Opportunity Spots Curious Object On Mars 288
EhobaX writes "Space.com is reporting that NASA's Opportunity Mars rover has come across an interesting object -- perhaps a meteorite sitting out in the open at Meridiani Planum. Initial data taken by the robot's Mini-Thermal Emission Spectrometer (Mini-TES) is suggestive that the odd-looking "rock" is made of metal."
Beagle? (Score:5, Funny)
So that is what happened to the Beagle lander [chron.com]! They finally found it.
Monolith (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Monolith (Score:5, Funny)
Currently at NASA HQ: "Hold on, we're getting something here. All...these...worlds...are...a...fanta...don't...y ou...wanta...fanta? Fanta? What the hell is this?"
Re:Monolith (Score:2)
Re:Beagle? or maybe the Orbiter? (Score:2, Insightful)
Robot Bunny? (Score:5, Funny)
To make a good sci-fi story though, Opportunity might have just reached its expiry date and that'll keep everybody in suspense for a long time.
Re:Robot Bunny? (Score:2, Interesting)
The thing that came across to me in that 'bunny ears' story was that the engineers were not at all suprised that might be bits of tape, fabric etc loose on the martian surface.
Each time one of these pieces of debris is observed, it will have to be identified to ensure it is not something more interesting. Wouldn't it b
Re:Robot Bunny? (Score:3, Funny)
What?
DOH!
Re:Robot Bunny? (Score:5, Funny)
Don't forget the telephone sanitizers, hairdressers, TV producers, and salespeople.
That's no rock... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:That's no rock... (Score:3, Funny)
I have a very bad feeling about this...
Re:That's no rock... (Score:5, Funny)
It could be a terrible miscalculation in scale. Good thing there are no small dogs on Mars.
Re:That's no rock... (Score:2)
It's a Martian Coke can. (Score:3, Funny)
sounds familiar (Score:5, Funny)
Re:sounds familiar (Score:2)
Look Denise, if you don't want to go look at it, fine. You just stay here. I'm going to look at it.
But first, here, wear my sports jacket, the sun is going down and it's going to get cold.
(walks away...)
(Turns around, and says reassuingly)
Don't worry, I'll be riiight back!
To boldy go... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:To boldy go... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:To boldy go... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:To boldy go... (Score:2, Insightful)
finally (Score:5, Funny)
Illudium pew-36 explosive space modulator? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Illudium pew-36 explosive space modulator? (Score:3, Funny)
Meteorite? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Meteorite? (Score:5, Insightful)
I'm just guessing, of course, but it's a possibility.
Re:Meteorite? (Score:2)
After a while these ran out and humanity started to look under the ground to find them. Then they invented mines.
It is quite plausible to have meteorites around you. Especially in a geologically dead world like Mars, a rock is either billions of years old or fell off the sky. When you look at the amount of craters, you can clearly see that apparently quite a lot of stuff fell off the sky!
Re:Meteorite? (Score:2)
Re:Meteorite? (Score:3, Funny)
Finally, they found my pet rock. (Score:5, Funny)
-- I discovered this SIG in the lost and found department.
Re:Finally, they found my pet rock. (Score:2)
It's obviously grown up a lot since you lost it...
Ooooooh........ Ahhhhhh.......
Meteorite with no crater? (Score:4, Interesting)
Anyone with more knowledge of meteor physics than me have an explanation?
Re:Meteorite with no crater? (Score:2)
Re:Meteorite with no crater? (Score:4, Insightful)
One scenario is that the rock hit Mars a gazillion years ago. Wind storms filled the area with Mars dust. Over the eons, the weather patterns changed, and now the wind storms are blowing the dust out of the area... uncovering the rock.
Though the thing sure looks a lot like a dehydrated Martian to me. Just add water!
Re:Meteorite with no crater? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Meteorite with no crater? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Meteorite with no crater? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Meteorite with no crater? (Score:2)
Maybe it did leave a crater. (Score:5, Insightful)
Things can sit on the surface forever there. It's not like there's anyone there to say "ooh, this is shiny!" and disturb it. That's a human thing... (although now that human scientists sent a rover to Mars, they're saying "ooh, that rock is shiny!" and disturbing it)
Re:Meteorite with no crater? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Meteorite with no crater? (Score:2)
Re:Meteorite with no crater? (Score:4, Informative)
Meteors don't work like that, basically. What happens is that anything moving above a certain speed gets vapourised; shooting stars are. If it's large enough that it doesn't vapourise completely, what's left hits the ground at kilometres per second and makes a hell of a bang.
