Space Penguin Could Hop Around The Moon 185
notdanielp writes "A robotic Lunar Penguin explorer could be hopping around on the moon by 2009, said Raytheon on Tuesday, as it unveiled the concept lander at an aerospace conference.
The unmanned lunar device, in development for two years, is 3 feet tall and weighs approximately 230 pounds. It "hops" by reigniting small propulsion engines ... President Bush last year refocused the space program on sending people to the moon, Mars and beyond. Raytheon said the Penguin could be a robotic precursor to future manned space missions and that it was being proposed to NASA."
You KNEW this was coming (Score:5, Funny)
Re:You KNEW this was coming (Score:5, Funny)
Re:You KNEW this was coming (Score:2)
Re:You KNEW this was coming (Score:2)
NASA uses battle-tested Wind River UNIX (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:NASA uses battle-tested Wind River UNIX (Score:2)
Furthermore... (Score:2)
For that matter... (Score:2)
Only if... (Score:2)
Of course it does (Score:3, Funny)
If the penguins were ru
Re:You KNEW this was coming (Score:2)
This must the long awaited golden thread. The one thread to bind them all. The one thread to rule the world.
Whoa (Score:1, Funny)
Moon Hopper from TV Century 21 (Score:2)
Perhaps it looks like the Moon hooper from Captain Scarlet and the Mysterons [tvcentury21.com] made by Century 21 [tvcentury21.com] (Not the real-estate people).
Great (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Great (Score:2)
As opposed to a penguin that had just stuffed itself with herring, you would prefer a penguin that had just gotten laid [sjbaker.org]?
(Well, maybe you do, but it's not politic, so maybe you shouldn't.)
There's an entire book, in fact ... (Score:2)
ill avoid the linux jokes... (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:ill avoid the linux jokes... (Score:1)
Re:ill avoid the linux jokes... (Score:5, Informative)
It's only called the Penguin because it was originally designed to explore the south pole of the moon to search for ice.
Penguins are native only to the Antarctic region (near the South Pole) here on Earth.
I don't know where they are native to on other planets.
Re:ill avoid the linux jokes... (Score:4, Informative)
Re:ill avoid the linux jokes... (Score:2)
And you're right, there could never be anything cooler than a penguin with a mullet... unless it also had a cameltoe.
Re:ill avoid the linux jokes... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:ill avoid the linux jokes... (Score:2, Funny)
Penguins with porkchop sideburns, but that's about it.
Re:ill avoid the linux jokes... (Score:2)
Re:ill avoid the linux jokes... (Score:2, Funny)
Teacher: WHY IS THE NETWORK DOWN? I CANNOT SEE ANY GRADES, MY EMAIL, OR INFECT THE SCHOOL NETWORK TODAY!
Jimmy: It was me teacher.
Teacher: Jimmy, what did you do!
(IT guy running in with a burned up server held by those tongs from chemistry)
IT Guy: We've located why the network has slowed down. *gulp* We've been slashdotted
Teacher: Not, not, but...
IT Guy: It was.
Teacher: JIMMY YOU ARE GOING TO THE ADMINISTRATOR AND CLEANING UP THIS MESS, AND I DON'T MEAN T
Re:ill avoid the linux jokes... (Score:2)
Penguins with herrings?
Re:ill avoid the linux jokes... (Score:2)
I did:
Penguin? Sounds a lot more like a blast-ended skrewt [wikipedia.org] to me.
Re:ill avoid the linux jokes... (Score:2)
Re:ill avoid the linux jokes... (Score:2)
Re:ill avoid the linux jokes... (Score:2)
"Hoboken?!?! Ooooh, I'm dying!" - Bugs Bunny
Because swimming is so convenient on the moon (Score:2)
Please, make it slide around on its belly instead.
Re:ill avoid the linux jokes... (Score:2)
Speaking of Linux Jokes (Score:5, Funny)
A: Maggots love open sores.
To the moderators: This post could be considered to be Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, or Offensive. Please moderate +1 Funny... understanding that we all need to laugh at ourselves and few bad puns ever once in awhile
Re:ill avoid the linux jokes... (Score:2)
Originally it was going to be marching lemmings, but jumping penguins is so much cooler!
Trademark (Score:1)
Re:Trademark (Score:1)
Which weapon, now? (Score:5, Funny)
Just curious what booster-powered hopping weapons system Raytheon has been working on lately, and if they have lasers strapped to their heads or what.
Re:Which weapon, now? (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Which weapon, now? (Score:2)
Sharks get lasers strapped on their heads.
