FMRI Shows Man Loves Wife More Than Angelina Jolie 347
An anonymous reader writes "We've discussed (at length) functional MRI technology as it pertains to marketing and virtual reality, but now Esquire writer A.J. Jacobs has become the first person to go inside the controversial machine to test the science behind his sex drive. As in, he has fMRI experts read his mind as to whether he's actually more turned on by his young wife or Angelina Jolie. The results, unsurprisingly, are both geeky and hilarious. Would you subject yourself to this kind of reality check?"
So which celebrity does he prefer? (Score:3, Insightful)
I think the MRI would find I preferred rotten turnip to Angelina Jolie. I think she's got no class. The term trailer trash comes to mind.
I actually do love my wife (who doesn't read this board, so this isn't some big suck up) but there would be plenty of celebs (and a few rotten vegies) that'd come closer than Jolie would.
Re:So which celebrity does he prefer? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:So which celebrity does he prefer? (Score:5, Insightful)
I originally assumed it was another of those 'gay nigger' posts which used to frequent slashdot. Still not sure though. I love my wife and she is deeply beautiful (also doesn't read slashdot) but that doesn't stop Angelina from being hot.
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
I've never understood people who talk like Angelina Jolie is like the hottest person in the world. Her face looks weird, her hair doesn't look good at all nor does her body because of those.
First post's trailer trash is a good term.
Re:So which celebrity does he prefer? (Score:5, Funny)
If you want to mess with people who drool over her, tell them to put her picture and one of Jon Voight side by side, then look at their mouths.
From then on whenever they look at her, they'll see him and find it nearly impossible to find her attractive.
But that may only work on right brained people. If any left brainers can confirm, that would be interesting.
Re:So which celebrity does he prefer? (Score:4, Funny)
Left-brainers have the opposite effect; after comparing the mouths, they find Jon Voight strangely attractive.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
I'm the freak who doesn't have a dominant hemisphere...Go figure. Every time I test, it runs right down the middle. Supposedly it runs that way for about 2% of the population. Anyway, I'll throw my opinion out there...FOR SCIENCE!
There is definitely something in the chin/lips, especially if you're looking at a picture of Voight when he's younger.
For me though, my perception is drawn to the eyes/nose triangle first, and then the first thing I notice about her mouth is that little smirk she affects. I'd never
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
I love my wife and she is deeply beautiful (also doesn't read slashdot) but that doesn't stop Angelina from being hot.
No, what stops her from being hot is that she doesn't look good and has mental health issues.
Re: (Score:2)
Angelina, hot? Seriously? She looks like a horse sat on her face. She's grotesque.
Re:So which celebrity does he prefer? (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
She looks like a horse sat on her face.
I have a horse, you insensitive clod!
Its ass is nowhere near as ugly as her face.
Re:So which celebrity does he prefer? (Score:5, Funny)
It should also be noted that Bea Arthur beat out Angelina and the wife.
Re:So which celebrity does he prefer? (Score:5, Insightful)
The chances of your wife being 'deeply beautiful' are almost nil.
If that's true, you fucked up. Why the hell do you marry someone in the first place?
And no men don't gradually find girls they live with to be more and more attractive over time.
Bullshit.
On the other hand, women find men they like to be more attractive than they really are.
So now you know attractiveness better than the people whose opinion actually matters to each other? How is this crap Insightful?
Re: (Score:2, Flamebait)
And it's insightful because it's true - men are lucky, we can improve how women perceive our appearance by having the proper attitude. Women don't have as much leeway as men do, in my experience.
Re:So which celebrity does he prefer? (Score:5, Insightful)
He knows attractiveness better than people with both interference from emotional attachments and good reasons to lie about their opinions.
Again, bullshit. If you think attractiveness is or can possibly be objective, you never got tired of talking to a beautiful but incredibly stupid woman.
Re:So which celebrity does he prefer? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
But what if stupid women are the only ones that say yes? Ummm... was that too much information?
Re:So which celebrity does he prefer? (Score:5, Insightful)
My experience seems to swing the opposite direction, but Ron White said it better than I did.
