The Birth of Optogenetics 70
Dr. Tom writes "Scientists at MIT and other labs have created transgenic neurons that fire when exposed to light. The technique targets specific cell types in live primates. They are already talking about the possibilities for therapy and behavior modification by optically stimulating specific brain circuits."
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Someone who lives in the basement and never reproduces... reminds me of someone, but I can't remember who.
Re: (Score:2)
However, due to the cranium, skull or whatever you chose to call it being opaque to sunlight this doesn't happen.
Now of course I'm sure you can postulate some even bleaker catastrophe scenario that you can peddle to you luddite friends as a reason to ban optogenetics.
Re: (Score:2)
Its interesting to see the way that, 5 minutes after learning the word "optogenetics" (at least in my case), we already see factions of staunchly pro and anti opto-genetic slashdotters forming the battle lines.
Im willing to bet that some of these articles are made up of whole cloth by the editors, just to see how many people will argue for and against the made-up topics.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Boy, I bet you'll be surprised when Plexiglas skull mods become all the rage with the younger set in 2025.
Re: (Score:1)
You know what, I call Poes Law on this guy.
There's no way you make a living convincing people you know a dman thing about biology if you think anything you just said makes any sence.
Re:Science for the sake of science can be dangerou (Score:4, Informative)
A retrovirus is made to "attack" the DNA of a cell. A neuron is not made for that, it can't inject new DNA to other cells.
Plus, a neuron don't divide as other cells do. Well, it happen for specific type of neuron, but it mostly stem cells. So most of them don't divide, and if they do, they will divide as the same cell, with the same DNA markers.
You should try real science, instead of trying to scares people with random Hollywood scenarios.
Re: (Score:2)
Imagine if these man-made monstrocities merged their DNA
into the host's DNA. Then the person reproduces (as we tend to do). That
child now has these neurons.
Luckily, most people don't reproduce via brain cells.
Re: (Score:2)
I bet feeding on other humans blood might mitigate some of the side effects...
Isn't it dark in there? (Score:5, Funny)
They are already talking about the possibilities for therapy and behavior modification by optically stimulating specific brain circuits.
They can talk about it all they want, but until they invent a transparent skull, I'm not sure I see many practical applications.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Im not sure MIT really counts as "Big Pharma".
Re: (Score:2)
The reason why optogenetics is so much better than electrodes is not only for the fact that you require physical electrode present to act as a growth area for scar tissue, but that you can target specific ne
Re: (Score:2)
So do they just go through a ton of mice, or how are they dealing with all the problems of implants that pass through the skin?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The animals who get these neurons will have neat little windows cut into their skulls. They'll also live in labs.
Re: (Score:2)
You mean tiny rectangular rooms with controlled environments where the subjects feed at regular intervals and are trained to press buttons to receive tiny rewards.
Whoops! Gotta go type up that report or I won't get that bonus or that bigger cubicle down the hall.
Re: (Score:2)
You mean tiny rectangular rooms with controlled environments where the subjects feed at regular intervals and are trained to press buttons to receive tiny rewards.
Whoops! Gotta go type up that report or I won't get that bonus or that bigger cubicle down the hall.
I have to be honest, your first line made me think of MMOs first.
Re: (Score:3)
It's the biggest MMO there is, my friend. And it happened way before the internet or computers.
Cheers!
Re: (Score:1)
They are already talking about the possibilities for therapy and behavior modification by optically stimulating specific brain circuits.
They can talk about it all they want, but until they invent a transparent skull, I'm not sure I see many practical applications.
There are conditions (Parkinson's, epilepsy, severe depression) in which people get electrodes implanted in their brains, with (sometimes) therapeutic benefits. Optical stimulation can be much more precisely targeted and controlled -- with good DNA delivery vectors, you can target specific cell types, or the neurons connecting two brain regions. Optical stimulation, I believe, also causes less cell damage than direct electrical stimulation.
It's not the kind of thing most people will ever need, but if you ha
Re: (Score:3)
Skin is actually light sensitive. Pain receptors are directly connected to neurons. It could be used for torture, if they found a way to replace regular sub-cutaneous skin neurons with photosensitive ones.
already done (Score:1)
it's already done, but lower in the spectrum. 95GHz waves, or 3.2 mm ones are used in the "Pain Ray" to remotely provoke unbearable pain in an outer layer of the skin. It's sold as the way of the future to quell protests, though good old water cannon and bullets are cheaper. There's even a commercial [youtube.com] about it.
Re: (Score:2)
They can talk about it all they want, but until they invent a transparent skull, I'm not sure I see many practical applications.
Skull is transparent enough, you just need a bright enough light. Alternatively you need to open the skull. Sharks with lasers mounted to their heads can do both.
Re: (Score:2)
They are already talking about the possibilities for therapy and behavior modification by optically stimulating specific brain circuits.
They can talk about it all they want, but until they invent a transparent skull, I'm not sure I see many practical applications.
If you mean where the Sun does not shine, then you have omitted fiber optics.