Penguins get missiles strapped to their backs.
Let's not confuse our movie villains.
Re:Which weapon, now? (Score:2)
No word if it runs Linux, though.
Name for the Machine? (Score:5, Funny)
Lunar Terrestrial Unmanned Excursion.
Lunar TUX
Huh? (Score:3, Insightful)
We were able to do manned moon landings for almost 40 years ago; has our know-how diminished, or are we just less determined than we used to be?
Answer... (Score:1)
http://techsupt.winbatch.com/webcgi/webbatch.exe?
Any further questions?
Re:Answer... (Score:2, Informative)
Yes, did you check your link with Snopes.com? A simple search yields:
http://www.snopes.com/language/document/1895exam.h tm [snopes.com]
Re:Answer... (Score:2)
Re:Huh? (Score:3, Insightful)
Seriously though, I think the somewhat hair-brained presidential directive involves building a base there. Stands to reason a "jump jet" vehicle would be useful in that.
And finally, to get on my soap box: A lunar outpost and manned martian exploration really isn't that bad of an idea. Sure, they are arbitrary goals that could be done via robotics, but so was landing on the Moon in the first place. Its not l
Re:Huh? (Score:2)
We can build modular components on earth, assemble and launch from the moon. Hypothetically, we can even field extraterrestrial materials retrieved from foreign bodies on the moon before cleari
Re:Huh? (Score:2)
NASA now realizes that they can send a lot more robots into space than humans. It's more cost effective and it's safer. Of course humans will probably be needed down the road for exploration but it's not cheap.
Someone's gotta do it... (Score:2, Funny)
Keep the peace(es).
Re:Someone's gotta do it... (Score:3, Informative)
Affordable? (Score:5, Interesting)
See how much great stuff comes out of military research? This is why all you tech-happy people should support increased military funding, instead of something so silly as direct funding of research.
Seriously, this is much more affordable only because we've already paid for the research. That's like a waiter saying, "Your meal will be 10% off, because you gave us the chicken we made it out of."
It's great that we can apply some of our military tech to space / lunar exploration. But don't say it's more affordable just because we already paid for it.
Re:Affordable? (Score:3, Insightful)
Seriously, this is much more affordable only because we've already paid for the research.Not entirely. It can also be more affordable if the manufacturing processes for these tactical weapons technologies are already active. Which is cheaper, a production run off of an existing assembly line or building a new factory and then doing a single run?
Re:Affordable? (Score:2)
But, there's also some consideration as to whether designing around existing components can be more expensive. Sometimes a top-down design, even with limited production runs, can be cheaper to manufacture. Hopefully not in this case, if it was designed well.
Re:Affordable? (Score:2)
Re:Affordable? (Score:2)
Russian rovers still hold traverse record (Score:5, Informative)
Of course many of us would like to see dozens of rovers crawling all over the planets and moons. The cost of the International Space Station would have funded over 200 rovers.
Re:Russian rovers still hold traverse record (Score:2)
Re:Russian rovers still hold traverse record (Score:2)
Re:Russian rovers still hold traverse record (Score:2)
The value of the mission is directly proportional to the amount of scientific enlightenment derived from it, not the mileage on the odometer.
Damn movie sequels (Score:5, Funny)
"March of the Penguins 2: Electric Boogaloo: In Space"
..Obligatory online game link. (Score:2)
http://www.bigideafun.com/penguins/arcade/spaced_
A classic.
The Joker (Score:1)
-not steve miller
Comment removed (Score:3, Funny)
"In your face, Space Penguin!" (Score:1)
Smoke 'Em Out (Score:1, Troll)
Re:Smoke 'Em Out (Score:2)
Re:Smoke 'Em Out (Score:2)
You should wonder more about why you don't understand that my post is passionate and angry because Bush is a total catastrophe. I'm g
You have to wonder... (Score:4, Funny)
TOP 5 NAMES SUGGESTED BY RAYTHEON ENGINEERS BEFORE THEIR PR DEPT TOOK OVER:
Re:You have to wonder... (Score:2)
You mean Fartoo Detoo?
March of Penguins... (Score:2)
jumping around (Score:2, Interesting)
Also, we are not looking for life in the moon, we already have lunar rocks, what the point of jumping around the moon?
We should a) get a cheap and reliable way to get to space b) build a base on the moon and explore other planets.
March of the Lunar Pengiuns (Score:2, Funny)
Coming with face melting lasers to a theater near you.