I didn't marry my wife for looks, and you shouldn't either. In a few years, if her boobs start to sag too much, there's a place you can go to and they'll lift 'em right back up to where they were. And you can point the nipple in any direction. Hell, you can go to a titty bar, pick out a set of titties and say "I want those titties on that woman right there." If she gets too fat and don't wanna work it off, you can get a tummy tuck. They'll give you a belly that looks like a cheerleader. If your eyesight starts to go bad, you can get Lasik surgery and they can give you 20/20 vision at any age. If your hearing starts to fail, they'll put a little device in your ear that makes you hear as good as when you were born. But let me tell you something folks- you can't fix stupid. There's not a pill you can take. There's not a class you can go to. Stupid is fo-evah.
Re:So which celebrity does he prefer? (Score:4, Insightful)
You're wrong about people who love each other and are sincerely are attracted to their loved ones.
Plus, this view of life is why your girlfriend is a wadded-up kleenex.
Re: (Score:2)
The chances of your wife being 'deeply beautiful' are almost nil. So yes you are sucking up to your wife. And no men don't gradually find girls they live with to be more and more attractive over time. On the other hand, women find men they like to be more attractive than they really are
Spoken like someone who goes home and inflates his lover.
It's all a matter of your point of view. We can all be either disgusting drooling snotty ape like creatures, or divine beings.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
It's not an exclusive or. We are drooling (sometimes) snotty (sometimes) ape like creatures. And since we create gods, we are also divine beings.
You just have to learn to swallow the dilemma.
(Fortunately, we Discordians [principiadiscordia.com] are trained in dilemma swallowing, as well as proposition juggling, axiom throwing, rebutting on a bed of nails, and all the other arts of the sideshow philosopher.)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Therefore a wife being 'deeply beautiful' isn't such a remote possibity, even if they don't fit the 'supermodel pretty' that we're told is what's important.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I call bullshit. This sounds like something the nerd in the basement figured out by reading a bunch of magazines found under his daddy's mattress. If a man says his wife if more attractive than some popular tart on the television screen, I believe him. My wife is. As for the "celebs" - phhht. There aren't very many of them who ARE better than trailer trash.
In a subjective matter? (Score:5, Insightful)
So, in a fundamentally subjective matter, you presume to tell people that their own perception is wrong? I'm used to this kind of crap coming from game fanboys, but it's a new twist to actually see it applied to something as _blatantly_ subjective as physical beauty.
If a woman X is attracted to man Y, that's it. That's by definition "attractive". He's attractive... for her. Hint: notice the common word root in there.
Who the fuckk do you think you _are_ to tell her that, in something that's 100% personal perception, her perception is wrong?
And yes, it's 100% subjective. Some people like older women. In fact, for some, it's a major turn on. There's a whole genre of porn about 70+ year old women. (So, yes, to answer that objection, that's one case he actually might like her more after 40 years of marriage.)
Some people like women who are anything between a bit overweight, to outright obese. Again, check out some of the BBW porn out there, and some looks like they filmed a vaguely humanoid blob of fat. Someone pays to watch those, you know?
Some people like huge breasts. Some actually like them small. And I won't just use porn this time, but look at the ideal of female beauty of the ancient Greeks and Romans. Look at all those sculptures that are barely A cup. Presumably because it represented a young woman who hasn't had children yet. (Ditto about the huge penis obsession recently, BTW: the greeks considered a perfect penis to be rather small, and they actually exaggerated in that direction in a lot of their statues. Huge phaluses were considered something the barbarians have.) To get back to breasts, the romans are sometimes credited with inventing the bra, but that's misleading. What actually got into fashion there wasn't some padded wonderbra, but just a strip of cloth tied over the breasts to press them down, so she looks like she has smaller breasts than she actually has.
A lot of people people like redheads, and especially in places where there aren't that many born naturally that way. But in the UK where they have the highest percentage of them, a lot of people aren't turned on by that mutation at all, and the term "ginger" is used as an insult.
Etc. It's really that subjective.