However, anything moving slowly gets slowed to a stop by the atmosphere, at which point it just falls.
The net effect is that meteors hit the ground either at kilometres per second or about two or three hundred miles per hour, and nothing in between.
Around the room reactions ... (Score:5, Funny)
Data Analyst Rimmer: Aliens!
Computer Programmer Neo: Woaaah
Re:Around the room reactions ... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Around the room reactions ... (Score:2)
Obvious. (Score:3, Funny)
That's not a rock... (Score:4, Funny)
Huh? (Score:5, Funny)
Did this guy think that by saying that he would somehow prevent half of the internet preparing some crackpot theory within 5 seconds of reading it?
Personally, I'll wait before jumping to conclusions, and look forward to reading the followup!
Re:Huh? (Score:2)
What was their first reaction? (Score:5, Interesting)
Then they get a picture of a big freaking rock with a bunch of wierd holes, sitting there in the middle of a windblown plain. Not covered in dust like everything else... even the wind patterns in the dust around it look new.
What do you think the first guy to get that picture said when he looked, and then looked again, and realized that this wasn't going to be just another day on Mars?
Re:What was their first reaction? (Score:5, Insightful)
Designing re-entry shields for planets you don't know alot about ( compared to earth ) can be tricky. Undoubtably they overengineered it, and made it heavier than needed just in case.
By examining the heat shield, and the thermal damage, they can get a better feel for the physical and thermal stresses caused by a martian re entry.
This would lead to lighter, better heat shields. And since cost is proportional to weight, a lighter more effective heat shield leads to cheaper future mars missions, or allows one to cram more instruments into a probe. Either way, WIN!
They are tooling around a planet we still know little about, so it's all good.
Re:What was their first reaction? (Score:2)
Re:What was their first reaction? (Score:4, Informative)
Looking at the heat shield doesn't seem like a very revealing bit of science -- more of a "gee look how far we've come" sort of cool thing.
You're right, looking at the heat shield isn't about science, but it is about engineering. The heat shield can obviously never be adequately tested, and until you take a look at it you never know exactly how well it performed. Were there areas where it could have failed? Was is over-engineered? Those are usefull questions that if we had answers to we could design better/more efficient heat shielding in the future.
The heat shield also digs into the surface far more than the rovers ever could, so you might see whats below the surface. Though looking at the heat shield sounds like a total geek thing to do, it can reveal a lot of non obvious information.
At this point you're probbably right about finding something to do. In the area where the rovers have landed we've seen the everyday stuff, and now it's all about being lucky enough to see the more rare things.
Re:What was their first reaction? (Score:3, Funny)
Goddamn battlecrabs.
> What do you think the first guy to get that picture said when he looked, and then looked again, and realized that this wasn't going to be just another day on Mars?
Probably something like "Yeah yeah. Thousands of years ago... Look, Delenn, I know you h
Mini-TES (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Mini-TES (Score:2)
Also, the "Mini" was added to its name just today, to look more trendy in the wake of Apple's Mac Mini, Google's jumping on the bandwagon, etc...
Re:Mini-TES (Score:5, Informative)
For clarity: That link is to TES, which flies on the Mars Global Surveyor. The instrument on the rovers is called Mini-TES [asu.edu] and does similar things.
I work at the lab responsible for both.
But what is this? (Score:3, Interesting)
Is it the heat shield?
Re:But what is this? (Score:3, Informative)
HHGG (Score:2)
Barriers to private Mars rovers based on MERs? (Score:2)
Re:Barriers to private Mars rovers based on MERs? (Score:2)
I've got it (Score:3, Funny)
Gold... (Score:2)
Don't touch with it! (Score:3, Funny)
Clearly... (Score:3, Funny)
Well well (Score:2)
Martian Gold Rush? (Score:2, Insightful)
Out of Bounds (Score:2)
"Hey! Little help over here? Can you just kick that back over this way? Say, you play goalie?"
-Todd
Read the small print (Score:5, Insightful)
By Occam, I think he's got it! (Score:2, Insightful)
Nice Idea, But Scotched By The Dunes (Score:3, Informative)
the blob seems to be about the thickness of a good skipping stone, while the aeroshell is mostly honeycombed aluminum or titanium, made of metal sheets much the same thickness as a soda can.
