New Mars Discoveries 109
sighted writes "The fleet of five active spacecraft examining Mars (in addition to the recently-missing Mars Global Surveyor) have been working overtime. On the heels of last week's finding of possible flows of liquid water, the ESA has announced that an entire hidden landscape exists just beneath the surface of the Red Planet, and NASA has released some really amazing images of layered topography that will yield many clues to the history of this strange world."
I won't believe it until confirmed (Score:4, Funny)
Re:I won't believe it until confirmed (Score:5, Funny)
New vacation destination (Score:3, Funny)
Smal print: Please bring your own O2, water etc.
Don't worry. (Score:1)
I bet it's caramel. (Score:4, Funny)
Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Awesome! (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Awesome! (Score:5, Insightful)
I don't mean to belittle NASA's achievements, but to simply say "The US won the space race" is disingenuous.
disingenuous (Score:2)
>say "The US won the space race" is disingenuous.
Well, come on now. We did it with a free society and a decent
respect for life. And you have to admit, our stuff worked better
(at least back then
The Soviets built freakin Titanium submarines too. Could go
deeper (reportedly) than any of ours. That's more of a testament
to a completely government-owned economy that didn't have to worry
about cost and democratic politics than to fine enginee
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
The Soviets had to worry about cost just as much as the Americans did. Just because it was a planned economy doesn't mean that you have an unlimited l
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
>wonderful The United States is from an early age
>but you could do with a little more skepticism.
Well, you don't know much, then. The educator
class likes to play at being bohemian rebels,
so most are "taught" the opposite.
>A free society? Millions of you are prisoners of
>an economy, nothing more.
Bizarre. I'll just remind you we're talking about
the freakin Soviet Union and leave it at that.
(Of course, this is Slashdot, so you probably weren't
Re: (Score:1)
But we're not talking about the "free society and a decent respect for life race". We're talking about the "space race".
Indeed, it is argued by some that the "space race", as far as it had a tendancy to focus on planting flags rather than useful exploration and science, was a distraction from the "free society and a decent respect for life race".
Depends on how one defines "better". Russian t
Re: (Score:1)
Well the USSR had a program underway to go to the Moon. Once we did it they shut down the program. Sounds an awful lot like what someone might do if they were in a race and lost and there was no 2nd place prize.
Re: (Score:2)
The Space Race is the race to get self-sustaining human habitations (whether something akin to L5 colonies, terraformed planets or moons, or whatever) in space before civilization collapses down here (from either internal or external forces) to the point where we'll never be able to try it again.
Nobody has won it. Currently we're not even close, and we may even be losing ground.
Re: (Score:1)
Do it like the good old days when colonizing the states, send criminals to
Re: (Score:1)
Deep down, I also believe there are other intelligent lifeforms in the universe. But if they're really so prevalent in the billions of stars that make up the Milky Way, why don't we have any proof?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Then there's the issue of gain. Our civilization's transmissions currently reach only about 50 LY (give or take an order of magnitude depending on what sort of technology you allow for to strip the wheat from the chaff). And they're decreasing, not increasing, as we move from "broadcasts" to more focused, higher bandwidth methods (satelli
Re: (Score:2)
If we've really been listening for 100 years (we haven't -- unintentionally broadcasting that long maybe, but only listening for about 40) then the size of the galaxy is irrelevant, we've only "listened to" a sphere 200 light years in diameter, 0.2% the size of the galaxy (actually, 80 ly and 0.08% at best, in reality much less).
Start worrying if we haven't heard fr
Re: (Score:1)
There are some other great, related pages on space exploration and some possibilities that apparently should have arisen in the time that the Milky Way and complex elements existed:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Von_Neumann_probe [wikipedia.org] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bracewell_probe [wikipedia.org] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_colonization [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
The thing is, all of that is based on assumptions that we have no bloody clue about.