Damn them... (Score:2)
PDA & Smartphone Optimized Sites [mobileoptimized.com]
Replacing my laptop with a Treo [mobileoptimized.com]
Re:Damn them... (Score:2)
Re:Damn them... (Score:2)
PDA & Smartphone Optimized Sites [mobileoptimized.com]
Replacing my laptop with a Treo [mobileoptimized.com]
It's a ploy. (Score:2, Funny)
Scene in the Oval Office: (Score:4, Funny)
Scientist: "Mr. President, we have a number of new designs for our next Mars probe. Utilizing various state of the art metallurgy processes and the most advanced..."
Bush: "Can the scientologist mumbo jumbo, Doc."
Scientist: "::sigh:: This one looks like a penguin."
Bush: "Ooh, a penguin? Heh heh, I like penguins. Approved!"
you forgot the line.. (Score:4, Funny)
Scientist: "::sigh::"
More desctiptive name for the probe... (Score:2)
Sound like they should call it the "Barking Spider" lander.
Did Someone Say Spaced Penguin!? (Score:2)
Where was Raytheon in 1991? (Score:4, Interesting)
We did a study of the tankage sizing changes required and a few other features and actually got some quotes back from some of the contractors. It would have been a relatively cheap mission, about the same as a geostationary satellite launch.
I don't recall whether Raytheon was one of the contractors we contacted for pricing.
Space Batman to Follow (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Hah, space penguins (Score:2, Funny)
No. Wait..
No pictures? (Score:3, Informative)
I know penguins, and that, sir, is no penguin.
Exclusive first pics! (Score:3, Funny)
Use them as a base precursor... (Score:2)
I don't know how much these things can carry, but let's say they can carry 100 pounds/50 kilograms. Why not build a couple dozen or a hundred or so, pack each one with 50 kilos of consumables (ice, dried food, medical supplies, etc) and stagger-launch them so that they land in roughly the same area. Also equip them with the means of "homing" on each others' signals, and let them "swarm" together, maybe set them to swarm to the first one to land safely. It might take
Reminds me of some tank mines I saw in the 80ies.. (Score:2)
Re:Not (Score:5, Insightful)
Would throwing another billion at the problem have changed the outcome? No. Sorry, I despise Bush as much as the next guy but at a certain point, the "bush sucks" rhetoric gets old.
Re:Not (Score:2, Insightful)
Where did I say he did?
Would throwing another billion at the problem have changed the outcome? No. Sorry, I despise Bush as much as the next guy but at a certain point, the "bush sucks" rhetoric gets old.
What anti-Bush rhetoric? The article summary said Bush had re-focused on the moon,mars and beyond. I simply pointed that Bush had cut NASA spending, which is a fact.
Neither did I suggest spending more money on
Re:Not (Score:2)
But he hasn't cut NASA spending [space.com]. It went up from $16.2 billion in 2004-5 to $16.45 billion in 2005-6. That might not have kept up with inflation, but it's not a cut.
Re:If money stays the same and things cost more (Score:2)
Re:Not (Score:2)
That point will be when there are no more Bushes in the White House. That means you too, JEB.
-Colin [colingregorypalmer.net]
Re:Not (Score:2)
Actually I think the "next guy" despises Bush more if the rhetoric hasn't gotten old for him yet.
Credit the President (Score:5, Interesting)
President Bush also cut NASA funding. They can't even get the shuttle into space without it falling to bits, despite a $1bn re-fit.
The fact that we are even debating the post shuttle/ISS space program is a credit to President Bush. The 'failure' to fix the space shuttle is illusory. The shuttle performs consistent with its design. It's just that the design can never be safer than 1 failure in 100 launches. First it was the SRB O-rings, then frayed wiring, and latest ET foam. If it keeps flying some other problem will reveal itself.
ET foam failure rate way up. (Score:2, Insightful)
But nobody in DC wants to talk about killing astronauts to 'save the ozone'.
Re:Space Penguin... (Score:2, Informative)
Better luck next time.
The irony... (Score:2)
Re:Going to the Moon is pointless (Score:2)
The original intent of the space program was to open another "front" in the Cold War. The USSR spent billions trying to beat us to the moon, which undoubtedly play a part in their economic collapse.
We no longer have the Cold War to drive us to the moon, and the moon doesn't have any real appeal from an economic point of view. It has no raw materials to be mined, no strategic value, no real purpose to be there.
I'm for space
Re:Going to the Moon is pointless (Score:2)
(f) has lower escape velocity than LEO
As I just pointed out, there's nothing on the moon. What good is the low gravity of the Moon if everything that you're lifting off of the Moon had to be lifted off Earth to be brought there in the first place?