First Internet-Connected Pacemaker Goes Live 158
The Register is reporting that a New York woman has become the first person to have her pacemaker wirelessly connected to the internet for full-time monitoring. "The device contains a radio transmitter which connects to receiving equipment in New Yorker Carol Kasyjanski's home, using a very low-power signal around 400MHz, to report on the condition of her heart. Any problems are instantly reported to the doctor, and regular checkups can be done by remotely interrogating the home-based equipment — the pacemaker itself doesn't have an IP address, fun as that would be."
Good thing there's no IP (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Good thing there's no IP (Score:5, Funny)
>I wonder what a DDoS would do to it ...
Blue face of death?
Re: (Score:1)
Re:Good thing there's no IP (Score:5, Funny)
Brings a whole new meaning to Ping of Death.
Re:Good thing there's no IP Ping a BUNCH of these (Score:1)
and you end up with a Pack-it (in) Storm.
I wonder if extreme latency, though will give longer TTL (time to live) for those shooting pics with TTL (thru the lens).
In any case, a barrage of packets would heap on "layers" of love.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Correlation does not imply causation. If it did you'd be an inbred racist hick who jumps to conclusions about statistics when they know nothing about how statistical analysis works.
oh wait.. never mind.
Re: (Score:1, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Blue face of death?
Is that what's up with these guys? [wikipedia.org]
If so, I fail to see this as news.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Forget DDoS, what about spamming with all of those male enhancement pharmaceutical ads.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Does it have a web site? Is there a web page with a button you need to push to make the guys heart beat?
Re:Good thing there's no IP (Score:4, Funny)
Yes. It comes with a 3 day trial subscription. Then you have to upgrade to premium membership to keep it beating.
Tech support calls are usually routed to organ donor hotline.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
I know you're joking, but this thing is only acting as a data feed to a computer. It has no receiver. It can't be controlled remotely or interacted with at all. The worst that would happen is the computer might crash and stop providing data to the medical center.
no IP address? (Score:1, Redundant)
Re:no IP address? (Score:5, Funny)
Recipient of said device breathes a sigh of relief when he discovers his heart won't be slashdotted.
Re: (Score:1)
"he" is a woman.
Re: (Score:2)
But how do we know that just by reading the subject line?
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
It doesn't have a receiver anyway. It's just a radio transmitter.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Before someone goes "but how is that worse than not having the device":
It's worse for the same reasons why bad security is worse than no security: A false sense of security. Without, you don't know whether the person is fine. When you don't hear from her and you're worried because she was supposed to call or show up, you call and see if she's ok. With the device, you check the device, read that it's fine and trust that reading.
If it's treated like an additional layer of security instead of a substitute, it'
Re: (Score:1)
Misleading title (Score:1)
So, this is NOT the first internet-connected pacemaker after all?
Maybe next time.
Well, at least we know why the IPv6 address space is so huge.
Re: (Score:2)
doesn't it have to have an IP to be internet connected, if its pacemaker->external montior->internet then the monitor must have an ip anyway!
I hope that's a one way connection (Score:5, Funny)
Otherwise that lady is going to be in for quite the surprise when the pacemaker starts looking at youporn.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Or starts downloading child porn. If cats can do it... [slashdot.org]
Re: (Score:1)
I swear, my pacemaker started downloading kitty porn! It wasn't me!
Re: (Score:2)
>> I swear, my pacemaker started downloading kitty porn! It wasn't me!
While phonetically similar, I doubt that has been the subject of recent prosecution.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
I got the lolcat caption all ready here, but what picture for the background?
I can haz cheezburgers. Eat lotz and lotz of greezy cheezeburgers for years and years. Then I needz uh internet connected pacemakerz.
Sorry for the lolcat, but I had to do it.
Yes, but... (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
Re:Yes, but... (Score:5, Funny)
No, but it does run Netbsd.
Has Netcraft confirmed that the patient is dying?
Re:Yes, but... (Score:5, Funny)
lib-pacemaker conflicts with lib-aorta and lib-left-ventricle.
... Dependencies not met.
... Stopping process /etc/heart.d
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Does it run Linux?
It does. When she sleeps, it downloads updates and reboots when she takes a shit.
On rare occasions when there's a kernel panic, she'll stop and and stand still while her eyes glaze over until the system reboots.
They switched to Linux when the windows version kept crashing and killing folks: the blue person of death. When the device moved to Vista, they had to open some folks up to add more memory.
