhole?
This mission seems to make more sense if there's a 100% chance it will hit the keyhole, because then there's no way to make it worse, but I'd like to see some statistics on the chances of making the situation worse (or on completely missing it and doing nothing at all)
At the ve
Re: (Score:2)
They've already done the mission with another asteroid. Haven't you seen the broadcasts on the Chinese news?
Re:Might make it worse? (Score:4, Insightful)
The problem is that the only way to be 100% sure (or even 10% sure) of an impact risk is to send something out there to track it with proper radio science measurements.
Generally the approach any mission should take is not to prevent an impact, which implies that you will have something approaching good knowledge of whether or not it would pass through a keyhole, but rather to reduce the probability of impact. Because the center of the distribution from your knowledge (largely gaussian) is going to be offset from the keyhole, you need to nudge the asteroid further in that same direction to move it out past a 5-sigma or 6-sigma or 7-sigma ellipse, whatever your desired goal is.
The annoying truth about dealing with anything in deep space is that its all probabilistic. You never really know where anything is, and you always have to quote your certainty values.
Re: (Score:2)
then they are screwed.
Re: (Score:2)
Then they're probably dead too. It's the same as the problem of blowing up the USSR with nukes: Even if you succeed, you have nasty consequences to deal with afterwords.
Re: (Score:2)
Then they're probably dead too. It's the same as the problem of blowing up the USSR with nukes: Even if you succeed, you have nasty consequences to deal with afterwords.
But how do you prove it was intentional? They'll say "Oh oops, looks like our mission failed, we failed to impact with enough force to divert the asteroid from the earth. sorry." They'll even include an international team of scientists on the team to design and implement the project, to help deflect (pun intended) blame for the "accident".
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not talking about the human consequences, I'm talking about the natural consequences with no human intervention required.
For instance, if anyone had actually pressed the proverbial nuke button, nuclear winter would probably have done in the capitalists and communists alike. In this case, the amount of ash and dust spewed into the atmosphere would probably take out a large portion of the crop-growing capacity, causing massive famine at best. Another way of putting it: They won't be saying "Oh, oops, sorr
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not talking about the human consequences, I'm talking about the natural consequences with no human intervention required.
For instance, if anyone had actually pressed the proverbial nuke button, nuclear winter would probably have done in the capitalists and communists alike. In this case, the amount of ash and dust spewed into the atmosphere would probably take out a large portion of the crop-growing capacity, causing massive famine at best. Another way of putting it: They won't be saying "Oh, oops, sorry, our mission failed", because (a) they won't be capable of talking to anyone, and (b) there's nobody left for them to talk to. When you're talking doomsday scenarios, it often doesn't matter who's to blame or who "won".
Oh, I don't think this particular asteroid would be that catastrophic - current estimates put it in the 200 megaton range -- the largest nuke test was 50 megatons, so this is "only" 4 times larger.
Granted, it would cause huge death and destruction over many hundreds of square miles wherever it hits, but I wouldn't think it would cause world-wide crop failure and famine.
Chinese (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Chinese (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
It seems like it would be a huge financial drain. Someone would be profiting, that's for sure.
Re: (Score:2)
What money do you think they would be absorbing this with? The Massive deficit they have had since before Gulf War, or the money they borrowed from, guess who, China?
Did you notice the "at least until recently" clause there in my first sentence? It's only 3 words in, so I would hope so.
Re: (Score:2)
Except it's not recent. The raising of the debt ceiling is recent. Hollywood has been making many movies where they are the wealthy powerhouse since before gulf war, despite being massively in debt and borrowing off China and other countries.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
So this was a pre-emptive measure to prevent future debt being unpaid?
Re: (Score:2)
More like a "You have drained the global economy enough, it's time to put it to an end"
Re: (Score:2)
See? people like yuou piss me off. You have no clue and ecnoomis work, you go on about the deficit, something you clearly know nothing abuot exept what you ahve been spopon fed by the media.
This is what wuod happen:
COngress would give NASA an effective blank check.
NASA would get a plan, hire a lot of contractors, and build the thing. Many people would get a lot of money, and in fact jobless would drop.
The people getting paid get taxed.