I suppose it would stimulate "nerve flow" whatever that is.
Be Scared (Score:2)
From TFA:
"... the free end of the optical fiber is simply inserted into the brain of the live animal when needed, or coupled at the time of experimentation to an implanted optical fiber."
Could make for good cybernetics (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
As for ordinary electrodes, it is getting easier all the time.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Another step toward the cartoon universe (Score:4, Funny)
where ideas are triggered by lightbulbs turning on inside our heads literally.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I had an amazing insight into this topic. But suddenly, there was this flash of light and I forgot it.
I do recall thinking that Will Smith does indeed make a back suit look good.
What could possibly go wrong? (Score:2)
Light-sensitive genes... ok.
However, I'll start worrying if tomorrow they come up with something that provokes serious mutations when fed after midnight.
Magnetogenetics (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Of course, having one's memory wiped by getting too close to a magnet *is* an unfortunate side effect.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Dollhouse? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Mr. Gumby (Score:2)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UrjHKMJTh1w [youtube.com]
Oh yeah...MY BRAIN HURTS!
New? (Score:2)
TSA? (Score:2)
Kinda makes you more weary of TSA scanners, doesn't it? Light is not just visible light. Radio waves are light waves, just at a different frequency.
Next time you go through a scanner and you suddenly think, "Hmmm, can I haz cheezburger?" think about if that impulse was internally or externally generated.
As much Deisseroth at Stanford as Boyden at MIT (Score:3, Informative)
The summary is a bit remiss in not mentioning Karl Deisseroth's group at Stanford, who have really made this technique practical. I'm at a different (also good) neuroscience lab, and his group's work looks like magic to me -- they've crossed a lot of t's and dotted a lot of i's. It's really, really elegant, and has a lot of therapeutic potential in humans.
They've made a great video showing optical control of a mouse's motor cortex [youtube.com], and the lab's main optogenetics page [stanford.edu] has some publications.
Re:As much Deisseroth at Stanford as Boyden at MIT (Score:4, Informative)
Article does mention Karl Deisseroth, just mainly by first name. But yes, Deisseroth's research group pioneered most of this research, which truly is spectacularly cool.
Here's a Wired article from last year [wired.com] that explains optogenetics in prose more familiar to the average Slashdot user. And a YouTube video [youtube.com] of Deisseroth giving an overview of his work.
I've been lucky enough to see Deisseroth speak a couple of times (always in a packed auditorium). The pace at which he displays his results and the value of the results themselves is almost mind-boggling. He'll talk about a really great result they got with an experiment inhibiting fear in mice (if I recall, they targeted the amygdala and then showed the animal hiding in corners of the cage until they turn on the laser and he runs across the open space) and then before you can wrap your brain around it he's already moved on to talking about revolutionizing Parkinson's research by selectively inhibiting dopaminergic neurons.
As if inventing a groundbreaking technique and using it to solve all kinds of interesting problems isn't enough, Deisseroth has also been very proactive about sharing his techniques and methods, to the point that his lab actually holds workshops for other neuroscientists to learn how to do similar work. A pretty awesome guy all around, and I suspect he'll be the recipient of a Nobel Prize before too long.
Re: (Score:2)
So far this is the only intelligent comment. Congratulations.
Re: (Score:2)
OK IAAS (I Am A Scientist) and I can appreciate the potential for good with this research but watching that video... it's just a little creepy to see a living animal quite literally turned into a robot. Maybe it's just watching too many episodes of STNG. OTOH I bet there are (some) military and covert agency types who got a hardon watching it.
New means of control? (Score:1)
In related news ... (Score:2)
... scientists are close to a breakthrough in introducing light into the dank recesses of your parents' basement.
So, Slashdotters. Beware!
I'm singin' in the rain, just singin' in the rain (Score:2)
I'm sure Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, Khadafy, Ceaucescu, Honecker, Ulbricht, Saddam, et. al. would have really enjoyed this technology. I'm sure that others will too.
third eye (Score:2)
Hold your horses there, cowboy (Score:2)
Scientists at MIT and other labs
read: other, insignificant to mention here, labs
They are already talking about the possibilities
the TFA is a guy talking about himself. "I this and I that"
announcing that ChR2 could be used to depolarize neurons
Well done. This, along with 213875684375925 other compounds.
viruses bearing genes
Now I ain't no more grammar nazi than the next guy, but a neuroscientist that writes history and coins up new terms certainly knows what the plural of 'virus' is.
As a case study, the birth of optogenetics
Yea, right- vanity at its best. Just keep up your part of your job, which is doing your job, and leave the grandiose historic naming of historic moments to historians, which is not yo
Finally ... Control of Bad People. (Score:2)
Using viruses (see TFA) to implant the necessary genetic changes to motor neurons, prisoners and other bad people can be 'prepared' for control by authorities ... but then so could we all, without our knowledge or consent ... even at birth.
What is really chilling is the sense that the articles author sees nothing wrong with controlling a brain. Of course it would be hard for him to see past his ego.