Some folks have Apple pacemakers with defibrillators. Many wanted one or another but Apple being Apple, only s
Re: (Score:2)
Like this? [youtube.com]
Duke Nukem (Score:1, Redundant)
Does it run Linux?
No, but they ship with Duke Nukem Forever.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Freudian slip? (Score:4, Funny)
If the patent is rapidly losing consciousness
I wonder if that was intentional or not?
It's gonna be bad.... (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
What happens if you hit the pause button?
Re: (Score:2)
Someone reported a while back that Dick Cheney had a bluetooth-enabled pacemaker. It would seem unlikely that nobody would have tried to fuzz that - maybe they're fairly secure these days.
Re: (Score:1)
Brave New World: Get an Internet Pace Maker (Score:3, Insightful)
Would you want one with an IP address?
Not me, thank you.
Re: (Score:2)
Would you want one with an IP address?
If it was routable, remote management over SSH by the doctor might be useful. The cardiologist could, for example, do a few runs of dd(1) and determine whether you're ready to have sex with your wife, or whether some additional tweaks are first needed.
The downside, of course, is the patient being a Unix user and discovering the localhost interface.
"Honey, call 911! I just did an accidental rm -rf /!"
Side note (Score:2, Funny)
On a side note, the pacemaker owner was recomended not to play multimedia content from youtube in his equipment so the battery lasts longer.
Heart tweet (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
dead (Score:4, Funny)
ping pacemaker
4 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 3609ms
meaning she is gone...
Re: (Score:2)
How do you have a round trip time when there are no returned packets?
Really Reuters and Yahoo! (Score:1)
Here's an idea (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
Excepting for the fact that twitter is neither stable nor highly available by any means the medical industry would use.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Here's an idea (Score:5, Funny)
I don't know ... I mean ... what could possibly go wrong with connecting a pacemaker to Twitter and a live internet connection?
Re: (Score:2)
You need to reincarnate your user and hope that fixes your problem?
If it can access the internet... (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
What kind of cooling system would you use?
Re: (Score:1)
Liquid of course.
RIAA (Score:1, Funny)
God forbid she downloads copyrighted material and the RIAA have her internet connection terminated...
All your pacemaker... (Score:1, Interesting)
...are belong to us.
Seriously, though...are we just one step away from remote-controlled heartplugs [youtube.com]? Dune fans...er...rejoice?
Warning: mild gore in link.
regular checkups? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
That's assuming that someone sets up a scheduler to actually do these checkups. When my Dad has his pacemaker put in, he was supposed to go back to the hospital every few months to have the data the device was collecting downloaded...
In this case, it sounds like the patient requires continuous monitoring, like you'd get in the ICU. Note that it's not just connecting to the nearest unlocked router -- there's application-specific equipment at her house. This has got to be a ton cheaper than the ICU (or at l
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
as another member of the "over 40" group, I'd have to say "No" to that idea.
There must be something I'm missing (Score:4, Interesting)
This is by no means the first "wirelessly-monitored" pacemaker. Pacemakers and ICDs have been linked to home monitoring equipment for several years, and that equipment routinely communicates with a central monitoring station (usually via a modem).
Now, if the pacemaker itself was doing the communicating directly (say over any Wifi or cellular network) that would be pretty amazing. But they point out that the pacemaker doesn't have an IP address, and it's only communicating with equipment in the patient's home. That sounds a lot like existing technology, except perhaps that the final link (home monitoring device -> monitoring station) is being performed via IP rather than a phone line. That's nice, but certainly not very exciting. And why does it require a whole new pacemaker to make this upgrade?
Clearly there's something to this article that I'm not seeing...
Re: (Score:1)
Did you see the bit about it being ON THE INTERNETS? There's the difference! When you put something ON THE INTERNETS it becomes more than just the sum of its parts, it becomes a new, unique, and patentable thing; a technological piece de resistance of intellectual property!
Re: (Score:2)
It would be interesting if they put the monitoring equipment in a cell phone, then even though the device has a short range it could be continuously monitored from anywhere not just the house, as long as the lady had her phone with her.
There IS something the author is missing (Score:2)
This is nothing new. Boston Scientific (formerly Guidant) Latitude system has been working wirelessly in exactly this manner for nearly five years.
And "researchers" have been trying to hack the protocol -- mainly by reverse engineering the wanded communication.
Gradma is in more danger of a "pillow-attack" for the inheritance than someone trying to tweak her pacing.