Every company and pretty much every American runs a deficit. How many peo
Re: (Score:2)
While this is true, the deficit in question for a car, or a house is a ONE YEAR deficit. After that, you're paying DOWN your debt.
Or are you one of those people who borrows money for a house, then borrows more money to pay off the first loan?
Note that the Federal Government, which increases its debt every year, falls in
Re: (Score:2)
THAT is why austerity has never gotten anyone out of a recession.
Completely untrue. It can drive you straight from a recession into a depression.
Yeah but the Chinese don't have experience... (Score:3)
... in gravity assists (which as I pointed out in my submission) could make the mission much cheaper and less risky.
Since they don't have any experience with gravity assists and (no-one) has any real experience with solar sails, I figure they just picked the one that sounded more sexy. If they actually had a long track record of deep space missions (they've only gotten to the moon whereas the U.S. is on its way to PLUTO), they wouldn't go this route. So I think the inflection point is still a ways off.
Re: (Score:2)
Indeed. Every time one of these 'fear the yellow peril' stories is posted, folks seem to forget that China (like Russia over the last twenty odd years) has a very long list of Sexy And Ambitious Plans they're going to accomplish Real Soon Now - and a very short (read:practically non existent) of thing's they've actually accomplished.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
But China seems determined to take over that position.
Re: (Score:2)
"[â¦.]but generally the rest of the world doesn't think twice when watching those movies[...]"
Why do you assume that?
I mean, unless you speak the language and participate in the local conversation you're not likely to pick up anything about how people react and what they think, right?
Re: (Score:2)
Seven years later? 2038! (Score:2)
See? The end of the epoch *is* the end of life! Screw the Aztecs...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
It's one year early. Our mission to the moon started a 2^32 second timer, counting down to our demise - we were deemed a threat once we began manned space exploration to the moon.
Re: (Score:2)
2030.... think about it...
I wouldn't hit it (Score:3)
I worry that an impact, rather than moving the entire asteroid, could shatter it and make it much more likely that one small (but still potentially dangerous) part would go through the keyhole.
Re: (Score:2)
I wouldn't even bother commenting except somebody modded this up, but... really?
A) A solar sail space craft has negligible mass. Seriously, light pressure isn't very strong. If you want any decent acceleration you need a ludicrous area-to-mass ratio. Against an asteroid this size, there's not going to be much concentrated impact.
B) Space is mostly empty, but there's a lot of little stuff floating around, and a large asteroid will have hit some of it before. They're not *that* fragile. I mean, it's literally
Re: (Score:2)
B) Space is mostly empty, but there's a lot of little stuff floating around, and a large asteroid will have hit some of it before. They're not *that* fragile. I mean, it's literally a big rock. Go find yourself a nice boulder and throw paper airplanes at it until it breaks - that's about the level of what's being proposed here.
Not all asteroids are created equal. Sure, some are like boulders, but others are rubble piles [wikipedia.org], held together only by weak gravity. If a solid asteroid is like a boulder, imagine a rubble pile like a set of pool balls racked on a pool table. Sure, throwing a paper airplane at that isn't likely to send a ball flying off either, but it's far more likely than hitting a boulder.
C) Even if some small piece does fly off, it's not necessarily a risk. Many, many tons of material hit the earth (or at least its atmosphere) every year. Most people call them "shooting stars".
But those are tiny chips. An impact is far more likely to knock a chunk off a rubble pile than chip a ball or boulder.
I'm not sayin
Re: (Score:3)
Slimmer than or less slim than its chance of passing through the keyhole?
The thing is that if we even knew where it was precisely enough to target it, we wouldn't have to guess about if it will pass through the keyhole.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yikes. While it's easy to think of the solar systems as a perfectly harmony object that's balanced on a point, it is not.
It's gravity effect are almost non existent and what is there is just noise easily drowned out by larger objects.
If, and the probability approaches 0 that there isn't, an issue like you say, it would happen so far into the future as to be irrelevant. I mean millions and millions of years from now.
