Skynet Means More Bandwidth for British 66
pcnetworx1 writes "A new £3.6bn project to upgrade the space communications network for British forces including the Army, Royal Navy, and RAF has gone underway. The first craft, Skynet 5A was launched from Kourou in French Guiana on 11 March 2007. There will be a constellation of three satellites in total. This system is also not an exclusive project for the armed forces, it is actually outsourced to a company called Paradigm Secure Communications. They work with NATO, France, Germany, Canada, Portugal and the Netherlands. They are also seeking new business in the US, Australia, and the Middle East."
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Goatse! (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Yay!
Moron.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Umm, the link was titled "Guy Opening Anus To Show Everyone", which you obviously clicked on. While he gets some class, maybe you could get some common-sense, which is after all part of growing up.
New uses (Score:1)
(No terminator jokes this time though, that was when it was launched a few weeks ago)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Skynet.. (Score:4, Funny)
20.38: Skynet becomes aware
20.39: Skynet gives more bandwidth
20.40: ????
20.41: Profit!
Now we know why! (Score:3, Funny)
Skyyyyynet (Score:5, Funny)
1997: Skynet, a neural net-based artificial intelligence built by Cyberdyne Systems,
brought online and given control over the U.S. strategic nuclear arsenal
2007: UK military ridiculed for choice of name for latest high-bandwidth series of "Skynet" satellites
Time travel's a bitch..
I predict... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:I predict... (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
All this technology... (Score:5, Funny)
They are also seeking new business in the US, Australia and the Middle East.
Terminator's Accent Confirmed (Score:4, Funny)
Good moves by the West (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
"Sure, China won't get it's satellite comm systems straight from the US, but I will bet you anything that western states allied against certain blocks of nations will direct limited amounts of tech into Chinese (and other) hands"
Hints
Router in the Sky (Score:4, Insightful)
It's a slight shame the Hollywood has given everyone unrealistic expectations of, among other things, the state of the art in military satellite systems. It's rather like the Stealth Fighter - an awesome achievement despite the fact that it was far from having the all-aspect stealth that it is generally portrayed to have. Another example would be those f***ng moronic films where someone breaks "128-bit encryption" in 60 seconds because he has a gun to his head (or whatever).
The interesting part of it is that Satellites of the Skynet 4 era need teams of people to fly them and make constant adjustments to their orientation and orbit but that commercial satellite tech has become so good now that one person can fly many satellites and each satellite can manage itself for up to 28 days. I never knew how much effort it was until hearing this.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Uncharted territory (Score:4, Interesting)
Personally, I think this is a completely overlooked field (which is understandable as they're all under the table). I think we should immediately seek Congressional funding and investigate if being in physical symbiosis with an attractive member of the opposite sex improves crypto and code breaking performance (I'm using 'physical symbiosis' to indicate that such research shouldn't be limited to just one specific approach - be thorough).
Who knows, Clinton may have simply been ahead of his time 8-).
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
That's only 2 steps away from self-aware, right?
I know, I know...
Re: (Score:1)
I always thought it was ironic that any encryption Hollywood depends on like CSS or AACS seems to get broken so quickly. Maybe they think that it's supposed to be like that.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
ICMP Warning (Score:1)
Grammar? (Score:1)
What happened to grammar? If it was about Americans, would it read "Skynet Means More Bandwidth for American"? I wouldn't have a problem with it if it said "the British", but that is not the case. It just reads as though the last part of the sentence (which would have been 'forces') has been sliced off.
Re: (Score:2)
Isn't that the name... (Score:1)