Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Space Science

Jeff Bezos's Space Company Reveals Some Secrets 240

An anonymous reader writes "Jeff Bezos's commercial spaceflight company, Blue Origin, has kept its plans secret to better compete with rivals such as Richard Branson's Virgin Galactic. But in order to build its launch facility in West Texas, it has revealed some details of its future operations: Blue Origin's Reusable Launch Vehicle (RLV) will carry three or more passengers on suborbital, ballistic trajectories to altitudes in excess of 325,000 feet above sea level. It will launch vertically and land vertically, and will use hydrogen peroxide and kerosene as propellants. It will operate autonomously under control of on-board computers, with no ground control. Blue Origin plans a maximum rate of 52 launches per year."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Jeff Bezos's Space Company Reveals Some Secrets

Comments Filter:
  • Jeff Bezos, the Amazon guy, has a space company? That's plenty of revelation for me!
    • Next: eBay (Score:5, Funny)

      by AtariAmarok ( 451306 ) on Monday June 13, 2005 @10:59AM (#12802705)
      Next thing you know, eBay will offer spaceflights, too. Just read the negative feedback carefully, and look for things like:

      "The TANG was stale"

      "Space captain farted in airlock and refused to provide refund"

      "Unsecured lunch lockers: tribbles ate my sandwich"

      "I am a smoker, and was told that smokers had to step outside during spaceflight. Do NOT buy!"

    • by Momoru ( 837801 ) on Monday June 13, 2005 @11:30AM (#12802960) Homepage Journal
      Yup...and he has already patented the "One-Click Launch Sequence"
    • Jeff Bezos, the Amazon guy, has a space company? That's plenty of revelation for me!

      It may not be as surprising as you think:

      The Blue Origin RLV would be comprised of a propulsion module and a crew capsule and would use hydrogen peroxide and kerosene as propellants.

      The RLV would launch vertically from a concrete pad and would land vertically in an area near the launch pad.

      The RLV would carry three or more passengers per operation.

      Blue Origin proposes to locate its launch facility on privately-
      • I'm not sure of the geography of Nevada or Utah, but Texas has a coast and a big gulf full of splashdown area. Of course that is only important if Blue Origin's landing sequence involves a splashdown.

        Perhaps it's because they already own the property.
        • I'm not sure of the geography of Nevada or Utah, but Texas has a coast and a big gulf full of splashdown area.

          That was my first thought as well, but upon further reflection it doesn't hold much water. (ha ha) The craft is designed for suborbital hops that involve vertical take off and landing on dry land. Without better knowing the flight profile, it's always hard to say, but it doesn't appear that this craft ever passes over water. It just goes straight up and comes back down.

          So what else is in Texas t
      • Re:Space company? (Score:4, Insightful)

        by cheesybagel ( 670288 ) on Monday June 13, 2005 @12:56PM (#12803765)
        Before Carmack started playing with rockets, there were plenty of VTVL prototypes and designs. DC-X, SASSTO, etc.

        Carmack's first attempt used an H2O2 monopropellant engine. This one uses H2O2 as oxidizer and Kerosene as propellant. It is not the same thing by a long shot. To be honest, I would have used O2 instead of H2O2 for the oxidizer (like Carmack is finally doing now). H2O2 is more expensive and decomposes into H2 and O2 easily. Too much trouble considering what it is worth. The only real bonus is that H2O2 is not cryogenic.

    • Yes but currently it is all up in the air..
  • by ChrisF79 ( 829953 ) on Monday June 13, 2005 @10:49AM (#12802596) Homepage
    I don't know about this one. "Culberson County, we have a problem" just doesn't have a good ring to it.
  • by Timesprout ( 579035 ) on Monday June 13, 2005 @10:49AM (#12802603)
    Is this actually a real venture or just a pipe dream to conveniently write tax dollars off against?
  • Price? (Score:4, Interesting)

    by MarkByers ( 770551 ) on Monday June 13, 2005 @10:49AM (#12802604) Homepage Journal
    Any idea on how much tickets are going to cost?
  • by It doesn't come easy ( 695416 ) * on Monday June 13, 2005 @10:49AM (#12802606) Journal
    Look for life insurance policies to have a new clause added to explicitly exclude coverage in the event of a spacecraft mishap (if they don't already have such a clause).
    • NASA folks have it. (Score:4, Informative)

