Strong Emotions May Cause Temporary Blindness 367
Iphtashu Fitz writes "Ever been watching tv when a violent image comes on the screen and you don't even notice that somebody just entered the room? You've just encountered something known as emotion-induced blindness. Psychologists at Vanderbilt and Yale Universities have determined that people can suffer short periods of blindness, up to 1/2 a second in length, immediately after seeing highly emotional images. By displaying a series of images for 1/10 of a second each they were able to determine that test subjects couldn't identify images shown immediately after very erotic or gory images. You can try this out for yourself at the flash-based test site they have set up which also contains more details of the experiments."
goaste.cx? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:goaste.cx? (Score:2)
Re:goaste.cx? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:goaste.cx? (Score:2)
You might get hairy palms, but, no you won't go blind.
Re:goaste.cx? (Score:3)
This explains my random moderating -- I get so worked up by some posts that I can't see what moderation I'm enacting!
Situational awareness (Score:5, Interesting)
The failure to attend to or notice changes in your environment due to more traffic in cortical associative areas is not surprising really, and has long been known by cognitive scientists working with Air Force pilots. The more tasks required or stress induced upon a situation will degrade attentive performance and result in missing changes introduced into the environment.
For all you gamers out there, this is sort of an intuitive concept, right? How many times have you missed the doorbell, telephone or significant other trying to get ahold of you in the middle of a Doom/Marathon/Unreal fragfest? You increase the number of participants (and thus tasks to attend to) and you decrease your situational awareness of your immediate surroundings.
Re:Situational awareness (Score:5, Funny)
I never miss my significant other. I frag her all the time, DIE BIATCH lol lol 5h3 iz 5o l4/v\3 lol pWn3d a64iN!!!!
Re:Situational awareness (Score:2)
Re:Situational awareness (Score:2)
It does, however, explain the phrases like 'blind rage'.
I'm guessing that the mind is 'stopping' to process full information out of the shocking image -- which means that processing of subsequent information is minimal/lost.
Why not "blindness'? (Score:2)
"Hysterical blindness" is an accepted term for a condition where the physical parts are working but the processing is either not happening or not being accepted by whatever accepts vision. And how about those poor "stripe-blind" kittens that were reared with not
Re:Why not "blindness'? (Score:5, Insightful)
Yes, but they also use the term in their peer reviewed paper in addition to the popular press articles.
"Hysterical blindness" is an accepted term for a condition...
Situational awareness.
And how about those poor "stripe-blind" kittens that were reared with nothing but strong vertical or horizontal lines...
That is a form of "cortical blindness" that is real and has to do with developmental defects in the visual pathways.
Obviously, the next step is to see whether the inputs briefly shut down, or if the input is ignored because of a rush of brain activity.
$100 says it is the latter and if I were reviewing this paper, I would suggest just that experiment prior to acceptance for publication.
Re:Why not "blindness'? (Score:2)
Re:Why not "blindness'? (Score:5, Insightful)
It's kind of like how people like to use "stealing" to describe copyright infringement -- they're superficially similar, but not synonymous.
Generally, things should be referred to by the term that accurately describes them. Why else would we have different words to describe different things?
Re:Why not "blindness'? (Score:2)
Except that it's not "unable to see." It's "unable to notice."
And Joe Sixpack already knows that it's extremely easy to miss something when he's intensley emotional.
Re:Situational awareness (Score:4, Funny)
Also known as... (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Situational awareness (Score:3, Funny)
Those fucker doctors that my mom took me too when I was 13 were liars. They called what you speak of ADD. Put me on Ritalin for nothing. Th
Blindness (Score:2)
Re:Blindness (Score:5, Interesting)
The classic demonstration of low level versus high level functionality has to do with something called a "true cortical blindness". In these cases, trauma or stroke (whatever) that damages occipital cortex may in some rare cases render a person functionally blind. However, when you throw a ball at them, strangely, they are able to catch it. Obviously there is some visual function related to vision taking place. What is happening here is that the tectum or visual centers in the brainstem whose functionality is orienting to place and timing are perfectly intact. However, visual centers related to conscious perception of what is being seen are damaged. All other visual pathways are intact.
Psychopath detector...? (Score:2)
(I've heard psychopathy referred to as 'a fear deficit disorder'. Something I've often felt as if I may have a borderline case of. Its saved my ass many times
Re:Psychopath detector...? (Score:2)
Wow, yeah you are right. I couldn't see the second 'mountain'!
BEER GOOGLES (Score:2)
I use what got me into that mess to get me out. I find that grabbing your pants, screaming FIRE FIRE!!!! and escaping in the ensuing confusing works best. She's looking for the fire your looking for the door. Any stage magician would understand. Also any current bachelor.