If enough Titanium melted from the aeroshell to make that one blob, it wouldn't be the on
Is it the Beagle? Russian? Viking? (Score:2)
I think it is.
Or it's from another star system or dimension, that's also plausible.
What? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:What? (Score:3, Funny)
Everybody is missing the obvious (Score:2, Funny)
It's a Uranium PU-36 Explosive Space Modulator [tvacres.com] of course.
Heck it's even on the right planet
Looks like Steve Case... (Score:2)
I think AOL started shipping their coasters in the little metal cases after some of their martian junkmail CDs failed to survive amospheric entry.
Inquiring Minds Want to Know! (Score:2)
http://a52.g.akamaitech.net/f/52/827/1d/www.space
looks like a hacked-up pre-PhotoShop tabloid cover photo???
-JT
Better resolution images! (Score:2)
http://marsrovers.nasa.gov/gallery/all/opportun
Conspiracy? (Score:2)
Be careful... (Score:2)
I for one... (Score:2)
Quaid, start the reactor!!! (Score:2)
Vamp vs Machine (Score:5, Funny)
It can't be a burnt up vehicle, (Score:2)
NASA is really putting out lately... (Score:3, Insightful)
What a great time to be alive! I'm happy that my tax dollars are funding this stuff.
It's a diversion (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Somebody loose a probe? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:A real mystery. (Score:5, Informative)
Any time you find something you've never found before, it's a big deal. Honestly, to people who've been following the mission, it looked like Opportunity was pretty much wrapping things up. It just left a geological treasure trove and there isn't much more "on the map", so to speak. It's neat to see it continue making nice finds.
Re:A real mystery. (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:A real mystery. (Score:4, Insightful)
The best part of the story is it seems that both the rovers will be continuing on for quite some time. Talk about a huge vat of gravy for this mission. It's really nice to see our taxpayer dollars repaid so handsomely.
With the initial "water" find complete, these little critters are free to give us so much more information about Mars than we could have gotten with 50 Viking probes or any manner of orbiting system.
Orbiters versus Rovers (Score:3, Interesting)
Don't fall into the trap of thinking that we get more data our of rovers than we do orbiters. Certainly a rover can give us very detailed data of a given area, but our knowledge of the regional and global characteristics of Mars come courtesy of our orbiter missions. The very landing sites picked were selected because of the data from these orbiters. Most of the rover data is relayed by the relay systems on the Mars Odyssey orbiter. I would say that rovers and orbiters complement each other nicely.
Keep
Re:A real mystery. (Score:3, Insightful)
Well, isn't everything on Mars something we've never found before? And how much of Mars is left?
It may be a big deal to planetary people, but to the General Public it's just more banality dressed up as something exciting.
Call when something interesting happens, like they figured out how the solar cells got cleaned off somehow and are generating more power.
Re:That's so odd! (Score:2, Funny)
Re:That's so odd! (Score:2)
What's even more scary is I get the reference.
Re:That's so odd! (Score:2)
Re:It's SCO's list of Linux's infringing source co (Score:2)
Re:a rotten brain (Score:2)
Re:There's gold in them there hills.. (Score:2)
Re:Could it be the remains of predecessor or itsel (Score:5, Informative)
"Iron meteorites", also called "irons", are usually just one big blob of iron-nickel (Fe-Ni) metal, as if it came from a industrial refinery without shaping. The alloy ranges from 5% to 62% nickel from meteorite to meteorite, with an average of 10% nickel. Cobalt averages about 0.5%, and other metals such as the platinum group metals, gallium, and germanium are dissolved in the Fe-Ni metal. (Fe is the chemical symbol for iron.) While most "irons" are pure or nearly pure metal, the technical definition of an "iron" includes metal meteorites with up to 30% mineral inclusions such as sulfides, metal oxides and silicates. The irons represent the cores of former planetoids.
Re:If it's a meteorite, then where is the crater? (Score:3, Informative)
Even without water, it doesn't have to create a crater. It is quite small, such an object might not create a crater if it fell down at a shallow angle or low speed trajectory. Also probably it fell down billions of years ago, not last week. The crater might have eroded away, if it was too shallow (the rock looks approx. fist sized)