From so-far-observed evidence, we're the only technological species in the universe. This would seem to indicate that either something is wrong with the assumptions Fermi makes, or we're very unobservant. I seriously doubt that Earth contains the only life in the universe, even the only intelligent life (loosely defining intelligence to cover the numerous no
Re: (Score:1)
Actually, we've only been transmitting a sphere 200 light years in diameter, but we've been receiving a sphere that is, as-the-photon-flies, 13.7-times-two light years in diameter, at various points in the history of the universe. ( This page about the Observable Universe [wikipedia.org] talks about some values for the diameter of the universe, but it is irrelevant whether my use of 200 light years and the size of the univ
Re: (Score:1)
Well, we've actually only been listening on and off since 1960 [wikipedia.org]. But I think we haven't heard anything because we're still primitive enough to think that broadcast radio is a decent means of communication.
I know it's a sci-fi cliche that aliens can pick up our TV and radio broadcast, but it's not true. The signals are just too weak. The only things we've sent out powerful enough to reach ot
Re:Awesome! (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:1, Insightful)
If you took the value of all the novelties on that page and others that can be legitimately attributed to NASA you'd be hard pressed to pay for one shuttle flight ($1B), let alone the $20B/Year that NASA has budgeted, or the half-trillion dollars over the last 25 years (wild-ass guess.)
Don't get me wrong, I'm pro-NASA, but I prefer to offer legitimate points in my support of it's missions. It's a massive, thinly-veiled subsidy for Lockheed and Boeing, not a great innovation-driver.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Nope, and I bet it doesn't mean anything to anyone else that can spell, either.
Odd pictures... (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1, Offtopic)
The Martians don't really need human marines; you didn't think that asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter happened by accident, do you?
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, I will.. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Space creatures or Martian creatures. Pick one.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
And just where do you think Mars is located?
Re: (Score:2)
Pretty much the same place Earth is located, give or take a few million miles.
I've always wanted to call myself a "space creature"!
I didn't know satellites had a schedual (Score:1, Funny)
Re: (Score:1, Insightful)
Why do so many /.'ers find it necessary to pick apart every post to the point of idiocy?
Re: (Score:1)
Re:I didn't know satellites had a schedual (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Surprising! (Score:5, Funny)
And the "hidden tunnel" link in the article didn't point to doom 3 screenshots, slashdot impresses yet again.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Surprising! (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
White dolphins discovered in Hellas Basin! (Score:5, Funny)
But maybe someday after Mars is terraformed* we'll have genetically engineered recreations that have the manufacturer's logo blazed on their flanks who swim along boats and squeak helpful shopping tips at the tourists.
Stefan
* By Halliburton, so bring a respirator.
Re: (Score:2)
When we do begin to explore and colonize Mars we need to keep the profiteering parasitical corporations out of it.
Please god, let us have a world without greed and advertising.
Re: (Score:2)
Obviously, because Governments can do it SO MUCH better!
Waitaminnit....
Re:White dolphins discovered in Hellas Basin! (Score:4, Insightful)
It's funny, people viewing corporations as the answer to high launch costs, when it's corporations that currently run the show.
If what people actually mean is "smaller startups", they should read about the staggering non-success smaller startups have historically had with rocketry.
That doesn't mean that the business world won't give us "the way forward". SeaLaunch hasn't done half-bad, and I keep an eager eye toward the progress of SpaceX's Falcon. But this isn't "something new". It's just the latest iteration of a long, ongoing process.
Corporations and Profit (Score:1)
A private corp that does charity is illegal in eyes of law and hence would be disbanded.
If the law is stupid enough to enforce profit-making as the ONLY permitted activity of a private corporation, then we can't blame the corporations for their predatory instincts because they are exactly doing what the law charteted them to do.
Doing anything beyond this which does NOT make a profit, is illegal in eyes of law and makes the man
Re: (Score:2)
Also if a corporation is founded with the goal of not maximizing profits and makes it clear to prospective stockholders, it would also be legal though they might not be able to sell much stock.
Re: (Score:1)
yep, because the best way to bring down the cost of space exploration is by keeping the corporations out. Corporate greed, together with competition, is the only way to bring down the costs of space exploration, like it or not. Today the corporations run the show, although not directly, but by getting polititians to do their bidding. Competition is non existent in todays government spending.