Re:Situational awareness (Score:2)
Chill dude. Actually, I thought the smiley took care of it and revealed my comment to be the good natured ribbing that it was. In our neuroscience program the psychologists and basic neuroscientists (yes, there is some overlap) are always getting playful digs in at one another. No big deal, eh?
BTW, chances are a good many of those "cogniti
On Slashdot? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:On Slashdot? (Score:5, Funny)
Goatse? (Score:2)
erotic? (Score:2)
Proof at long last! (Score:3, Funny)
VBScript (Score:5, Funny)
Re:VBScript (Score:2)
That web server is certainly going to experience.. (Score:2)
This explains some "eyewitness" problems (Score:5, Insightful)
Witnesses to a crime often have problems remembering what happened after a traumatic event, to the extent that they often give conflicting accounts of which direction a suspect fled. This research indicated that they might not have processed that information because of the emotional overload.
Re:This explains some "eyewitness" problems (Score:2)
I couldn't say whether I pulled ahead slightly after the accident and shut off the car, or if the other car just bumped me out of the way. I was later able to infer the latter by the way my tire was damaged. When t
Re:This explains some "eyewitness" problems (Score:3, Interesting)
I do remember waiting for the impact, t
Re:This explains some "eyewitness" problems (Score:4, Interesting)
The effect can last longer than 0.5 secs (Score:2)
if I had known (Score:2, Funny)
WHY DIDNT ANYONE TOLD ME BEFORE!
So it's true... (Score:3, Funny)
Is this similar.... (Score:2)
Dear god (Score:2)
Moving too fast (Score:2)
Re:Moving too fast (Score:2)
Jokes aside, I like how you just know these things, your a scientist right? Note the multiple trials where they rearranged the order of the pictures.
Personally, that picture of the hand stuck in my mind longer than the rest, while the ones of trees seemed to go by faster. Meh.
Re:Moving too fast (Score:2)
I saw the bloody hand quite clearly and immediately the first time I ran the test, but hardly registered any of the other 'boring' images. Still, I knew what the test was about, so one could argue I was simply "looking for" something gory. But either way, your hypothesis that the speed of the images is the problem totally fails to explain the actual, measured differences in awareness of different images amongst test subjects between the experiment and control image sequences. (That's the whole point of havi
Re:Moving too fast (Score:2)
Like I'm gonna click that link (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Like I'm gonna click that link (Score:2)
Not so sure about this... (Score:5, Informative)
I didn't see the target.
I replayed that thing about a dozen times before I finally caught it.
I suspect I missed it because "rotated 90 degrees" doesn't stand out enough to notice, with such complicated images and only a tenth of a second per image - Though I suppose using something like simple brightly colored shapes would tend to make the "graphic" image stand out unduly.
Anyway, once I finally spotted the target image in the last sequence, I nailed it first try in the first two sequences (the ones supposed to induce temporary blindness).
Then again, perhaps I just have a deep fear of fire hydrants, while bloody stumps don't really phase me.
Re:Not so sure about this... (Score:2)
I think a better way to read the results would be, "people have a hard time getting a solid bearing of an image in a tenth of a second." Or perhaps, "split second reactions poor among Internet users."
Re:Not so sure about this... (Score:2, Interesting)
That said, I don't think they've been exhaustive enough to support the conclusion. Sure, they've proven that people are less likely to recognize a distinctive image shortly after another distinctive image. I RTFA, and I don't see any mention of testing where, instead of violent or erotic images, they used checkerboard patterns or other emotion-neutral pictures th
Re:Not so sure about this... (Score:3, Informative)
The target picture was a sideways lighthouse.
And yes, I didn't notice the lighthouse either, even on the "control" sequence. I thought it was the tree branch with the mountain.
I agree with the parent that all this shows is it's hard to notice a side-ways image that's white with low contrast when it's only shown for 1/10th of a second.
Hmmm (Score:2, Interesting)
For the best results... (Score:2, Funny)
Guess they didn't test gamers (Score:2)
Though I could care less about the bloody hand... the picture just didn't look right. Of course it could mean I'm just not very sensitive to detached limps.
Maybe it's from too many shooters, but I'm pretty sure I could have scored a head shot there.
Try some porn next time folks!
"seeing red" (Score:3, Interesting)
I guess with age I've mellowed, as I haven't been as mad as that since losing the contest for the Slashdot Cruiser -- well, maybe since the Karma Cap was instituted... or was the last time when I saw my first Microsoft ad on Slashdot? Hmmm...