Maybe his wife wouldn't be "deeply beautiful" to you, but how do you know it isn't for him? Oh, right, you presume to tell someone that his tastes are wrong and yours are some kind of platinum standard for all humanity. Carry on.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
That is, of course, a possibility.
My own _guess_ would be more along the lines of: See, they too thought that some foreigners have huge dicks. It seems to me like that's a constant human complex. There's always someone, some tribesman somewhere who's got a 3 ft long dick and is gonna steal your women. We make such generalizations about blacks today. But funnily enough some blacks, at their first encounter with europeans, thought that the europeans had such long dicks that they wrap them around their waist.
Re:So which celebrity does he prefer? (Score:5, Insightful)
The chances of your wife being 'deeply beautiful' are almost nil. So yes you are sucking up to your wife. And no men don't gradually find girls they live with to be more and more attractive over time. On the other hand, women find men they like to be more attractive than they really are.
To me, and I'm sure also a lot of men (and women) out there, 'attractiveness' is more than just physical. Personality can also play a key role in attractiveness. I may find a "perfect 10" woman, but if she has no personality, some of that attractiveness is lost.
Women find men to be as attractive as those men are [b]to that woman[/b].
Re:So which celebrity does he prefer? (Score:5, Funny)
Not true. Many slashdotter wives are "deeply beautiful". ...
You thought there was gonna be a joke here, but you're wrong. I know for sure that there's at least one slashdot user with a gorgeous wife (hi, honey).
[note to young guys: this is how you manage to still get oral on a regular basis after 20 years' marriage]
Re: (Score:2)
Well, I did RTFA (quite interesting and the brevity of the summary gives it no justice) and his wife wasn't really gorgeous (but not bad either). I do however remember my psychology professor talking about beauty in class, and how people we know for longer have more appeal. He also demonstrated that we are attracted to a sort of mean of appearance, and showed computer generated image of a man and a woman that were composed of thousands of photos compiled into one. They didn't catch my particular fancy, but
Re:So which celebrity does he prefer? (Score:5, Funny)
Your prof's a dork. The longer people know me, the less they like me.
Re:So which celebrity does he prefer? (Score:4, Funny)
Outside of a book, a dog is man's best friend. Inside a dog, it's too dark to read.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
I thought, Angelina was hot, until I learned, she has a Che Guevara tattoo [helium.com]... Eeeewww...
Re: (Score:2)
Is that actually true? Judging by her politics/personality, I wouldn't be at all surprised ... but I haven't been able to find any credible sources to support that claim. All I can find is articles saying something like "reportedly" she has it "somewhere on her body".
Re: (Score:2)
Well, so was Reagan to be honest. Or Lenin, or JFK...
But all the facts are beside the point due to our penchant for idolatry.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Your point about all heads of notable states being responsible for some deaths is taken, but you missed the bigger picture. Although he was never a head of any state (his highest position was head of Cuba's secret police), Che Guevara exceeded all of those people you listed by personally executing scores of people — and enjoying it. Contrary to the GP-posting, he was not a "cold-blooded" killer. He was perfectly hot-blooded and passionate in his kil
Re: (Score:2)
You're a commie, with a short left leg? Hmmm. My dad had a short leg, which he fixed with a special pair of shoes. It stops the leaning, at least.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
You're a dumb person, that's all. Nobody thinks he's a saint. I think some falsely infer that people with Che shirts/tattooos/whatever know much about Che at all. Most common people don't associate him with communism, they associate him with being a rebel. And he was.
He was a hard man, as are most rebels. He killed people unjustly. His ideology was fundamentally flawed. You could make an argument he was a bad man, though comparing him to Hitler is laughable.
But above all, he led an interesting life an
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
And he looks like he might have some of that "book learnin". Get the rope, we can't have no dang smart-mouthed lefties around here making things uncomfortable with them thar "ideas". Muh daddy told me people who think different need killin.
Re: (Score:2)
I think the MRI would find I preferred rotten turnip to Angelina Jolie.
Did you just say you were more sexually attracted to rotten vegetables than a woman?
Interesting. What do you call yourselves? Turnipys?