What we need is polititians that represent the people, not puppets of the corporations. But the only way way to get
Most of this isn't new... (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Most of this isn't new... Actually, it is. (Score:2, Interesting)
It's a fairly old _idea_, but there have been all kinds of ideas. I follow the Mars news fairly closely, not super-closely, and this is the first time I've seen what amounts to proof of buried craters. That's why people are excited, I think. Not because nobody ever had the idea before.
Likewise with the layered deposits. Yes, those have been found before, but they were on a much smaller scale. These vast, flat, deposits really suggest ocean sedimentation over millions of years. (Suggest. Far from pro
just think (Score:5, Insightful)
Really impressive technology being used here. Kudos to those who make it happen.
Re: (Score:2)
I believe it's canals you're thinking of. And cool, gazing intelligence that travels in lighting bolts, etc. But that would still be good for funding!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
how mind blowing it would have been if the sub-surface radar showed roads or infrastructure of a previous existance... It would have turned the way funding is for space all around, as well as change text books all over the world.
Really impressive technology being used here. Kudos to those who make it happen.
All this crater stuff, that's just what they want you to think. That's just one of their kid's art project in photoshop. The real pictures would really blow your mind! :-P
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
evidence (Score:1, Funny)
Where's Helium? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
J.C.
overtime pay for robot workers? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Why?
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:overtime pay for robot workers? (Score:4, Insightful)
Not quite true. They need to eat, sleep and shit - just not in the "biological" fashion that we carbon based life-forms do.
It is well known that;
A.) The Mars rovers are often limited in the amount of work they can perform due to light availability (food).
B.) The rovers must also transmit data back to the earth (shit).
C.) When power is limited due to lack of light, they must cease all science operations (sleep).
I would say that both of these rovers do in fact have a workday, and that it is much harder than most of the folks here on Earth would care to imagine...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
id say its more like giving of heat. Stuff it dose not want and needs to get rid off.
Sending data back to earth, thats just time/money wasting by the water cooler chit chat
But can they see... (Score:1)
jks =P
Duh (Score:2, Funny)
Interesting discovery... (Score:3, Interesting)
1) put enough sediment into the atmosphere to cover the entire surface,
2) put larger rocks into orbit which eventually decayed and came back down to form the rock-strewn surface we are accustomed to seeing, possibly forming some of the ounger crater impact sites, and
3) blocked out sunlight, killing off any shred of life on the planet at the time of the event
"How" this could come to pass is the first thing that pops into my mind - no speculation in the article though which I always enjoy hearing from NASA.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
w00t! (Score:2)
Now, there's where all the action may take place: on the rock bottom, under the ocean of dust.
What's next: we'll dig out live macroscopic, big, crawling and wiggling animals that live in the Martian soil near geo...thermal heat sources?
We need sensitive geo...phones sent up there ASAP to detect if there is any characteristic sounds of moving.
OK, I need a help here: when word has prefix "geo", should it be substituted if it is applied to other planets?
Theres a good article in Sci Am this month (Score:3, Insightful)
My own belief is that Mars slowly lost its atmosphere due to its low gravity and poor magnetic field and as the air pressure went down it was easier and easier for water to evaporate until at some point the pressure got to the point where the boiling point of water had dropped to below the ambient temperature of the planet and that was the end of the lakes/seas if there were any still around by then. Once in the atmosphere the water was dissociated into hydrogen and oxygen, the H2 escaped and the O2 reacted with whatever was around producing the rusty landscape we see today.
With Apologies to Wells (Score:3, Interesting)
Richard C. / C2C AM (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Moo (Score:1)
Of course, to get to the hidden landscape you have to go to the fake water stream, and travel forward one step, then backwards one step, while holding down the acceleration pedal, and jump towards the center of the hole.
Total Recall? (Score:1)
Now we just need to Rovers to find the alien control room and start melting the ice.