Re:"seeing red" (Score:2, Insightful)
Conflicting crime scene testimonies (Score:4, Interesting)
Might such periods of "blindness" be in part responsible for the inability of crime witnesses to recall details, and, for conflicting crime reports by witnesses.
There is the classic gambit of a law professor having a mock murder take place in front of law students to test their ability to recall details correctly. OTOH there was Aldus Huxley who, when left alone at home, would answer the door, deal with whomever was at the door, and, then return to his work without any memory of having dealt with some mundane task. A. Huxley was also able to recall, verbatim, pages of his college texts after having been given only a slight prompt.
Charles Tart in his book Altered States [amazon.com] gives a fun run down on some of the oddities of human consciousness.
I'd go further into abnormal psych... (Score:3, Interesting)
It would seem to point to a quality of selective attention, that when we attend to internal echoing i
Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Maybe, but... (Score:2)
Re:Maybe, but... (Score:5, Informative)
Image set 'B' was with the target image quickly after the hand.
Image set 'C' was with the target image in the same spot as 'B', but the hand was replaced with a fire hydrant.
C is clearly the control. Well, unless you have some sort of a hidden memory of something bad (or erotic) dealing with a fire hydrant.
Re:Maybe, but... (Score:2)
Yeah, how do you think Goatse man got his fame? The whole thing is rigged I tell ya!
I can't see a sidways building in the control test (Score:5, Insightful)
I personally think that this is a bunch of crap. Requiring a person to interpret an image that is skewed should require more mental effort then a properly oriented image and would be more difficult to process when you might already be processing a gory image and questioning just what you saw.
I would like to see the test done again, but instead of a complicated image, like a sideways building, why not use a large black arrow on a white background. I think that a simplistic object like an arrow would be easier to discern and would likely be noticed and its direction easy to determine. Would a lower processing requirement make the "blindness" less blinding?
Blindness? What about simple distraction? Carnage and nudity are probably one of the few things that would make most anyone take another look at something-- just to make sure that they were seeing what they thought that they were seeing. Other things that would make a person double-take would require a context. For example, if you are sitting in your office and a horse walks by your door... you would likely have a reaction similar to seeing gore or nudity for a split second, but you can't provide a context when flashing images, so I think gore and nudity are all you are left with to evoke a "mental double-take."
What if the image wasn't gory? What if in a series of tests they made the gory image less and less discernable, at what point would the effect be eroded? What about putting in something unexpected? Place a skewed image of something easily discernable (iconic) like a sideways Captain Crunch character or an upside down Nike Swoosh. Does an image that makes you mind work harder have the same effect. How about a word... place a misspelled or scrambled word before the sideways building... does it have the same effect? What about showing someone what the sideways building looks like before showing the clips, would that have any effect?
What leads them to attribute this to emotional response? Replace the gory image with a photo of a loved one or a cute animal, is the response the same? How do they gauge an emotional response to an image?
Maybe I am missing something, but this seems like bad science to me.
Just my $0.02 --
More obviously (Score:2)
Seems to me the problem this test proces is that in arbitrary images displayed at 1/10th of a second are virtually impossible to process in the first place, regardless of some infinitessimal "trauma" associated with the image.
Shed new lights on (Score:2)
I saw... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:I saw... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:I saw... (Score:2)
Tough test (Score:2)
Strong Emotions last only seconds (Score:2)
Very timely write-up (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Very timely write-up (Score:2)
Oh wow imagine that! (Score:2)
Thanks!
blindness during eye movement (Score:5, Interesting)
The coolest experiment used an eye tracker that painted words on the screen only where the fovea (the high resolution central portion of the retina) was looking and painted "X"s on the screen everywhere else (the low resolution bulk of the eye). Every time the subject's eye moved, the screen was redrawn to show the words where they were now looking and hide the words were they weren't looking. Subjects could read documents normally and were totally unaware that the screen was, in reality, full of "x"s except where their central field of vision happened to be pointing.
The point is that the eye & brain is not a simple pixel-based camera.
Re:blindness during eye movement (Score:3, Informative)
Yes, it's because it takes a small, but finite, amount of time for your brain to reset and reacquire its focus.
This also explains why pigeons, doves, chickens, etc. walk the way they do moving their head in fits and starts as they walk forward. The time lag for them to refocus their attention/eyes is pretty long.
