Reflectivity Reaches a New Low 166
sporkme writes "A new nanocoating material developed by a team of researchers from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute has the lowest level of reflectivity ever seen ... or not seen in this case. The amount of light reflected by the composite of silica nanorods and aluminum nitride is almost the same amount reflected by air. From the article: 'Schubert and his coworkers have created a material with a refractive index of 1.05, which is extremely close to the refractive index of air and the lowest ever reported. Window glass, for comparison, has a refractive index of about 1.45. Using a technique called oblique angle deposition, the researchers deposited silica nanorods at an angle of precisely 45 degrees on top of a thin film of aluminum nitride, which is a semiconducting material used in advanced light-emitting diodes (LEDs). From the side, the films look much like the cross section of a piece of lawn turf with the blades slightly flattened.' Suggested applications include increased efficiency in solar cells, more energy-efficient lighting and advances in quantum mechanics."
Hey check out my new low reflective phone! (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Hey check out my new low reflective phone! (Score:5, Funny)
Ooooh! Shiny! Wait... awwwww...
And what everyone was really thinking... (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re:And what everyone was really thinking... (Score:4, Funny)
Superman: So, I see you're flying the invisible plane.
Wonder Woman: Oooh, um...er...this is...kinda embarrassing. You see...I'm actually, in the lavatory of the invisible plane.
Superman: Oh...so, you mean...right now, you're...
Wonder Woman: Yeah.
(Wonder Woman stands up and walks forwards, sitting down again and gripping the invisible steering wheel)
Superman: So...I noticed you didn't wash your hands in the invisible sink...
Re:And what everyone was really thinking... (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
I know a (substantially funnier) variant which goes pretty much like this.
Superman is flying over Metropolis and notices Wonder Woman lying naked on the rooftop of a building. Using his super-speed he fornicates her super-fast for her not to notice and flies away. Right then, Wonder Woman asks "what the hell was that?", to which the Invisible Man replies "No idea, but that did hurt my ass!".
Re: (Score:1)
That's nothing; my old pre-OS X Mac already has that feature.
Re:And what everyone was really thinking... (Score:4, Funny)
I think you mean:
What I first thought (Score:2)
Who needs Fuzz Busters!
What I first thought also (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I can see coating the surfaces of a spacecraft (thermal blankets, booms, dish, etc...) that are near the field of view of instruments sensitive to light (as many are). Glint poses a serious problem for many instruments and this could help mitigate the problem
I wonder how long it outgasses?
Actually, I was thinking... (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
That's not what I was thinking... (Score:2)
Nothing to see here... (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
And yes, I agree, not reflecting light is only part of the invisibility problem. The other part is getting light to pass through or around an object making it apear as if the object isn't there. However, In the case of search lights in the night sky or maybe infra red heat vision and maybe rada
Re: (Score:2)
We picked up on the possibility, but got way ahead of you before we posted.
The material has a variable refractive index. (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
But it will make a great coating for my stealth car... let's see the LIDAR catch me now!
Re: (Score:2)
Transparent Aluminum? (Score:4, Funny)
typed on "Keyboard, how quaint"
Re:Transparent Aluminum? (Score:4, Funny)
>
>typed on "Keyboard, how quaint"
Naw, that ship was at least visible. How about something like that ship over there. I mean that... is really bad for the eyes... I mean you can hardly make out its shape... light just seems to fall into it!
And the UI... I mean, it's the wild color scheme that freaks me. Every time you try to operate on of these weird black controls that are labelled in black on a black background, a little black light lights up black to let you know you've done it. And then it crashes into the sun! What kind of UI is this, Windows Aero?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Oh crap.... (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Finally (Score:2, Funny)
For Energy-Efficient LIGHTING? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:For Energy-Efficient LIGHTING? (Score:5, Informative)
This is how I would explain it. All these reflections are really echos of light. And when a pulse of light is fired along the fiber, it gets reflected at many interfaces, travel backward, gets reflected again and travels forward etc. Thus the single transmitted pulse arrives as multiple pulses of varying strengths and varying time differences. When a series of pulses are fired, at somepoint the echos completely overwhelm the signal. The anechoic coating will help communication, stealth aircraft etc. It might find applications in improving solar cell efficiency. But might not make your light bulb any brighter.
Re: (Score:2)
Being stealthy involves reflecting back just enough to not be suspicious. Too much or too little and it's obvious that something of interest is there.
Military contractors came up against this problem when designing stealth missiles that were supposed to skim the waves. Radar reflects off the waves & creates a certain amount of noise, but the first batch of missiles reflected nothing... which showed up as a moving black spot on the radar.
