Hubble Survey Finds Half of the Missing Matter 189
esocid sends along the news that scientists believe they have found about half the missing matter in the universe. The matter we can see is only about 1/8 of the total baryonic matter believed to exist (and only 1/200 the mass-energy of the visible universe). This missing matter is not to be confused with "dark matter," which is thought to be non-baryonic. The missing stuff has been found in the intergalactic medium that extends essentially throughout all of space, from just outside our galaxy to the most distant regions of space. "'We think we are seeing the strands of a web-like structure that forms the backbone of the universe,' Mike Shull of the University of Colorado explained. 'What we are confirming in detail is that intergalactic space, which intuitively might seem to be empty, is in fact the reservoir for most of the normal, baryonic matter in the universe.'"
Ether (Score:4, Insightful)
Dark Matter??? (Score:3, Insightful)
Wow (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Dark Matter??? (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Wow (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Ether (Score:3, Insightful)
Not disproven, really, but fell away due to Occam's Razor. The difference between ether and this "web-like structure" is that ether was never directly observed.
Re:Dark Matter??? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Dark Matter??? (Score:4, Insightful)
So no, not dust.
Re:Ether (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Dark Matter??? (Score:3, Insightful)
Except there aren't people like that. We knew this normal matter existed, we just didn't know where it was.
Every time we talk about something new being found in the universe, someone likes to say, "Oh look at those stupid astronomers, making up stuff no one can prove. There never was any dark matter." I know that's not what you specifically said, but by bringing it into the conversation and conflating this observation with theories of dark matter, you essentially did the same thing. Your basically attempted to make other people look stupid by making an ill-informed, seemingly insightful comment. I'm rather disappointed to see that it that the mods fell for it.
Evidence... (Score:2, Insightful)
And the irony is... (Score:3, Insightful)
That statement is essentially true. The best you can ever know about the universe is by inference. Standard candles are an approximation and you aren't really able to prove anything by duplication as much as you are trying to say this is a pretty good story based on a computer model kicking out a similar result. I mean, it all sounds pretty good on paper, but I could always make a computer model of the "real killer" stabbing Nicole and Ron, and not OJ.