It also explains another visual semi-trick or observation. People tend to blink more frequently whe
Re:blindness during eye movement (Score:3, Informative)
for example... look towards a light source (preferably not directly) and look on different sides of it. then close your eyes (for best effect) and you will be able to see the movements of your eyes in relation to the light trails. explain this one... (i dont doubt you, i would just like to know why this is, when you strongly 'argue' 'against' it)
Because the retina is still gathering information; it's just not sending it to
Re:blindness during eye movement (Score:2)
Perhaps, because I think afterimages are always present, but usually too faint to register. In theory, you could see the images if you a) closed your eyes at the exact moment the target image changed to the next, and b) were sensitive enough to see afterimages of low-brightness objects. In practice, however, a 1/10 second window and normal vision sensitivity is not sufficient
That's why people don't RTFA (Score:2, Funny)
Apple-induced blindness... (Score:2)
I must be desensitized (Score:2)
I also woke up about 2 minutes ago... the fact that I'm already on slashdot is probably more disturbing than a bloody hand.
Oh my. (Score:2)
So those peril-sensitive ... (Score:2)
Arthur, give me back my money ! [engadget.com]
masturbation causes blindness (Score:2)
I've seen it happen (Score:5, Interesting)
My brothers and I operate a chain of grocery stores in Jamaica. Two months ago, one of the small stores was invaded by four gunmen who made the staff lie on the floor, shooting three of our employees in the process; fortunately their wounds were minor. While they attempted to open the safe in the manager's office, she surreptitiously placed a cell call to the police station, which is only about 100 meters away. When the police arrived, a 45-minute shootout ensued, during which the police shot and killed two of the assailants. The police eventually teargassed the building, and when the remaining two attempted to slip out by mingling with the staff as they left, they were attacked by a large, very angry, machete-carrying mob that had gathered on the scene, and hacked into mincemeat. I really have no sympathy for the bastards, but Jesus, they died horrible, horrible deaths. When I eventually reached the store after visiting the staff at the hospital, the police were still hosing away blood and fragments of flesh.
After seeing the three injured employees being treated, I arranged for the others, who were badly traumatized, to have a counseling session, and it was heartbreaking to hear them describe the ordeal of lying on the floor for 45 minutes while a firefight raged around them. The were showered with broken glass, lying in blood, having to look at the bodies of the two dead gunmen, one of whom had had his face shot away. They didn't believe that they were going to survive. While one of the group was recounting the events to the psychologist, he started sweating profusely, I mean veritable rivers running off his face and arms, and complained suddenly that he couldn't see. He didn't respond to hands being waved in front of his face, and the psychologist assured him that he'd seen this happen before as a result of extreme stress, and that his vision would return in a few minutes. I honestly don't know if he was just spinning a line of bullshit to calm down the guy, but sure enough, his vision returned in about five minutes. Clearly he hadn't suffered any physical injury apart from some cuts and bruises, but I can only surmise that the extreme psychological stress had screwed with his brain somehow. Can anyone shed any light as to the mechanism that could have caused this?
It didn't effect me (Score:2)
Re:It didn't effect me (Score:2)
The article describes how highly emotional images affect people by effecting a temporary blindness in those that view them.
very interesting (Score:2)
Great work guys. However, I propose a new test, in the interest of science of course, with erotic images!
I must have a bad visual processor (Score:3)
Would be nice if they included a little button to go through the images slowly so I can feel sorry for myself.
hardly surprising (Score:2)
Hell, anyone that's had sex knows that your situational awareness goes to hell outside the smalle confine of the act itself.
ABC news web strategy (Score:2)
Did any other firefox users get a zedo.com popup? I hit adblock, and blocked about 20 large swathes of abc advertising.
You know, if they hadn't hijacked my computer and opened a window without my consent, then I wouldn't have had to. 0.0.0.0 zedo.com also.
pain in the ass bitches.
Simple Emotocons Better (Score:2)
or
I hate it when someone does a
on me.
Oh shppt Icamt swe
Re:Rage? (Score:2)
Re:Rage? (Score:4, Insightful)
Or rather, it confirms that these expressions actually come from somewhere. Many of the folk wisdows contained in various expressions turn out to contain at least a grain of truth once scientific research catches up with them.
Re:Rage? (Score:2)
Re:Bush Derangement Syndrome (Score:2)
Re:Bush Derangement Syndrome (Score:2)
Re:Ha ha ha stupid nerds and your nerd rage (Score:2)
Re:Ha ha ha stupid nerds and your nerd rage (Score:2)
So it's flamebait!
Re:I was put in such a violent shock that... (Score:2)
Re:Is the site safe to ... (Score:2)
Oh, apart from tubgirl in the very last pic - just kidding...
Coca-Cola is evil. (Score:3, Informative)
Reminds me of a flurry of adverts which made the rounds a couple of years back; where highly stressful social situations were depicted, (a family arguing over their teen daughter's announced pregnancy, a couple in a strained relationship having an argument, etc.), followed immediately by a product placemen