Re: (Score:2)
My worries are that moving the asteroid could somehow disrupt the balance of the solar system and have gravitational repercussions with other objects, kind of a butterfly effect... Yes, it's small, but if it disbalances the orbit of another object, and those do the same thing to others... the millon-years-old balance that we have in the solar system could be wrecked. Just a very wild thought. Any astrophysicist that could help me with this? Is it really possible, or is the lack of coffee messing with my mind?
Everything is perfectly balanced. Don't move....
Damn. You moved. You fool! You've doomed us all!
Re: (Score:2)
Why not remain blissfully ignorant (Score:2)
Sounds like something out of Civilization (Score:2)
Right before they finish building this project...
"Project cancelled."
"Incan civilization completes wonder: Asteroid Defense Satellite"
Or maybe it would be more appropriate for SMAC instead of Civ...
Use a solar sail directly (Score:2)
If the solar sale provided enough delta-v to accelerate a ram, in less than a year, to a speed high enough to deflect the rock, it would necessarily be powerful enough to directly maneuver the rock.
Re: (Score:2)
They can orbit it and plant the sail from orbit.
yet another conversion error (Score:3, Informative)
Juno's [wikipedia.org] mass is listed as 3625kg, or almost 8000 pounds, not almost 8 metric tons.
As for the energy obtained from "falling several hundred million miles": that would be exactly the same energy it took to get that far "up" in the first place (not saying that there's no energy to steal from Jupiter, but it's a pretty hair-brained plan, imho, not in the least because such a trajectory would probably take the better part of a decade to complete).
Right about conversion error, wrong about energy (Score:2)
I'm assuming you're right about the conversion error, I just plucked the 8000kg figure off the first web site that I got off Google (I'm the submitter). Still 8000 LBS. is a lot more than the Chinese probe's 10 kgs.
As far as the energy calculations go, using a (large) gravitational body to change the velocity (speed AND direction) allows the transfer of momentum (energy) from Jupiter to and from the spacecraft. By causing the spacecraft to "lose" its forward momentum relative to the sun, Jupiter can rob i
The Real Reason For The Mission (Score:3)
We can't let mankind's job of destroying itself be outsourced to illegal alien asteroids that can be payed practically nothing.
I assume Sun Tsu (Score:2)
Chinese Reliability (Score:2)
Yes, all the stuff I get from China is so reliable that I'd trust it not to deflect the asteroid in the wrong direction, into Earth. China's military is so accountable to reasonable, compassionate authorities that they'd never risk hurting people just to demonstrate their strength and spread around some military/industrial money. After all, the Chinese space programme has so much experience doing hard things no others have ever tried, let alone accomplished. This project couldn't possibly be just a reckless
The real story here... (Score:2)
is that China can hold the rest of the world hostage once they are able to nudge the largest WMD ever either towards or away from the Earth. ;-b
Re: (Score:2)
Why not just send Bruce Willis?
He's not Chinese.
Re: (Score:2)
I think that if you broke it up with wisebabo's method, you would be pretty much guaranteed to cause some of it to impact. You might get lucky and it is a bunch of stuff that well make pretty streaks in the sky... or you could obliterate a continent.
solving a non-problem is always problematic, in this case, it could be devastating.
Re: (Score:2)
Which is why "wisebabo" is a particularly troublesome nickname to have in this particular discussion.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, there would be no retaliation during the 7 years it takes for it to return and hot the target. Or any attempt to change it by other nations.
Re: (Score:3)
I know Unix fans are a bit on the Zealous side, but diverting an Asteroid to destroy civilisation so as to prevent this coding flaw from coming about is a bit too far.
Re: (Score:2)
My time_t has been 64-bit for the last five years or so so I'll miss the party....
Re: (Score:2)
There is no other inhabitable planet within reach. Its not like we could knock it out of the solar system altogether
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
The biggest problem with an impactor might be fragmentation. If you had a nice solid rock that was certainly going to hit the Earth one of the very, very last things you would want to do is break it into lots of little pieces. Two or three (calving) wouldn't be that bad and might even be better than one big rock, but lots of little pieces would be extremely bad.
Why? Because of a little thing called atmospheric heating. Drop a rock into the Earth's atmosphere and if it is small enough it will burn up (ab
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
They know that...they're just saying this to mess with the American psyche.