Re: (Score:2)
Did you just say you were more sexually attracted to rotten vegetables than a woman?
Well I guess you could classify her as a woman....just.
Re: (Score:2)
I wholeheartedly agree. Angelina Jolie for me is in that same category that contains also Madonna and a few other over-hyped (looks-wise) celebs.
Also, my wife does happen to be very hot. And no, I have no clue what she found in me. Will have to put that on my T-shirt one day.
Re:So which celebrity does he prefer? (Score:5, Funny)
Well, I can detect lies (with a 100% success rate) - just by staring into the character of the electrons of a slashdotter's post.
And you are lying.
Oh, wait! Sorry, not lying - but self-delusional. The characteristics electron remnants of lying & self-delusion appear similar on occasions.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
90% success rate? That's all! I have a 95% success rate at detecting lies personally (no fancy equipment necessary, I just look at the guy and then I know).
Right, because after someone lies to you, they notify you of the fact so you can tally it up into a percentage...
;)
I'll just assume you meant that 95% of the time you that accuse someone of lying, you are correct.
Sorry if this was some joke that just went right over my head
Re: (Score:2)
Tbf, what they could mean is "I always acuse people of lying, and I'm right 95% of the time", but that would be a decidedly less interesting statistic than claimed.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
They should have chosen a celebrity who the subject does find very attractive.
That's exactly what they did.
The test was rigged! (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
If it was an honest test, they would have asked him about Kristen Bell.
Just to show that tastes vary (and that's a good thing), I think she looks like a piglet. And for the record, no, I'm not attracted to piglets.
This thread is useless without pics (Score:5, Funny)
of his wife.
Re: (Score:2)
His wife is pretty- see the article. With 25,000 of work, she could probably look like a movie star.
(some actresses are approaching the $500,000 mark.)
Re:This thread is useless without pics (Score:5, Insightful)
With 25,000 of work, she could probably look like a movie star.
Why do people still think knives are instruments of beauty? Can you show me anyone who looked better one year after their surgery than they did before?
Yes and No (Score:2)
Yes there are women who look more pleasing to the eye after major surgery.
However for me personally when I see the before picture it reduces that persons 'new' attactiveness not because they were 'ugly' before hand but because I get the feeling that the person I'm looking at is n't the 'real' person and to me that is kind of creepy.
I was going to suggest Joan Rivers (Score:2)
however I do not think anyone has ever seen her before the knife.
Clearly if she willingly put her under the knife to look as she does now she had to be a serious bow wow, or Michael look a like
Re:This thread is useless without pics (Score:5, Insightful)
Why do people still think knives are instruments of beauty? Can you show me anyone who looked better one year after their surgery than they did before?
Yes:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30586321/ [msn.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, everyone knows the superior cosmetic enhancement techniques all involve acid.
Yup. You take some, and don't worry about your looks anymore. Compare Michael Jackson.
Re: (Score:2)
of his wife.
+1!!
Hey, throw in some pics of Angelina and Kristen, too, while you're at it. For science...
RTFA and thou shall find... (Score:5, Funny)
No joke, no troll, just one hot lady!
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
I personally never thought Angelina Jolie was that hot. She looks kind of bizarre to me--like a snide elf with inflatable lips. So not EVERYONE thinks she's so hot.
Now Natalie Portman--THAT'S hot! Bring on the grits!
Re:This thread is useless without pics (Score:5, Informative)
http://www.esquire.com/cm/esquire/images/julie-sex-pic-0609-lg-11217105.jpg [esquire.com]
There's a pic of his wife topless if you read the article.
Re:This thread is useless without pics (Score:5, Funny)
Congratulations. You figured out how to get slashdot readers to read the article (or at least skim it looking for pictures).
The next test (Score:2)
Are you in love with A.J Jacob's wife more than your own wife?
Re: (Score:2)
There are three of them in the article, which apparently she agreed to. I'm impressed they both put their lives out on display like this, it's a pretty interesting (and quite witty) read.