Re: (Score:2)
That wouldn't apply to aircraft though. There isn't something blocked by the airplane that reflects a radar signal. You wouldn't be able to identify the difference between the non-reflective air vs. the non-reflective aircraft using a normal radar.
In theory, you could set up something where the radar emitter is on the opposite side of the aircraft from
Re: (Score:2)
Too much of echo is the more serious problem. Not just in optical frequencies, even in plain and simple electronics. Many wireless communication devices stop working indoors due to multiple echos.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fresnel_equations [wikipedia.org]
This coating moves the light more smoothly from air's RI (1) to say window glasses (1.45) and avoids the reflections.
LEDs are made from an optically dense material (plastic) and lose a portion of their light due to internal reflection and reabsorption in the plastic or on the internal structure. I don't think it is the main source of inefficiency of LEDs though.
Re: (Score:2)
Well yes, the Sun has it's photosphere, let's start with that...um, the campfire is problematic. Actinic chemical reactions; test tube? Um, unless it's that unregistered lump of ammonium hydride I see over there. Cesium dropped into sea water? That's a light source.... golly, you're right though, I'm just having fun ...
Re: (Score:2)
However, I'm sure that's not what applies here. When light from an LED passes through a medium, some energy is absorbed, but the energy input is in a very narrow spectrum, while the energy output owing to the heating of the medium is in a broad spectrum (and at low temperatures, insignificant as far as the visible spectrum is co
stealth (Score:1)
Speedtrap evasion (Score:2)
Try painting your car with this stuff, drive past a cop shooting LIDAR, and see if you get pulled over.
FWIW, police officers are trained to aim the LIDAR at your front license plate for best results, as the retroreflective surface provides the best return. However, this can be tricky with a moving target Of course, anything that provides a sufficient reflection will usually work.
Oh my... (Score:3, Funny)
Just when you started to think it couldn't get worse...
Good way to avoid speeding tickets (Score:1, Redundant)
Link to abstract (Score:4, Informative)
Anti-reflection coatings are nothing new. Their used all the time in optics. What's new about this acts as a broadband anti-reflection coating. If this can be transferred to commercial production it would have a huge impact on optical equipment.
Extremely useful (Score:1, Redundant)
Re: (Score:1)
note to radar operators (Score:3, Funny)
Use for this stuff (Score:3, Interesting)
Strength at thickness? (Score:2)
There are plenty of applications for high-strength high-transparency (which I'm assuming is a product of lower reflectivity) materials. Heck, if they're strong enough then depending on the cost there's a decent market for them just in the vehicle-window market (especially planes, jets, submarines, ships, etc).
Re: (Score:2)
Wavelengths & military applications (Score:1, Redundant)
Re: (Score:2)
this material would do bupkus for Stealth. Radar would pass through, bounce off whatever else they make the plane out of, and then bounce right back to the receiver.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes. It will work in the very exact maner it works hiding a liquor bottle within a transparent bag.
Re: (Score:2)
That's not true. The point it is not that it absorbs light; it is that it doesn't *reflect* light. While a method not to reflect light is being black, it is not the only one: a transparent thing doesn't reflect light either. And since this material's refractive index is compared to that of glass or even thin air, you can go figure.
Re: (Score:2)
So, after all, you made me read the article. What's the good of Slashdot then?
But, after reading it, I must say no: it doesn't imply at any moment the new material absorbs light in any significant manner.
"Otherwise, it would not appear dark in the picture"
I think you mean the picture where it appears with some other objects. If you look at it carefully, the other objects are brilliant because the light
Re: (Score:2)
No. This material is non-reflexive, not light-absorbing.
Radar works by shining the equivalent of a bright light out in space, and watching for anything that shines back. Stealth works by not shining. A block of this material would also not shine, but the components that let the plane fly would shine rather brightly.
Refraction matters to cinephiles! (Score:2)
I wonder if the basecoat were of this material and the topcoat tiny (20 micron?) glass beads, would it give good results?
I figure since the beads are round and the back of the display has no reflectivity, the light from the projector wouldn't bounce back and blind you like if you were to use a mirror because the back doesn't reflect...
Re: (Score:2)
Correct me if I am wrong... (Score:2)
Sorry, wrong: (Score:5, Informative)
No.
It's caused by the curvature of light refracted by the difference in refractive index between the hot air near the sun-heated surface and the cooler air above it. The light bends back up without "touching" the underlying surface.
You only get a little bend. This is why you need a very hot surface to get enough of a bend to be visible at all. It's also why you only get it at large distances, where the line of sight is nearly parallel to the ground.