      by Overzeetop ( 214511 ) on Monday June 13, 2005 @11:48AM (#12803135) Journal
      Not really on topic, or of any use whatsoever, but NASAs group life indurance policy (as of 10 years ago) actually did include loss of life due to space craft disaster.
    • Re:Prediction... (Score:5, Interesting)

      by rev_sanchez ( 691443 ) on Monday June 13, 2005 @11:50AM (#12803160)
      There are a few standard hospital diagnosis codes for spacecraft accidents:
      spacecraft accident ground crew
      spacecraft accident occupant
      spacecraft accident person (non-crew)
      falling in a spacecraft (I guess that means floating into something)
      and the generic spacecraft accident

      Being almost too young to remember Challenger we'd kid around about these at work until Columbia.
  • by DragonMageWTF ( 887275 ) on Monday June 13, 2005 @10:50AM (#12802618)
    will use hydrogen peroxide and kerosene as propellants. It will operate autonomously under control of on-board computers, with no ground control.

    No problems what so ever. Sounds incredibly safe to me.
    • by Timesprout ( 579035 ) on Monday June 13, 2005 @11:09AM (#12802788)
      It is, all the rocket side of the business will be subcontracted to Acme, they have been in the business for years and really know their stuff.
    • by Anonymous Coward
      Well, at least it is controlled by computers...

      Will it be running Windows for Space Flight (tm)? Having to reboot at 300,000 feet gives a whole new meaning to "blue screen of death".
  • Landing vertically (Score:5, Informative)

    by madaxe42 ( 690151 ) on Monday June 13, 2005 @10:50AM (#12802620) Homepage
    I'm assuming they mean they're going to use 'chutes to land - landing on reverse thrusters or what have you in earth's gravity well could be fairly fuel expensive, and doesn't make much sense.
    • by WolfWithoutAClause ( 162946 ) on Monday June 13, 2005 @11:04AM (#12802757) Homepage
      Actually, it's not too bad. You need about 10% of the landing weight of the vehicle to be fuel.

      However, it more or less has to be computer controlled descent; the timing is a bit critical.

      The description I heard was:

      You're coming in and you think the engines should fire soon, otherwise you're going to die.

      Then you think it's got to fire now, otherwise you're dead.

      Then you fall some more.

      Then you *know* your going to die.

      And then they fire, and then you land.

      Then you go change your trousers.

      • Reminds me of a similar joke on paratroopers who do reconnaissance missions.

        Cadet: Sir, what do we do in these four weeks of training?

        Sgt: Well, son. In the first week, we separate the men from the boys.

        Cadet: Wow, that sounds hard.

        Sgt: Yes, it is. And in the second week, we separate the real men from the fake ones.

        Cadet: This should be exciting!

        Sgt: And in the third week, we separate the real men from the fools.

        Cadet: Wow, and what's the final week for?

        Sgt: Well son, in the fourth week the
    • I'm assuming they mean they're going to use 'chutes to land - landing on reverse thrusters or what have you in earth's gravity well could be fairly fuel expensive, and doesn't make much sense.

      They'll be using cavorite.
    • by tsotha ( 720379 )
      I'm assuming they mean they're going to use 'chutes to land - landing on reverse thrusters or what have you in earth's gravity well could be fairly fuel expensive, and doesn't make much sense.

      Fuel isn't the cost driver for this kind of venture. VTOL is a great way to save on operational costs, since you can pick your exact landing spot instead of landing wherever the wind takes you. The technical challenges of vertical landing aren't insurmountable, as they've been overcome by at least three groups I ca

  • by AtariAmarok ( 451306 ) on Monday June 13, 2005 @10:51AM (#12802623)
    "Blue Origin's Reusable Launch Vehicle (RLV) will carry three or more passengers"

    As long as the passengers after the flight are reusable too, it should be a workable, safe plan. However, could we claim spaceflights under the "Amazon Prime Plan", which claims "Unlimited shipping privileges cost just $79 per year"? After all, it all boils down to being shipped by Amazon.