Thank you MythBusters... (Score:5, Insightful)
The MythBusters had an episode (episode 93 according to google) where they had team members who took part in a mock crime in order to test various "lie detection" methods, complete with real punishments for various outcomes.
It wasn't valid science, but it was a fascinating exploration of how one could fool these various tests. The polygraph was the usual mumbo jumbo, but the MRI test was interesting in showing how difficult it is to isolate anything for interpretation. I interpreted the results as an effectively random outcome, much like the interpretation is being used here - all correlation with an external event, with everyone involved convincing themselves they've isolated the causation.
But if this works for him to convince himself that he truly loves his wife, I'm not going to argue with him.
To me, it shows the value of double(or more)-blind testing.
Ryan Fenton
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Thank you MythBusters... (Score:4, Insightful)
Not at all - in triple-blind studies, those who are interpreting the results also don't know which 'drug' is being tallied, and so can't know to shape numbers in a given way. Source [wikipedia.org]. For every level of interpretation that can occur before the study is 'complete' to publish, there's another level of blindness you could potentially apply.
Ryan Fenton
Re:Thank you MythBusters... (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Well, fuck it. We're going to five blinds.
Re:Thank you MythBusters... (Score:5, Funny)
For quintuple blind, everyone involved in the experiment must be 100% visually impaired.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
And if you leave all the tables and conclusions blank when you publish the results, you have sextuple blind.
Re: (Score:2)
The problem is that if you give someone data and tell them here is group one and here is group two, they will analyze the data with that "prior". Tell them which one had the treatment and add salary depende
Follow up experiment (Score:4, Interesting)
I would be very interested in seeing this same test run on somebody that just terminated a relationship, and then run once again after a rebound fling. Bonus points if the reboundie was blacked out.
Not very controlled. (Score:5, Interesting)
I don't know, I think comparing studio airbrushed photos of Jolie with candid snaps of his wife may not be the best experiment.
This whole thing seems not very scientific and more like "hey lets play with our toy".
Re: (Score:2)
Have you got an idea on how to make it more "scientific"?
It seems that lately many people have the misconception that science is exact. Math is exact; science is mostly just guesses, based on what is assumed to be fact for a while.
Even telling the truth, your brain lies (Score:4, Interesting)
Would anybody like to place a bet that Brad Pitt's brain would light up brighter for Jacobs' wife (assuming she's reasonably hot)? Does it mean either guy would even consider trading wives? Not for a second.
And let's not forget that there's a measurable time lag before the hormones kick in and that immediate flash of reflexive horniness morphs into something similar but far from identical.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Bad post...I wasn't clear. My point is that the reflexive reaction, no matter what it is, isn't the one that has a lot to do with a long-term pair bond. A sexy picture of the significant other is going to conjure memories of an actual physical relationship. A sexy picture of somebody hot might be stimulating, but it can't replicate the memory of something that has actually happened.
Not Surprising (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Not Surprising (Score:5, Funny)
Shhh. Don't spoil my fantasy.
Re: (Score:2)
FFS, he writes for esquire. He's a nobody. This isn't a controlled study. Why do I care what/who some sod with a kid loves?
Depends on the person (Score:3, Funny)
Scientist: "Look at the following pictures, please. *Click* Next picture, *Click*, Next picture *Click*"
Patient: *Ding on metal sound*
Scientist: "What was tha--Oh!"
Well of course. (Score:4, Insightful)
He's not going to "Love" Angela Jolie more because he doesn't know her to have that bond.
That doesn't mean he wouldn't rather shag her though!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
when the movie Serenity came out, the /. thread evolved into guys who thought the engineer girl was hot or cute
OH MY GOOD FUCKING LORD, YES [xs139.xs.to].
I'm almost tempted to leave "Post Anonymously" unchecked.
Not another pseudoscience "detector" test! (Score:4, Insightful)
If the lie detector wasn't bad enough, this certainly takes the cake of "tests" concerning the psyche of people. It's anything but unheard of that lie detectors are wrong (you can actually train that, go figure), and they at least have a semblance of a realistice chance to guess right. You are asked questions, your physical reaction is measured. That's at least straightforward. Worthless, because if you have a little control over your autonomic system (it's possible, to some degree) you can easily fool it, but at least there's a connection.