Really changes the definition of DoS... (Score:3, Funny)
4chan (Score:4, Funny)
Thousands of 4channers suddenly stop what they were doing and in unison spit out, 'WHAT just got connected to the Internet?' as smiles spreads across their faces. ... maybe this isn't such a good idea...
Harkonnen heart plug (Score:1)
This just remind me of that Harkonnen heart plug from Dune
"Fatal error" jokes aside... (Score:5, Informative)
As someone fitted with a pacemaker of late, having means to often update the doc with performance data would be nice - if not downright life-saving.
With current technology, I have to go in for my "tuneup" every six months. It does involve a wireless interface, and there is an impressive amount of data dumped. A great many parameters can be changed with ease by a trained technician. When we determined that my natural resting heartrate was under 60bpm, reprogramming that to a minimum of 50bpm was trivial.
Transmitting ongoing data to the doc would be convenient, making it easy to email "hey, something funny happened today, please look into it" without having to wait until a scheduled appointment involving a not-always-available technician. Being able to transmit critical event as they occur is also very desirable - duh; my Medical Alert necklace may direct medics to call my cardiologist, who would be much more effective if he already had incident data.
Of course the real problem is remote control. Informing the doc of ongoing/critical data is one thing; allowing access to make remote updates is a different issue. Making the unit such that remote changes are impossible is, of course, possible. However, if ANY change will be made to such a critical device, then it should be done IN A DOCTOR'S OFFICE. One of my diagnostic routines is dropping my heart rate to 40bpm - harmless if done right, lethal if screwed up.
Of course the real concern to most /. readers is the LOLFAIL headline. "Hey, watch out for a DDOS on your pacemaker! Ha ha ha!" Nothing wins a lot of reads like a headline making some technical advancement sound really dumb. Funny how so many readers of a high-tech news source treat high-tech advancements like Luddites.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
When something impressive comes along, most /. readers are simply quick to point out vulnerabilities, that's all.
Like you said, Remote logging of activity - incredibly useful, right?
Remote control, for example, is simply one of the largest hazards.
It doesn't have an IP address - because its just broadcasting, but that could mean it has an SSID on that particular wave - which means that perhaps anyone can access the data. Is it encrypted? Does it contain personal information?
The internet itself isn't a secur
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Nothing wins a lot of reads like a headline making some technical advancement sound really dumb. Funny how so many readers of a high-tech news source treat high-tech advancements like Luddites.
have you ever read /. before? that's pretty much what we do here. that and welcoming various overlords.
Re: (Score:2)
You know, all this monitoring stuff is crap.
Wake me up when they invent a way to charge my damn pacemaker so they don't have to replace it every six years or so.
Re: (Score:2)
Imagine a Beowulf Cluster of These (Score:3, Funny)
serving as a timing belt.
Patient drops when TTL is exceeded (Score:2)
No IP Yet ... But Next Version Who Knows? (Score:4, Informative)
Article indicates the pacemaker doesn't have an IP address, and only connects via 402-405 MHz radio link.
However, it's nearly inevitable that a later version of it and/or those of another pacemaker manufacturer will have its own IP.
Those with access to a large bot net could easily scan for pacemaker software and then target all or, more likely, a specific person(s) to remotely sabotage their pacemaker, possibly resulting in death...
Most killers won't go to such extremes, since there are numerous easier, less traceable ways of killing. But for people in prison, remote killing has its appeal ... in particular, to target judges and prosecutors, who, due to age / stress along with access to top quality medical care, often have pacemakers.
To digress somewhat, there are already numerous horror stories of people's on-line medical records getting mixed up / corrupted due to identity theives who seek care under someone elses name - and to make matters worse, ID victims generally do NOT have the right to see that extraneous data nor have it removed. So I'm highly skeptical of the security of on-line medical devices when even on-line medical records aren't as secure as they should be.
Ron
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Article indicates the pacemaker doesn't have an IP address, and only connects via 402-405 MHz radio link.
As does the summary...
However, it's nearly inevitable that a later version of it and/or those of another pacemaker manufacturer will have its own IP.
Why? Because it'd be cool to do so?
Those with access to a large bot net could easily scan for pacemaker software and then target all or, more likely, a specific person(s) to remotely sabotage their pacemaker, possibly resulting in death...