  • interface (Score:5, Funny)

    by justforaday ( 560408 ) on Monday June 13, 2005 @10:52AM (#12802636)
    Apparently, the interface for the vehicle will be a single button with the word "click" stenciled underneath it.
  • Sign me up! (Score:5, Funny)

    by Ridgelift ( 228977 ) on Monday June 13, 2005 @10:53AM (#12802646)
    It will operate autonomously under control of on-board computers, with no ground control.
    Sounds great! Put me on the list, with one provision: if an announcement is made that "Microsoft will partner with Blue Origin to provide software" then forget it, I'm not goin'
  • by RobertB-DC ( 622190 ) * on Monday June 13, 2005 @10:54AM (#12802664) Homepage Journal
    As a public service, here are some facts about Culberson County, Texas [culberson.tx.us].

    * The county seat is Van Horn [google.com].

    * As you can see by the satellite photo [google.com], the rugged Guadalupe Mountains meet the barren, flat Llano Estacado.

    * Culberson County includes the highest point in Texas, part of Guadalupe Mountains National Park [nps.gov].

    * Road geeks will appreciate the significance of this fact: Van Horn is the western terminus of U.S. Highway 90 [geocities.com].

    * Due to the lack of water, tourism and mining are the only sources of income. For details on how the county's 3,407 souls bide their time while waiting for the new spaceport to be built, see the Handbook of Texas Online [utexas.edu].

    And in the tongue-in-cheek words of singer-songwriter Brian Burns [coquet-shack.com]:

    Welcome to Texas,
    Don't anybody get me wrong;
    We're glad y'all came to see us,
    Just don't forget to go back home.
  • Good trick (Score:4, Interesting)

    by It doesn't come easy ( 695416 ) * on Monday June 13, 2005 @10:57AM (#12802690) Journal
    [...]would operate autonomously under control of on-board computers,

    Didn't know anyone had systems relable enough for civilian passengers (i.e. not NASA, military, etc.) to do this yet (or maybe it's all in the disclaimer you have to sign beforehand :)...

    with no ground control during nominal flight conditions[...]

    So they will have ground control during less than nominal flight conditions?
  • not bad (Score:5, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 13, 2005 @11:00AM (#12802717)
    at one launch per week, it wouldnt take more than a year or two to send prety much everyone i dont like into space. ^_^
  • by lintocs ( 723324 ) on Monday June 13, 2005 @11:00AM (#12802721)
    I guess weekly launches aren't unattainable, as long as there's no requirement for an equal number of landings, and a large supply of launch vehicles.

    S
  • Cart, horse (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Princeofcups ( 150855 ) <john@princeofcups.com> on Monday June 13, 2005 @11:03AM (#12802742) Homepage

    I don't know. To me this is like the Wright brothers announcing their new airline and airport before ever flying at Kittyhawk.

    jfs

    • From the article:

      "Operations at the launch facility would include development testing, pre-flight processing and flight, landing and recovery activities." -- Paul
    • by HopeOS ( 74340 ) on Monday June 13, 2005 @12:22PM (#12803469)
      The Wright brothers probably did not have to file environmental impact statements or calculate mean casuality per launch or estimate the damage of an explosion for insurance purposes or...

      Jeff Bezos brought his evironmental impact statement to a conference once; it's about the size of a metropolitan phone book. It has sections that state that their rocket will not cause floods or hurricanes, will not change the flow of any rivers, will not interfere with the mating habits of local desert lizards, and on and on.

      Present day aerospace development is regulated to the point of near inactivity. At least, the developers are still allowed to kill themselves in the process or nothing would get done.

      On the upside, recent legislation has made launching easier. Finding a launch site with an appropriate window and a minimum of EPA hassles is still tricky.

      -Hope
  • by Frank T. Lofaro Jr. ( 142215 ) on Monday June 13, 2005 @11:08AM (#12802783) Homepage
    Would he have a one click launch sequence?
    Would he patent it?
  • Secrets... (Score:2, Redundant)

    Jeff Bezos's Space Company Reveals Some Secrets...

    Will it have a patented "one click" Affiliate Program?

  • by It doesn't come easy ( 695416 ) * on Monday June 13, 2005 @11:09AM (#12802789) Journal
    Would you take a ride on this thing?
  • No ground control? (Score:4, Interesting)

    by suman28 ( 558822 ) <suman28@hotm a i l .com> on Monday June 13, 2005 @11:12AM (#12802812)
    What about evasive evasive maneuvers? Ground clearance? and all the other details involved in space flight?
  • by 3770 ( 560838 ) on Monday June 13, 2005 @11:13AM (#12802815) Homepage

    This thing is supposed to land vertically? That sounds more like a crash to me.