Now here's a man that loves his wife more than Angie. So? Maybe he's not into this kind of woman? Maybe he really loves his wife, or maybe he loves fat chicks, unless you ask him (and he chooses to tell the truth) you'll never know.
You add another variable to a test that is already guesswork at best: Personal taste and preference. It's not just true or false anymore. A lie detector is at least straightforward with the question, even if the answer is mostly just "maybe" in most cases. With this test, even the question is fuzzy.
Re: (Score:2)
For those interested in fmri and marketing I suggest you read Martin Lindstroms book Buyology.
> unless you ask him (and he chooses to tell the truth) you'll never know.
What I learned from that book was that people don't know themselves if they tell the truth.. ..)
Our unconscious mind reacts very fast, makes impulse decisions (what product to buy, what you like,
and when you're asked about it, our conscious mind will try logically explain it and make up a rationale (which may not be what actually happened)
Good thing no women are going to read about this (Score:5, Funny)
If women hear about this...
Next argument:
"You don't really love me!"
"Baby you know I do!"
"Prove it! You, me and my sister are going down to the machine tomorrow!"
*Uh oh*
Re: (Score:2)
This guy is crazy to submit to this test. (Score:5, Funny)
This guy is crazy to submit to this test. Here is a (near) pseudo-science test being applied to him with a loaded question that can have only one possible correct and right answer. And the machine is not assured to give him that correct answer. And he does it in a nationally published magazine.
Suppose this machine 'proved' that he was more turned on by a professional sexpot movie star than his own wife. Do you think that she would ...ever... let him live that down? If you say yes, then you don't know anything about women...go fuck your compiler.
Thirty years from now they have some silly disagreement. She says "..but you don't really love me..." He says " but, darling, honey, of course I do..." She says, "no, you really don't, and that machine proved it!".
There are some questions that have only one possible correct answer, regardless of what might be the 'truth'. The most important one is when your wife or girlfriend asks you " do you really love me?". Guys, listen to this, this is important, the only possible thing that you can ever say when this collection of sounds hits your ears is "YES". No hesitation, no ..uh.., no ponderous meaningful silences, just 'yes'. Anything else that you could say or not say would be taken by her to mean 'no, I don't love you'. It just takes one 'no' and she will never believe you next 10 million times that you say "yes, I love you".
Another example of question that has only one possible answer is when someone who has the ability and the inclination to destroy your life asks you: "Have you ever used drugs?" Here the only possible answer is NO!, even if you're standing there with a joint dangling from your lips. Please don't forget this as it may come in useful some day.
A third example is when someone is pointing a gun at you and asks you, "Do you believe in...". Fellas, this is not an occasion for amicable discussion imbued with gentle irony. Chuck it up, smile, and shout 'YES!'. I believe in jumpin' Jehovah, the lizard king, the holy rock, the flying pizza monster, whatever, and add that you're overwhelming glad to find another true believer, and " could you ...uh... maybe ...uh... put down that gun?"
So you or anyone else in the world has nothing to gain by allowing yourselves to hooked up to some machine and be asked one of the questions that have only one possible answer, and gambling that the machine affirms that you actually and truly believe that you are giving the right answer. You have nothing to gain if the machine says 'yes, he's telling the truth' and everything to lose if the machine indicates otherwise.
It's like playing Russian Roulette.
Re: (Score:2)
If those are the kind of arguments you're having with your spouse, I'd prefer being divorced.
If there's anything I hate more in those "discussions" "people have while married" it's those flower petal counting lines.
Sure, she might ask this "question" at some time when they're moody during pregnancy (or somesuch), but if you and your spouse really have nothing more tangible to argue about during fights than "do you love me", then you probably don't anyway. You probably love the idea that you're married, or
Re:This guy is crazy to submit to this test. (Score:5, Funny)
You fail to mention the most feared question of all though: "Honey, does this dress make my butt look big?"
There's no good answer to that at all. If you hear it coming from your loved ones lips, you're better off throwing yourself out the window than trying to answer it.