Making a good reaso
Re: (Score:2)
As for electronic records, don't worry, it appears the US is right on track to stick with the most arcane, inefficient, and not-particularly-effective medical system in the modernized world, so the chances of us making any new types of errors are fairly low! Yay!
Re: (Score:2)
However, it's nearly inevitable that a later version [...]will have its own IP.
Currently, cars are mostly used to transport people from one place to another. However it's nearly inevitable that a later version will include heavy particle cannons.
It's madness! Everyone will have heavy particle twin cannons!
Let's discuss the horrifying consecuences of that unavoidable future!
Poll:
I'll want the particles in my car's heavy particle twin cannons to be:
- Red, they go faster.
- Green, go green!
- First!, because First! is always the best answer.
- I don't have a car. I'll probably die in the he
I for one welcome my ..... (Score:5, Funny)
.... Aaargghh
Mashup! (Score:2)
I'm totally doing a mashup so the Internet can watch Carol Kasyjanski's heartbeat and music to go with it.
I just tried to browse it... (Score:3, Funny)
... I think the server crashed, just dead links.
We don't need an IP, we are /. ! (Score:3, Funny)
Doesn't matter just try out some of the 2^32 minus reserved addresses
all /.ers Christian Name starting with an "A" take the 0.5*2^30 upper addresses and ...
Thank good they haven't postet the IP on /.
I suppose you don't even need a computer network of brainless bots to DDOS a computer,
slashdot + us the faster than light clicking slashdot-crauts would fullfill the task, twice as good as any botnet can do,
btw. "Police: Man blamed child porn on cat"
haha next time he can blame his hacked pacemaker for doing so, it will also be very complicated to confiscate this evidence.
and here it comes the DomainName for the Pacemaker
http://pacemaker.chicagohope.md/ [chicagohope.md]
Related Stories: (Score:2)
First Internet-Connected Pacemaker Goes Dead
Aside from all the jokes (Score:3, Interesting)
It brings me to my own situation: I recently got a CPAP machine with a smartcard for data storage. Unfortunately the card reader is about 130 dollars online and it requires a proprietary software. If my MD wants to see the data he needs for me to remove the card and send it in.
Wouldn't it be great to have these kinds of home devices just "phone it in"? Real data that my MD can look over at his discretion as well as having a copy of it available to me for my own edification. It could be set up to red flag certain data that, because it could be detected as it happens, could prevent minor issues from becoming major issues. This is the kind of technology that is cheap to employ, automated systems could look for abnormalities and could lead to saving lives as well as curbing the cost of health care by making sure that small issues don't become major issues.
More and more people are doing home monitoring of medical conditions without being able to make sense of all the data. This is a great resource and one I can agree to using stimulus money for to take to the next level.
Getting my own pacemaker checked (Score:2)
Every six months my pacemaker is checked. Part of the test is to speed and slow down the pacemaker and my heart for a short time.
It is a truly a scary and heartfelt experience.
Mhm... smells fishy (Score:1)
" the pacemaker itself doesn't have an IP address, fun as that would be."
Cant be done.
You cant have a tcp connection without a source IP.
Now maybe the IP is forcefully dynamic and always within the private ranges.... buts thats another thing. K?
Re: (Score:1)
Why is that fishy? The pacemaker talks to the base station unit, reporting it's status. The only thing connected to the internet is the base station. It doesn't need an IP address any more than a wireless HID does when attached to a computer.
This isn't even very new, really. Devices like this already exist, they just use telephony to literally "phone home" instead of the intarwebernets
As cool as the headline sounds (Score:2)
The pacemaker is not connected to the internet. The "base station" is and that is what the doctors are remotely checking. The pacemaker is just sending its current state to the "base station". The pacemaker is no more connected to the internet than a wireless keyboard or a pair of bluetooth headphones are.
Remote Monitoring (Score:1)
A key thing that is left out (But what most people have surmised):
Pacemaker <--MICS Band--> Home monitoring unit (developed by pacemaker company; obtains IP address - typically via dial-up.) <--TCP/IP--> PaceMaker Companies Servers <-- TCP/IP--> Physician Web connection
The 400mhz is considered to be the MICS band - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_Implant_Communication_Service [wikipedia.org] . The great thing about MICS is that it covers not only 'both sides' of the pond, but pretty mu
The first...? (Score:1)
Peacemaker, (Score:2)
Comment removed (Score:3, Funny)
&$&#*&NO CARRIER (Score:2)
... oops.
The next step: Heartbeat pop up ads! (Score:3, Funny)