    Will it have parachutes?
  • by e**(i pi)-1 ( 462311 ) on Monday June 13, 2005 @11:28AM (#12802939) Homepage Journal
    The place looks close enough to Roswell [af.mil].
    Is there a secret meaning to Blue Origin?
  • by Kozar_The_Malignant ( 738483 ) on Monday June 13, 2005 @11:37AM (#12803037)
    You're still in Texas. Sheesh! I though the idea was to escape.
  • Are they implying that this thing will be unguided? Just pointed at the sky and shot off without post launch guidance, like a bullet? That's what it sounds like to me, and would explain why ground control guidance is not seen as a problem: there's no way to guide it. It would be considerably cheaper to develop, but I'm not sure it would be too popular.

    Another thing I'd like to know is, where does it land? If it's a water landing, that makes passenger safety and training more complex (they have to learn h
  • Sand Crash? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by centauri ( 217890 ) on Monday June 13, 2005 @11:46AM (#12803124) Homepage
    Neal Stephenson (Snow Crash, The Diamond Age, The Baroque Cycle, etc.) has taken a part-time job [nealstephenson.com] as a consultant for Blue Origins.
  • When are we going to get 90-minute express ballistic shipping to anywhere on the planet?
  • by KC7GR ( 473279 ) on Monday June 13, 2005 @12:01PM (#12803268) Homepage Journal
    "It will operate autonomously under control of on-board computers, with no ground control..."

    This could certainly add new meaning to the phrase "Blue Screen of Death."

    I'll wager that they'll never get guv'mint approval to operate without at least one human pilot.

    Keep the peace(es).

  • Oh, it'll land vertically, alright.

    In high power model rocketry, we call this condition "Shovel Recovery," and it's not pretty.

  • by Dachannien ( 617929 ) on Monday June 13, 2005 @12:14PM (#12803382)
    Jeff Bezos's commercial spaceflight company, Blue Origin, has kept its plans secret to better compete with rivals such as Richard Branson's Virgin Galactic.

    Commercial manned space travel still seems like quite a lofty goal - lofty enough, and expensive enough, that trying to ensure competition in the marketplace at this very early stage seems counterproductive. One would think that everyone could benefit from open cooperation between Blue Origin and Virgin Galactic, at least until they both get a revenue stream going (read: customers actually in space).

    Unless, that is, Bezos and/or Branson think the first-mover advantage will really translate into significant profits. I suspect, however, that those profits are in the pretty distant future, and the best way to bring the profits closer would be to cooperate.

    • Unless, that is, Bezos and/or Branson think the first-mover advantage will really translate into significant profits. I suspect, however, that those profits are in the pretty distant future, and the best way to bring the profits closer would be to cooperate.

      Sure, but then after they get the whole thing making a buck, some guy in his basement will complain that his own personal open source ballistic rocket ship is being unfairly kept out of the hands of users by the $pace$hipOne evil monopolists.
  • You know, from what I hear, jet airliners basically fly themselves. It's not a major problem for a pilot to land or take off in one of these things, and once you get it up, it's basically cruise control. Of course, as they say, when you need an experienced airline pilot, there is no substitute.

    What happens when something goes wrong? If this thing isn't built to have some human control when things are out of the ordinary, no one in his right mind would go up in one of these things.

    (Just my two cents.)

  • by Locke2005 ( 849178 ) on Monday June 13, 2005 @01:42PM (#12804229)
    But, couldn't a launch accident involving hydrogen perozide render everyone within a 3-mile radius blond?
  • OK so this thing is going to shoot straight up, then it's going to fall right back down so it will be able to land vertically... like a splashdown i assume. This doesn't sound like fun to me. I mean I think the only way you can land near where you launched with a ballistic trajectory is straight up and straight down. (well really close to it, you know what I mean)

    300-sum-thousand feet?

    I am just disappointed.

    But on the brighter side, there are people who will pay to do this and maybe it will become a

  • by gelfling ( 6534 ) on Monday June 13, 2005 @02:27PM (#12804682) Homepage Journal
    Send enough flights into space and EVENTUALLY one will come down profitably.

Computer programmers never die, they just get lost in the processing.

Working...