And no, "No honey, your butt makes your butt look big" isn't really as conducive to not sleeping on the couch for a few weeks as many single young men would think.
Re:This guy is crazy to submit to this test. (Score:5, Insightful)
The correct answer - "I don't know, take it off, I need to compare" at which point you go down on her and she forgets all about it.
Try a banker (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Or toes, yeah, the stinkier the better! yeah! toes... mmm
err, what...! i'm just saying.
Not surprised (Score:2)
I mean, you see a half naked pic of your wife and you also know that she goes off in the sack. Jolie, on the other hand, looks pretty but you just have no idea, or memory, of how much fun she is.
My wife also gets me excited. And really, that's no surprise. I know what she really likes and I really, really like it too. Everytime I think about it, it gives me a smile.
Results are no shock. Jolie is just eye-candy. That it.
Lip size (Score:2)
Perhaps beauty is simply inversely proportional to lip size?
That could be an alternative explanation to these results.
uh, no it doesn't (Score:2)
Actually, it does not show what the summary title claims.
"Love" is different from sexual arousal, and I mean that in a medical sense. While many details are still unclear, from what we do know, regarding hormones and brain scans (only one of which is covered by this research), there are marked differences, especially regarding long-term love and sex drive.
Brick Wall? Head. Head? Brick Wall. (Score:5, Interesting)
Myself and others wax scientific and rant extensively about the problems associated with using this technique. I'll keep mine short this time by keeping it to an example. From TFA in that eminent science journal Esquire:
"When you speak, blood flows to the language centers. When you blink your eyes, it flows to the eye-blinking centers."
The same region that makes something happen is also responsible for inhibiting that action. Each contains both accelerator and brakes. When you withhold speech, blood flows to the language centers. When you prevent your eyes from blinking, blood flows to the eye blinking centers. When the reaction is "I love my wife", blood flows to the I love my wife centers. When the reaction is "I don't love my wife", blood flows to the I love my wife centers.
It is not possible for fMRI to tell the difference between a positive and negative reaction, and is in fact measuring both reactions being considered prior to resolution in the sampling time. The two reactions may use some different Hebbian neural assemblies within the same region, but the low (ie. several cubic millimeters) spatial resolution of MRI catches both of them plus much more in the same voxel (3D pixel). The same problem emerges when different regions "light up" in the different conditions. It can't be determined whether that is excitatory or inhibitory activity.
By way of providing a reference, the above is what I was taught by a biophysicist who was working on his dissertation on this subject under Peter Fox, originator of the use of MRI for functional testing (ie. 'boxcar' design), including the use of SPM (statistical probability mapping) for analysis in comparing the MRI results in the different conditions. The above should also make it clear that using fMRI as a "lie detector" is fruitless.
No surprise to the married ... (Score:2, Insightful)
Seriously, in your brain your wife is a very complicated entity that's backed with a serious amount of information. Where you sat on your first date? That (hopefully) subtle look on her face when she can't stand her friend's conversation matter?
Might be more interesting to see how much you 'love' someone you actually despise but know very, very well.
Unless you have a horrible marriage or are a child, your marriage is a unique thing to your brain. Comparing it to your feelings for Angelina Anybody is just
Could have costed a lot of money.. (Score:2)
I don't know. If he had any sense he would have a plan B ready: if the result was different he'd have to bribe the researcher to "interpret" the results to keep peace in the family :-)
I'd rather face the RIAA without a lawyer than upset the significant other :-).
Jolly jolie (Score:2)
Inflate to 50 pounds.
Re: (Score:2)
No. He should have fucked Angelina Jolie for a year, and then done the test.
Btw, how do you sign of for this studie?
Re: (Score:2)
Unless I feel safe that I'm needed by my spouse, I'm not interested. Of course, I'm co-dependent-- if someone clearly needs me, I'm immediately drawn to and interested in them. If they clearly do not need me, I'm repulsed. If they are in the middle, then it's more about whether I'm interested or not.
This is one of the clearest breakdowns of a key part of successful relationships I have ever read. Bravo.