Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 


Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror
×
Science News

Archeologists Uncover Mayan Mural in Guatemala 25

Posted by samzenpus from the older-than-you-thought dept.
OakDragon writes "Archeologists have found a 2,000 year old Mayan mural at a San Bartolo site in northern Guatemala. The mural itself is quite beautiful, and especially impressive as it predates what is considered to be the classical Mayan period by hundreds of years. Says William Saturno, "It was like discovering the Sistine Chapel if you didn't know there had been a Renaissance.""
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Archeologists Uncover Mayan Mural in Guatemala More

Archeologists Uncover Mayan Mural in Guatemala

Comments Filter:

  • Yikes! (Score:3, Funny)

    by daeley ( 126313 ) on Wednesday December 14, 2005 @08:58PM (#14260831) Homepage
    "The story starts with this deity, who is patron of kings, standing in water. He's running a large spear through his own penis, letting blood. Blood is squirting all over the place," Saturno said.

    Somehow I don't see the Catholics letting Michelangelo go down this particular path. ;D
  • ...condsidering that when the Western world discovered the "new" world, we pretty much trashed (not even intentionally - just being germ carriers) everything native we encountered for the next 200 years. The biggest gaps in our knowledge of Western history tend to be after a "barbarian" invasion, a plauge, flood, a library burning and sacking, etc. - so is it suprising that our knowledge of the history of the Americas is even more sparse?

    On the bright side, there may still be other amazing discoveries lurk
    • I would rather said that germs were quite slow catching after Holy Inquisition or good old fellow Cortes (not counting innumerable other conquistadors in the broad sense, starting with Joshua Ben-Nun).
    • "Anthro departments are taking some major financial hits lately."

      That's a shame, because if your Anthro department went 12-0 and went to a bowl game that would bring in a lot of needed funds... That's where the money is, Bowl games and poll results...

    • condsidering that when the Western world discovered the "new" world, we pretty much trashed (not even intentionally - just being germ carriers)

      Europeans trashed the new world quite intentionally: the Catholic church in particular deliberately and methodically destroyed religious writings, murals, and other records.
  • I predict many tumbleweeds blowing through this story.
  • It is an interesting find, however, I must say that my interest would be greatly heightened if there was an actual picture of what they found.

    Humbug!

  • sad (Score:1)

    by TheClam ( 209230 )
    It really is quite beatiful. It's a shame that "nerds" don't think this "matters."
  • I am surprised at how certain they seem about the interpretations of the mural. I was imagining the painting as they described the interpretation and the painting that my imagination came up with had multiple intreptations.

    Maybe they're right, but how do they get so sure?

    Maybe they even have good reason to be sure, but it wasn't in the article. If anyone can tell me where to look to see if they really know, or if the intrepetation is just speculation, I'd appreciate it.
    • It says that there are words there, some of which the scholars can read.
      • I understand that, but I read both the Chicago Tribune and the National Geographic article, and I didn't get the impression from either one that they were really reading a narrative, but mostly intrepeting the pictures.
        I just re-read the NG article, and got the same impression, but can't read the Chicago article anymore.
        I guess I still need to find another source that will tell me just how much of what they are reading into this is speculation.

        • Re:Certainty? (Score:3, Interesting)

          by Descalzo ( 898339 )
          From the Chicago Tribune:

          The mural proves that these stories of creation and kings--and the elaborate writing and art to tell them--were well-established more than 2,000 years ago, centuries earlier than previously believed.

          That's the best I could come up with. It makes it sound like there's writing to back up the art. Still, as I reread your posts, it makes me wonder the same thing: How do they really know?

          Especially when you consider that there is so much we don't know, how certain can they be?

          P.S

Slashdot Top Deals

As you will see, I told them, in no uncertain terms, to see Figure one. -- Dave "First Strike" Pare

Close