It looks like water because you look at the ground and see a a region of like of the sky's color, shimmering due to convection current - generated patches of uneven refractive index in the air rather than surface ripples.
Re:Sorry, wrong: (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
No.
1960s: "Reality is an illusion!"
2000s: "Illusion is reality!"
"History doesn't repeat, but it does rhyme." B-)
scumbags (Score:2)
Those scumbags. Worse than the RIAA and MS combined!
announcement! (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Then why have I been skipped twice?
Nanotech... (Score:2)
Of course, given that it's not descended from West African slaves, is it really black?
http://www.rawstory.com/news/2007/Colbert_questio
Great for a manager (Score:2, Informative)
What is the possibility of making a transparent door with this new material? My open door policy will still remain in effect. But my door will always remain closed. I think I will like my job again when
Well.... (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
fun subject (Score:3, Funny)
Eh, until reflectivity wakes up in a dumpster with a dead hooker, not knowing how it got there or what happened the night before, I think it could get lower.
I hope it comes in a Nikon AI-P mount... (Score:2)
The Nazis where looking for this kind of stuff (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Terribly sorry. (Score:2)
-FL
When I first saw this story. . . (Score:2)
I was rather disappointed. Though I still like being able to say that it will now be so much harder to recover if you happen to lose your marbles.
-FL
Hotblack will take 500 gallons... (Score:2)
Hotblack Desiato will love this for his new stunt ship! After he's revived from spending a year dead - for tax purposes...
Just one question (Score:2, Funny)
"Black body radiation. The development could also advance fundamental science. A material that reflects no light is known as an ideal 'black body.' No such material has been available to scientists, until now. Researchers could use an ideal black body to shed light on quantum mechanics, the much-touted theory from physics that explains the inherent 'weirdness' of the atomic realm."
HOW CAN YOU USE AN IDEAL BLACK BODY TO SHED LIGHT?
Great stuff... (Score:2, Interesting)
Perfect application (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
-nB
Re: (Score:2)
Matt Hitchens, Comp Sci, '02
Re:Refractivity? Or Reflectivity? (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Refractivity? Or Reflectivity? (Score:5, Informative)
There is reflection at a dielectric boundary. A dielectric is something that is not a metal, like glass. If you focus your eyes on a window, you can see a reflection of yourself because air and glass are dielectrics with different indices of refraction.
The amplitude of the reflected light wave for light that strikes perpendicular to the dielectric boundary is (n1 - n2)/(n1 + n2) - the "n's" are indices of refraction. For a boundary between air and this stuff, the reflection is (1.05 - 1.0) / (1.05 + 1.0) = (0.05/2.05) = 1/41. Compare with glass, with an index of 1.4: (1.4 - 1.0) / (1.4 + 1.0) = 0.4/2.4 = 1/6. (The difference in intensity is the square of this, though, which diminishes the difference.)
The equation for non-normal incident light is more complicated*, but even light that is a long way off normal incidence reflects by about the same amount. It's only when you start approaching 90 degrees off normal that a dielectric boundary starts reflecting lots of light. Try it with a large window pane: you have to get your head right up there and view something with a glancing reflection to see it clearly.
They're saying that they can coat a semiconductor, like an LED or a photovoltaic cell, with this stuff. Then about (1/6 - 1/41) more light either strikes the PV, or leaves the clear stuff that surrounds the LED.
This will not work as well as a magnesium fluoride coating for lenses, though. That kind of antireflective coating relies on destructive interference with the reflected light from the two dielectric boundaries, which is why they only work at a certain wavelength.
* Google "reflected light at a dielectric boundary" for the gory details.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
I believe that there are three things that can happen when radiation encounters an object:
a) Reflect
b) Absorb
c) Pass through
In the case of "solar power", it strikes me that there is another application aside from PhotoVoltaic that could benefit from lower reflectivity, and that is solar thermal. I would think that surfaces designed to absorb solar thermal energy, such as solar water heaters, or solar concentrating power systems,
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
There are 10 types of people, those who don't have a life and put binary tricks in there sig, and 9 other enjoying the many suprises of life.
Re:How to tell an engineer from a scientist (Score:2)
fatty red stripe.
The engineer put on the stripe.
The scientist noticed it was easy to find if it was set on a sheet of white paper.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Umm the reflectivity of black paint is listed here..
Look about halfway down the page at table 2. Black paint is listed.
http://www.concretethinker.com/Papers.aspx?DocId=
Re: (Score:2)
Sacrifice the Chicken.